Slashdot Mirror
Google Introduces Programming Challenge In Advance Of GoogleIO
First time accepted submitter X10 writes "Google announced some time ago that they want only developers to attend their Google IO conference. They hinted at developing a 'programming test' that you have to pass before you can register. Now, they have introduced the Input Output machine at the same time they announced that Google IO registration will open on March 27. I take it that registrations will be ordered according to the quality of one's IO machine. Cute idea ..."
n/t
It fails to load in Chrome but works flawlessly in Firefox. Is somebody not eating their dogfood?
I take it that registrations will be ordered according to the quality of one's IO machine. Cute idea ...
So I guess my "blank canvas art" submission won't get be an invite?
Google has commented on various other comments in the google+ posts for IO that it's a first come first served process on the 27th. There have been some comments about an easter egg in the game which gives a link for preregistration but google has not confirmed. Known IOn members (Those who have attended 3 IO's) have gotten preregistered this week, and the rumor is that Past attendees will get the nod next week. But as of now google has been saying it's a free for all on the 27th. I'm betting they want to break their previous record for how fast you can sellout a conference. And I think that the price hike to $900 is their plan to try and keep out those who simply want to get whatever they give away. We'll see on the 27th how well that worked.
So what? Life contains much fascinating fun stuff other than being around women. I for one, would have loved to attend this event in person, but sadly wont have the money or the time to spare.
Football Odds
How do you use this... the ball always seems to bounce violently off of it.
Yeah, for instance the organizers and the Slashdot submitter are all men.
My first program:
Hell Segmentation fault
Way to go google!
I apologize for the lack of a signature.
For most of the IO's except for maybe the first Google has given away more free stuff then the cost of the conference itself. A noticable group has went simply to get this swag. 2 years ago they gave out 2 phones. Last year they gave out a special edition Galaxy Tab, a 4g LTE Mifi, and a Chromebook to attendees, and certain sessions also gave out things, one was a PS phone and one was an Arduino. I think almost doubling the price to $900 from last years $550 (I believe) is more to attempt to drive these people out. I was there last year and you could tell who was only there for the swag as they sat in the back and left the sessions or keynotes for the swag desk as soon as things were announced.
-- Dave... Life isn't fair and it isn't always right but it's all We've got right now.
And I can see that, but I think that assuming there aren't "developers" out there not just going for the swag is preposterous. I know I would be if I was attending, because honestly I find a lot of what Google has to say about programming to be uninspired and uninteresting, so that would be about the only reason I'd be there.
.. this brings to mind the experience of a friend who applied for a job as technical writer. He was given a "test" to write a fully-specked chapter of documentation for a supplied program undergoing beta testing. On showing up for the interview carrying his "test' assignment, he ran into another interviewee who carried a draft of a different "test" chapter.
What does your contract with Google say about payment schedules?
Because if it says nothing, or says something that means they *can* delay payment, you don't have a leg to stand on and Google aren't technically doing anything wrong (you may have a moral argument, but that's about it).
The only quote I've found is:
"Google expects to initiate payments to your bank account on the second of the month; exceptions to this are weekends or Bank Holidays. Payments will include sales processed from the first day to the last day of the previous month. Google Checkout will send your payout to your bank account; however, your bank may take an additional three business days to register the payout in your bank account. Please contact your bank representative for the specifics of your bank's turnaround time for electronically deposited funds. Note that in the event of a technical issue, your payout may be delayed and is expected to be initiated by the 15th of the month."
Considering it constantly says "expects" and not "will definitely and guaranteeably pay", that suggests to me that there is no "deadline". If you signed up to that, that's your own fault.
"Sign in with Google+"
They just want to track people who can program.
Even if you have an account it asks you "Google Developers is requesting permission to: Know how you are on Google, Perform these operations when I'm not using the application". If you click "No thanks" instead of "Allow access", you get "Access Denied".
Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
still looking at the 'spinning record player of Death' icon...
It's Google's mating call to attract the soulless. So no, it would actually not work at all without the shitty music. They need that.
Just built a machine that, depending on some hidden factor, either catches the ball and transports it, throws the ball away off the bottom of the screen, or just misses the catch entirely and lets it smash into the end wall. But the actual result seems random because I don't change anything in-between, just press the spacebar to "launch" a ball.
Sorry, but I played The Incredible Machine when I was a child, thanks, and it was frustrating enough even when it WAS consistent. I don't program in languages that like to change the parameters at random.
It's Google's mating call to attract the soulless.
I wonder if I can get that as a ringtone for my iPhone ;-)
A tip for anyone who wants to go through with it. The simple design is usually the better design. The inconsistency are factors which you have to factor for in your design. Kind of like how in life nothing is truly consistent.
For that to happen, you first need a standard. Ask that to the countless ARM licensors, I am sure they don't want to do that
Haven't played around much with this yet, but it could be used in a similar way to how Minecraft was used to build an ALU, right? Wonder if they'll eventually allow you to chain multiple machines together with multiple outputs...then I think you'd be able to do it...
But why, you already have the iPhone, that's an even more powerful statement :P
Company that makes money from harvesting your personal details to send you advertising demands more access to your personal details in exchange for features you may like.
I don't think we need a film for this one, guys. Animated short at 11.
Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
Tried it in Firefox, didn't seem to work; must need Chrome. Tried it in Chrome, didn't seem to work; remembered WebGL is disabled because the Linux ATI driver is blacklisted. Restart Chrome with google-chrome --ignore-gpu-blacklist but it still doesn't seem to work. Maybe it's a puzzle and I just don't get it; I'll check the comments on slashdot.
This is what the web felt like 10 years ago. Maybe it's my fault for not realizing I had to sign in, but there isn't anything on the page to indicate that, and I don't use Google+ anyways.
tomorrow who's gonna fuss
Self reply.... FlashBlock was my problem. I'm going for coffee.
tomorrow who's gonna fuss
Why, then, it might mean that the user isn't willing to put in the time, thought and preparation necessary for an inherently complex task.
Or it might mean that the user is trying to do something simple (registration? hello?), and the implementation is brittle, obfuscated, and/or inefficient.
If your user has to read instructions in order to register for an event, YOU fail, not your user.
There's nothing to support the idea that machine quality is linked to registration.
I believe the hike to $900 is their response to 'freeloaders' showing up just to get swag.
Ugh. Seeing a sentence like this "...architect a machine only you could have dreamt of" makes me think that they may want to consider allowing just *one* non-developer... someone who can write.
Steve
Yep, they must not want any machine I might make more than they want to target me for ads. They get neither.
Someone had to do it.
The tutorial level you have to complete in order to actually be able to play with it has an annoying non-dismissable pop up at the bottom which covers up part of the machine. Either it's buggy or they don't like my monitor size.
Maybe it would be easier if you replaced the 's' & 't' with 'c'?
Irony is, most people probably already have a G+ account, even if they never signed up for one.
Of course, if you're wanting to go to Google I/O you probably are an Android user, which means you have a Google account and by definition, it's a G+ account even if you did nothing...
Hell, I bet if all you did was sign up for YouTube you have a G+ account.
And hundreds of people are willing to fill that void, and come up with machines just as great or greater.
Tell ya what: You go make a standard SoC that ALL of the Android handsets will use, and I'm sure we can make the Android thing work.
Hell, we're comparing it to PCs. Make two. Shouldn't be that hard, right?
Input: Any text. Output: "Buy (any text) online in canada! Available at your local shopping mart!!!! Great deals (any text) secrets they don't want you to know!!"
I've tried putting a wall along the top, and will probably put one along the bottom. However, recently my machine has also caught the "The ball doesn't go where it used to go" problem.
Yes, wanting to go to Google I/O but don't want to participate in Google's main ID hub... Isn't that a bit like wanting to drive without a license?
I8-D
It does not allow for predictable state changes!? Stupid machine...
Irony is, most people probably already have a G+ account, even if they never signed up for one.
A Google+ account is not the same thing as a Google account. You have to sign up for G+, it's not automatic. For example, Google Apps administrators have to specifically enable Google+ access for their users, after which the users then have to use their Apps account to sign up for G+.
A recursive sig
Can impart wisdom and truth
Call proc signature()
i didin't even get past the fist tutorial puzzle. this is way too dumbass even for a dumbass like me.
so, googies, here is my application:
arbitrarily limited component size: fail.
gui - geekish look : nice
gui - crappy responsiveness : fail
lousy mechanics : fail
embarrassingly idiotic animation : fail.
random behaviour on a logical puzzle: fail (cool for rpgs, though)
too pissed off to continue / evaluation aborted.
well, just the cool looks is not enough, guys.
it wasn't so hard, you should just concentrate in innovating what doesn't work, stick with what does:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incredible_Machine_(series)
i guess my application is now accepted, but i couldn't care less.
I found it pretty fun....
That stupid thing wants me to create a Google+ account in order to let me play.... Also the idiotic music is the worst thing in the Internet since Pioneer's java appleted page in 1999...
-- no sig today
These are embedded devices, they don't have PCI nor all the other nice stuff we have on PCs.
Why not? Shouldn't Google have thought of this and established some standards?
Call me an idiot all you want. I don't see why you can't have a basic set of standards for Android devices to follow that would make porting the OS something other than the 6-month custom-code fest it seems to be now.
The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.