Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Production Delayed By Factory's Assembly Flub

nk497 writes "The first shipment of Raspberry Pi devices has been delayed, after the factory manufacturing the cheap educational computer used non-magnetic jacks instead of ones with integrated magnetics. The problem is already nearly fixed, but new jacks need to be sourced for subsequent shipments, so those could be delayed slightly. 'It's inevitable, isn't it — you're freewheeling along perfectly happily and then you get a puncture,' said spokeswoman Liz Upton, apologizing for the delay."

132 comments

  1. Why the magnetics? by tecker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can someone explain to me what advantage a magnetic 8P/8C connector has over a non magnetic one? I have no idea where this would be used. My cables have that little lock tab not a magnet. Does it not need the little tab anymore (that always breaks off)?

    --
    Procrastinating life a way at a rapid rate of speed.
    1. Re:Why the magnetics? by prefect42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had the exact same thought and googled magnetic jacks:

      Molex Magnetic Modular Jacks incorporate wire-wound components (magnetics) in standard RJ45 jacks. These integrated magnetics, resistors and/or capacitors filter common-mode noise to provide signal integrity, protect PHY chips, provide DC isolation and offer low-mode conversion.

      I'm assuming that's the case here, and the magnets are providing filtering (given the cable's got a predominantly plastic and copper end it's not going to do much to hold it in place).

      --

      jh

    2. Re:Why the magnetics? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Conditions the signal, like the little donuts on monitor cables.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Why the magnetics? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Informative

      As I stated in the other, non-annointed article and posted here, the magnetics are actually tiny transformers used to convert from differential to single-ended signals and to isolate. Additionally center taps can be used for PoE.

      "The magnetics in question aren't to hold the connector in like those in a Mac power cord, but rather the tiny transformers that are required for Ethernet differential signal isolation/transformation."

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:Why the magnetics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magnetics doesn't refer to the connector itself, but the isolating transformers that are typically part of the Ethernet jack. Some parts depend on external transformers (and are typically cheaper), but all sorts of fun might happen if you run it without the isolation.

    5. Re:Why the magnetics? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      TFA claims without the magnetic connector the jack simply won't work. Perhaps the non-magnetic kind needs to be used differently in order to work.

    6. Re:Why the magnetics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm assuming that's the case here, and the magnets are providing filtering (given the cable's got a predominantly plastic and copper end it's not going to do much to hold it in place).

      They're not magnets. They're tiny transformers and inductors that magnetically couple the signals while providing 1.5 kV DC isolation and some filtering against common-mode disturbances.

    7. Re:Why the magnetics? by tecker · · Score: 1

      AH! Had not considered the magnetics to be an isolation thing. Thanks Maud'Dave. Hopefully other will see this (or your other post). If I could post and mod I would rate this up.

      I feel a bit foolish now.

      --
      Procrastinating life a way at a rapid rate of speed.
    8. Re:Why the magnetics? by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      who where what when now?
    9. Re:Why the magnetics? by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, that makes much more sense. Magnetics isn't a term I knew.

      --

      jh

    10. Re:Why the magnetics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the olden days the non magnetic jacks used a separate larger transformer for isolation.

    11. Re:Why the magnetics? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Still reasonably common. I don't have exact figures or anything; but you'll still quite often see those distinctively chunky, rectangular passives placed in neat rows just slightly behind the ethernet jacks on devices where space constraints aren't a huge issue. They essentially double the board footprint of the jack, so I assume that they've been stamped out in laptops, classier switches where density counts, and the like; but cheapie switches, home router boxes, NICs of indifferent quality, and so forth are still using them. Sometimes even pin-through-hole DIPs, no less, not even surface mount...

      They do tend to have all the magnetics for at least one port, often two or four, crammed into one package, I don't think I've ever encountered discrete ones on anything remotely recent; but magnetics separate from jacks are still around.

    12. Re:Why the magnetics? by aramosfet · · Score: 1

      All Ethernet interfaces must have magnetics. Having the magnetics in connector saves board space. Otherwise you would need a separate module between the Ethernet PHY chip and the connector.

    13. Re:Why the magnetics? by ifrag · · Score: 2

      For those cables, I think that would be a Ferrite Bead.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    14. Re:Why the magnetics? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You are right - I probably chose a poor example since the donuts aren't magnets. Still, like the cable ferrites, the magnets in the connectors condition the signal off-board to free up space.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Why the magnetics? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Does it not need the little tab anymore (that always breaks off)?

      That's someothing that's always bugged me. Of course you're going to need mini or submini jacks in a very small device like a transistor radio or an iPod, but I could never figure out why they didn't use RCA jacks in PCs. Not that RCA jacks don't sometimes fail. Heck, they could have used 1/4 inch jacks in PCs, I've yet to see one of those fail, even in a heavily used environment like a guitar amplifier.

    16. Re:Why the magnetics? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      They're not magnets. They're tiny transformers and inductors that magnetically couple the signals while providing 1.5 kV DC isolation and some filtering against common-mode disturbances.

      Ahhh! ELECTRO-Magnetics. I wonder why that got left off.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    17. Re:Why the magnetics? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The big problem with RCA jacks is that they are not keyed. You can insert any RCA jack into any RCA Jill. Sometimes that's not an issue, others, well, good designers know that it's best not to let end users think much.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:Why the magnetics? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      isolation transfomers.

      had they said that, yeah, you want that in ethernet. products that omit that (popcorn hour, cough cough) have ruined NICs and bad performance for noise.

      in audio (spdif) you also want pulse transformers. same idea.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    19. Re:Why the magnetics? by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      Semantics

    20. Re:Why the magnetics? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Magnetics is a term sometimes used for all such components.

    21. Re:Why the magnetics? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Some controller IC's require magnetics on the PHY side in order to work at all. Others will work without magnetics, but only if short cables are used.

      If the Raspberry Pi circuit was designed such that the magnetics are responsible for 'pulling up' the output stages to the positive supply, then the Ethernet function simply would not have worked at all without magnetics in the connectors.

      BTW, 'magnetics' is a very common term in the field of electronics. It typically applies to inductors, transformers, and ferrite beads, but interestingly enough, is not used to refer to such components as relays, which also rely on electro-magnetism for their operation.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    22. Re:Why the magnetics? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Magnetics != Magnets. These are the Ethernet transformer coils that are missing.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    23. Re:Why the magnetics? by kabz · · Score: 1

      Surely, this is a brilliant post, and should be modded heavenwards. I haven't laughed so much all day.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  2. Magnetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the Raspi forums :

    "It doesn’t mean no network connection at all on all devices, but this board has been designed for a magnetic jack. The magnetic bits mean better signal integrity, better filtering and shorter transmission distances for data."

    "Magnetics refers to the presence of transformers and chokes which are used to isolate the Ethernet wires from the RaspPi’s power supply. and each other and probably to reduce high-frequency noise. Without them you would effectively tie the RX and TX signals together and probably turn the entire network into an aerial for Radio 2 reception."

    1. Re:Magnetics by vanquished · · Score: 1

      "Without them you would effectively tie the RX and TX signals together and probably turn the entire network into an aerial for Radio 2 reception."

      I have no idea what this means. How is this possible?

    2. Re:Magnetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a joke.

    3. Re:Magnetics by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 1, Troll

      I have no idea what this means. How is this possible?

      I guess because you didn't study properly at school... ;-)

      "Without them you would effectively tie the RX and TX signals together and probably turn the entire network into an aerial for Radio 2 reception."

      I disagree with the first part of this. Ethernet works off differential signals and the transformer does a good job of removing the common mode signals (non differential) coming down the wire. Without the magnetics the common mode signals (such as DC, mains interference, Radio 2 transmissions) picked up by a potentially long ethernet lead will turn up at the input to the ethernet phy (receiver) chip. This may or may not be enough to stop it from working depending on the interference received. The lack of correct voltage biasing (also done via the magnetics) will very likely stop it from working though. Even so the RX and TX won't be shorted.

      --
      wot no sig
    4. Re:Magnetics by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Its a joke. I think the fault makes the whole ethernet cable into, effectively, a dangling wire, and the only use of a dangling wire is as an aerial. Possibly connecting tx and rx makes it into a loop of sorts, and thus a loop antenna.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    5. Re:Magnetics by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Informative

      Without the intervening transformer, the TX- and RX- lines would be tied together at ground on the device. In the diagram below, the differential RX+/- and TX+/- signals are turned into single-ended RX and TX by the transformers. Removing the transformers connects RX- and TX- to ground, which is a Bad Thing(tm).

      RX+_____3 E_______RX
                    3 E
                    3 E
      RX-_____3 E_____GND

      TX+_____3 E_______TX
                    3 E
                    3 E
      TX-_____3 E_____GND

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:Magnetics by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 1

      At least the forums are holding up now with new hardware ;-p

      --
      who where what when now?
    7. Re:Magnetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Radio 2: UK radio station broadcasting crap music for housewives.

    8. Re:Magnetics by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      They also crucially provide center taps to provide a path for DC currents from the transmitter to ground and to give the receive signal the correct common mode level. Also because of the aforementioned center taps the pinouts of a jack with integrated magnetics will almost certainly differer from a plain jack.

      http://www.smsc.com/media/Downloads_Public/lan9000/9512_sch.pdf

      (that is a reference design for the lan chip the Pi guys are using)

      So without the correct magnetics things are unlikely to work at all.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:Magnetics by anon208 · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mod this up.

    10. Re:Magnetics by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      RX is recieve, TX is transmit.

    11. Re:Magnetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I think I get that.

      Let me paint this out in my mind and tell me if I have it right -

      Say both RX and TX is quiet. A bit comes along down the RX line. Because the RX and TX grounds are connected, it could cause noise on the TX line, which may in turn get sent back down the line to who sent the bit in the first place? And this is why it is "a bad thing"?

  3. Before anyone makes any silly comments... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Informative

    The magnetics in question aren't to hold the connector in like those in a Mac power cord, but rather the tiny transformers that are required for Ethernet differential signal isolation/transformation.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Before anyone makes any silly comments... by eclectro · · Score: 2

      It would have been more informative to call the internal circuitry "filters" rather than "magnetics," which is conceptually more accurate.

      That said, this has to be great advertising for Molex.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Before anyone makes any silly comments... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      They're not just filters, they're transformers that (as a result of their inductance and capacitance characteristics) also act as filters. I chose molex simply because they were first on the search and seemed informative.

      They've been called 'magnetics' in this context for quite a while - I guess it's a bit of an industry standard. They also have cute terms like PHY and MAC.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Before anyone makes any silly comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magnetics is the correct industry term for transformers, inductors, etc.

    4. Re:Before anyone makes any silly comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The magnetics in question aren't to hold the connector in like those in a Mac power cord, but rather the tiny transformers that are required for Ethernet differential signal isolation/transformation.

      Hey, thanks for the explanation/link. Haven't had time to look it up lately.

  4. Re:Why the magnetics? - parent is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >convert from differential to single-ended signals

    Actually the signals are still differential. Take a look at the datasheet of any Ethernet magnets before commenting.
    They were there to isolate, impedance match (if necessarily) and common mode filtering.

  5. Seems reasonable enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think many people, me included, have been expecting something like this to happen. As said in the article, this is a relatively minor bump in the road that was practically inevitable and they seem to be handling it as well as could be expected.

    I suspect they’ll get a bit of flack over the “4 day” thing... however they would have gotten a lot of flack if they came out with some information that turned out to be incorrect. I guess they could have come out saying “there is a minor problem and we are investigating”... but we aren’t talking credit card leaks here, and a few days to figure out what exactly happened seems fair enough to me.

    I certainly don't think this is time to start panicing and referencing OpenPandora.

    1. Re:Seems reasonable enough by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Someone in China (the same guys that did the mistake in the first place, which most mentions have assumed to be a deliberate cost-saving measure rather than a true accident) has to receive those units back, hand-unsolder 10,000 connectors and hand-solder 10,000 correct connectors back into place before then packaging them up and sending them back to the UK.

      Where, still, as far as we know, there's been no tests of functionality other than networking (i.e. they haven't seen if similar issues affect the other ports like the display, etc.). And then someone has to test a good portion of them again before sending them onto the suppliers.

      Meanwhile, they have to source a supply of 100,000's of the proper connectors for future runs, which they are just starting now. And hope that the network WAS the only problem.

      In effect, they did no actual testing of the actual device functionality ("it'll all just work if the factory did their job") until the entire first batch was opened in the UK. The testing in the manufacturing facility was purely electronic and COMPLETELY missed this problem (surprise, surprise). And immediately upon opening them here, they spotted a problem, which took FOUR DAYS to isolate (and was isolated only because they were baffled and broke one of the connectors open and happened to spot the difference) and now it all has to be sent back for more work.

      That's a mite more than a "minor bump". Not irreconcilable, but certainly not a bump. More like a hard jolt with metal grinding. I sincerely hope it doesn't turn into another OP, but given that we've gone from "No preorders" to well, pre-orders, and a full launch to, well, we'll tell you when we have a working device in the same country as our distributors, the slippery slope has certainly started. Of course they can recover the situation. The question is, what other mistakes have they made in their supply chain of making 10,000 bare PCB's with components (something that happens thousand-fold times every day).

    2. Re:Seems reasonable enough by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I'd have bet on supply problems.
      Always innovating, geekphone, and other manufacturers other than pandora had similar problems.

      A new company might overlook some details ending up in delays, the factories might be giving priority to big clients and go out of their way to not displease them, or maybe open hardware running open software is the #1 enemy for the modern models of marketing which rely on planned obsolescence.
      We ought to look whether startup hardware companies selling cheap closed stuff go on without problems selling their toys or suffer similar inconvenients.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    3. Re:Seems reasonable enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem there. The hardware isn't open source ("licensed manufacturing"), the firmware isn't open source ("binary blob") and the graphics driver isn't open source ("binary module"). The people behind the project are Broadcom employees and the SoC is a Broadcom chip, what did you expect?

    4. Re:Seems reasonable enough by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quotesdfrom the forum
      ''Jamesh is right – they sent us test units which *did* have the right part on before they moved to a larger batch. "

      --
      who where what when now?
    5. Re:Seems reasonable enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In effect, they did no actual testing of the actual device functionality ("it'll all just work if the factory did their job")
      No, incorrect. You are making unsubstantiated assumptions.

      The product may have worked perfectly in the factory test stand -- the magnetics at the mating switch would have provided the isolation, and it's certainly possible that at a short cable length (e.g. less than 3m/10ft) LAN interface operation tested OK. Transformer coupling is not the *only* way that ethernet works -- capacitive coupling is used all of the time in embedded/low-cost applications. Moreover, modern PHY devices have a lot of leeway in RX equalization. So, it is entirely possible that the product worked in the test stand with a short LAN segment to the test apparatus.

    6. Re:Seems reasonable enough by ledow · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. Read the forums there. They tested ONLY the electronics (i.e. that the caps etc. were the correct value, the right current was on port X, etc.). They did not test network functionality. They NEVER plugged it into a network box.

      And what sort of test regime is it if you only test with a short LAN segment without checking, e.g. signal strength, expect cable loss, etc.? That's exactly my point.

    7. Re:Seems reasonable enough by bsane · · Score: 1

      bah! Replying to remove mis-moderation...

    8. Re:Seems reasonable enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hate to stereotype, but this is quite typical for China. You need to watch them closely or they will cut corners whenever possible.

    9. Re:Seems reasonable enough by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      They probably wont be sending them back. They will probably be recycled.

    10. Re:Seems reasonable enough by mydnite · · Score: 1

      This kind of substitution happens all the time with manufacturing in countries outside of your own. Any one familiar with manufacturing in China, particular circuit boards, will know after the mistakes in the first run to always state in the manufacturing agreement "No Substitutions". Other wise you will get very subtle changes that while they look the same or perform the same are not what you spec'ed. The only other thing you can do is ask for the first 100 of the production run, not the engineering / sample run, to be shipped via air and the rest stays at the manufacture. This allows you to test will the rest is still being manufactured. For example we had a run of 1600 boards in China, we did not state no substitutions on the agreement. The engineering samples were perfect, the production run was not. Fortunately we had the first 100 sent via air express so that we could check them and it turned out the the serial connector had been replaced with one while functional the same was actually inverted and shorter then our design. Once the shroud was placed over the board in our units the cables could no longer connect to it. We managed to catch them half way through the second 100 and got them to correct the problem. These simple things would only come with experience and will not mitigate all your problems but does reduce some of your liabilities. They will know better the next time round.

  6. So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and they could have built them at multiple Western factories, encouraging the revival of a local electronics industry rather than cementing dependence on the Far East. Once economy of scale kicked in, the price would have gone down anyway. I'd have happily sponsored any opportunity to decrease the chronic (and now quite severe) unemployment in Britain since it decided that an advanced country can operate without building anything on its own, relying on the ability to exploit less developed countries.

    1. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Well, the good news with everything being manufactured in the Far East is that wait a few hundred years and the Morlocks will be so far away they won't be able to eat the Eloi.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 2

      Blame the extortionate tariff on importing components versus the lack of tariff on finished goods for production being outsourced. Here's a direct petition on the matter: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/27158 -- that is the direct reason manufacture is being outsourced. From what I understand of the Foundation's statements on the matter no economy of scale could overcome the cost of the tariff because the bill of materials cost would be too high to be profitable at the desired price point as a result.

      And I don't see any cost increase. Model As are $25 before tax and shipping. Model Bs are $35 before tax and shipping. That has never changed.

    3. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I'd certainly pay more for these things.. but their entire goal here is to make these as cheap as possible.

      They also posted a pretty damn good explanation as to why they had to outsource.

      I do hope they recover from this (and I suspect they will.. it's not OpenPandora yet..) and take some hard won lessons about testing and assumptions.

      I also feel forry for the poor guys down in China who have to hand unsolder/resolder 10,000 of these suckers.

    4. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thers is no such tarriff. No-one can find it on the books. The Foundation has evaded providing information on how they came to believe this.

    5. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you would be interested to find out what the tariff actually is? Or perhaps your definition of "extortionate" isn't the same as mine. Hint: the upper limit across the various electronics tariffs, last I checked, was 14%. Broadcom does not deserve the blind trust geeks seem to be awarding it over this Raspberry Pi project: even though some of the characters may be familiar, we're a long way from the days of the BBC B where a bunch of bright uni students got together with academic entrepreneurs.

      It is, of course, quite absurd to charge on components but not on finished computers. A tariff should be a function of rights imbalance and amount of work involved. So a relatively free nation would not be subject to significant tariff, whereas a nation like China would be subject to a high tariff, the tariff increasing for completed products as more work was done under conditions not acceptable to the consumer nation. I cannot think of a better way to get developing countries to improve their citizens' fortunes. Can you?

    6. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their entire goal here is to make these as cheap as possible

      Then they're not doing a good job of it. My smart phone has an ARM11 CPU, a capacitive touchscreen, WLAN, GSM, 3G, GPS, Bluetooth, compass, accelerometer, etc. It cost less shipped (contract-free) than the Raspberry Pi, and it comes with a case, a lithium battery and a USB charger and cable. For the Raspberry Pi, these are all extra. And the phone is a commercial product that doesn't get the tax breaks of a "charity".

    7. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      What phone do you have that costs under $25?

    8. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Raspberry Pi costs $35, plus shipping, plus taxes. You end up paying more than 40 EUR for it. My phone was cheaper.

      In a year the Raspberry Pi will look properly dated.

    9. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Once again what phone was this? I take your inability to answer such a simple question as a sign that you are lying. So good day.

    10. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Raspberry Pi costs $35, plus shipping, plus taxes. You end up paying more than 40 EUR for it. My phone was cheaper.

      I suspect the idiot doesn't realize he's spending around 15 additional bucks a month for it for the next 2 years. If they inspect what it would cost to break the contract, it should become obvious.

    11. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. (Note that this is a "used" one, but practically new. Truly new ones start at 40 EUR shipped with SIM lock but without contract. New ones without SIM lock and contract are always available for 50 EUR, but you can get them for less than 40EUR if you shop around (i.e. not on eBay) and keep your eyes peeled. Good day to you too.

    12. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No contract. That means the thing is mine and the upfront cost is all there is. Was that clear enough for you or do I have to use bold letters?

    13. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      So 40 Euro shipped plus tax. Versus 40 dollars (or 30 for the cheaper version) shipped for the pi. Get back to me when the concept of conversion rates sinks in to you head.

      Also, let me know when you get your phone connected to hdmi and ethernet.

      Then again you're an idiot who thinks a rasberry pi is a phone so I doubt there's hope for you.

    14. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don't worry, they say that there's absolutely no chance these things are being manufactured in a sweatshop. Working conditions are "adequate!" They're ensuring they make a "few pounds profit!" to "reinvest in further development!" They "know" that it's a good employer, but they didn't actually "assess" whether that was the case. Trust them.

      Never mind that the first world geeks who will buy this are completely willing and able to spend a few extra bucks to "on"-shore the manufacturing. The key was keeping it as cheap as humanly possible by offshoring to sweatshop manufacturers, who as we know, never mess up.

      He said that by manufacturing in China, the charity would make a few pounds profit on each unit which could then be reinvested in the charity's research and development activities, but if it had selected a UK manufacturer the charity would struggle to break even.

      Upton is confident that the Chinese manufacturer has adequate workplace conditions. He did not name the manufacturer, but said: “For various reasons we are aware that they are a good employer, but that was not formally part of our assessment.”

    15. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of a way: Give them the tools needed to go from being in a state of perpetual poverty and ignorance to being rich and understanding. The easiest way is "wealth transfer". It's what happens when you buy goods from those countries unimpeded by the government. Tariffs cause the opposite.

    16. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Phone: Less than 40 EUR including shipping and tax.
      Raspberry Pi: More than 40 EUR including shipping and tax.

      Tax alone makes the Raspberry Pi more expensive than $40. That it ends up costing close to 40 EUR is all due to the weak dollar. Conversion rates. You know the words, now learn what they mean.

      The Broadcom SoC is designed to be used in phones, so basically the Raspberry Pi is a phone without everything but the core CPU and RAM, plus a USB hub with integrated Ethernet tacked on.

    17. Re:So, delayed anyway. 20-30% increase in cost... by Catroaster · · Score: 1

      I bought a Samsung 1080 for £9.99 at Tescos recently, SIM unlocked.

  7. Re:How wrong I was! by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can understand this critisism as I've had it many times over many different periods of "omg, not another <whatever> story".

    But I'm way too damned excited over the Rasperry Pi to care! Kinda fun being on the other side of things for a change :D

  8. Fucking magnets. by Chrutil · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do they work?

    1. Re:Fucking magnets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut one in half and see for yourself ;p

    2. Re:Fucking magnets. by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      By attracting balls of steel.

  9. Bye Bye Raspberry Pi by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bye Bye, my Raspberry Pi,
    I thought that I might buy you,
    but the warehouse was dry,
    those good old boys say just wait one more month,
    but you keep running into delays,
    yeah, you keep running into delays.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Bye Bye Raspberry Pi by Bog+Standard · · Score: 1

      At least I now have a reason as to why Farnell pushed my date back from April to mid May. All they did was inform me of the date and not provide a reason for the delay.

    2. Re:Bye Bye Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you see the other recent post? There was a mistaken mass email by Farnell about pushing back orders.

    3. Re:Bye Bye Raspberry Pi by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That was bad. Bad rhyming, bad meter. Try this one.

      Bye Bye, mister Raspberry Pi,
      Ain't as heavy as a Chevy
      but the warehouse was dry.
      those good old boys, they just want one more try,
      If I don't get one I think I will cry,
      If I don't get one I think I will cry.

  10. Re:Why the magnetics? - parent is wrong by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I have, thank you, and the transformer can be used to do exactly what I said as well as for pure isolation with the resultant signals retaining their differential status. Please consider that there are other Ethernet circuits than the one(s) you're familiar with before making general statements. Some really do need single-ended signals into the PHY.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  11. Maybe... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they were using the wrong kind of tyres.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  12. Re:So much for opensource hardware taking off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's what happens when you have too many chiefs and no indians...

  13. Eternal shame by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

    I was going to make a joke about suicide due to the shame of making this mistake, but then I remembered that this is a Chinese factory. DON'T KILL YOURSELF!

    1. Re:Eternal shame by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Shame.. or having to hand desolder/resolder 10,000 of these damn things.

    2. Re:Eternal shame by tftp · · Score: 1

      or having to hand desolder/resolder 10,000 of these damn things.

      These connectors are nearly impossible to remove. Two large shield tabs + 8 (or more) through hole pins... It might be cheaper to scrap the batch.

      I'm amazed that this was allowed to happen. Mightily unprofessional. You never assemble a large production run of anything until the same people assemble a hundred boards from the same kit and then you personally test those 100 boards. Then they are returned as "approved" samples, and any deviation will be at expense of the assembly house.

    3. Re:Eternal shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the most cost effective option is to sell them as model A's if the ethernet port is effectively useless.

  14. Serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They advertise the hell out of their product, then they predictably can't deliver, then they silence any and all criticism on their forum (because not being all positive is "bad attitude", and they don't allow that), then another disaster strikes. I guess it's called karma.

    If you order now, you're going to get a delivery estimate about 3 months from now. Their mailing list had more than 100000 subscribers, and Liz Banhammer has the audacity to claim surprise when demand exceeds the initial 10000 batch.

    1. Re:Serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it was a predictable clusterF$%k from the start. I suspect this "hiccup" was planned and the 10000 batch was never made. They waited till they had 100K orders so they could meet their price point. The problem is it seems to be lie to cover up a lie a lot of times.

      The FAQ on RS Components site seems to indicate they never had 5000 units like the foundation said they did:

      Q - Do you actually have any Raspberry Pi in stock? And how do we order them? I can only get a Register Your Interest page?

      A - Along with the other supplier of Raspberry Pi, we are expecting our first shipment of boards towards the end of March.

      RS Components

      The story at launch from the Pi guys was they were in stock and were shipping as early as March 12.

      And the fact you can be banned for simply stating a "contrary" viewpoint tells me enough about them.

      And one more thing while I'm on a rant... how can they produce them for $35 when the cheapest ARM clones and even the Arduino's are $30. It makes no sense even if they have a deal on the CPU's.

  15. For once, this fits! by Prod_Deity · · Score: 1

    Fucking magnets! How do they work?

    1. Re:For once, this fits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't, magnetic fields never do work.

  16. Re:So much for opensource hardware taking off... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, no. This is what happens when you outsource manufacturing to vendors in countries like China where it is common practice for them to quietly substitute parts between the reference design stage and when the device hits production. Sometimes, you get lucky and they even tell you in advance that they're doing this and you have a chance to evaluate impact on the design. Most times, they simply do it and pocket the difference in cost while hoping not to get caught.

  17. How's that cheap Chinese production looking now? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still good value?

    What about when the returns start flooding in because a 1 cent component failed when a 2 cent one might have soldiered on? Budgeted for handling that?

    I know these guys are amateurs, but do they really need to keep demonstrating it?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  18. Re:So much for opensource hardware taking off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially those pesky safety/redundancy and over-engineered components.

    That said, the Raspberry Pi guys did a pretty good job explaining why they pretty much had to outsource to meet their goals.

  19. Re:Why the magnetics? - parent is wrong by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    And finally also to remove DC components, many PHYs have a constant DC component on their output lines because it's easier to vary the output currents while keeping it in the same direction than it is to change the direction of a current while maintaining smoothness.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  20. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still looks pretty viable to us.

    - Every electronics company

  21. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, amateurs. JUST LIKE Apple, Dell, HP... The only difference is that they are letting us know every step of the way what's going on.

    FFS, EVERYTHING is made in china. The cost difference is not (entirely) the fabrication costs, it's that they would have been paying taxes on EVERY COMPONENT. Making it in china they don't pay any taxes on the thing AT ALL. In addition, even WITH the delay from both this and the crystal, the time to spin up production in the UK would have ment a longer timeframe to making them avalible.

    So yes, it's still a good value.

  22. import tariffs? Pah! by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    No, the main reason it's not financially sensible to manufacture mass-appeal items in the UK is that the unemployment benefits are higher than chinese assembly workers' wages. You can't get native brits to take on menial work as they can get more money for being unemployed than, for example, picking vegetable or jobs that other stoop labour industries can afford to pay.

    If these boards were to be assembled in the UK the costs of doing so (setting aside component costs and amortised developemnt costs) would make each board massively more expensive.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:import tariffs? Pah! by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise the Daily Mail ....

      Yawn! - and so completely wrong

      1) What is your evidence that £65/week is "higher", cost-adjusted, than the wage at, say, Foxconn?

      Didn't you think to do any research - anything at all, even a simple Google search, before spouting off.

      A junior level worker in Shenzhen, China, will receive 1,800 yuan a month, according to Reuters, citing a statement by the Taiwan-based company. Monthly pay may rise to 2,200 yuan if the worker passes a technical examination. That puts the monthly pay at between $285 to $350,

      That works out at about £2,600 p.a. for the top rate. Compare that with your own figure of £65/week or £3,380 for an unemployed brit.

      As for all the rest of your uninformed rant: TLDR, since the first sentence was so wrong, there was no point.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:import tariffs? Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for all the rest of your uninformed rant: TLDR, since the first sentence was so wrong, there was no point.

      Why do Daily Mail readers have such trouble with argument, attention span and detail? To begin:

      cost-adjusted

      If you think that overheads alone on one employee - who may also receive subsidised meals etc. - add up to less than ~£700, then you've never actually run a business and you're just another armchair Tea Bagger stuck in the '80s. One educated employee at Foxconn is more expensive than someone on the dole in the UK, receives comparable pay, yet someone on the dole in the UK copes with a comparatively huge cost of living.

      There are two significant differences:

      (1) Hours - China expects people to work like it's 1850 in Britain, taking advantage of the fact that when one man burns out, two can take his place. Every empire can enjoy at least several decades of glory riding the back of slaves. But we know from, well, every Western country, what happens in the end;

      (2) Government priorities - China's government, expressed through its own activity and its investment, taxation, infrastructure and planning, aims for its country to (i) produce goods; (ii) consume debt. Our prosperity and near full employment through the '60s was the result of similar policy. The Tory handling of Britain around the oil crisis led to the reversal of (ii) (many people blame Labour because it was the Labour government of the late '70s which had to deal with the consequences - just as people today will blame Cameron for Blair/Brown). Then Thatcher reversed (i). This made and continues to make the middle-men to the producers very rich, but with nothing to offer to its own people or the world, Britain is gradually sold off, fades and dies.

      In the medium term, (2) matters. the reason Foxconn is in China and not in Britain is not because China is really cheap but because China as a nation supports manufacturing. From an economic PoV, (1) matters in the long term; from a humanitarian PoV, (1) matters always. So there is the balance to be struck between (1) and (2). Germany's been a lot better at striking the balance than Britain, which is why it has finally achieved its century ambition and taken the reins of Europe.

    3. Re:import tariffs? Pah! by makomk · · Score: 1

      No, the main reason it's not financially sensible to manufacture mass-appeal items in the UK is that the unemployment benefits are higher than chinese assembly workers' wages.

      That probably has a lot to do with the cost of keeping workers alive and healthy and fit for work here in the UK being higher than Chinese assembly workers' wages. It's kind of impossible to get workers for less than the cost of feeding and housing them.

    4. Re:import tariffs? Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda, but there's far less difference than you think, as petes_PoV was easily baited into finding out. The propaganda that workers must be prepared to be paid less and to work longer hours to keep us competitive is gradually being instilled, but it has no basis in fact. The reason China does the manufacturing is not because China has much cheaper labour but because the Chinese government directs its investment, planning and tax structure toward local manufacturing - exactly as Britain before the '80s.

      It's a lot easier to make money in the short term being a middleman than by actually running a successful manufacturing base. The former class of people took over the US and the UK through the '80s.

  23. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    Why do you assume that the same mistake - or one like it - would NOT have been made if the boards were assembled in the west? Since western wage rates are so much higher than chinese ones if this error had been made in a british or american plant it would probably be cheaper to simply crush the whole batch and start again,

    Then instead of a 1 month delay, you'd be waiting 6 months - or never, since the RPi foundation would have gone bust as it was banking on the sales of these units.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  24. I wonder... by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    How many people are killing themselves trying to keep up production with the demand for Raspberry Pi.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:I wonder... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Based on the amount of complaining about supply issues, apparently not enough.

  25. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    This sort of thing is precisely why the standard Slashdot rant of "all they did was put x, y and z together, this isn't innovating!" is so much silliness. It's not easy to mass produce things. It takes planning and more planning. It takes money and more money than you planned on because some small aspect of Murphy's law is going to pop up and rip your balls off.

    It's why the Motorola Xooms of the world come with stupid little missing bits and even why our fearless denizen of perfection, Apple, still screws first releases up 99 times out of a 100.

    Production electronics is not building a Heathkit in your bedroom.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  26. Hard to tell? by PPH · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    It's actually very hard to tell unless you look at the insides of the part,

    Ohmmeter?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Hard to tell? by makomk · · Score: 1

      Yep, that should do the job. Certainly a lot easier to get hold of than an X-Ray machine...

  27. Re:So much for opensource hardware taking off... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    This is also what happens when you talk about whatever fuckup occurred on the dark end of your super-fancy-don't-look-too-closely-contemporary-JIT-outsourced-supply-chain...

    Consumer electronics widgets are constantly having their ship dates quietly revised, usually with a terse announcement from some PR flack that 'Release of Widget Foo has been moved from late Q1 to mid Q2'. Or they just go up for pre-order and take longer than initially promised to ship. Annoying; but hardly unusual.

    In this specific case, I'm a bit surprised that they didn't have somebody plug one into their laptop and then wonder why the NIC wasn't working slightly earlier in the process; but so it goes.

  28. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The release has been a cluster frak:

    • Delayed since November with promises of we'll ship next month
    • Promises of preferred status for early orders thrown out the window with the next point
    • Switch from shipping the unit themselves to 'licensing' the technology to two UK companies
    • One of the company's only ships to businesses and said screw you to 5000 people after they got confirmations. (That has been rescinded but their shipping dates got pushed back at least month since the companies got the first batch)
    • BTW: both UK companies said we'll take back orders but we will not tell you there will be about a $15 Shipping and Taxes until we charge credit card (my $25 bare bones machine just went up 60% in cost)
    • ...and now further delays

    I have said it before: They should have stuck with the original plan and got the original shipment out and THEN license the technology to other companies. That why I'm not ordering for at a few more weeks until they get their crap together.

  29. Re:So much for opensource hardware taking off... by Anrego · · Score: 1

    In this specific case, I'm a bit surprised that they didn't have somebody plug one into their laptop and then wonder why the NIC wasn't working slightly earlier in the process; but so it goes.

    Reading through the forums, it sounds like they were sent early test boards which contained the correct connector before the full run. Sounds to me like the "accident" happened between the test run boards being signed off on and the full run.

  30. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great point. One you have the BOM for the Raspberry Pi, doing the actual engineering is fairly cut and dry. Much of the work that goes into bringing a product like this to market is down-costing the BOM and figuring out the manufacturing logistics.

    I recently brought a product to market and I had no idea what I was getting myself into before hand. There is a ton to consider.

  31. Inductors? by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    I have only dabbled in electronics, but I don't care for the term "magnetics" (nor I have ever heard it before). I would think "inductor" would be a better term. Anyone who actually knows what they're talking about care to illuminate what the difference is between "magnetics" and inductors?

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Inductors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're actually transformers (i.e coupled inductors). Magnetics is a general term that covers a lot of wound components, usually those where inductance, self or mutual is relevant (so not including relays).

      If you want to see what the external ones look like, Google "H2019NL" as a sample part and you'll get the Pulse datasheet for a bunch of ethernet transformers.

  32. They should change the name to.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raspberry Pi Forever

  33. Re:open sores/linux FAILS again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably meant Open Source. Open Sores is what you end up with when Apple does you once every few months and you take it gladly.

  34. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by LiENUS · · Score: 1

    I've said it before and I'll say it again and again and again. The release was insanely successful. This is a small crew with a fairly limited budget. They essentially sank all the cash they had into the first 250k and I am amazed that they still came together and are going to be able to get the first batch out without a major delay. I'm guessing licensing to these two companies had something to do with it. With no pre-orders how are they going to give preferred status to the early orders? The first 10k people get theirs shipped first so yeah they got preferred status. Do you mean the mailing list? It took them days to send out all of the emails it ended up being impossible they had over 100k people on the mailing list and only 10k boards. When apple sells out of iPhones for a month its a huge success, when this tiny company sells out a quarter of a year already its a huge fail... I don't think so this release has been insanely successful the only thing they could have done better is if they had more cash to set up the initial shipment better but alas the money tree crop hasn't been doing so well for the world lately and for a tiny group of people doing something to save the world they did damned good.

  35. Re:How's that cheap Chinese production looking now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to what? Every electronic device in my home was made in china. They all work flawlessly.

    Every computer on the planet has components made in China. What, exactly, is the alternative?

  36. UK Manufacturing by randomsearch · · Score: 1

    "Firstly, the schedule for manufacture for every UK business we approached was between 12 and 14 weeks (compared to a 3-4 week turnaround in the Far East)."
    http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/509
    [Posted on January 10th, 8.5 weeks ago - and manufacturing had already started at that point].

    I guess UK manufacturing wouldn't have been much slower, after all.

    RS

    1. Re:UK Manufacturing by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      If they are referring to on-going manufacture as well as the first batch latency, then this bump is not that significant long term. If the order-to-deliver latency differs by 8-to-10 weeks generally then that can make a massive difference to stock control. If you might be waiting for longer to get new stock you would want to keep more in the warehouse in order to better deal with sudden bumps in demand.

  37. Re:So much for opensource hardware taking off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, the Indians would have fucked it up just as badly as the Chinese.

  38. louis vuitton online store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to our Louis

    Vuitton Outlet Stores ,we provide Louis Vuitton

    Purses ,

    Authentic Louis Vuitton Bags and so on.we provide
    you with the lastest style,so you could find the things you like here
        Authentic Louis

    Vuitton
    Bags
    is one of the most luxury products,so the price of them are

    too
    high, why? because of the design and material become more and more good and the
    most important is innovation and have a long history.
        now Louis Vuitton

    Online Store
    provide you a chance to have their own them.
        In our site have a lot of Authentic Louis Vuitton Bags ,fox example
    hotsellersnew productsfeatured products.maybe you will like them,click here

    to
    join Louis Vuitton

    Outlet
    Stores
    .