Slashdot Mirror


Google Cools Data Center With Bathroom Water

judgecorp writes "Google is cooling its data center in Douglas County, Georgia, using 'recycled' water that has been through the bathtubs and toilets of the surrounding community. So called 'grey' water is perfectly adequate for the data center's cooling system which relies on evaporation (the wet T-shirt effect), says Google."

230 comments

  1. Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What do they do with the shit and other solid matter like hair plus the corrosive chemicals in urine and other chemicals people flush down the drain?

    1. Re:Shit by ThePromenader · · Score: 4, Funny

      Answer: They filtered to MSql databases.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    2. Re:Shit by fifedrum · · Score: 4, Informative

      grey water does not have toilet water in it, that's called black water, and should be completely different from grey water.

    3. Re:Shit by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

      The summary (and Google) are being misleading here. This is treated sewage that would have been otherwise dumped in the local river - thus it is almost drinkable, and almost certainly cleaner than the river water itself. "Greywater" usually describes untreated sewage from non-toilet sources (showers, sinks, dishwashers, clothes washers).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's what I thought too, but when I asked the plumber to install two separate wastewater systems in my house he looked at me funny and insisted that they would both end up in the same sanitary sewer as he wasn't allowed to connect either to the storm sewer.

      I told him I didn't care, and I don't mind spending the extra money, so now my shower water is separate from my toilet water all the way up until they exit my house.

    5. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 2

      Correct, but the somewhat interesting part is that Google built their own wastewater treatment plant to supply the data center with coolant.

    6. Re:Shit by Wilf_Brim · · Score: 1

      Clothes washers are somewhere between grey and black. Where to place them is a bit of a controversy/dillema in those that think about such things. In most situations they are grey water. However, when diapers and the like are washed there is a much higher concentration of fecal coliform contamination than usual: the water is a very dark shade of grey. Washing diapers has become a bit of an edge case, but it is frequent enough to screw up placing the effluent from a clothes washer into a grey water stream.

    7. Re:Shit by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I've got to ask.

      Why?
      How is there any benefit to doing that?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:Shit by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Actually, they built a wastewater plant to treat the water that already passed through the data center - and I suspect that was a requirement even when they were using tap water... I highly doubt that you can dump any kind of industrial wastewater without "treating" it, even if treating just means putting it in a big open-air tank to let it settle and testing it once in a while.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 1, Troll

      It makes me feel like I've done something for the environment.

    10. Re:Shit by fnj · · Score: 2

      It makes me feel like quite erroneously I've done something for the environment.

      FTFY.

    11. Re:Shit by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      What have you done if both lines are connected to one sewer pipe right outside your house?

      You've actually wasted resources (money) that could be better spent actually doing something for the environment.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Clothes washers are somewhere between grey and black.

      Fun experiment:

      Create a color gradient between "grey" and "black". Then pick a color in between them. What would you call this new color?

      Does the metaphor of "grey water" make more sense now?

    13. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 2

      Other articles have reported that Google built a primary treatment plant to supply the data center as well. For example: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/03/google-flushes-heat-from-data-center-with-toilet-water.ars

    14. Re:Shit by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      Wait, let me get this straight. By adding a completely separate, unnecessary and redundant wastewater system in your home that dumps into the same sewer pipe anyway, you are helping the environment? You realized you caused more resources to be consumed, more labor hours, the plumber probably had to drive his 8-cylinder work truck around town to get more parts, etc. etc. But somehow that helps the environment?

      I'm the farthest thing from an environmentalist you can find, and even I find what you did to be wasteful and unnecessary. If you want to do something to help the environment, just plant a tree, man.

    15. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 0

      Apparently you're not into environmentally friendly lifestyles.
      I consider that a character flaw.

    16. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Well I couldn't afford to install separate systems for everyone in my neighborhood, so I just did what I could.
      Everyone's got to do their own part.

    17. Re:Shit by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      So, your answer is that you've done nothing and want to lash out at others?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    18. Re:Shit by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      Either my usually finely-tuned sarcasm detector is broken this morning or you're trolling me.

      Please explain how installing a completely separate system for gray and black water, that all ends up in the same city sewer, did absolutely anything to help the environment? Are you doing something useful with the gray water, like Google, or did you just want to use a bunch of extra resources (thereby increasing your carbon footprint, if you believe in all that) so you could say you did something to help the environment and hope no one asked any questions?

      I need to find a way to cash in on all this enviroguilt so I can stop actually working for a living...just wow.

    19. Re:Shit by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      Ahh, I see.

      A troll AND crazy.

      Good to know.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    20. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 2

      I might have increased my carbon footprint a little bit by doing that, but I offset it by using a gas grill instead of charcoal, so i'm carbon neutral.

    21. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might have increased my carbon footprint a little bit by doing that, but I offset it by using a gas grill instead of charcoal, so i'm carbon neutral.

      Ah, right. Everyone knows the typical (propane/NG) gases are regenerated soooo much faster than wood... or was it the other way round...

    22. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well now i've done something for the slashdot environment and modded you the correct way. hooray

    23. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Man, it's like shooting fish in a barrel today.

    24. Re:Shit by busyqth · · Score: 1

      It comes with the territory.

    25. Re:Shit by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      At least you have planned for it environmentally friendly operation.

      You can also use a source-separating toilet separating the urine and the fecal matter. The urine is rich in nutrients for plant life.

      But one other thing is that the water from kitchen and shower usually has a decent temperature so you can add a heat exchanger and heat pump to benefit from it too.

      There is a lot of stuff you can do before the waste water is really not useful anymore.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    26. Re:Shit by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      it's not supposed to end up in the same sewer. in a dual system, black water goes to sewer and gray water is used to water plants, soak foundation if you have soil/settling issues, etc. The only reason to install separate systems is to reuse the gray water. Regulations on what you can and can't do with the water, how much you can store and any required devices like backflow prevention should be in local building codes.

      So, in answer to your question. Installing a completely separate system would cut down on water waste and be environmentally helpful. If your plumber doesn't understand what you're going for with dual systems, you should get another plumber.

    27. Re:Shit by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      After the plumber and building inspector leave, you can reroute the greywater to irrigate you lawn, vegetable garden or whatever. Just be sure to use eco-friendly soaps, etc.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    28. Re:Shit by Monoman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Greywater is wastewater generated from domestic activities such as laundry, dishwashing, and bathing, which can be recycled on-site for uses such as landscape irrigation and constructed wetlands. Greywater differs from water from the toilets which is designated sewage or blackwater to indicate it contains human waste.Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greywater

      Reclaimed water or recycled water, is former wastewater (sewage) that is treated to remove solids and certain impurities, and used in sustainable landscaping irrigation or to recharge groundwater aquifers. The purpose of these processes is sustainability and water conservation, rather than discharging the treated water to surface waters such as rivers and oceans. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reclaimed_water

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    29. Re:Shit by FreedomOfThought · · Score: 1

      This has got to be the best set of comments I have read in a very long time... On ANY website. Well played, sir! Well played. (or ma'am?)

    30. Re:Shit by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      The shower water could have been redirected to flush the toilets (which is a common use for grey water), and he may be exceedingly poor at communicating this fact. Alternatively, he may be a complete moron.

    31. Re:Shit by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      As long as it's recycled lead bullets, you're good to go!

    32. Re:Shit by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I'd still like to thank you for the entertainment you provided for the rest of us today. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    33. Re:Shit by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Considering he used the word 'separate', I'm going to go with the second option.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    34. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like you just got done watching a month's worth of The Colbert Report for the first time and either A) failed to understand how his brand of humor works or B) you don't have a sense of humor in the first place but are bitter about some citywide environment regulation you blame on them durn lib'rullz and teh gummervents (OHNOES!).

    35. Re:Shit by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      And don't puke in any sink, tub or shower.

      And don't have kids that might shit in the tub.

      And don't use a garbage disposal for anything other than food.

      And don't wash out paint brushes in the sink.

      etc, etc, etc.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    36. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One good use for gray water I can think of is to flush toilets with it, thus utilizing it twice before letting it go, but it would probably require additional water pump and energy.

      But before that, another not so obvious use would be for washing machines (except for rinsing, rinsing cycle definitely requires clean water). In fact, with rudimentary solids and colloids separation, gray water could probably be reused many times for that. As a bonus, it would cut down detergents usage.

    37. Re:Shit by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it does. So they have one for inflow and one for outflow. Seems expensive, but like I said, these probably aren't much more than a big pool and some monitoring devices. Depending on the quality of the effluent from the municipal plant, they may or may not need to run the water through a sand filter since I'd bet the little chunks of algae and bacteria would mess with their cooling system.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    38. Re:Shit by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Diapers is one area where I'm firmly on the side of the polluters and not the environmentalists :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    39. Re:Shit by shaitand · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO. For every reply you get an angel loses its wings.

    40. Re:Shit by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Grey water is going to be high in soap and detergent so doesn't it slowly alter the PH of the soil, resulting in nutrient lockout and killing some of your plants slowly?

    41. Re:Shit by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      FWIW, *I* had it figured out with the first description of stereo drain systems. :-)

      Next you can have the drains circle the house before heading to the mains. Surround sound. Get it? Ha!

    42. Re:Shit by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      I once had some folks on an environmental site convinced I insulated my house with specially treated meat.

    43. Re:Shit by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "You can also use a source-separating toilet [holon.se] separating the urine and the fecal matter. The urine is rich in nutrients for plant life."

      That might help offset the PH imbalance caused by the high soap content in shower water. Maybe when mixed with the shower water the concentration is dilute but generally speaking urine is very concentrated nitrogen fertilizer and doesn't contain the balanced nutrient profile that is required for a plant to support the rapid vegetative growth that will be caused by the nitrogen.

    44. Re:Shit by garrettg84 · · Score: 2

      I agree, it is usually the FEELING that matters when it comes to these sort of things. This is the same reason people still buy Prii (plural of prius http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/21/toyota-decrees-the-plural-of-prius-is-prii-your-latin-teach/).

      --
      -g
    45. Re:Shit by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      i do my part by driving a 52 gallon tank suv/monster truck everywhere i go. i figure if i help use up all the oil resources in the world, they, you know the powers that be, will be forced to think up eco-friendly solutions quicker. right? supply and demand.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    46. Re:Shit by cekander · · Score: 1

      Haha, yea, I knew something was up with that summary.

      "Mmmm, a wet t-shirt evaporating toilet and bathtub waste. The perfect solution! Is anyone else excited?"

    47. Re:Shit by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Agreed on all counts. I have not personally done this, but I have several friends who have. They all have several things in common. They live in rural areas where they are on well and/or spring water supply and septic tank system for sewage. When you live with this kind of water and sewer system, which I have, you are already pretty careful of what and how much goes down the drain. For example, very few people with a septic tank use a garbage disposal at all; you compost. Most people who use greywater for irrigation are also selective about which greywater gets routed around the septic tank. High volume flows like shower, bathtub, washing machine are ideal. Kitchen sink goes to blackwater, because of cooking oils and grease. My friends who have done this are all pretty committed to taking good care of themselves and their property.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    48. Re:Shit by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      It's OK. I'll be the first to admit you got me. I usually don't fall that hard, but I guess a stressful workday combined with 3 hours of sleep threw my troll-o-meter all out of whack. Well played.

    49. Re:Shit by Xphile101361 · · Score: 1

      Fun experiment:

      Create a color gradient between "grey" and "black". Then pick a color in between them. What would you call this new color?

      Dark Grey.

    50. Re:Shit by yodleboy · · Score: 2

      It depends on the plant. I don't have one of these systems, although I had a neighbor with one. He didn't seem to have issues. Here's an article that talks about gray water and plants: How does detergent in gray water affect landscape plants? While i was looking for that on I also found another that goes into local water codes in DFW area that pertain: City rules on gray water around Dallas-Fort Worth Obviously, YMMV, but gives an idea of some of the regulations.

      I can't really see retrofitting something like this being very cost effective unless you garden in Arizona.

    51. Re:Shit by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Definitely not cost effective at the residential level but it should be more cost effective in a large installation like Google's. But this isn't a cost saving measure at the residential level its a green feature.

      It's actually a hell of a lot more important a green feature than any carbon reduction. In the US we've invested heavily in the water supply but the fresh water supply is rapidly depleting.

    52. Re:Shit by mcavic · · Score: 1

      One good use for gray water I can think of is to flush toilets with it

      A good idea, but you'd still have to filter it, and use electricity to pump it into the toilet.

      By contrast, I pay for my water, I pay for my sewer access, and I trust that my waste water is handled as efficiently as possible.

    53. Re:Shit by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Grey Water is storm runoff potentially contaminated with runoff from roadways including oil. The stuff from your sinks, showers etc is black water because it can ALL contain human pathogens and waste products. (don't tell me you don't know someone that pisses in the shower).

    54. Re:Shit by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      No man, You have your shower on third floor, tank on second, toilets on first floor. Let gravity do it.

      Note: I actually did use a system like this. It was quite terrible to clean the grey water tanks. Right up there with cleaning greese traps and septic.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    55. Re:Shit by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      If you ever see a toilet back up and start filling a tub you would wish the two were connected down at the difficult to stop up main sewer connection... Often the two fixtures are connected to the same 3" line within a few feet of each other so if the 3" line gets stopped up the tub starts to fill as it is lower than the bowl of the toilet.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    56. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole article is a diversion so you don't pay attention to all the other creepy shit that Google is doing. But they don't fool anyone, not anymore.

      --
      mchurch

    57. Re:Shit by dwywit · · Score: 1

      In my own experience, washable cotton nappies (diapers) spend a considerable amount of time in the soak bucket after having most of the poop scraped off into the toilet. If you also use a disposable paper nappy liner, there's very little poop left on the cotton nappy - semi-liquid "events" notwithstanding. Anyway, spending 12-24 hours soaking in a very high pH takes care of much of the faecal coliform problem. I live in a rural area with no connection to the sewarage system, so all my effluent is disposed onsite. The blackwater (toilet + kitchen sink) goes to the septic tank and the effluent from that goes to trenches on a gentle eastern downslope. Shower/bath outflows to an open tank and then trickles out to the fruit trees on the northern slope. All other greywater flows southward directly downslope through our "rainforest" plot - and very happy it is, too.
       
      I understand the major risk with greywater is keeping it for more than ~24 hours. In that time, all the dissolved oxygen is consumed by aerobic activity, then the stinky anaerobics get their turn.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    58. Re:Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like an environmentalist hippie had mod points.

    59. Re:Shit by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You need to head over and edit Wikipedia:

      Greywater is wastewater generated from domestic activities such as laundry, dishwashing, and bathing, which can be recycled on-site for uses such as landscape irrigation and constructed wetlands. Greywater differs from water from the toilets which is designated sewage or blackwater to indicate it contains human waste.

      Pee is usually sterile, and while I - ahem - know people who pee in the shower, I do not know anyone who drops a deuce in the shower. My understanding is that the only "grey" area is in clothes washing, since it could potentially contain cloth diapers.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    60. Re:Shit by DemonGenius · · Score: 1

      Most modern sewage systems have separate drainage lines for grey and brown water. Brown water usually shares the same drainage lines as the street with grey water being separate so that your sinks and tub don't get backed up in heavy rainfall. Older infrastructure usually drains brown, grey and street water all on the same line. When the streets flood in this case, the results aren't pretty, nor are they sanitary.

    61. Re:Shit by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather not waste my time editing Wikipedia. I frankly trust my Waste Water design text books and the education I received on what the various definitions in water treatment are. Grey water is organically or chemically contaminated water, it also applies to treated sewage water that doesn't include a tertiary process as well.

      In simple terms Black water is anything that can contain human pathogens, you shed them when you shower, use the sink, and they contaminate your clothes (washer) etc. Black water is basically anything in a Sanitary sewer (or in other words the sewer output from your home). Grey water is output from a typical storm sewer, ie. roadway runoff, industrial site runoff, agricultural runoff etc. It contains chemical or organic contamination that will need to be removed to tolerable levels before it's fit for human consumption. Black water contains both organic/chemical contamination and human pathogens. The typical sewer treatment plant will remove 99% of the organic contamination (referred to as BOD or biological oxygen demand) and all of the pathogens (typically a biologic digestion process where bacteria are used to consume the organics and out-compete the pathogens along with a final sterilization before discharge to eliminate any possibility of discharging human pathogens into water sources).

      I'm not surprised that Wiki is wrong, in fact it could be right in some context I'm not familiar with. My context in from the civil engineering perspective and is the language used in the design and operation of treatment plants and environmental law.

    62. Re:Shit by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      it also applies to treated sewage water that doesn't include a tertiary process as well.

      Well, TFA certainly uses the term to describe effluent, so I don't doubt your education :)

      But the term "greywater" clearly has other uses - you've already used it to describe effluent and storm run-off... it seems appropriate to use for anything between blackwater and drinking water.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. water from a toilet... by bman08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    does not have the electrolytes data centers crave.

    1. Re:water from a toilet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are these electrolytes? Do you even know?

    2. Re:water from a toilet... by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're... what data centers crave!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:water from a toilet... by pinfall · · Score: 5, Funny

      This week's Google Doodoo was submitted by Charles Breckinridge on Lorimer Street. Notice the raspberry seeds!

    4. Re:water from a toilet... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Most watercooled systems dislike an overdose of electrolytes. Try running salt water through an RVS pipe...

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    5. Re:water from a toilet... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      does not have the electrolytes data centers crave.

      But it does earn them the coveted LEED Brown status.

    6. Re:water from a toilet... by willaien · · Score: 2

      You missed the Idiocracy reference. For background, the idiots of the future were trying to grow plants with Brawndo (an in-universe ripoff of Gatorade/other sports drinks), because it has replaced water in people's diets, and they can't think of using water for anything but flushing a toilet.

      Plants didn't take to it much better than your pipes would.

    7. Re:water from a toilet... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Yes, I missed that. That film sounds like a laugh.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  3. The wet t-shirt effect? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Funny

    I...I am not even sure what say to that...

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Just google it, if ya' know what I mean.

    2. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will pray for rain.

    3. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      I...I am not even sure what say to that...

      Strange but true: If you use water blocks to cool a server, the cdrom eject button pokes out an extra 1/4 inch due to the cooling effect. Of course I haven't seen a new rackmount box with an internal cdrom in some years, so I guess this only applies to racks that are sagging with age (ugh)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by BlueTrin · · Score: 2

      It is the cooling effect you feel when wind is blowing on you and you wear a wet T-shirt.

      Part of it is caused by the evaporation of water.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    5. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the juxtaposition of "water that has been through the bathrooms and toilets" and "wet T-shirt" that gives me a mental image I didn't need.

      And yes, I'm sure there's a rule 34 for that too, and I do not want to know.

    6. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Especially when I thought the wet t-shirt effect was referring to transparency and not evaporative cooling.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by yourpusher · · Score: 5, Funny

      I...I am not even sure what say to that...

      "Show us your bits!"

    8. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by zelvek · · Score: 1

      Bits or GTFO!

    9. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Heinrick.

    10. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by JamesP · · Score: 2

      Well it's quite simple

      1 - dress a wet t-shirt
      2 - go outside (preferably if you live in NYC on the month of January)
      3 - tah dah!

      Now, seriously, this effect can be more easily felt for example if you drop ethanol (pure or moderately diluted - most spirits will do) in your hand, and you feel it cool.

      Volatile substances (water is volatile but not as much as other substances) cool the substances they are in contact with when they evaporate (so what's cooled is usually the amount of liquid that hasn't evaporated yet and its substrate)

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    11. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I...I am not even sure what say to that...

      Short answer: some Google employee was caught going to a strip club on his 20% time and had to get real creative real fast.

    12. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      For a second there I thought you were being serious, then I read the second sentence and got the joke.

    13. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 4, Funny

      2 girls 1 datacentre?

    14. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by rvw · · Score: 1

      I...I am not even sure what say to that...

      "Show us your bits!"

      What if it's a genuine 19" rack?

    15. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by maiki · · Score: 1

      I...I am not even sure what say to that...

      It's quite obvious... Google should go all the way and put wet t-shirts around their servers.

    16. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by martas · · Score: 1

      I'm imagining it... Oh sweet Jesus, I'm imagining it!

    17. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I did as you asked and the first hit is below. I can definitely see how that can cool a datacenter.

      http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2007/virgin-money-romp-in-the-garden/

    18. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      By volatile substances I assume you mean all substances. A phase change from liquid to a gas requires heat energy (taken from anything close by and therefore cooling it) and a change from gas to liquid releases energy (warming anything near by).

      The same concept is used in your typical AC system but the difference is that Google trades coolant efficiency for thermal efficiency. Essentially they throw away the water where your AC system changes it back to liquid and heat syncs that to an air cooled system, both the additional phase change and heat sync/air cool system cause additional losses in thermal efficiency.

    19. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are redshirts, and then there are yellowshirts...

    20. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is probably NSFW...

    21. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by JazzXP · · Score: 1

      This really needs to be modded to +6 Funny!

    22. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wet t-shirt effect can cause excessive heating - the opposite of what you describe here - in most males when the wet t-shirt is worn by attractive, buxom females. Ethanol applied internally to the males can multiply the excessive heating effect.

    23. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      2 girls 1 datacentre?

      2 girls 1 cpu surely?

    24. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      It's a shame I got modded up and you didn't, your's was better than mine.

    25. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by laurelraven · · Score: 1

      There are redshirts, and then there are yellowshirts...

      I think the problem here is the brownshirts.

      --
      RTFA is Known to the State of California to cause cancer.
    26. Re:The wet t-shirt effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wet t-shirt definitely does not cool me down.

  4. The water temperature at the Google centre would.. by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    ...be ~higher~ if I was there, expecially after the two-bottle-of-vodka bender that would precede my visit...

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  5. not a good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pipes that carry the water to the systems that need cooling could get shit-clogged! woah!

    1. Re:not a good idea! by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      The pipes that carry water to the systems would likely not exist.

      Rather, like most cooling systems, the water is likely used to cool a heat exchanger, which in turn cools air that's blown into the server rooms. If a pipe gets clogged (which is unlikely, since the pipes have little reason to be as small as household ones), that heat exchanger just won't be as cold for a while.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:not a good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? We all knew IT support was a shitty job anyway.

      Google will send in one of their PHDs if the pipes get clogged.

      http://www.google.com/onceuponatime/tisp/install.html

    3. Re:not a good idea! by Igarden2 · · Score: 1

      From TFA:
      "With the evaporative cooling method employed in the data centre, cold water is brought into the facility, where it’s used to cool the hot air from the servers. Some of it evaporates into the air via cooling towers, while the rest remains as a liquid."
      There, I've spoiled the fun. Sue me.

      --
      Normally I ascribe all life to intelligent design, but in your case I'll make an exception.
    4. Re:not a good idea! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Wow, a reporter doesn't understand a concept as well as a SME, shocking.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  6. Well, that explains crappy search results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    (rimshot)

    1. Re:Well, that explains crappy search results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flush twice its a long way to tech.slashdot.org

    2. Re:Well, that explains crappy search results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (rimshot)

      And all the shit I see on the internet!

      *Ba dum*

      Thank you! Thank you!

      We're AC & AC! We'll be in DC next week! Tell your friends!

    3. Re:Well, that explains crappy search results. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's like a series of tubes that someone took a dump in.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. Wet T-shirt effect by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently evaporation is the tendency for young women on spring break to get drunk and engage in civil disobedience of public indecency laws. Somehow, this is related to cooling.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    1. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I like that you phrased the aforementioned behavior as 'civil disobedience.' I'm going to have to remember that one.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by Walterk · · Score: 1

      It has a chilling effect on the nation's moral fibre.

    3. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by alex67500 · · Score: 2

      Apparently evaporation is the tendency for young women on spring break to get drunk and engage in civil disobedience of public indecency laws. Somehow, this is related to cooling.

      Hence the saying "all the cool kids do it".

    4. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by Rich_Lather · · Score: 2

      G( ^ Y ^ )gle!

    5. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by cffrost · · Score: 1

      I like that you phrased the aforementioned behavior as 'civil disobedience.' I'm going to have to remember that one.

      Same here. It really is the best and most logical description. Since it's legal for males to be topless in public; having a law prohibiting female toplessness is discriminatory and misogynistic. I would think most males would get behind this idea; it's puzzling to me how these Puritanical laws stay on the books. On the other hand, we still have people unable/unwilling to say "porn," and hide behind the pseudo-1337 (and as I hypothesize), Puritanical construct, "pr0n."

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    6. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nipples. I'll let that sink in.

    7. Re:Wet T-shirt effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently evaporation is the tendency for young women on spring break to get drunk and engage in civil disobedience of public indecency laws. Somehow, this is related to cooling.

      Yeah, it's COOL.

      Duh.

  8. Love the smell by Depsidee · · Score: 1

    "I love the smell of vaporized toilet water in the morning". I just hope they find a way to clean the tubes as well.

  9. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If I lived in Douglas County, I'd be spending a weekend researching on what chemicals to flush to destroy this system.

    1. Re:Good. by afidel · · Score: 2

      Um, why? Why would you want to intentionally contaminate a water source? Besides being all kinds of illegal (federal crime under the clean water act for starters, if not seen as terrorism for messing with a water treatment plant), it's also highly unethical. Google is trying to be a good environmental citizen by making use of grey water instead of requiring fully treated water which requires significantly more energy and chemical usage, what possible reason could you have for trying to dissuade this behavior?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then you're a cunt

    3. Re:Good. by retchdog · · Score: 1

      an interesting claim from someone who advocates using the ammo box "starting now" to defend liberty. maybe he already ranted about; voted against; and sued google, and is just taking the next step in protesting google's data retention policies?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  10. Um, we have an issue by rullywowr · · Score: 1

    Herb: Damn Jim, the server room evaporator is leaking again Jim: I just called roto rooter, they should be here in an hour Herb: I guess we can just mop this piss up

  11. Bathroom Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's a pretty crappy way of cooling a datacenter.

    (I'm sorry. I had to.)

  12. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What a shitty system.

  13. Graywater vs. Blackwater by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Graywater" is water that does not contain human waste, but has been used for other purposes and isn't fit for drinking.

    "Blackwater" is sewage water containing human waste (and easily confused with the mercenary business formerly owned by Erik Prince).

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Graywater vs. Blackwater by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      "Blackwater" is sewage water containing human waste (and easily confused with the mercenary business formerly owned by Erik Prince).

      And both are named after an old Doobie Brothers song.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Graywater vs. Blackwater by jbengt · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Graywater" is water that does not contain human waste, but has been used for other purposes and isn't fit for drinking.
      "Blackwater" is sewage water containing human waste (and easily confused with the mercenary business formerly owned by Erik Prince).

      Exactly.

      Of course, if you read TPWFA (The Poorly Worded Fine Article), you'll find that they are using neither grey water nor black water, they're using treated effluent from the local sewage treatment plant, which should largely be free of solids and possibly decontaminated (in Chicago, anyway, there's a controversy brewing because the treated water dumped into the river is full of nasty bacteria). They will have to treat it further - even clean, potable water needs to be treated when using it in a cooling system in order to prevent fouling of the equipment and possible microbiological growth. Then, as the article says, it gets treated again before it is dumped into the river, since the water accumulates dissolved minerals and other solids and because the treatment chemicals added may themselves be bad for the environment.

    3. Re:Graywater vs. Blackwater by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Informative

      Greywater only contains a little poo, hair, and used toothpaste. See also: Humanure

    4. Re:Graywater vs. Blackwater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid that if it's gone through my shower, it may have a little human waste in it.

  14. Hooray for common sense. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Engineers have been considering approaches like this for ages. It's good to see it being put into practice.

    As best I can tell, one of the biggest hurdles is local waste-handling laws. When we had a local drought a few years ago, we were saving wash water to put on our outdoor plants -- but that was a violation of local policy, because cooties from your dirty clothes might get into The Environment, contaminating all the bird and squirrel and cat and dog waste that's already there.

    I'm sure Google's treatment policies have satisfied the local authorities, and if they're proceeding with the project, I'm sure they've found a way that's cost-effective.

    1. Re:Hooray for common sense. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is a form for everything. In some states in the US, it's illegal for you to collect and use rainwater for anything. States grant exclusive right to water catchment to various water companies, so for anyone else to capture that water before it reaches the reservoir is effectively stealing.

    2. Re:Hooray for common sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While it may sound ridiculous, it becomes less ridiculous once you remember that many states are almost all desert, and thus water collection and usage really does need a management system that wouldn't be the case elsewhere.

    3. Re:Hooray for common sense. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Engineers have been considering approaches like this for ages. It's good to see it being put into practice.

      Except it's being done sorta backwards here. I used to work at a hospital that took street water (about 45 degrees, IIRC) and ran it through the data center, then sent it out to the hospital to use for tap water at about 48 degrees. After all, it's just a long pipe as far as the water is concerned.

      A city water supply would be a tremendous heat sink. If we assume that a fair amount of it is going to be heated anway, it's a net energy savings for the community too.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Hooray for common sense. by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      I fail to see anything innovative about this. The Palo Verde Nuclear power plant uses reclaimed water for cooling as there's no nearby river of the correct size.

      From Wikipedia:

      Located in the Arizona desert, Palo Verde is the only nuclear generating facility in the world that is not situated adjacent to a large body of above-ground water. The facility evaporates water from the treated sewage of several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling needs

  15. Faced with all the stupid comments above by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Informative
    Haven't you ever heard of filters, guys? I mean big cloth or paper things that get stretched on big frames and then the water gets pumped through them and all the muck gets extracted, not the sort of filters that IT people know about. Have you ever stopped to think about the amount of mud in a water reservoir after the wind and rain have whipped it up a bit? Doesn't get in your drinking water, does it?

    I am afraid that my opinion of the IQ of the average /. reader just dropped an infinitesimal amount.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Faced with all the stupid comments above by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      " water gets pumped through them and all the muck gets extracted, not the sort of filters that IT people know about. "

      No that's pretty close to how firewalls work.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Faced with all the stupid comments above by Sique · · Score: 2

      But normally you don't use the sieve type of filters. Sieves tend to get clogged very easily. Normally you use a three-chamber-system. The first two chambers are connected near the bottom, the third one connects to the second chamber via a spillover. Untreated water enters the first chamber, and all swimming particles stay there. Heavier particles sink to the bottom. The water enters the second chamber via the connection and is mainly clean of any swimming particles, while still containing some heavier solid material. The water entering the third chamber via the spillover is mostly free of any particulate matter, because all the remaining particles stay in the second chamber. The third chamber then gets emptied via an outflow at the bottom.

      This water can still contain micro particles which neither drift to the surface nor sink down to the bottom. Thus the water can be treated via an micro filter, e.g. a bassin with reed it enters at one site and an outflow at the other. Except for the substances soluted in the water, the water is clean and can be used for most applications.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:Faced with all the stupid comments above by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Have you ever stopped to think about the amount of mud in a water reservoir after the wind and rain have whipped it up a bit? Doesn't get in your drinking water, does it?

      An almost miniscule portion of said mud does so - because the designers of such reservoirs aren't stupid and place the intakes well away from the shores/edges and inflows, where 99.9999% of such debris is. Not to mention you vastly overestimate the amount of mud and debris "whipped up" in the first place.
       

      I am afraid that my opinion of the IQ of the average /. reader just dropped an infinitesimal amount.

      My estimation of you dropped by quite a bit more than an infinitesimal amount - because you made a stupid and groundless assumption and the proceeded to treat said assumption as if it were a fact.

  16. Why should data pipes be the only ones full o shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data centers are already full of shit, this is just a little more

  17. Star Trek by maroberts · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kirk: The cooling system to the warp drive is down again Scotty. How soon can you fix it?
    Scotty: Ach Jim, I'm a warp drive engineer, not a plumber....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  18. Black vs Grey vs Treated by zenyu · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm no potty expert, but I thought that water that is output from a toilet is called black water, water collected from the bathtub, and kitchen are called grey water, and what they are actually using is called treated water.

    Am I just behind the times on the terminology or is the article's writer just being sloppy?

    1. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're toilet water is black after you use it, you might want to consult a doctor. bleeding from the bum is a pain in the ass

    2. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by oddjob1244 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mod parent up. This is correct, the article/summary uses bad terminology.

    3. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Informative

      The writer is being sloppy (or confused).

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by vlm · · Score: 1

      After sufficient "fermentation" or whatever it normally turns black. Look at milorganite, or garden manure. Or ask to help a RV owner or serious boater empty the blackwater tank.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by txmcse · · Score: 2

      You are correct. the writer was just being sloppy.

    6. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by EmagGeek · · Score: 2

      Correct. They are using treated water, which is neither Black nor Grey water.

    7. Re:Black vs Grey vs Treated by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      I'm no potty expert, but I thought that water that is output from a toilet is called black water, water collected from the bathtub, and kitchen are called grey water, and what they are actually using is called treated water.

      Right. And the connection coming from the toilet is. . . . . . . . . . the potty line.

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  19. All together now.. by RenHoek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pooping in the sink,
    pooping in the sink,
    I'm clogging up their coolers
    'cause I'm pooping in the sink!

    1. Re:All together now.. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but garbage disposals have to have their own share of nasty chunks and bacteria.

    2. Re:All together now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a sink pooper, I'm offended you think of it as a joke.

    3. Re:All together now.. by cffrost · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but garbage disposals have to have their own share of nasty chunks and bacteria.

      Especially Kramer's.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  20. came here to say this! by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Informative

    Shower, bathroom sink, maybe clothes washer - not toilet.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:came here to say this! by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      It's Black Water if it potentially contains pathogens. Showers, sinks and even the clothes washer can contain pathogens from human waste.

    2. Re:came here to say this! by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Then there is no gray water.

      Everything that's been through "the consumer air gap" has that potential. It has that potential even if it hasn't, but that's just experience seeing brown water come out of the tap well inside Houston.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    3. Re:came here to say this! by laurelraven · · Score: 1

      Brown water from tap is probably from rust, I would think. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though.

      --
      RTFA is Known to the State of California to cause cancer.
  21. IF they have that much grey water.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    They need to stop the free soda and lemonade bar.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  22. Party time by halfkoreanamerican · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Google has just won first place in a wet t-shirt contest" was all I read. I don't think that was even written anywhere.

    1. Re:Party time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention it was really cool.

    2. Re:Party time by aliquis · · Score: 1

      That's what the Os represent.

      bOOble!

    3. Re:Party time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you didn't notice the new PG-13 Google logo then?

  23. Toilets != grey water by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Informative

    What comes from toilets is 'black water', but 'grey water'. Grey comes from showers, washing machines, etc. It's specifically that which has been used, but has a low risk of pathogens in it.

    From the article, it sounds like they're using a blend of the two ... but they never linked to the March 15th Jim Brown blog post. From reading his blog, he states, "We worked with the WSA to build a side-stream plant about five miles west of our data center that diverts up to 30 percent of the water that would have gone back into the river", while the article linked to states "about 30 percent of the water is diverted from the WSA system".

    The article makes it sound like they're getting the water *before* it would have been cleaned by the water treatment plant ... from the blog post, I'd say it's after it's been treated, and getting it before it would have been sent back to the river. So it's treated wastewater, which would've already gone through some sort of system to remove pathogens.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Toilets != grey water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What comes from toilets is 'black water'

      "Brown water" in Europe.

    2. Re:Toilets != grey water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brown water" in Europe.

      "African-American water" in America.

    3. Re:Toilets != grey water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damned Europeans and their food.

    4. Re:Toilets != grey water by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      So it's treated wastewater, which would've already gone through some sort of system to remove pathogens.

      There's a park I've been to a few times and it has a beach.
      The park also has a water treatment plant in its midst that discharges into the waters of the beach area.

      I got to talking with one of the park rangers and he told me he wouldn't let his dog swim in that water.
      "Treated" doesn't necessarily mean what we think it means. It isn't sterile and you shouldn't let it get into any mucous membranes or open wounds.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Toilets != grey water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. So wifey is right and I really am not supposed to pee in the shower?

    6. Re:Toilets != grey water by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      Most water treatment plants discharge a higher quality of water than the rivers they inject into, but you're right, it's not sterile, and it hasn't been treated with ozone, chlorine or reverse osmosis. They may removed pathogens, but that means it's reduced, not that they're all necessarily gone. It's also impossible to test for every last pathogen (as we'd have to know what they all are, and have tests for them, and be able to do it in a fast enough time for it to be useful).

      That all being said, there's a movement to make sewage treatment and drinking water treatment a closed loop -- discharge the treated water above the intake for the drinking water, so that in times of drought, you still have water that can be cleaned to use.

      There's also two kinds of treatment plants -- sanitary sewers have a nearly constant discharge rate (it may fluctuate, but not dramatically), while ones like Blue Plains that serves Washington, DC is comined sanitary + storm -- so at times of high rain, the discharge is so much that they have to send some of it straight into the river without treatment ... those are the ones that you *really* don't want to go swimming near.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  24. Network congestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTTP error 666: Turd overload

    1. Re:Network congestion... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I think that's error 002.

  25. "Gray" vs "Black" water by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

    Usually "gray" water is water from showers, sinks, etc. -- everything but toilets. Water from toilets, including human wastes, is called "black" water. Some systems keep these separate, although most municipal systems (including, it appears, Douglas County, Georgia) mix them together. So this water starts out as "black", but according to TFA, it's partially cleaned up before being sent to the data center. Apparently it's treated enough to be called "gray", but still isn't potable. Then Google finishes the water treatment and releases the result into the river which is where it would have gone after the county treatment center anyway.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:"Gray" vs "Black" water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in Douglas county for a while. Yes all your shit and bath water leaves in the same pipe. There is no "gray" or "Black" water as described just used shitty water.

  26. Firewalls by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My experience of firewalls and water treatment is this: that water treatment is designed and operated by some extremely professional people who know exactly what they are doing, and that this is not often the case for firewalls. Given how some firewalls are configured, the water treatment analogy would be to stop most things and restrict the flow of the water, while letting the really nasty bugs through.

    OT but possibly of interest: the daughter of a friend of ours studied environmental biology at university. Her mother wondered what use it could possibly be. As a researcher into water treatment, she is now into her second paid postgraduate placement with the prospect of a very well paid international job at the end of it. Oil may be sexier, but water is actually the more important resource.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Firewalls by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      "My experience of firewalls and water treatment is this: that water treatment is designed and operated by some extremely professional people who know exactly what they are doing, and that this is not often the case for firewalls. "

      I used to work in the world of Water Treatment. No, they are not "extremely professional people who know exactly what they are doing" I was one of those guys for over 7 years. Many times we just would crank in more Chlorine or Alum to see if it worked.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Firewalls by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My experience of firewalls and water treatment is this:

      Mine is that the water puts the fire out.

      water treatment is designed and operated by some extremely professional people

      But it only takes one extremely incompetent one to bugger it all up.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Firewalls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My experience of firewalls and water treatment is this: that water treatment is designed and operated by some extremely professional people who know exactly what they are doing, and that this is not often the case for firewalls.

      You are talking about chemists and biologists. Please, try to stay serious.

  27. Yuck, swamp coolers in Georgia by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Given the high humidity of the South East I would think they could be better served with high efficiency air conditioners and some sort of solar to help offset the costs.

    1. Re:Yuck, swamp coolers in Georgia by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Though TFA did not really say, they would not typically be directly cooling the data center with water cooled by evaporation. They would be rejecting heat from their refrigeration equipment (probably water chillers, possibly other types) and using the refrigeration systems to cool the air. The advantage of a water-cooled AC equipment is that the cooling tower water is typically heated up by the refrigeration equipment from 85F to 95F and then cooled back down by evaporation. Whereas air-cooled refrigeration equipment typically has to work against air temperatures of 95F to 115F, creating a less efficient cycle.

  28. sounds like a really crappy idea by goffster · · Score: 2

    Garbage in, Garbage out?

    1. Re:sounds like a really crappy idea by allo · · Score: 1

      you mean: Crap in, Crap out.

    2. Re:sounds like a really crappy idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean: Crap in, Crap out.

      Hmmm ... CICO ... is that pronounced "psycho"?

  29. Re:I Pee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I cool my servers with the frost piss

  30. Overheat by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Let me guess.

    The servers are all going to overheat on Seis de Mayo. All the spicy food the day before will be warming up the cooling water.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  31. It's fine... by Certhas · · Score: 4, Funny

    until the shit hits the fan...

    1. Re:It's fine... by tirerim · · Score: 1

      No, no, you're thinking of air cooling. With water cooling, shit hitting the fan is not the problem: it's shit hitting the pump.

  32. It's not greywater. Read the danged article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're not using greywater. Greywater is untreated non-human-waste water, like from sinks and showers. Google is using the water which has already been treated by the waste water treatment plant and would otherwise be delivered back to a river. It's not pure enough to drink, but it isn't bathwater. It's purity is somewhere in between tap water and river water, with almost zero "floaties".

    But yay poop jokes. Who knew /. had so many 4th graders?

  33. Re:I Pee... by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Core dumped... All my data went down the tubes...

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  34. TiSP is almost a reality! by BetaDays · · Score: 1

    It's almost a reality?

    http://www.google.com/onceuponatime/tisp/install.html

    --
    Paul: Father... father, the sleeper has awakened! - Dune
  35. Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by thesandbender · · Score: 4, Informative

    My g/f's from Japan and when we went to visit recently I noticed a lot of homes had toilets with a sink built into the top of the toilet tank. When you flushed, the water to fill the tank came out a faucet and you could wash your hands with it. Not only recycles but saves room in a 1/2 bath... a simple little thing we should see more of here in the states. As an example...

    1. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That is a great idea. I don't live somewhere with a water scarcity problem (I don't even have a water-saving washing machine), but that is a good idea.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Water doesn't need to be saved unless you're breaking apart the atoms.

    3. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by swillden · · Score: 1

      Water doesn't need to be saved unless you're breaking apart the atoms.

      Clean water, however, is a scarce resource in many places in the world.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Water doesn't need to be saved unless you're breaking apart the atoms.

      Clean water, however, is a scarce resource in many places in the world.

      And it's an abundant resource wherever grey water systems are put into place.

    5. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but that means if I'm washing the acid or whatever off my hands (from etching PCB's) then that is going to go into the toilet tank. I don't want that stuff sitting around eating all the metal bits. Or say I'm washing off the oil and crap from working on the car. I don't want that sludge going into the top of the toilet tank and getting it all gunked up.

      And I wouldn't wash any of that type stuff off in the kitchen sink or otherwise near my food for obvious reasons. The bathroom is the logical choice.

    6. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by swillden · · Score: 1

      Water doesn't need to be saved unless you're breaking apart the atoms.

      Clean water, however, is a scarce resource in many places in the world.

      And it's an abundant resource wherever grey water systems are put into place.

      TFA disagrees. Note the point about potential problems for the data center in the event of drought and subsequent restrictions on data center water usage.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Grey water is under utilized, even in the home by tirerim · · Score: 1

      Some friends of mine have one of these, mostly because they have a really tiny bathroom that doesn't have anywhere to put the sink except on top of the toilet. The problem I've found with it, though, is that it's very hard to finish washing my hands before the tank stops filling.

  36. Flush the queue! by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    Flush the queue!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Flush the queue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

  37. Crap by digitalsolo · · Score: 2

    Sounds like a pretty crappy design to me.

    --
    Just another ignorant American.
  38. Recycled water rulz by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

    There are small systems that can produce recyclable water even for single family homes. The National Sanitation Foundation now has NSF Standard 350 so manufacturers can test to a protocol and become certified. The water can be used (depending on state code) to fill toilets, urinals, water the lawn, wash your car, lots of non potable uses. Right now there is only one device certified, the Bio-Microbics Bio-Barrier http://www.biomicrobics.com/?p=59 However several other manufacturers are now testing. Recycled water is no longer limited to large facilities.

     

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  39. This is some Cool Shit that Google Cooked Up ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    someone has to do the dirty work on saving the planet.

  40. puppy linux by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    does not have the electrolytes data centers crave.

    Unless they are running puppy linux. My dogs love the big white drinking fountain.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  41. it's not a bug in the system... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...but a giant floating corncob.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  42. the wet T-shirt effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hardware with nipples - I think I died and went to heaven

  43. Your opinion by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Well, the three water treatment specialists I know include two PhDs and a mere MSc, who between them have done research into everything from rural water purification in Africa to the adhesion of bacterial colonies on permanent water hardness deposition in domestic pipes. Your mileage, as they say, may vary.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Your opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am sure all the people working under them that are actually doing the work, are just as professional. Your experience is not the norm, therefore your mileage doesn't count.

    2. Re:Your opinion by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      If they are hiring PHD's and MSc's then they are nutty. Any BS holder can easily know everything there is to know about water treatment. In fact most of the United states only a high school diploma and a state certification is all that is needed.

      Even the high end membrane filters and UV treatment stuff is insanely easy. a PHD would be bored to hell with water microbiology.

      PHD's running a water plant is like hiring the best NASA engineers to drive the Bus.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  44. Legionellosis ? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

    I have to admit I had to read the TFA in order to understand how the hell this system works.
    So they use open circuit cooling towers with cleanish water coming from a sewage treatment plant.
    Those wet cooling towers are known for being prone to Legionellosis, even when clean water is used.
    This problem probably becomes worse with dirty water.
    I wouldn't like to be the technician cleaning and repairing those towers.

    1. Re:Legionellosis ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open-loop evaporative cooling is what chicken farmers do. Apparently Google is trying to go down the same road; would say it's the easiest and cheapest way but not necessarily the most professional one from a HVAC engineer's standpoint.

      And by the way, please mod the parent up.

  45. Hi Derek by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    I'm not about to get into a pissing match on this because my original comment was a two-minute squib intended to be semi-humorous (how much is infinitesimal? It's as close to zero as you can get without being at zero.) Had I known it would be extensively reviewed by experts like yourself, I think I would have expressed myself more carefully. Did I say reservoir designers were stupid? I'm sorry if you are one and think your profession has been impugned...because I didn't. I was actually making the point that all the posts about poop in the water were pretty silly, because water treatment is so well understood.

    Anyway, thanks for the epithets.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Hi Derek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had I known it would be extensively reviewed by experts like yourself, I think I would have expressed myself more carefully.

      Give me a break. You did know. Slashdot is populated with all sorts of experts, your quip about IQs notwithstanding. If you want to post or read a bunch of phony baloney unchecked, check out Diggit or Facespace.

  46. Not Good by glorybe · · Score: 0

    Evaporative cooling works well in hot and dry climates. In humid climates it is not that good a choice. For a large building they would need large towers with powerful fans (think helicopter) creating a slight vacuum in the up draft to encourage evaporation. Usually intake water temperatures will drop only a few degrees and that slightly cooler water is then pumped into a chiller which eats electricity big time. The water chilled in the chiller is usually about 55 degrees and is pumped through coils that act like the opposite of a radiator in your car. This requires water treatment and should only be done in areas that have water low in calcium. Frankly I doubt that Georgia is the right place for this type of cooling system. Perhaps they have done something different than what i think they have done.

  47. They should still be cautious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but I poo in my shower. Easy to clean off and I don't waste toilet paper. Plus there's just something satisfying about taking a shit while standing up, my wife agrees. I had a garbage disposal installed in my bathtub drain just for that reason.

    Captcha: Spurted

    1. Re:They should still be cautious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good advice! I was thinking of trying that. But what about when you have diarrhea? And aren't the skidmarks on the bottom of the tub hard to deal with?

    2. Re:They should still be cautious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I just rub the skidmarks off with my feet, kind of like scuff marks. They're the last part of my body I wash anyway, besides my hands obviously! As for diarrhea, honestly if I feel like I have something explosive coming, I'll just use the toilet. But if I ever have an accident like that, or the odd errant turd, I have a removable shower head and I just grab some household cleaner and spray it around and hose it all down. It's a little unpleasant but it really doesn't happen very often. I've got a glass door on the shower so it's quite easy to deal with everything.

    3. Re:They should still be cautious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great! Thanks for the info. I really have a lot of butt hair so wiping after a dump takes almost a whole roll, even if I wet the tissue. This will save me a TON of money! If only we had Japanese toilet seats in the west. I can't install a bidet even in my cramped master bathroom, so shitting in the shower is basically my only option.

      BTW to anyone else out there, I tried shaving my ass, don't do it! It's extremely irritating having ass stubble, and when you wipe, there are tons of pieces of paper left over and when your butt sweats, you just end up making a brown paper paste between your ass cheeks that itches and irritates all day. Getting waxed is way too expensive and you need to go too frequently.

  48. water? you mean like in the toilet? by tresstatus · · Score: 1
    --
    stephen
  49. How to get myself modded down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A minor point, but one that shines out in an economic discussion about water, is that there is, and can never be, any such thing as a WATER shortage.

    There are about two cubic kilometers of water for each man, woman and child on this planet. And when we drink or use water it is never destroyed. It just passes through us and returns in a cycle. So the idea of 'saving' or 'wasting' water is mistaken. Subtly, but nonetheless fundamentally mistaken.

    What there CAN easily be is a water storage and distribution infrastructure shortage. Water will always be there somewhere - we just have to consider how much we want to spend to obtain it. That is the infrastructure cost - NOT the water cost.

    What tends to happen is that water companies do not want to spend their profits on new infrastructure as a population rises. Instead, they run the infrastructure with higher pressures, and try to make do. Then, as the rainfall naturally fluctuates, a short year will catch them out. Because the 'short' years' lack of rainfall is obvious to the population, the water companies find it easy to claim that a 'climate change' has occurred, and that everyone must 'save this scarce resource'. In fact, the water resource is fixed (at about 330m cubic miles) and can never be used up - it is infinite in practice - and the shortage is actually in the provision of water storage/head of population.

    Going for 'water-saving' systems therefore completely misses the problem. It just lowers people's water-using lifestyles to bring them into line with the water companies' ability to provide without any new investment. And when that happens, the water companies rake in the profit, selling a reduced level of product (their infrastructure/per head) to many more people at the same price as before. There is no particular reason to be profligate with water use, but equally, there should be no reason to 'save' it. What you are actually saving is water-company investment, NOT a 'natural resource'.

    I have yet to see ANY appreciation of this fact when 'water shortages' are discussed...

    1. Re:How to get myself modded down... by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Instead of even more tediously refuting a long post point by point, let me just ask this: what does a thousand cubic kilometers of salt water in the middle of the Pacific have to do with a California desert neighborhood full of people who want to water their lawns, golf on natural greens, and wash their cars weekly?

  50. Job opprotunity! by Gription · · Score: 3, Funny

    Facts don't matter. It's the feeling that matters.

    I think you are perfect for a career opportunity with the TSA!!!

  51. Not bad, but could be better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of boiling water to the atmosphere, they could boil ethanol / sour mash into fuel. That would seem to have a much greater environmental and monetary pay-off than simply turning sewage into slightly less sewage + excess humidity.

    If treated for the proper components, perhaps the sewage could be used for the mash water...then you're killing about three birds with one stone.

  52. Move servers to the arctic by a-zA-Z0-9$_.+!*'(),x · · Score: 1

    It would make more sense to move server farms to the arctic where the heat could be used to keep greenhouses warm.

    --
    Epitaph: At last! Root access!
  53. Puns - go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds wasteful. har har har har.

  54. Grey water? by generic · · Score: 1

    Where I am from water from the toilet is black water. Grey water is water from shower/sink.

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  55. Is this why their search results went to shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean seriously, this could explain a lot. And here you guys have been blaming SEO.