Slashdot Mirror


Google Unifies Media, Apps Into Google Play

eldavojohn writes "Google has just announced Google Play to merge their existing solutions for music, movies, books and apps in the new cloud based storage system promising that you will never have to worry about losing or moving them across devices ever again. You'll be able to store 20,000 songs for free. The region breakdown is: 'In the U.S., music, movies, books and Android apps are available in Google Play. In Canada and the U.K., we'll offer movies, books and Android apps; in Australia, books and apps; and in Japan, movies and apps. Everywhere else, Google Play will be the new home for Android apps.'"

146 comments

  1. Will Apple file a lawsuit? by walterbyrd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems like it might infringe on the idea behind iTunes, or App Store, or something.

    1. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by imamac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it would infringe, but it is certainly Google's "me too" moment of the day.

    2. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What everyone is forgetting, is that iCloud is the same as many other services long before it. Bah, even Ubuntu One was there first.

    3. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Nadir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, the "cloud" experience on Android was there long before Apple. Buy an Android phone, insert your google account, and a few moments later you have all your contacts, calendars and apps.

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
    4. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      or SkyDrive which has been around several years. Or Dropbox. Apple iCloud is a late comer to this,and with the insane limitation that you can only use it for files created by Apple programs, and not share files.

    5. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the "cloud" experience on Android was there long before Apple. Buy an Android phone, insert your google account, and a few moments later you have all your contacts, calendars and apps.

      Thats funny because the original iPhone did that too

    6. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      really? a windows user with an iPhone would have all their contacts synced with the iPhone?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, also they use computers, and apple use computers..so the are clearly copying apple.

      sheeesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      which came out after the original android

    9. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Cyberllama · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but that's hardly the same thing. It did that by getting them from the corresponding apps on your Mac when you synced the phone. It didn't pull them out of thin air, which is what "Cloud" is all about. It also didn't work unless you had a Mac. You used to need a computer to make your smartphone work. Now the Smarthphone IS the computer--or it least it can be if you're the minimalist sort.

    10. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      SHENANIGANS!

      The original iphone 2G required you to connect it to itunes to
      #1) activate (couldn't get past lock screen without initial itunes activation)
      #2) sync contacts/calendar/photos/music etc. etc.

      The cloud functionality for ios came MUCH later (measured in years)!

      In contrast, my first android handset pretty much *never* touched a computer USB port.

    11. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by rhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until recently the iPhone required iTunes in order to sync your contacts/calendar/apps. Android devices have never required a computer in order to sync this stuff.

    12. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think apple tried this already - turns out a store, even an electronic one, is not a patentable idea - too generic

    13. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Something, yes. Obviously, the cloud - that is, another computer connected to your computer over a network - was invented by Apple. I'm surprised Google has the front to try and rip them off so blatantly. This will not end well.

    14. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by rsborg · · Score: 4, Informative

      really? a windows user with an iPhone would have all their contacts synced with the iPhone?

      As of iOS 2.0, yes. Using either CalDav+IMAP or Exchange ActiveSync you could sync your calendar and email fine with an original iPhone in 2008.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    15. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      The world is divided in two categories: those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.

      The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    16. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm

      You do realize that with nothing more than your google account and internet access:
      1) Contacts were always in the "cloud" from the get go
      2) Music sync was available at least in the US mid last year.
      3) Picasa photo sync was available for ages
      4) Apps always reinstalled themselves automatically.
      5) Movie and book rentals were always available to be downloaded from the android market since mid-to-late last year. Movies at least, where available on any devices with a web browser able to play a certain codec (i.e. in the cloud)

      The only thing that Google's done here is to unify several services that never had a "name" into one banner. So at the very most, you can only say that Google is copying by giving these features almost all Android devices had available for around early-to-mid last year.

    17. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Americano · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they sued Amazon for trademark infringement when Amazon opened the Android Appstore, claiming that "App Store" was trademarked by Apple, and complaining that Amazon's use of the mark was infringing.

      There was no patent on "having an electronic store." There was no suit over "having an electronic store." It was a trademark dispute, in which Apple basically said "They should have to call it something else without using the phrase "App Store." Amazon went live with their Android Appstore anyway, and Microsoft has also filed a challenge on the trademark, claiming it was too generic to be a legitimate trademark.

      The most recent I've heard, a few months back, the case is still working it's way through the federal courts.

      Silly lawsuit? Probably. But the USPTO granted them the trademark in the first place, so I'm inclined to believe that the USPTO deserves a fair share of the blame for the waste of the lawsuit, also.

    18. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by oakgrove · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called business. Apple makes a lot of money and is in a sector ripe for real competition. It's the war of the ecosystems and with MS and Apple playing for keeps you better believe Google is going to step in the mix.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    19. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by imamac · · Score: 1

      Oh don't interpret my comment (as some mods did) as negative or attacking Google. I'm completely for this. Competition is good. I hope they continue this type of relationship (without the lawsuits) to spur competition and keep making better products and services.

    20. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      so.. after Android than? And with additional 3rd party programs?

      For certain values of fine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by SadButTrue · · Score: 1

      That's pretty amazing since the original iPhone didn't have apps at all. The apple app store its self didn't exist until mid 2008.

      --
      grape - the GNU free, open source rape
    22. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Google Music has been out before Apple's equivalent cloud offering. And they had a web interface to Android market long before iOS got one.

      This thing is really just an aggregation of existing Google cloud services under a single brand.

    23. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OS Doesn't matter. When you sign into your GMail account on the iphone it automatically synced your Gmail, Gmail contacts, and calendar events.

    24. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      Thats funny because the original iPhone did that too

      no, pre-icloud the iphone only sync'd local resources ... your photos in iphoto, your contacts in address book, etc.

    25. Re:Will Apple file a lawsuit? by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      Contacts and calendar yes, but I've never seen apps sync. I always have to reinstall them all.

      Can you tell me what I should do to have the apps sync too? That would be very helpful.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
  2. Why store songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I get almost the entire catalog via Pandora or Spotify?

    1. Re:Why store songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's still something about actually having the mp3's that gives less of a temporal feel than streaming. Same sort of thing as having the cd's as opposed to the mp3's only..

    2. Re:Why store songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to pay to get Spotify on Android.

    3. Re:Why store songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or modify your user agent string.

    4. Re:Why store songs? by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      Shush.....

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
  3. Yay! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    At last, somewhere to store all my pirated music and movies!!!!!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Yay! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Just use archive.org for that. It may take half a year for new files to show up, though.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Yay! by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      And get caught!

    3. Re:Yay! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Exactly! That's why I'm planning to buy 20000 copies of Madonna's Like a Virgin at a discount price of 15000 USD and store them in my Google account. That way, since elsewhere a song costs 99 cent each, I'll save 4800 bucks. A bargain, if you ask me.

  4. I don't want my cloud provider to know type of med by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't want my cloud provider to know type of media that's on there - if they know they'll pull it down at request or in case of apps possibly if the publisher just doesn't renew.

    also a little birdie told me thet bitcasa beta is open.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. Some background by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's worth pointing out that all of this functionality is already available. There is nothing new here except the name and an icon. Not even an interface change. Much ado about nothing.

    --
    -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
    1. Re:Some background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's worth pointing out that all of this functionality is already available. There is nothing new here except the name and an icon. Not even an interface change. Much ado about nothing.

      Yes, but this IS Slashdot. The frothing masses need to whip themselves into a frenzy over Google doing something vaguely evil every day, or they risk calming down and realizing they don't have any talents besides inventing problems to bitch about. You remember how worked up they got when Google said they were going to simplify their privacy policies with all the data they already collect from you, right? And how they actually weren't collecting anything new?

    2. Re:Some background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, slashdot can be downright silly sometimes.

    3. Re:Some background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also a sale on apps, which is nice. Not really Slashdot worthy though.

    4. Re:Some background by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      It's even more worth pointing out that good re-branding can increase sales and bad re-branding can bankrupt companies ( Qwickster anyone? )

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    5. Re:Some background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I disagree, but Netflix isn't bankrupt.

  6. Re:Here's an idea by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Proxy through international servers so you are coming from different IP addresses.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  7. Re:Here's an idea by oldwindways · · Score: 1

    Hey, someone needs to protect American jobs with tariffs, because that worked so well in the 1930's.

    --
    "Si vis pacem para bellum" -Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus
  8. All my stuff in the cloud... by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...until I wake up one day and it's not.

    1. Re:All my stuff in the cloud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the same experience as storing it on your local storage device - until it fails.

    2. Re:All my stuff in the cloud... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I have moved a lot to the cloud.

      I recently set up a computer.
      Install Steam,
      get games,
      install Chrome
      Done.
      No buying software,. no installing office like tools, no looking for game disks, no copying over music, no duplicating the file structure.

      Easy, peasy.

      If you back up now, then you can back up your docs from the cloud. If you don't back up now, then stop being an idiot and do so.

      *Any browser, but I use chrome.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:All my stuff in the cloud... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Yes, because the RIAA can just phone you at home, and *poof* your hard drive fails. Or a court can place an injunction on one of your neighbours, and *poof* your hard drive fails. Or the US government can shut down the local telephone book company, and *poof* your hard drive fails.

      That's a lot of failure modes, I'm starting to think local storage really is more hassle than it's worth.

    4. Re:All my stuff in the cloud... by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Routinely back everything you store in the cloud locally. Problem solved.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    5. Re:All my stuff in the cloud... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      ...until it RIAANS?

    6. Re:All my stuff in the cloud... by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      The RIAA can just claim you are a copyright infringer, and *poof* the cops come and take your harddrives. A court can place an injunction on one of your neighbors, and *poof* the cops come and take your harddrive. The US Goverment can decide you need to be investigated for posting terrorist messages on twitter, and *poof* the cops come and take your harddrive.

      Oh, and they'll take ALL your electronic equipment, not just things related to what you're accused of, and you won't be getting anything back.

  9. WHY? by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    USA: Music, Movies, Books, Apps
    CAN: Movies, Books, Apps
    UK: Movies, Books, Apps
    Au: Books, Apps
    Japan: Movies, Apps

    Um, does this not seem odd? Only the US can store Music in Google Cloud? Is this because the RIAA can sue people there? Why the mashup of various media in various places. I wonder does this have more to do with law in the country in question, or the county of origin? Considering the stellar privacy stuff lately, I think I would rather figure out how to host my own server to take my stuff anywhere I like.

    Oh and Books? Really? I mean you can fit like what a million on a micro SD card these days. Hell even music, unless you have a 20,000 song library, you can fit more music than you could ever really want on a 16GB smartphone... 32GB even more.

    Video is intriguing. I can just imagine what is going to be uploaded there.

    1. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Each of these industries are entrenched in more than a hundred years of business law and protect their regional fiefdoms viciously. They do so because they all know the internet makes them completely obsolete. They know that without the anchor of a physical pretense some small company anywhere in the world can beat them.

    2. Re:WHY? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I wonder does this have more to do with law in the country in question, or the county of origin?
      > Considering the stellar privacy stuff lately, I think I would rather figure out how to host my own server
      > to take my stuff anywhere I like.

      I'm guessing it's to do with licensing.

      Oh, and some of us have much, much more music than will even begin to fit onto a 32GB `smartphone`.

    3. Re:WHY? by cmiller173 · · Score: 2

      ...

      Video is intriguing. I can just imagine what is going to be uploaded there.

      Not the generic "Video" it's "Movies" and it is Google's movie rental service. Near as I can tell there is no uploading, although you would think they would wrap YouTube in there somehow.

    4. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you can fit like what a million" -- Yeah, yeah I know. We know because we're old geeks. Google's drive is about complete device independence. You can use your phone, your roommate's netbook, your work laptop, your school terminal, the tablet of that guy you're having coffee with, your aunt's desktop -- wherever the heck you are, your Nest of files and apps is always there. And always in the same interface.

      If you don't want to use that (I don't) that's fine, but don't misunderstand that this is going to be extremely normal.

      What's kinda sortof ironic, is I remember when having your own *nix server that you could tunnel to from anywhere was cool geekdom. This is just that gone commercial and easy-to-use.

      As usual, we don't like the band after they go mainstream.

    5. Re:WHY? by rsborg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Each of these industries are entrenched in more than a hundred years of business law and protect their regional fiefdoms viciously. They do so because they all know the internet makes them completely obsolete. They know that without the anchor of a physical pretense some small company anywhere in the world can beat them.

      Yet, with Apple, you can do all of this and more with iCloud + iTunes Match in 19+ countries. What it means is that Apple figured out there is no winning against the MAFIAA, and have paid their cut. Google is slowly starting to get with the program.

      It's unfortunate, but it does appear that the media industry is going to win vs. the internet by balkanizing or eliminating it entirely.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    6. Re:WHY? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and some of us have much, much more music than will even begin to fit onto a 32GB `smartphone`.

      Right, and we stream the files from home, where we don't have to worry about someone searching thru them on some public server, to see what we have that they can nail us to the wall with.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    7. Re:WHY? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      when do you plan on listening to it all?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:WHY? by JohnFen · · Score: 2

      As usual, we don't like the band after they go mainstream.

      No, that's not it. It's that we're being asked to trust third parties with the bulk of our personal data. Running your own server is better because you only have to trust yourself (and it can be just as -- if not more -- easy-to-use as any commercial offering). It has nothing to do with popularity.

    9. Re:WHY? by rhook · · Score: 1

      Video is intriguing. I can just imagine what is going to be uploaded there.

      Nothing since you only get access to video's you purchase/rent from Google.

    10. Re:WHY? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Um, does this not seem odd?

      No, it's copyright law. "Odd" with copyright law would be "Appears to have some logic behind it other than greed."

      And if things ever DO seem "odd" (in the sense that they make sense) with copyright law, be very afraid: they REALLY have you where they want you.

    11. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen to it? What are you talking about it? The point is to [i]have[/i] it, not listen to it! ;)

    12. Re:WHY? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Oh I do not doubt. So do I. However do I have a need or even want to carry around 32GB of music? Not really. Most of it is music I haven't used in ages.

    13. Re:WHY? by Threni · · Score: 1

      I'm listening to it all the time; on my journeys to and from work, at work, when I'm coding at home. I never, ever listen to the radio, or on tv, or stream music from websites etc. No interest in any of that at all.

    14. Re:WHY? by Threni · · Score: 1

      I carry around 24gig of it, all the time. I picked up a little Sansa Clip+ (8gig with a micro sd slot I stuck a 16gig chip in), which I charge and change around the music of once or twice a week. I suppose when 128/256gig chips become available/affordable I'd get one of those too but for now this is pretty much the perfect solution!

  10. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jew
    Nagger

    That's racist, man.

  11. Why no movies in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why no movies in Australia?

    1. Re:Why no movies in Australia? by Desler · · Score: 2

      Because the dingo ate your baby.

    2. Re:Why no movies in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because your breath stinks.

    3. Re:Why no movies in Australia? by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're having problems with the australian correction algorithm. It's actually quite hard to rotate the video stream 180 degrees in real time so they can view it down there.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  12. Re:Here's an idea by Americano · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for this argument, laws vary from country to country, and so terms and conditions for any service must comply with relevant local laws in each country, and the wishes of the rights-holders regarding distribution of their product to those countries.

    Did you really think that companies *prefer* having to build a different storefront with a different set of products, for every country they operate in? This isn't google forcing the restrictions, it's the content owners not granting google the rights to sell/distribute those products in the relevant markets, or the local laws preventing them from doing it for some reason.

  13. The problem with clouds by kawabago · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is dissipation.

    1. Re:The problem with clouds by slinches · · Score: 1

      I thought the problem with clouds is precipitation.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    2. Re:The problem with clouds by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

      Or fallout.

  14. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Encryption.

  15. Dumb move. by __Paul__ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Google Play" sounds like an environment for children. Why would people look there for serious applications?

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    1. Re:Dumb move. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 0, Troll

      think: who WORKS at google.

      there's your answer.

      that's how google sees the world. thru a twentysomething's eyes (essentially).

      the 'you have no privacy' is a 20something thing. I know of no one in their 30's or older who truly believes this; yet the school graduates seem perfectly fine with this.

      to google, the internet is a 'playground'. THEIR playground (important detail, btw).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Dumb move. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm far past my 20s and love the name. And Google has one of the best privacy policies. read it.
      Google plays too well with others to give the impression they think it's their playground.

      SO stop projecting what ever pops into you head onto others.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Dumb move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, Unfortunate nugget of truth.

      Don't forget that Google also employs a lot of FOSS types: the people who brought you such delightful product branding as the GIMP, The SPERM Report, Gaim, pidgin, iceweasel, all of the Ubuntu release names, all of the K-named KDE apps, and a host of "cute" recursive project names like GNU.

      The FOSS community's ability to "name things in a way that people will take seriously" is just about as strong as RMS' ability to "make you want to snuggle up in bed with him."

    4. Re:Dumb move. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It makes more sense when you look at how individual services are named - it's "Google Play Music", "Google Play Movies" etc.

    5. Re:Dumb move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, get a clue. With google YOU are the product. No other company of their size operates like this.
      It all stems from their core bussiness being advertising. They are an advertising company. Think about it.

    6. Re:Dumb move. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I have read it. That it's one of the best privacy policies around doesn't mean it's a good privacy policy. Personally, I chafe at it.

    7. Re:Dumb move. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      "Google Play Books", Google Play Apps"... uh wait, that still sounds incredibly stupid.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    8. Re:Dumb move. by rhook · · Score: 2

      You mean that Facebook (another company where you are the product) doesn't operate in a similar (but much worse regarding privacy) manner?

    9. Re:Dumb move. by Inda · · Score: 1

      Whoa! I was thinking the exact opposite!

      http://www.google.co.uk/products?q=durex+play&hl=en

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    10. Re:Dumb move. by glodime · · Score: 1

      RMS' ability to "make you want to snuggle up in bed with him."

      He does have a teddy-bear-like allure, doesn't he?

    11. Re:Dumb move. by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      That's why I refuse to buy a Blue-ray Player. It's got play in the title, and to start a movie you press the "play" button. So childish. As an adult professional, I refuse to be associated with such things, even in the privacy of my own home.

  16. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by Americano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If security, confidentiality, and permanent ownership of the stuff stored are such overriding concerns, then it's likely that a cloud service isn't for you, and you should avoid using one.

  17. Wow thats.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    absolute garbage. It just has apps in my jurisdiction.

    Oh well, gotta go check on how my torrents are doing...

  18. Fisher Price? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only one that thinks the new name, Play Store, sounds a lot like something that would come from a children's toy mfg. Not the image you want to brand on your serious apps. Should've kept it Market.

    1. Re:Fisher Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed... it's an awful name to use as an umbrella for books, movies, apps, etc. Market was way better, IMO.

    2. Re:Fisher Price? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Play Store, sounds a lot like something that would come from a children's toy mfg. Not the image you want to brand on your serious apps. Should've kept it Market.

      Ah, "Market Play", indeed.

  19. play books? by rodenti · · Score: 1

    Looks like RIM is going to have to find a new name for their tablet now that Google is using the "play" prefix.

    This new Google Play thing even has a Play Books section!

  20. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Then go with a zero-knowledge provider like SpiderOak. All of the data is encrypted on their servers. Your password is encrypted before it even leaves your computer. (If you lose your password, your recovery option is "I'm fucked".)

    Moreover, even if the feds came knocking on their door, all they could say is that you have x gigs of data on this particular server. The company can't even view your files, no matter how much they (or law enforcement, or a court) might want to.

  21. First test by jeti · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just tested the new Google Play apps. Here's what I found:

    Google Play Books: This item cannot be installed in your device's coutry
    Google Play Music: This item cannot be installed in your device's coutry
    Google Play Movies: This item cannot be installed in your device's coutry

    (German user)

    1. Re:First test by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      Again, all is broken, i am still waiting for my google voice in portugal..... google looks like my ex always changing the shitty furniture around the house to look the same in the end.

    2. Re:First test by houghi · · Score: 1

      Same here in Belgium. So it is basically a new website for Android Market.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:First test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone complaining about not being about to access particular features should try Market Enabler which lets you chose which country you appear from.

      Worked great for getting Pandora installed back in the day.

      (I am not affiliated with any of these companies or products)

    4. Re:First test by ibic00 · · Score: 1

      Rooted phone + Market Enabler for the rescue. From Singapore.

    5. Re:First test by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      Hello, fellow Portuguese guy!

      Google Voice actually became available in Portugal a few months ago! Go give it a try!

  22. Wacky World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it is odd that Canada and U.K. don't get the music, Australia doesn't get music nor movies, and Japan doesn't get the books nor the music.

    What is Google saying here? Are Canadian's tone-deaf... Japanese can't read?

    I think it is a wacky world if where you live determines what you can buy.

  23. A little rhyme for the 'Play Store" by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Google Search taught me what my life was worth. Google Docs lets me write at home in my socks. Google Mail, I get so much I want to wail. Google Maps led me into a criminals trap. Google Play, another way to make me Google Prey.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  24. Vetted Apps by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    It would actually be better if they would create a secured server in which only vetted apps are in it. My parents and in-laws are now on Android, and I worry about their downloading apps. Basically, it would be better for them to pay $.99-5 / app KNOWING that it is safe, rather than have access to so many apps of which a small number of them are insecure.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Vetted Apps by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      If you're that paranoid, word has it Amazon is running some kind of Android app store. If the rumors are to be believed you can even go to their website on your Android device and install the installer.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    2. Re:Vetted Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would actually be better if they would create a secured server in which only vetted apps are in it. My parents and in-laws are now on Android, and I worry about their downloading apps. Basically, it would be better for them to pay $.99-5 / app KNOWING that it is safe, rather than have access to so many apps of which a small number of them are insecure.

      If you like trading freedom for security and allowing some corporation with questionable motives to decide what you can and cannot buy, get an iPhone. Just remember the fact that no software is ever "safe", even if Apple says so.

    3. Re:Vetted Apps by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It would actually be better if they would create a secured server in which only vetted apps are in it.

      I suspect that this isn't so easy to do, based on the fact that nobody is doing this in a really effective way yet. Google does as good a job of it as anybody else.

    4. Re:Vetted Apps by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I did not say that it was for me. I said that I wanted this for my parents and in-laws. They are in their 70's. And the ipod would not work for them. All of them got the samsung Galaxy S II because of the screen size as well as the voice. It makes sense for google to offer up a different market that is secured, while allowing me to run appbrain.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Vetted Apps by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      How did you get that I was suggesting trading freedom for security? What I suggested was a SEPARATE market place in which all the apps are vetted. My parents and in-laws are in their 70's. They would gladly pay a small amount of money for security. However, none of them wanted a small iphone. That is a killer on their eyes. That is why they all bought the samsung Galaxy S2. Good phone. I still like my Motorola.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Vetted Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're that paranoid, word has it Amazon is running some kind of Android app store.

      Only in the USA.

      Next smart-arse suggestion?

    7. Re:Vetted Apps by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Plenty of them but since you're such an asshole, fuck you.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    8. Re:Vetted Apps by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      What is it that you fear could happen to them if they download an unsafe app?

    9. Re:Vetted Apps by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Older folks tend to run one password and login across all of their systems. As such, if you can pull it off the screen, then you can go after other systems. In addition, like many other baby boomers and before, they have lots of money tied up in their retirement funds and in stocks. The last thing that they need is a cracker on their system obtaining that information. Considering that my parents/in-laws are in their 70's, I DO worry about their system security. I talked my dad into switching off windows to Linux for his bank accounts (and he does it on a DVD boot so that there is zero chance of a root). The hard one is convincing my in-law to drop their windows and go with say Mac or Linux. I even preferred the iphone for them just for security reasons, though they really like the size of the galaxy (hard to blame; nice phone).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:Vetted Apps by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      So you can convince him to switch to a DVD boot of Linux before he logs into his bank account, but you can't convince him to use different passwords? And wait, they use a DVD boot of Linux on their android phones? You do know Android is Linux based, right? Or where you not answering my question at all?

  25. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by Brannoncyll · · Score: 2

    Then go with a zero-knowledge provider like SpiderOak. All of the data is encrypted on their servers. Your password is encrypted before it even leaves your computer. (If you lose your password, your recovery option is "I'm fucked".)

    Moreover, even if the feds came knocking on their door, all they could say is that you have x gigs of data on this particular server. The company can't even view your files, no matter how much they (or law enforcement, or a court) might want to.

    Unfortunately many countries have laws under which you can be forced to give up your encryption keys to law enforcement. God only knows how the US has resisted implementing laws like this so far, although I don't see this situation lasting long considering how the government lately seems hell bent on eliminating the human rights of its citizens.

  26. So, they still don't want my money... by gshegosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...just because I live in Poland or some other "obscure" country. I say fuck you and go back to piratebay.

    1. Re:So, they still don't want my money... by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "just because I live in Poland"

      The highway between Germany and Russia is a country? (runs)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:So, they still don't want my money... by gshegosh · · Score: 2

      You can't be from USA, you placed Poland on the correct continent.

  27. Congrats Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just ruined a decent Cloud service idea we have still been waiting on for years now.

    I will continue to use Gmail it seems.

    Eh, I guess I could video-crypt truecrypt data in to frames or some other useless nonsense for fun.
    Static is best film.

  28. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by geekoid · · Score: 2

    And every country has a guy willing to wield a lead pipe.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Promises, promises by fusiongyro · · Score: 2

    promising that you will never have to worry about losing or moving them across devices ever again.

    You know, until they shut down the service in 18 months because it isn't popular enough...

    1. Re:Promises, promises by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Or arbitrarily block your account without giving you a reason beyond "ToS violation", and then a few days later, restore access, again without explanation.

      I wish this stuff worked. I wish you could rely on it. It would make life so much easier ...until they blocked access to my account.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  30. Great! by miltonw · · Score: 1

    As if finding something in Apps Market wasn't hard enough!

  31. The only video I ever lost access to was from Goog by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    A few years ago I downloaded some test video from Google Video... doesn't work anymore since they shut things down.

    So it's kind of amusing that Google is trying to solve a problem they themselves took part in at one point.

    In contrast any video downloaded from iTunes still works - even if it's not in the store anymore.

    However, given the nature of DRM video I still think of all DRM protected video as a rental. It might be a long term rental, it's great if it still works but I'm not silly enough to expect it always will. Until the video content providers managed to get their eyelids forced open Clockwork Orange style and made to see the same light the music industry saw, very little will change about online video as much as Google (or Apple) might claim you can access it "forever".

    Here's to hoping whatever Apple comes up with un regards to a newer version of AppleTV is a step towards the video industry seeing that light.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Maybe you should blame your country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know your country's laws about this sort of thing? Maybe you should look them up before you blame Google?

    1. Re:Maybe you should blame your country? by gshegosh · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do. They're tougher than what ACTA was trying to introduce.

  33. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then don't use cloud-based services. That's the route I take -- I just don't use them. I do use an Android phone and apparently will be using the cloud for apps, but that's all.

    If you want cloud services, then use encryption -- but understand, if you're truly concerned, that encryption will not guarantee that your stuff stays private. All public key encryption is breakable without difficulty to someone who has access to a large sampling of your encrypted data and lots of CPU cycles to throw at the problem. Such as cloud providers do.

  34. How long... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    How long will it be before civilians are no longer allowed to purchase/own storage media, I wonder. I mean, all it's ever used for is piracy, right? According to the RIAA/MPAA?

    Then again, there's probably more money to be made in litigation than in actually making/selling music/movies.

  35. Habeas corpus by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    What if you create an encryption key, upload a few files, and then forget the key and lose any written copies? How can they force you to provide something which no longer exists?

    1. Re:Habeas corpus by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be simpler to securely delete the data? Then there's nothing to decrypt.

  36. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For what values of lots?

    Also, why are you using public-key cryptography for this?

  37. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by afabbro · · Score: 1

    Or better: Tarsnap - "online backups for the truly paranoid".

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  38. Bah! Google should be fixing problems by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    How nice, all unified, except that quite a number of users have, since last week, not been able to edit their google docs. Searching for "help docs trying to reach google.com" shows how bad this problem is, and also displays google's apparent lack of interest in fixing it.

    I can't wait to see the response when a problem occurs on this unified system of theirs :(

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  39. Re:I don't want my cloud provider to know type of by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    it's still miles away from being auto-profiled for lawsuit based on the mp3's you have.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  40. This really does everything! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    Everywhere else, Google Play will be the new home for Android apps.

    And I don't have an Android device.

    Way to go! Get us excited about an awesome new service that does everything we've ever wanted, then tell me that basically it does nothing. Just because you live in a country the big media people forgot. And not some third-world country either - a perfectly normal and highly technological European country. Birthplace of the Android kernel, by the way. This is how they repay us?

    I usually have nothing but good things to say about Google, and I know that for many parts this stuff is not really their fault, but god damn this stuff is always depressing.

    </bitterness>

  41. Why is the UK different? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    How come the US get to store music but we don't? I thought the US music comnpanies were far more hardcore than in the UK?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    1. Re:Why is the UK different? by lpq · · Score: 1

      Actually music is only supported in the US, where devices to allow easy transfer of music are generally not sold by agreements to keep them out of the hands of consumers. Like -- my last 2 phones -- no way to transfer songs to the phone over USB -- only to send them to the phone by paying to do it over the phone network where you are charged by the MB (after paying an initial $50 (~ £20-30)/mo for access.

  42. That Was Easy by merrickville · · Score: 1

    Well, call me a cynic (yes, I can be cynical, but many may agree) but this new "US based" Google cloud just makes it easier for the US government to examine ALL your personal data in one nice tidy little cloud. None of that mucking about with ISP's and the like trying to track down information about you!

  43. Unforeseen consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they renamed the Android market, there is a now a button on my Motorola phone that no longer works.

    I can only imagine what else this does on other handsets. It'd be nice if the manufacturers actually bothered to release software updates.

  44. Apple What Happened To You? by BarrettsComp · · Score: 1

    Back in my day apple was a harmless fruit!! Come to think of it so was blackberry!! Check out www.barrettscomputing.co.uk for great downloads and training videos