Slashdot Mirror


Evidence For Antimatter Anomaly Mounts

sciencehabit writes "The big bang created a lot of matter—along with the same amount of antimatter, which wiped out everything and brought the universe to an untimely end. That's what accepted theoretical physics tell us—though things clearly didn't work out that way. Now, results from a U.S. particle smasher are providing new evidence for a subtle difference in the properties of matter and antimatter that may explain how the early universe survived."

32 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Playing with marbles by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

    Our universe is just another marble in someone's bag. *sigh*

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Playing with marbles by Zandamesh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Our universe is just another marble in someone's bag. *sigh*

      Galaxy. It's another galaxy in someone's bag.

      --
      Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
  2. So the Universe ended... by neokushan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess that means I must be in heaven or hell.
    Come to think of it, reading the comments on Slashdot does feel a little bit like Purgatory....

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  3. Oblig. Bad Car Analogy by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    So then, its like populating the roads with an equal number of Priuses and Lincoln Navigators?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Oblig. Bad Car Analogy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. The Navigators, being made by Lincoln would decay at a faster rate than the Priuses made by Toyota.

      Therefore eventually there would be more Priuses on the road than Navigators.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  4. Then unmount it by hhedeshian · · Score: 5, Funny

    sudo umount /dev/anomaly

    1. Re:Then unmount it by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I prefer recalibrating the deflector dish to deal with antimatter anomolies myself.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:Then unmount it by gorzek · · Score: 2

      But where are you going to find an inverted tachyon pulse generator?!

  5. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lol so the very fact that there is a universe, in which we can contemplate the laws of physics, is itself a phenomenon that the standard models can't yet explain? Nice. Seems like a minor hole :)

    1. Re:Interesting... by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And at one point we couldn't even model two point particles interacting in a collission. Just because we don't know how it works today doesn't mean we never will.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:Interesting... by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is that the physicists equivalent of rubbing two sticks together?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Interesting... by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All knowledge begins with "Why does X. I don't know, let's find out."

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    4. Re:Interesting... by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Funny

      And all humor begins with not taking things too seriously.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Interesting... by Jenka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Followed by "Hey Yall! Watch this!"

    6. Re:Interesting... by damien_kane · · Score: 3, Funny

      And all humor begins with not taking things too seriously.

      Not all humor
      In direct contrast to your statement, I often find my self laughing at people taking things too seriously.

    7. Re:Interesting... by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lol so the very fact that there is a universe, in which we can contemplate the laws of physics, is itself a phenomenon that the standard models can't yet explain? Nice. Seems like a minor hole :)

      The standard model also doesn't explain dark matter, gravity, quantum physics and pile of other things. However, it does explain a lot of things really well, so until we can come up with the Grand Unified Theory of Everything, we're stuck with what we got.

      It's like how Newton's equations of motion work extremely well for general everyday human-scale physics, but fail when you go really small or really fast.

      Lots of things we understand in physics have limitations, and as long as we observe them, they do hold up.

    8. Re:Interesting... by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lol so the very fact that there is a universe, in which we can contemplate the laws of physics, is itself a phenomenon that the standard models can't yet explain? Nice. Seems like a minor hole :)

      Hell .. I don't even think there is an understanding as to what gravity is. And thats a lot less existential than "existence/non-existence"

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    9. Re:Interesting... by Renraku · · Score: 2

      We'll never be able to come up with a complete theory of everything until we can 100% model the interactions of the smallest bits of matter in every circumstance. Once upon a time, we could only model the interactions of macro objects, that is, classical mechanics. A lot of wonderful things came out of this, like skyscrapers, airplanes, jet engines, etc. Imagine what will happen when we can model the smallest of particles. Perhaps one day we'll have electrons coming in on one wire, positrons coming in on another, and they'll annihilate each other in a basement reactor to provide a shitload of power to the house. Who knows?

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  6. James Branch Cabell by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Informative

    I rather think J B Cabell preceded MiB. Refer to "The Silver Stallion", if you can find a copy.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  7. Indeed by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Under the highest magnification of our latest scanning tunneling microscopes, new images of these anti particles reveal that they sport tiny goatees.

    1. Re:Indeed by rla3rd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Had me scared... I first read this as tiny goatses.

  8. Anomaly you say? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    It should be possible to detect these anomalies by throwing bolts at them and observing the reaction. If you don't have a bolt, the older tool used was a rock covered in a handkerchief with a string tied to it.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  9. Summary goes a bit too far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The research is certainly interesting and important (at least to physicists), but it demonstrates CP violation only in certain relatively rare particles, the neutral D mesons. CP violation has been known to exist for a while (in K and B mesons), so that really is not that ground breaking. On the other hand, as far as I know, these effects are far too small to account for the matter/antimatter imbalance in the universe and additional mechanisms are required.

    1. Re:Summary goes a bit too far... by physburn · · Score: 2

      CP violation has been observe in every weak decay that transform a quark from one generation to another, using the weak force. The weak force normally acts between a up-like quark and down-like quark in the same generation, but there is a miss-match between the down quarks as since by the W particle and the down quarks since by the Higgs that generate the masses of the particles, this leads to an additional matrix, the CKM, in the action of the W particle on quarks, leads to transmutations between the three generation of quarks and the decay of heavy quark generations to lighter ones. The K mesons and the Beauty mesons the a single complex phase of CKM matrix is responsible for difference between the matter quarks and the anti-matter quarks and this is well describe by the CKM matrix. This result for the D meson (D^0 = cd) is much larger at 0.2% than the predicted value of around 0.01% and is truely a hint of new CP violating physics.

  10. Re:42? by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or on an Intel P5 Pentium.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  11. Re:Opposite direction by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  12. Stupid by wzzzzrd · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what accepted theoretical physics tell us

    Your knowledge is approximately 20 years old.

    Yours sincerely,
    Nal Lerpil,
    Accepted Theoretical Physicist

    --
    On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
  13. Re:To the point: "reality bias?" by yotto · · Score: 2

    Could be because we use "ordinary" matter to study the phenomena?

    Short answer: No.

    Whether or not we are Matter or Antimatter (in which case we'd call that matter, but that's another... ahem... matter altogether) doesn't change the fact that there is a lot more of one of the two types around. Something caused that. What we don't (or do we, now?) know is WHY.

  14. Re:Opposite direction by werepants · · Score: 2

    Antimatter does, in some respects, travel backwards in time. A positron behaves precisely as an electron would if it were going the opposite direction in time.

  15. Re:Opposite direction by lgw · · Score: 2

    Except that the whole point of TFA (I know, I know) is that it doesn't quite. There must be some sort of symmetry violation in order for the universe to be matter-dominated.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  16. Re:WTF are they studying?? by dissy · · Score: 2

    I think CP violation was used by particle physicists long before the term was hijacked and given a different meaning by law enforcement hysteria.

    There's another meaning? Google just turns up the physics one, at least for me.

    Well there's your problem! Don't search for Child Porn on Google, search for it on 4chan or motherless instead, you'll get many more non-physics related results!

  17. Re:But what I want to know by ledow · · Score: 2

    The speed of darkness is always faster than the speed of light. No matter how fast light gets somewhere, the darkness has always beaten it to it.

    (C) Terry Pratchett