Pi Day Is Coming — But Tau Day Is Better
PerlJedi writes "A few months ago, a Tweet from Randal Schwartz pointed me to a YouTube video about 'Triangle Parties' made by Vi Hart. My nerdiness and my love of math made it my new favorite thing on YouTube. Now, with Pi Day coming up later this week, I thought it would be an appropriate time to point people to another of her YouTube videos: Pi is Wrong. The website she mentions at the end, Tauday, has a full explanation of the benefits of using Tau rather than Pi. Quoting: 'The Tau Manifesto is dedicated to one of the most important numbers in mathematics, perhaps the most important: the circle constant relating the circumference of a circle to its linear dimension. For millennia, the circle has been considered the most perfect of shapes, and the circle constant captures the geometry of the circle in a single number. Of course, the traditional choice for the circle constant is pi — but, as mathematician Bob Palais notes in his delightful article "Pi Is Wrong!", pi is wrong. It's time to set things right.'"
What, pi is 14.3? When did that happen?
Thing is, we like pie. Being able to eat a Pi sized slice of Pi at 1:59 on 3.14 is a geeky excuse to consume treats.
"Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
Tau day is better because I have an excuse to get 2 pies instead of just one. I still celebrate pie day as well as groundhog day, mmmmm ground hog).
Time to offend someone
Wait, what about four-thirds pi, the constant that relates the volume of a sphere to the radius???
Using 2pi as the so-called "constant" is two-dimensional chauvinism!
http://www.geoffreylandis.com
Then, when somebody wants to argue that twice e is actually a better constant, we can say "2e or not 2e, that is the question."
Both are irrational.
And, I think it's perhaps a little wrongheaded anyway. The area of a circle is pi*r^2. That'd become tau*r^2/2... You took the 2 out of one place and put it in another. And it does nothing for spheres: Volume = (4*pi*r^3)/3 = (2*tau*r^3)/3; Surface area = (4*pi*r^2) = (2*tau*r^2).
And besides, tau's already claimed as the "time constant" variable, so n'yah!
Program Intellivision!
Sure there is: e^(tau * i) + 0 = 1.
Hey, it's really not any more ridiculous than "... + 1 = 0".
Umm, no!
e^(pi*i) = -1 implies e^(tau*i) = 1
e^(tau*i) = 1 does not imply e^(pi*i) = -1
The tau version follows from the pi version. The pi version does not necessarily follow from the tau version, because the tau version would still be true if e^(pi*i) = 1.
So the tau version is missing some very important information.