Slashdot Mirror


Final Analysis Suggests Tevatron Saw Hint of the Higgs Boson

ananyo writes with exciting news from the world of particle physics: "A hint of the Higgs boson, the missing piece in the standard model of particle physics, has been found in data collected by the Tevatron, the now-shuttered U.S. particle collider at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois. While not statistically significant enough in themselves to count as a 'discovery', the indications announced on 7 March at the Moriond conference in La Thuile, Italy, are consistent with 2011 reports of a possible standard model Higgs particle with a mass of around 125 GeV from experiments at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN near Geneva, Switzerland. The data is more direct evidence of the Higgs than the constraints on its mass offered by the precise W boson mass measurement reported on Monday. On a sad note, the find vindicates Tevatron scientists who campaigned unsuccessfully to extend the collider's run. The request was turned down by the Department of Energy but this last hurrah suggests that Tevatron might indeed have found the Higgs ahead of CERN's Large Hadron Collider if they'd secured the funding required. The Tevatron is currently being raided for parts."

49 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. I LOVE the Tevatron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's my favorite ride at the fair!

  2. sign of the times by phrostie · · Score: 2

    shutting things down right when they can make the most difference.

    it sucks, but when you don't have the money to maintain them,,,,.
    at least the shuttles are going to museums.

    1. Re:sign of the times by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, this was found long after the funding was gone and the Tevatron was being taken apart for other experiments, but you go on insinuating that they're simply lying.

    2. Re:sign of the times by tqk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh yeah. It's amazing how much stuff they find when their funding is up for review. Surely that is just a coincidence....

      "So, wtf do we do now that funding's been cut and the thing's being mothballed or cannibalized?"

      "Uh, how's about we analyze the data it collected?"

      "Brillant [sic]! Smoley hokes, would you look at that? A freakin' Higgs boson!?!"

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:sign of the times by blackicye · · Score: 2

      This was my point. It would have been prohibitively difficult to repair and then routinely service the HST using any other launch system.

      Considering the cost per launch for the entire duration of the shuttle program, it's likely that it was one of the most prohibitively expensive delivery systems they could have possibly employed.

    4. Re:sign of the times by tqk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is finding proof of the Higgs Boson really the "most difference" that the Tevatron will have made during its long life?

      No, it found the Top quark too, and that was really straining its capabilities, which is why the LHC was built (after the abandonment of the SSC).

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  3. Thank you... by wcrowe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...for not calling it the "God particle".

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Thank you... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Christchurch is a name, Higgs Boson is a name, "The God Particle" is a popular media nickname (and not really justified), and coordinates are a description.

      Your analogy confuses these.

      If the local newspapers started calling Christchuch, "The God city.", I would still call it Christchurch.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    2. Re:Thank you... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, "The God Particle" is a name coined by a Nobel prize winning physicist. Sort of. He wanted to call it the Goddamn Particle but his publisher wouldn't let him.

      It's not exactly unjustified either. A sea of Higg's Bosons are theorized to pervade the entire universe and the interact with every particle of matter. That's not entirely dissimilar to the Christian description of god being a force or entity that is everywhere at once. Various Christian theologians have also posited that god's ongoing influence is required to keep the planets in their orbits, guide thrown stones, etc. all of which are things the Higgs is supposed to do.

  4. Transform and Roll Out by pcolaman · · Score: 2

    Tevatron is on the loose, let's call in Optimus Prime!

  5. What is a Higgs Bosom worth? by 3seas · · Score: 2

    http://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=2156439899482364662

    And the better answer is:
    The sum total of what it cost to find one.

    1. Re:What is a Higgs Bosom worth? by polyp2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      A Higgs Bosom ? ... now thats gotta be a worth a look!

      Bosom

      N ...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:What is a Higgs Bosom worth? by Brannoncyll · · Score: 2

      A Higgs Bosom ? ... now thats gotta be a worth a look!

      Bosom

      N ...

      Do you really want to see Higgs' bosom? Well, whatever floats your boat.....

  6. 50 years ago... by drachenfyre · · Score: 5, Insightful

    50 years ago the U.S. could put a man into space. Today it can't.
    50 years ago the U.S. was at the forefront of particle physics. Today it isn't.
    50 years ago the U.S. started development of 3 different spacecraft on 5 different man rated rockets over a 7 year span. Today it's 10 years just to develop one.
    50 years ago the U.S. had a plane capable of traveling at Mach 3.35. Today it doesn't.

    I seriously feel bad for the future country my kids will inherit. It doesn't seem like we're moving in the right direction on the science and technology front.

    1. Re:50 years ago... by daem0n1x · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But think positive. You have plenty of lawyers, bankers and preachers!

    2. Re:50 years ago... by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, 50 years ago, the U.S. could manufacture most of its own consumer electronics.
      50 years ago, the Federal Reserve hadn't ordered the printing of anywhere near the amount of money they have today, either.

      The reality is, yes, the United States is in a state of decline, after arguably having "peaked" somewhere in the 1950's or 60's. Today, you can't even buy a kid a model rocket or a chemistry set without someone limiting the sale or fretting that you might be a terrorist.

    3. Re:50 years ago... by fragtag · · Score: 2

      50 years ago the U.S. could put a man into space. Today it can't.
      50 years ago the U.S. was at the forefront of particle physics. Today it isn't.
      50 years ago the U.S. started development of 3 different spacecraft on 5 different man rated rockets over a 7 year span. Today it's 10 years just to develop one.
      50 years ago the U.S. had a plane capable of traveling at Mach 3.35. Today it doesn't.

      I seriously feel bad for the future country my kids will inherit. It doesn't seem like we're moving in the right direction on the science and technology front.

      I completely agree. We need to spend more money developing science and math education courses that engage children when they are young. Its sad to me the number of kids who don't even attempt word problems because they are "too hard".

    4. Re:50 years ago... by ifrag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And basically all that research and science was driven by the Cold War. Scientific research can't really justify the budget for this stuff based purely on potential for profit.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    5. Re:50 years ago... by BornAgainSlakr · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we had just lowered all taxes to zero and cut all job-killing regulations, we would have colonized the solar system 50 years ago instead of just putting a man in space.

      If we had just lowered all taxes to zero and cut all job-killing regulations, we would have pwned particle physics so hard it would be taught to 4th graders today in private religious schools the way God intended.

      If we had just lowered all taxes to zero and cut all job-killing regulations, you would be able to buy a spacecraft at your local Ford dealership in any of 40 different models, 5 different trim levels, and hundreds of different colors.

      If we had just lowered all taxes to zero and cut all job-killing regulations, no one would care about Mach 3.35 except the hippies that own Prii today. Everyone else would be getting on with their lives commuting between the Earth and Mars in their Ford spacecraft at a quarter of the speed of light.

      PS... NASA still has operating SR-71's, so we technically still have a plane capable of traveling at Mach 3.35. And, God only knows what the slow, Government-teat-sucking, mouth-breathing engineers have been able to cook up in the past 50 years. Maybe they have us up to Mach 4 now.

      --
      IANYL, IANAL, TINLA, IANAMD, IANAP, ...
    6. Re:50 years ago... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Me not being able to tell whether this is satire or honest opinion scares the crap out of me...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:50 years ago... by geckipede · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mao once said that a communist nation would always be able to outmaneuvre a capitalist nation, because capitalism can only ever make moves that profit in the short term.

      I think it's fair to guess that in his own mind, he was comparing some utopian ideal of communism vs. a straw man capitalism, but even so, he had a point.

    8. Re:50 years ago... by hackertourist · · Score: 2

      50 years ago the U.S. was at the forefront of particle physics. Today it isn't.

      Today, being at the forefront of particle physics is beyond the means of any one country. Particle physicists left the nationalistic dickwaving behind and decided to collaborate on the biggest and most complicated piece of measuring equipment ever devised. This is progress.

    9. Re:50 years ago... by jythie · · Score: 2

      Big talk for someone typing on a computer, which exists because of engineers striving and preforming 'engineering stunts'.

    10. Re:50 years ago... by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As with all things, it is in the balance. A pure capitalist system and pure socialist one are equally dysfunctional, though pure capitalist ones actually do come out worse and historically are much less stable then their socialist counterparts. This is actually why we have so many examples of socialist countries in the world and very few capitalist ones, the socialist ones might not work well but they do work.. the capitalist ones tend to explode within a few decades or collapse into 3rd world expletive-holes.. or more commonly wealth quickly concentrates enough that a small group starts acting as a defacto economic planner anyway, so it decays into a hybrid system anyway.

    11. Re:50 years ago... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2

      Maybe that's why we're running out?

      --
      This space available.
    12. Re:50 years ago... by u38cg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, it took China fifty years to recover from Mao's economic depradations, so possibly not the best authority to be quoting.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    13. Re:50 years ago... by drachenfyre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right. Nothing ever came out of the space program, aerospace industry or particle physics labs that equated back to our day to day life.

      To quote JFK, "We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too"

      The U.S. learned from going to the moon. From building the tevatron and the A-12/SR-71. From the Manhattan project.

      It doesn't matter if the goals are social equality and food for all, or freeing ourselves from the Oil economy. What matters is the single, common and focused goals to drive projects and technology further. The type of projects that lead to new and better lives for everyone in it. The list of discoveries and advancements made *JUST* off of the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo projects would fill pages. It was not about putting a footprint on the moon. It was putting a footprint on the moon and learning everything we could about doing it. It was about the advancement in computers, radio, rocketry, electronics and a myriad of other fields. The A-12 project advanced our understanding of supersonic travel to a new level.

      The point is, I really think as a society, we've fallen into the prediction that John Steinbeck made at the height of the progress of the 60's.

      "We now face the danger, which in the past has been the most destructive to the humans: Success, plenty, comfort and ever-increasing leisure. No dynamic people has ever survived these dangers."

    14. Re:50 years ago... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2
      But in one area the US shines: it is the head of a world-wide crime syndicate (the MAFIAA) that is telling nations worldwide how they should write their laws. That's true world domination!

      Indeed, what good is the ability to manufacture your own electronic devices if the MAFIAA tells you which devices you are allowed to manufacture? And what good is the ability to run a successful economy if the MAFIAA then hits you up for protection money (also known as royalties and license fees...)

    15. Re:50 years ago... by drachenfyre · · Score: 4, Informative

      PS... NASA still has operating SR-71's, so we technically still have a plane capable of traveling at Mach 3.35. And, God only knows what the slow, Government-teat-sucking, mouth-breathing engineers have been able to cook up in the past 50 years. Maybe they have us up to Mach 4 now.

      No they don't. They haven't since 1999...

      http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/FactSheets/FS-030-DFRC.html

    16. Re:50 years ago... by TKane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      50 years ago the highest marginal tax rate was 89 percent.

    17. Re:50 years ago... by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2

      50 years ago the U.S. could put a man into space. Today it can't..

      But we still have the know-how and we are actively building new launch systems that can and will support manned spaceflight.
      Just because we had to retire the Shuttle's before we have a replacement ready doesn't mean we can't.
      Besides, using the Suyuz craft is far more cost effective than continuing shuttle flights.

      50 years ago the U.S. was at the forefront of particle physics. Today it isn't.

      Yes we are. Just because we don't have the biggest dick on the Super-Collider block doesn't mean we aren't participating. How many colliders do we need? Do you know how big and expensive the LHC is? Does the world need a second one? What would the benefits be aside from facilitating a race? In case you don't know, US scientists can run tests on the LHC and US scientists have access to the data that comes from the LHC. As do other scientists around the world. Particle Physics is no longer the domain of a handful of competing and jealously mistrusting egos, it's a large global effort that requires international cooperation to analyze and review the data these machines generate.

      50 years ago the U.S. started development of 3 different spacecraft on 5 different man rated rockets over a 7 year span. Today it's 10 years just to develop one.

      And how many missions did those 3 different spacecraft fly? How long did it take to develop the Shuttle and how many missions did those fly?
      How many missions are our new craft supposed to fly? Are the new craft more safe and advanced than the craft of 50 years ago?

      It takes a lot longer to build a gun than a slingshot.

      50 years ago the U.S. had a plane capable of traveling at Mach 3.35. Today it doesn't.

      Mach 3.5?
      Have you not heard of the Falcon project? They are exceeding Mach 17
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Falcon_Project

      That's a tad bit faster IMHO.

      I seriously feel bad for the future country my kids will inherit. It doesn't seem like we're moving in the right direction on the science and technology front.

      Rest assured that you sound just like every other conservative minded adult concerned about his children's future since the dawn of time.
      Things are never as good as they used to be when we were young -- but that has more to do with the loss of childhood's naive innocence and the acquisition of much cynicism through the years of our life than it does with the demise of our culture or civilization.

    18. Re:50 years ago... by darkmeridian · · Score: 2

      And we also have a spaceplane that's been in orbit for over a year now. Keep in mind that there's ton of top secret stuff that we don't know about as well. The Blackbird itself was a secret program for a long time. God knows what we have in the wings.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    19. Re:50 years ago... by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      Oh my God, we've turned into the AMARR!

      I don't even like lasers!

    20. Re:50 years ago... by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      50 years ago you could catch smallpox. Today you can't
      50 years ago all production cars required petroleum products to run. Today you can buy electric.
      50 years ago the average life expectancy was 70. Today its 78 (enough time for two advanced degrees)
      50 years ago you needed an expensive encyclopedia set or journal to research a subject. Today all thats in front of your face, largely free...on that note...
      50 years ago random people around the world didn't really care what you thought. Today....well some things never change ;)

      I wish we had a mars colony as much as the next err...pro mars colony guy, but the point is, its not all bad

    21. Re:50 years ago... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Not even close. Basic scientific research, which is what we're running out of now, can't justify it's budget based purely on short term profit.

      People estimate that 80% of the west's economy is based on quantum mechanics, which was developed from about 1900-1930, with the not-so-basic engineering done mostly in the 50s and 60s. Since then we've been shortsightedly reaping the rewards, and we're starting to run out now.

  7. Good thing the Higgs will be confirmed at LHC by ganv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the US had extended funding for the Tevatron, the accomplishment of finding the Higgs as the Tevatron neared retirement would have been nice for American high energy physics, but it would likely have been bad for the field more broadly. Having the Higgs discovery near the beginning of data acquisition at the LHC will provide publicity and a morale boost that will enhance the productivity of the field over many years.

    1. Re:Good thing the Higgs will be confirmed at LHC by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So
      1. CERN finds some hints in where the Higgs is, ie around 125 GeV
      2. Tevatron looks at their logs in the range ~125 GeV and says "well it could have been here, indeed"
      3. Tevatron announces that they may have discovered the Higgs before, if ...

      Questions:
      1. What if CERN found at 110 GeV - maybe the Tevatron logs would show a similar indication?
      2. I thought there was a matter of collider power/energy, and the Tevatron is not powerful for that discovery in the first place, anyway?

      --
      March 7, 2012 Not a good day for my karma

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  8. Urh Urh Urh! by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Tevatron is currently being raided for parts

    Now I have an image of it being pulled apart by a gang of Sandpeople

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  9. Re:You americans trying to take the glory again? by Sez+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You americans trying to take the glory again?

    What could be more American than that?

    -- The Butler, Clue

  10. the search is a very intricate calculation by peter303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First you have propose a decay scenario, several which exist for the Higgs. This scenario suggests what particle tracks will hit one of several hundred sub-detectors (several thousand in the LHC) for various angles and distances (lifetimes). And may have to be search for a wide set of rotations. Maybe only one per trillion collision events out of trillions recorded in petabytes of data. This is a multi-week supercomputer run for each scenario. An ambiguous result, the back to the drawing board, propose a new decay candidate and another calculation. Or as they plan do for half of every year, run the collider again to collect trillions more interesting collisions. Last years LHC proposed energy "bump" was only five contending events out of several trillion studied.

    1. Re:the search is a very intricate calculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Last years LHC proposed energy "bump" was only five contending events out of several trillion studied.

      It's more than 5. For the ATLAS detector by itself, as of Dec 2011 they had 89,760 probable Higgs events. (Whether or not they 'actually are' the Higgs remains to be seen of course.)

      Your overall point about the low frequency of events is correct, though. Those 89k events are from 380 trillion proton-proton collisions, which translates to an efficiency of 2.4×10^(-10).

  11. Re:"Shuttered"??? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    What happened to the word "closed"?

    It was shuttered.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  12. Note for the America hating audience: by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No one is saying the Tevatron discovered the Higgs, or that it 'beat' the LHC. They're saying that now that they know what they're looking for, they found HINTS of it in their data.

    Fun Fact: People from all over the world worked at the Tevatron in Illinois. We should all be sad it's gone. Also, many Americans are now working at, and helping to fund the LHC.

    It's sad that these projects that bring us together in peace, get treated as if they were sporting events or yet another political pissing match.

  13. Re:You americans trying to take the glory again? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    You americans trying to take the glory again?

    What could be more American than that?

    -- The Butler, Clue

    Shooting the Higgs boson for trespassing on your particle detector chamber?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  14. Disagreement from the field by krlynch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shutting down the Tevatron with the turn-on of the LHC was the right move, from my perspective in the field. The Tevatron would NEVER have reached the magic 5sigma threshold for discovery confirmation, something the LHC will do easily if the Higgs is really near 125GeV. And running the Tevatron isn't free: it's tens of millions of dollars a year, and many hundreds of man-years of effort. This funding would have been essentially "lost", but more importantly, the lost man-years would have decimated many other projects that Fermilab and the high energy physics community considered much more valuable than an additional year or two of Tevatron running. It would also have delayed for years the development of new accelerator projects at Fermilab that are considered extremely high priority within the field. These issues are why the shutdown decision was taken in the first place. Tevatron was a great machine for thirty plus years. But time marches on, and we don't keep high cost infrastructure running based just on nostalgia....

  15. As a particle phisicist who worked at Tevatron... by mu22le · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (and on LHC too) let me call the conclusions of the article bullshit.

    This last hurrah suggests that Tevatron might indeed have found the Higgs ahead of CERN's Large Hadron Collider if they'd secured the funding required.

    It took Tevatron 10 years to accumulate as enough data to reach a 4 sigma result (let us not discuss the statistical details). It would have taken years to reach the 5 sigma level. On the other hand LHC has obtained in one year almost as much data as Tevatron in 10. By summer 2012 the amount of data recorded by LHC will be an impossible goal for Tevatron to accomplish. It just made no sense at all to keep the old machine on.

    The sad thing is not that Tevatron has been shut down but that the USA government is not investing any money in using the Fermilab infrastructure for some awesome future project (I'd love to see them try a muon collider).

  16. Re:You americans trying to take the glory again? by Herr+Brush · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you asking the Europeans or the Americans?

  17. Smooth glide path by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    You could go around 100 years back and comment on the decline of the British Empire. On the whole, the UK weathered this dramatic change fairly well (no viking hordes or precursor Red Dawn equivalent). We can only hope (and prepare for) the same in the US - though we might have too many selfish greedy bastards to survive our transistion without landing in the third world.

  18. Re:I hope they don't find it by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Er, not finding the Higgs Boson -- when we would be able to find it if with the LHC if it existed anywhere in the range allowed by the Standard Model -- would not leave us in the same place we started. We started not knowing if this final prediction of the Standard Model would be borne out or not. We'd end up knowing that the Standard Model was incorrect beyond those predictions that had already been verified, and that there was new physics that would have to be explored in order to find out how massive particles get their mass.

    This would be very exciting for many people. Ruling out the Higgs would open the door for a lot of new avenues of research.

    Probably the least exciting thing that could happen is that we verify the existence of the Higgs at ~125 GeV, and then find nothing else.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are