Slashdot Mirror


World's First Biodegradable Joint Implant Grows New Joints

cylonlover writes "Joint implants should always be made of materials like titanium, so they can last the lifetime of the patient ... right? Well, not according to researchers at Finland's Tampere University of Technology. They've developed a product known as RegJoint, which is reportedly the world's first biodegradable joint implant. Unlike permanent implants, it allows the patient's bone ends to remain intact, and it creates a new joint out of their own tissue."

25 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Did anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They were talking about Marijuana?

    1. Re:Did anyone else think... by mooingyak · · Score: 2

      First thought through my head was "Isn't it illegal to grow joints?"

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    2. Re:Did anyone else think... by cupantae · · Score: 2

      Black swan. Only a fool would answer no to that question.
      Besides, some of us are high right now, you insensitive clod.

      --
      --
  2. Re:Porn Use? by neokushan · · Score: 3, Funny

    If your Penis has joints in it, you've got more serious concerns.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  3. The details by arnoldo.j.nunez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So I'll save anyone wanting to read the article for scientific details the trouble: they don't even mention the material used!

    So I searched around and found this. http://www.scaffdex.com/sites/default/files/RegJoint_IfU_rev_0_1.pdf

    I thought I knew polymers, but my biochemistry is a bit weak. 96L/4D poly-L/D-lactide copolymer fiber. Seems to be porous, is that the key to making a bodily joint?

    Apparently it loses it strength as quickly as within 15 to 24 weeks and then completely loses its strength within a few years. Meanwhile, your body is allowed a framework to develop around after physical trauma.

    1. Re:The details by dbIII · · Score: 5, Informative

      I went to a presentation about materials in joints around 1998 and one very interesting point was raised by a Japanese researcher.
      Hard joints grind your bone ends into bits. Hundreds of millions of little bits. It does things to the immune system (which attacks solid bone in such situations after being fooled by lots of tiny bits of bone) and creates extra wear on any cartlidge, tendons or anything else in the vicinity. We are bags of mostly water so that stuff doesn't stay put. The life of the joint depends on both it's structure and the damage to the surrounds, which can be measured in inches/centimetres so the replacement joint has to be a lot larger.
      At the time making the surface of a joint very porous and relatively soft was the way things were going since it's now expected that people with artificial joints will live for more than a decade after the joint is put in place. The old style of using very hard materials in direct contact with bone doesn't last long enough.

    2. Re:The details by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read TFA and they claim the damaged joint structure regenerates by itself, the copolymer is a scaffold that triggers stem cells to grow a brand new joint structure completely replacing the said copolymer with the body's own tissue after a while. In other words, that would be the holy grail of joint repair, of course, only if the stuff is really working as advertised.

    3. Re:The details by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd rather have some kind of hybrid, like a titanium kneecap with this polymer connecting the end joints.

      Dammit, if I'm going to get body parts replaced when I'm older I want to be able to knee someone in the head and have it sound like an aluminum bat hitting a soft ball. *tink!*

    4. Re:The details by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd rather have some kind of hybrid, like a titanium kneecap with this polymer connecting the end joints.

      Dammit, if I'm going to get body parts replaced when I'm older I want to be able to knee someone in the head and have it sound like an aluminum bat hitting a soft ball. *tink!*

      So the spectator sport of cybernetic combat will actually take the form of geriatric men brawling.

      I still think it will sell, though.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  4. Re:Porn Use? by cosm · · Score: 5, Funny

    If your Penis has joints in it, you've got more serious concerns.

    Like which axial direction to articulate in? One direction could lead to a new baby while the other will have you questioning the bars you've been going to.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  5. Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by Thanshin · · Score: 2

    I wonder what's stoppiong us from creating bones made of bone with stem cells.

    1. Re:Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Due to the fact that stem cell research is being restricted or banned, in various degrees, across the world, and that reduces the number of researchers, resources and research avenues dedicated to it.

      Yes. Sorry. I was being sarcastic but went too far in the obfuscation.

      What I meant is: Why in hell are are we accepting living in a shittier world just because we've decided not to let scientists keeping us moving forward? Why are we so afraid of knowledge? Why are we so damn stupid?

      Fortunately the human race isn't competing with an alien race of similar opportunities but less inclined to ignore them in favor of irrationality.

    2. Re:Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by antero_h__ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fortunately the human race isn't competing with an alien race of similar opportunities but less inclined to ignore them in favor of irrationality.

      ...and what makes you think we aren't?

    3. Re:Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, it is only embryonic stem cells that ever have an issue here with banning/restriction. That isn't nearly as much of a setback now as it was 3-4 years ago. Even if you ignore the ethical issues, the setback is probably worth it - it has accelerated the development of techniques for "undifferentiated" adult stem cells so they can create more cell lineages than they could have naturally. Why is this a big deal? What kind of rejection issues will you have to face when your new transplant comes from another person's tissue? Now, what if it comes from your own? That's the advantage.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    4. Re:Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by sheepe2004 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As I understand it the problem is in the other stuff that surround the cells (disclaimer: I only did one very short course on tissue engineering).

      Basically it's a chicken and egg problem: the stem cells need a good structure to grow in but the structure needs to be created by the cells. A solution is to create an implant which allows the cells to grow within it and then gracefully degrades as it is replaced by the natural bone/collagen etc. which seems to be what these guys have done.

      It's a difficult (materials science) problem because there are a lot of requirements. For example it needs to be as tough as bone but break down after a reasonable amount of time. It needs to be non-toxic (before and after breaking down). It of course needs to be cheap(ish) and reasonably easy to mass produce. Anyway there's much more information here.

      --
      http://compsoc.man.ac.uk/~shep/
    5. Re:Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell_laws_and_policy_in_the_United_States#Federal_law

      No federal law ever did ban stem cell research in the United States, but only placed restrictions on funding and use, under Congress's power to spend.

      The Corporations can spend $$$ on research if they want. Depending on what sort of stuff they want to do they might have to be careful about which US State they do it in.

      But hey don't let facts get in the way of your religious beliefs and prejudice.

    6. Re:Why aren't we already using bone made bones? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Basically it's a chicken and egg problem

      There is no chicken and egg problem. Dinasaurs layed eggs, and chickens are descended from dinasaurs. The egg came first and everyone should know that by now.

      Besides, who has chicken for breakfast?

      Unfortunately, I saw a poll just this morning that said over half of people thought the chicken came first. There sure are a lot of uneducated people.

  6. Re:Porn Use? by jlar · · Score: 4, Informative

    "If your Penis has joints in it, you've got more serious concerns."

    Like maybe having too many genes in common with chimpanzees or gorillas?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baculum

  7. Re: by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Except this is for arthritis in finger joints, which the body does not tend to repair on its own. I suppose eventually, if it works in fingers, they will find a way to do knee joints with it as well. (i suspect that would involve months of low/no impact rehab/physical training to allow the joint to re-develop.)

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  8. Re: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    That was what struck me (purely as a layman commenting on slashdot, of course) as being one of the tricky things:

    The body normally 'allocates' bone growth in response to physical stress, which is why those astronauts lazing around in zero G come back with bones like your great grandmother; but you presumably don't want to stress a comparatively delicate implanted polymer scaffold more than absolutely necessary until it has regrown into a proper bone structure(worst cases, the thing either dissolves without any regrowth, and you've just got a nice gap to show for your OR time, or it re-ossifies after having been deformed into some gnarled, nonfunctional horror-shape).

    I'm impressed by the delicate balancing of initial strength vs. absorption rate and/or biochemical trickery to induce growth without strain that they must have used to achieve bone regrowth without deforming or destroying the implant before its necessary lifespan is over...

  9. Re:Porn Use? by mooingyak · · Score: 2

    Or, as Jay-Z once poetically put it, "If you got penis joint problems, I feel bad for you son. I got 99 problems but a penis joint ain't one."

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  10. Re:Implants are not titanium by pnewhook · · Score: 4, Informative

    Joint implants are not titanium. No, no no. That's a myth that won't die.

    No, sorry it is you that is mistaken. Medical grade titanium (Ti6Al4V Grade 5) is widely used for joint implants because it is biocompatible and MR safe. ASTM-75 is only classified as MR Conditional at best so its effect on MR image quality and localized tissue heating has not yet been fully established.

    Just do a search on Titanium joint implant and you'll see they do in fact exist and are quite popular

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  11. Only for non weight bearing joints by Wilf_Brim · · Score: 2

    From TFA: "The implant has been in development since the mid 90s, and is intended for use in the small finger and toe joints of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients. It is made from a polylactide copolymer, and is inserted within the joint capsule of the affected digit." There are a relatively small part of the total joint replacement world. There are fairly few of these arthroplasties done: usually they are fused with a fair functional result. The joints most often replaced are knees and hips, shoulders sometimes and elbows even less. The two former are weight bearing, and the arthroplasty must be able to withstand 10+ years of wear. The growing mass (physical I mean) of the average individual is making this job increasingly difficult. And the endless ads from personal injury lawyers trolling for new clients for their class action cases against total joint makers underscores the dangers associated with a new technology in this field.

  12. Re:Porn Use? by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

    Hmmm, fact of the day -- a new word. Now to use it in a sentence with a random stranger. "Hey, is that a baculum in your pants or are you just glad to see me?"

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  13. Re:Implants are not titanium by heathen_01 · · Score: 2

    Yes