Slashdot Mirror


Woman Wants To Replace Her Non-functioning Hand With a Bionic Prosthesis

erice writes about the case of Nicola Wilding: "Injured in crash which damaged the nerves in her arm, she has reached the limits that can what be accomplished with nerve transplants. She can move her arm but doctors have given up hope of restoring use of her hand. So she wants doctors to amputate the hand and replace it with a bionic version that does work." The doctor, Oskar C. Aszmann, first performed a similar operation last year.

171 comments

  1. Sounds good. by mhajicek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not?

    1. Re:Sounds good. by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the first step to being consumed by the Dark Side.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Sounds good. by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hell, I want to replace my FUNCTIONAL hand with a bionic one.

    3. Re:Sounds good. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Potential liability, perhaps. Who could she sue if it doesn't work right?

    4. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one. I'm sure she'll be signing plenty of paperwork before this goes on. The only liability I see is phantom pain.

    5. Re:Sounds good. by EdIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      But I hear they have cookies.

    6. Re:Sounds good. by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      Will come handy during handjob!

    7. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but what if we get a breakthrough in nerve repair in the near future and she could have had full function back in her hand?

    8. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember: practice on a hot-dog first.

    9. Re:Sounds good. by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Then she'll be sorry she did it. On the other hand what if we don't?

      It's her choice. If she thinks it's better for her to give up the slim hope of using her real arm again for a bionic arm that's what she should get.

    10. Re:Sounds good. by loufoque · · Score: 4, Funny

      Signing without a functioning hand?

    11. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And luckily we've all seen the TED talk, or the House episode, and know how to cure it! :)

    12. Re:Sounds good. by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, at least the world won't have to worry about your genes propagating...

    13. Re:Sounds good. by rhook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These days you sign a release of liability that covers the doctors from pretty much any lawsuit before you go into surgery.

    14. Re:Sounds good. by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly! Same reason you should wait to buy your next car... flying cars are just around the corner, until then, you can take the bus.

    15. Re:Sounds good. by sjames · · Score: 1

      She already has the phantom pain due to the nerve loss.

    16. Re:Sounds good. by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Possible, but it probably won't happen in the next 5 years, and as long as she can come up with the money she needs and the prosthesis works well, I don't think she'll regret it.

    17. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of. You sign a waiver acknowledging that you understand the risks and that even if the doctor does everything correctly, you might still come out worse on the other side. That being said, the doctors aren't protected if they don't do everything properly (ie: negligence, gross negligence, etc.). Perhaps the waiver is a bit more comprehensive and enforceable if the procedure is experimental (eg: here).

    18. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be pretty easy to replace, you would think.

    19. Re:Sounds good. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If the nerves in her upper arm are damaged, and that's why her hand doesn't work, how is an artificial hand going to work any better? It still needs to receive impulses from those nerves.

      Seems to me they need to do more research on nerve repair, regeneration, or maybe even artificial nerves.

    20. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says they need to use those nerves to control the hand? They had a monkey controlling a robotic arm with no arm nerves being sued at all (it was connected directly to the brain), so this shouldn't be any harder.

    21. Re:Sounds good. by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, at least the world won't have to worry about your genes propagating....

    22. Re:Sounds good. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      No waiver can waive legal rights, and negligence can never be waived for. Just going in to a trial with a "he cut off my hand (at my request)" sob story may be sufficient for winning a negligence trial, even if no actual negligence occurred.

    23. Re:Sounds good. by FreedomOfThought · · Score: 1

      "On the other hand"

      Tee hee! I giggled a little.

    24. Re:Sounds good. by FunkDup · · Score: 3, Funny

      What you've really got to worry about is a voice activated bionic hand. Be absolutely sure that you never say "Fuck me dead!"

      --
      Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds -- Albert Einstein
    25. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone rated you down on two posts and rated the anonymous troll you're talking with up on two posts. hmmmm.

    26. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Hand, pick up the ball."

    27. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would she pray to our Lord the holy father with a "Bionic Prosthesis"?

      Just disgusting! How can she give up her own hand? This is certainly not okay with me. :(

    28. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The doctor who would perform the operation said in the article that she will need to use the nerves in her lower arm to control the hand. That is why he needs to do further electrical conductivity tests to evaluate whether she is a good candidate.

    29. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, good old Red Dwarf.

    30. Re:Sounds good. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Nerves only regenerate very slowly if at all but, they are the one part of the body most likely to respond to stem cell treatment. In this case the other hand might be a stem cell solution in five to ten years time, how likely, a pretty good chance. Hand replacement, perhaps a century or more away. Lesson to learn in gambling, go with the odds.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    31. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to stop making false statements. TOS can apparently allow you to void your right to a trial, so there isn't much hope in general, I am afraid.

    32. Re:Sounds good. by definate · · Score: 2

      Depends on the country, state, hospital, and procedure, etc.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    33. Re:Sounds good. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You don't have a "right" to a trial, except in criminal cases. And most of the mandatory arbitration clauses are illegal because they are defacto unfair when one party selects mediators, or other unfair control over the "fair" process required.

    34. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh I'm sorry, you don't feel like such a big man now? Hint: don't fuck with people you know nothing about.

      Eventually you might understand that 'trash talk' about someone being a virgin and shagging one's mother isn't meant to be honest guesses. Also while 'throwing back' similar insults might win you respect in the school yard, it's boring.

    35. Re:Sounds good. by Alamais · · Score: 2

      You're funny.
      .
      .
      .

      (...also, damaged.)

    36. Re:Sounds good. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you really think that's going to be a problem?

      are there really that many "he cut off my penis(at my request)" sob stories in the courts?? even though many of those cases actually regret what they asked the doctor to do.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    37. Re:Sounds good. by mhajicek · · Score: 2

      I'd wait a few more revisions first. If you watched the video you saw it's still pretty slow and clumsy.

    38. Re:Sounds good. by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain they're taking the best approach on that. It seems they don't need to replace any hardware, just the control cables. Put a chip in her brain, run wires from it under the skin through a signal processor to the hand. Shy might have to wear a circuit board on her forearm to process and amplify the signal, but would be able to use her existing hand.

    39. Re:Sounds good. by necro81 · · Score: 2

      You don't have an appreciation for the current state of the art in upper limb prostheses. They are getting better all the time, but they are a far cry from restoring the dexterity, speed, range of motion, and fine control of a normal hand. Present prostheses, and forecasting out into the next decade, are functional replacements, but they are far from superior.

    40. Re:Sounds good. by necro81 · · Score: 2

      Not all prosthetic hands are controlled via EMGs. Actually, the majority are what are called "body powered." Through the socket and harness, you tension a cable using the shoulder and back muscles, and that is used to control the hand. Typically, the cable directly actuates the prosthesis, like the cable on a bike directly actuating the brakes. In other cases, the cable is a linear potentiometer, and the prosthesis uses that input to actuate motors. It may sound like a kludge, but wearers can achieve impressive function. It's not a replacement for a good hand, but compared to a non-functioning hand, could provide her with a great benefit.

    41. Re:Sounds good. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Keep the real hand in the freezer, just in case.

      Seesh, I have to do all the thinking around here.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    42. Re:Sounds good. by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      Better slow and clumsy than completely useless.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    43. Re:Sounds good. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Well played, sir, well played!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    44. Re:Sounds good. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Keep the real hand in the freezer, just in case.

      Seesh, I have to do all the thinking around here.

      Yeah, but say you move house and have to disconnect the freezer while you move it? Didn't think of that did you?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:Sounds good. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's crazy. No bionic hand is anywhere near as good as the one you grew unless you had a birth defect or ruined the one you had. There's no way anybody will get a bionic hand to have the sense of touch your real one does, at least in this lifetime.

      Now, a prosthetic hand that augments the real hand? Sure, I'll take two.

      BTW, I'm already a cyborg. There's a device in my left eye that replaces its lens. Want one? Usually gives you 20/20 or better vision (mine's 10/16 in that eye), costs $7k per eye, and they have to stick a needle in your eye to install it. If you have a cataract, insurance will pay for the old style implant that won't focus and you need reading glasses with, and you'll only need about $1k for the new one.

    46. Re:Sounds good. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1
      Am I misunderstanding the constitution?

      Amendment 7 - Trial by Jury in Civil Cases. Ratified 12/15/1791.

      In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

      Why doesn't this prevent AT&T from forcing arbitration?

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    47. Re:Sounds good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing how most of them are means I get laid more than you could ever dream of.

      translation: Thank god I can afford hookers!

    48. Re:Sounds good. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Two really long extension cords. Or one incredibly long one...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    49. Re:Sounds good. by binkless · · Score: 2

      It worked for Nina Sharp

    50. Re:Sounds good. by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      No bionic hand is anywhere near as good as the one you grew

      Jay J Armes disagrees

    51. Re:Sounds good. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Put a chip in her brain? Some of you guys are just plain crazy. Brain surgery is probably the most dangerous surgery there is, and if there's one prgan I do NOT want damaged, it's my brain.

    52. Re:Sounds good. by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Thing is, putting a chip in the brain to control a prosthetic arm has already been done. There are other possible locations for it though; upper arm, spine, etc. The key is to give it access to nerves, and enough of them to develop all the desired control channels.

    53. Re:Sounds good. by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      In this lifetime? I think those will be out inside a few decades, at the most.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  2. Sarif Industries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She never asked for this... oh wait, she did? Well never mind, then.

  3. Already happened in Austria by aBaldrich · · Score: 2, Informative

    And it was also covered by the BBC.

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    1. Re:Already happened in Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What tipped you off? It's the same doctor. The summary specifically states that AND gives a link:

      The doctor, Oskar C. Aszmann, first performed a similar operation last year.

    2. Re:Already happened in Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But did it happen to woman????

    3. Re:Already happened in Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is some indication the doctor's original surname was Goldman.

    4. Re:Already happened in Austria by similar_name · · Score: 2

      The summary specifically states that AND gives a link:

      Not just a link but the same link and somehow he is rated +3 informative right now. I wonder if I can get +5 for this brilliant post

      "Injured in crash which damaged the nerves in her arm, she has reached the limits that can what be accomplished with nerve transplants. She can move her arm but doctors have given up hope of restoring use of her hand. So she wants doctors to amputate the hand and replace it with a bionic version that does work."

      The doctor, Oskar C. Aszmann, first performed a similar operation last year.

    5. Re:Already happened in Austria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The doctor was Rudy Wells. Goldman wasn't a doctor.

  4. Quite... by Quartus486 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..the hand-decap then. Would someone just lend the poor woman a hand already?

    1. Re:Quite... by MattDaye · · Score: 2

      I've got to hand it to her, she really has a grasp on what the future holds.

  5. no more puns for you, by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 5, Funny

    you're cut off.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    1. Re:no more puns for you, by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, you're just getting on his nerves now.

    2. Re:no more puns for you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd give you two thumbs up but I've only got one.

    3. Re:no more puns for you, by k3vlar · · Score: 1

      Come on! Now you're just grasping at straws...

      --
      Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
    4. Re:no more puns for you, by SomePgmr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I could count the funny jokes in this thread on one hand.

    5. Re:no more puns for you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High five for that one

    6. Re:no more puns for you, by rts008 · · Score: 1

      I only have ONE hand, you insensitive clod!

      *not really, I have two hands, but the obligatory joke had to be made.
      Be glad I did not use the 'In Soviet Russia' meme... :-)*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    7. Re:no more puns for you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, they may just be beyond your grasp

    8. Re:no more puns for you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But on the other hand....

  6. I wish I had a bionic hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd give myself the stranger every day

    1. Re:I wish I had a bionic hand by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      Yeah, can you detach it and set it to "auto"?

      I'm asking for... a friend.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:I wish I had a bionic hand by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How do you break an anonymous coward's prosthetic thumb?

      Kick him in the stomach!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  7. In other news by neonv · · Score: 2

    In other news, DARPA announced the first functional light saber ...

  8. Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We think we have all this "technology" but we are really only good at a few things. Burning fossil fuels in a turbine, mass-producing items and putting transistors on a tiny chip so we can play video games But our understanding of the mechanisms of life is piss poor. Why can't we fix a few grams of living matter? Because we aren't nearly as clever as we think we are. We're going to replace a hand with some sort of toy robot hand with a few motors in it that will not work anywhere near like a real hand. Pathetic.

    When are we going to stop trying to re-enact the past with ridiculous private space efforts and dare to build the future? Where are the visionary rich when it comes to biotech?

    1. Re:Pathetic by causality · · Score: 1

      Where are the visionary rich when it comes to biotech?

      Hiring patent lawyers. At least if Monsanto is any indication.

      See, the problem is that this bionic hand can't cross-pollinate with natural hands and produce new lawsuits. Fix that and there will be bionic hands for everyone who wants them.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Pathetic by mcavic · · Score: 1

      We created technology, and therefore we know how it works. We didn't create the human body, and it didn't come with an instruction manual.

      Even so, we've come a long way in medicine. Being able to use nerve impulses to control a bionic implant is amazing to me.

    3. Re:Pathetic by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We think we have all this "technology" but we are really only good at a few things. Burning fossil fuels in a turbine, mass-producing items and putting transistors on a tiny chip so we can play video games

      Really? That is how you sum up all of human endevour? We have come so far and acheived so much since we came down from the trees. We have sent space ships out beyond our solar system, and explored the depths of the ocean that would crush a man if he ventured that far down. We can repair our bodies in extrodinary ways that were unheard of even 50 years ago. Doctors can use robots to perform surgery on people half a world away. We can make a robotic hand for someone. We made the world a smaller place by allowing us to talk to each other anywhere we want. We made Jersey Shore.

      OK, we still have a long way to go, but why not see that as an exciting opportunity rather than bitch and moan that we haven't invented everything yet.

      Why can't we fix a few grams of living matter? Because we aren't nearly as clever as we think we are.

      Do you really think that the doctors in this case are so deluded that they think that they can fix this woman's hand? Obviously not, otherwise we would not be talking about fitting a bionic hand. Do you think the woman thinks that we are so clever that we can fix her hand? Obviously not, otherwise we would not be talking about fitting a bionic hand (again).

      So who is it that thinks we are more clever than we really are? Not the people in the story. Not the people posting here. I know that it is certainly not you. You are too busy seeing the negative in everything around you. Maybe you are just still bitter that we don't all have flying cars like the old science fiction stories promised you when you were a child.

    4. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why can't we fix a few grams of living matter?" - because it will require tools that we do not have yet. "Tehcnology" is a tool that we use which will eventually allow us to do that.

    5. Re:Pathetic by arogier · · Score: 1

      Well most computing hardware is etched onto the fairly stable medium of silicon. Most cells, pretty much all of them in persons have membranes have membranes composed of phospholipids studded with proteins. Which substrate seems friendlier to work with.

    6. Re:Pathetic by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      "Why can't we fix a few grams of living matter?"

      Sorry space man, we humans haven't conquered mortality yet.

  9. Bad comparison by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're going to replace a hand with some sort of toy robot hand with a few motors in it that will not work anywhere near like a real hand.

    That's not the comparison she gets to make. Her options are a human hand that doesn't work, a hook, or a "toy robot hand." She doesn't get to wait for future technologies that might never come to apss.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Bad comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Weird. Slashdot is the same place where people are sure Space Elevators are a simple technology, but patching a few molecules in a nerve will never come to pass. Very, very VERY bizarre.

      And those aren't her only options. If you feel like you can handle some horrific medical imagery, look at Krukenberg hands...

    2. Re:Bad comparison by camperdave · · Score: 1

      She doesn't get to wait for future technologies that might never come to apss.

      It's not like having a useless limb is killing her. She's been like that for twelve years. So, of course she can wait for future technologies. She just doesn't want to.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Bad comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, try crippling your hand, living with it for twelve years and through several nerve transplants and attempts at physio, and see if you feel like continuing waiting an indefinite period through an indefinite number of new procedures until it's (perhaps) actually repaired.

    4. Re:Bad comparison by rhook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you ever stop to think that she spent 12 years waiting for "future technologies" and that a bionic hand is just that?

    5. Re:Bad comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might never come to apes? are we interfacing with todays xkcd?

    6. Re:Bad comparison by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's weird how some people think Slashdot is full of people who all have the exact same opinion.

      From what I've seen, Slashdot is a place where people are sure that Space Elevators will never, ever happen, and are completely impossible; and that Microsoft is the greatest company with the best products.

    7. Re:Bad comparison by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2

      It's not that they all have the same opinion. Just that all opinions get modded down until there is only one.

    8. Re:Bad comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      "people are sure that Space Elevators will never, ever happen, and are completely impossible"

      We tend to call such people realists, engineers or physicists. Also, space is an empty hell, why the hard-on to get there?

    9. Re:Bad comparison by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's called resources, you idiot. The moon and asteroids are full of valuable minerals, and you don't have to wreck the environment to extract them. The sun puts out more energy than we could conceivably need, and in space there's no atmosphere or night/day to hinder your acquisition of that energy.

    10. Re:Bad comparison by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Did you ever stop to think that she spent 12 years waiting for "future technologies" and that a bionic hand is just that?

      Of course. I have no doubt that the prosthetics available today are well ahead of what was available a decade ago. It's just that the parent post made it seem like she no longer had the choice to wait for even more improvement in the technology; as if she had to decide - right now - between a forever limp arm, a hook, or a robotic hand. That's wrong. The option to wait is always there, right up to the point where she goes under for the surgery. If she learns of a procedure of using implanted computer chips to replace the damaged nerve clusters, she could still go for that. Stem cell nerve regeneration - still a go. She could wait another 30 or 40 years if she wanted to. It's just that she doesn't want to.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Bad comparison by s.t.a.l.k.e.r._loner · · Score: 1

      Of course she gets to wait. They can chop off the useless organic hand and install the "toy robot hand". Then, when technology is sufficiently advanced, they can just chop off the "toy robot hand" and install the Power Fist! When that gets old or tech advances again, they can chop off the Power Fist and install the like-new organic vat-grown stem cell hand! I just realized: while I'm not going to cause any harm to my actual hands, I might secretly be hoping for a catastrophic hand injury... This is gonna be awesome!

    12. Re:Bad comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will come to the app store, don't worry. Only the battery will be non-replaceable but that'll be fine 'cause it won't get any viruses and will make for some smooth masturbation in a coffee shop surrounded by fellow hipsters who have saved for like 6 months for the new hand which has even more innovative features like copy and paste and bluetooth which only works partially.

    13. Re:Bad comparison by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      When the technology advances to the Power Fist stage, it might become so commonplace to change your hand in for better, that a catastrophic injury isn't required.

    14. Re:Bad comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to get a bionic hand instead of this useless lump.

      You should wait until better prosthetics are available!

      And then there was no market or testbed for intermediate technology, and the future never arrived.

    15. Re:Bad comparison by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The argument isn't whether she *should or shouldn't* wait. The argument is whether she *can or cannot* wait.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  10. Objection by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    She doesn't look a thing like Lindsay Wagner.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Objection by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Objection by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wasn't even aware they'd done a remake!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  11. Piss poor article and summary by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Another lame slashdot summary linking to a lame article. EVERYONE knows the man's name is Oscar Goldman.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  12. why cyber prosthesis? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Cutting off the hand is rather final.

    If I were the woman, I would attempt a radical neural stemcell treatment instead. If it goes wrong, then cut off the hand.

    The one you re born with is far superior to what science is currently able to provide, and it doesn't scare children.

    1. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by pz · · Score: 2

      The real question is why she doesn't want to use FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation) of her existing musculature. The interface is going to be the same as with a fully mechanical robotic hand, and the aesthetic outcome far superior.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    2. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That would use her existing muscles, with artificial stimulation. A device worn on the forearm to stimulate those muscles would be less frightening than something like the LukeArm.

      Still, I would try to repair the damaged organic system first. There have been many breakthroughs in nerve regeneration in the peripheral nervous system that would be helpful, and artifical stimulation would be a great suppliment to that.

    3. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Granted, overall it's superior, but fake hands can do different individual things better, too. A prosthetic hand could easily be stronger than a real hand, for example. I don't know if anybody has worked on this, but I'm sure it's possible to do so. A prosthetic hand could also have more movement options. It could spin, for example, or the fingers could go all of the way back.

      I think that under certain conditions, for certain people, a prosthetic limb could be better than a real one.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but even my working hands don't have 360 degree motion wrists! After playing Deus Ex, I want the option of snapping a guy's neck like that! Plus you can sharpen a pencil in one move! Bonus!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could make a prosthetic with a stronger grip, but you'll never make one capable of lifting more than the rest of your musculature can support. If you did that it would dislocate your shoulder or throw out your back.

    6. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      And even if you had a total bionic skeleton, you couldn't lift a truck up with on had without falling over. (Unless you weigh a few tons)

    7. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Scaring children has its purpose.

      In this case, children will learn that driving can be dangerous, so pay attention to the road and other vehicles.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:why cyber prosthesis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about less frightening, but it would be fucking awesome. "My arm is braindead, but we Frankensteined it back with this electrical apparatus."

  13. No Fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck getting on a plane with that.

    1. Re:No Fly by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Most of us don't want to fly anyway.

  14. An exoskeleton would be better. by Ichijo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I had a nonfunctioning hand, I think I'd be happier with an exoskeleton, because it would be easy to install and uninstall. It's much more difficult to unamputate a hand.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:An exoskeleton would be better. by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      I think you're right.
      however, it's probably easier to make robot fingers then exoskeleton fingers. although I wouldn't bet on it.
      furthermore, the doctor is probably interested in working with amputees in the future, so he wants to have experience with that.

      --
      new sig
    2. Re:An exoskeleton would be better. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Even more awesome would be to put her own skin back on top of the bionic hand. Even more awesome than that would be if they could retain the sensory nerves in the skin while doing this (although it would make the slice-skin-open-show-robot-inside trick like on terminator a bit hurty)

      I guess we're a decade or two away from a bionic hand that is maintenance free enough to allow this, plus all the issues of keeping the skin alive without being attached to an actual hand, and by then hopefully we can just grow new hands.

    3. Re:An exoskeleton would be better. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Finally, a power glove that isn't a total disappointment!

  15. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't ask for.... wait a minute, yes I did.

  16. A Dead End by sqrt(2) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Synthetic prostheses will probably end up being a dead end, for normal people at least. If your goal is to get someone back to 100% function of their original organic hand (or an idealized perfectly functional human hand if it was already malfunctioning from birth) then growing a new hand, either in situ or in a lab for later grafting, seems more likely. After all, we carry around everything we need to grow more body parts--that's how you got your original hands. Coaxing the body to do that trick again will likely be accomplished before we can make a synthetic body part that works just as well as a real one.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:A Dead End by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

      Synthetic prostheses will probably end up being a dead end

      Yes, that's pretty much what "prosthesis" means.

      [runs away]

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:A Dead End by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Growing new organs would be ideal. But a synthetic hand doesn't have to work just like the organic one. It just has to work better than having no hand.

    3. Re:A Dead End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But someday, somebody will look at that 100% functionality and decide they want 120%...and then it's back to prosthetics.

    4. Re:A Dead End by dkf · · Score: 1

      If your goal is to get someone back to 100% function

      As opposed to being stuck with the current, say, 1–5% function? Having 100% as the only possible target is dumb.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    5. Re:A Dead End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfft 100% as the only possible target totally is dumb, the target should be a minimum of 200% or more. I'd be happy with 400% and military applications should see 800% minimum.

    6. Re:A Dead End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If your goal is to get someone back to 100% function of their original organic hand (or an idealized perfectly functional human hand if it was already malfunctioning from birth) then growing a new hand, either in situ or in a lab for later grafting, seems more likely.

      She has a natural, 100% original organic hand. There are some broken nerves which renter it useless.

      With the artificial hand the doctors bypass all the nerve damage and just run a wire. No need to fiddle with growing synapses. Recall that natural nerves are chemical things that communicate with chemistry. The axons use electrical potentials to just speed up getting the chemical message far away. Artificial limbs can be made to work with just electricity, like the signals used by nerves to trigger their chemical exchanges, cutting out the chemical middleman.

      If you can't regrow the nerves, then grafting a new hand would be useless. If you could then she'd just get new nerves and be done with it. Sadly she did have significant repair done to her shoulder nerves. It just didn't fix her hand.

      Frankenstein is sadly fiction: plugging organic body parts together is fiendishly hard. When nerves are involved, it is usually a matter of patch'n'pray. We may end up with tank grown limbs, but without some non-grown engineered interface between the parts - say wires or magical neuron grafting tech - I'm betting they will be worthless.

  17. Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see no problem with replacing a hand. I want to replace my entire body. Until we know how to digitize the brain it would probably have to be a brain in an enclosure inside a robot body but later the goal would be to replace the brain. Do synapse by synapse replacement while you are awake and by the end you can think thousands to millions of time faster and at no time did you ever die.

    Imagine all you could learn and see with a fully robotic body. You could explore space, many places on this planet that humans can't go and you would live long enough to see participate in many things that humans are only beginning to work on now. I would love to live for millions to billions of years and learn everything that I could.

    Once you are fully digital you could even make probes to send down to new planets and it would feel just like you where there but if the probe is destroyed you would be fine since you could run it on remote. You could even have your brain be a massively redundant computer with stable memory in case of full power loss. Humans bodies are just not up to what I want to do and I prefer to go the technology route and fix the problem instead of accepting the limitations of what humans can do. We have been at our best trying to strive beyond what we can do, even if we don't reach our goal we learn a lot in the process. Artificial eyes, ears, legs, arms etc will help many people.

    --
    Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    1. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I'm sure you'd love an army of robo-humans to fight the Shadows with. I'm onto your meddling.

    2. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Why do you want a robot body, Kosh? Surely it'd be a step down for a big, glowy energy being such as you.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Looshi · · Score: 1

      Cavil, is that you?

    4. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully robotic body, eh? Reminds me of the Ghost in the Shell TV Series. It's an anime that depicts a world in which you can have a fully robotic body, save for the brain.

      Although don't brain cells have their own lifespan? I thought that the neurons in the brain can only last for about 120 years. Even neurogenesis can't replace all the brain's cells... and diseases such as Alzheimer's would still be present in a robot body.

    5. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer section first: I'm a Chinese Martial Arts teacher (been practicing soft, so-called "internal" martial arts for ~15 years), and I'm also practicing Qi-Gong daily. (Oh, and I'm also a physics major and software developer.)

      At this point, I'm slowly beginning to comprehend what our bodies are capable of. Are you even remotely aware of what this is, and how this will *not* be available to you bionically anytime soon, unless you basically re-invent your own body the way it is now? Basically everything, except immortality, is better than any machine you could conceive: the unique combination of coordination, precision and power, extremely high level of self-awareness (i.e. sense for acceleration and pressure in basically every cm^3, diagnosis possibilities for almost every sub-system of your body, like digestion, long- and short-term physical or psychical overwork, heart irregularities, respiratory system irregularities, etc), then the ability to easily self-repair even major damages without little or no intervention of a 3rd-party (think "break my leg while I'm alone in the wilderness")...

      Practicing good Qi-Gong is like learning access to your own body's "firmare" -- with years of practice, you can query and influence a lot of properties of your body, more than you could "out of the box", after your birth. This is for better or worse, meaning you can also fuck things up pretty badly, if you don't know what you're doing :-)

      So, if by some magic you ever *do* have the chance of switching: do yourself a favor and keep your biological body, and learn how to use it! :-) Doing otherwise is like trading a jet plane for a wooden cart just because you couldn't figure out how to attach your horse to the former...

    6. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by gl4ss · · Score: 1
      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course if you made this transfer of consciousness from flesh to machines mandatory it might cause a conflict. A conflict which could escalate into a war that might decimate a million worlds.

    8. Re:Go for the whole thing once technology advances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Great News: Doc says I have Alzheimer's and cyberbrain sclerosis. #FML

  18. No news here by dakra137 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Replacing non-functional limbs with functional prosthetics has been going on for decades. Decades ago this was controversial, especially for children with birth defect limb deficiencies. My father-in-law, Dr. Leon M. Kruger, was the chief surgeon at a Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children. He conducted and published a study following children as they grew up, comparing measures of success in life skills, schooling, careers, happiness, etc. for those who did or did not have amputations. The success of those with amputations and prosthetics far exceeded those who kept the nonfunctional hands, arms, feet or legs. As they grew up, many of these children sent Dr. Kruger movies of themselves engaged in sports, riding motorcycles, etc. One favorite story was of a motorcyclist with a prosthetic who was in an accident. He was stuck in a position unable to remove his prosthetic which was pinned down under the motorcycle. He shouted to the first responders, "Take off my leg. Take off my leg." They told him not to worry, they could get him out with amputation. He most emphatically told them he'd be able to get himself away if they would just disconnect his leg. You might consider that a sick story. He thought it was funny, as did the teenager swimming in a lake in the summer of 1975 who grabbed onto the dock, stuck his stump in the air, and yelled, "Shark, Shark."

    1. Re:No news here by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      One favorite story was of a motorcyclist with a prosthetic who was in an accident. He was stuck in a position unable to remove his prosthetic which was pinned down under the motorcycle. He shouted to the first responders, "Take off my leg. Take off my leg."

      They told him not to worry, they could get him out with amputation. He most emphatically told them he'd be able to get himself away if they would just disconnect his leg.

      Presumably you meant "they could get him out without amputation"? Not nazi-ing, just very confused at the text as-is. But a good story.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  19. Not bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who was born with only one hand, I'm holding off for either a cloned hand, or a bionic one with superhuman strength and/or lasers. None of this halfway stuff.

  20. Wrong Oscar by lophophore · · Score: 1

    I thought that was Oscar Goldman's department...

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:Wrong Oscar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in the fuck is Oscar Goldman?

  21. Synthetics by berniemne · · Score: 1

    The reapers are here.

  22. An excellent idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She should make sure to have them install a Husqvarna Chainrip(tm), ideally with the optional pullcord. A bit expensive but it'll do wonders for her cred with the boosters.

  23. Does it perchance... by Brad1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cost 6 million dollars?

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Does it perchance... by compro01 · · Score: 2

      Closer to $29 million.

      Inflation is a bitch.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Does it perchance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But for him they replaced more than just a hand. So the cost should be a fraction.

    3. Re:Does it perchance... by assertation · · Score: 1

      Dude.

      For Six million dollars the government bought Steve Austin an entire arm, two legs AND an eye.

      BTW, according to measuringworth.com that 6 million from 1974 would be about 21 - 22 million in 2012 money

  24. A human revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last person to get this surgery ended up with bionic sunglasses and an arm-blade, but she never asked for that.

  25. Aszmann by IcyHando'Death · · Score: 1

    The doctor, Oskar C. Aszmann, first performed a similar operation last year.

    If the lady wants an artificial hand, that should be her call, but you have to wonder about her judgement if she wants a proctologist to do the procedure.

  26. Max Barry, Machine Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody read it?

    Trailer

  27. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lost use of 1/3 my finger, can i have half a working finger? :D

  28. Crazy lady by firefrei · · Score: 1

    Doesn't she know that she's now dependent on Neuropozyne for the rest of her life?

    --
    I remember when Linux was good... too...
  29. Liability/insurance by Dogbertius · · Score: 0

    I recall bringing up a hypothetical question along the lines of this topic only 2 months ago. What if some drunken lowlife crashes into your car and you lose an arm?

    Let's say the jury only awards you a measly $200,000 for a ruined life, and you are a professional who relies on you being in full control of your body (ie: surgeon, engineer, optician) and your annual salary is close to the court-awarded amount. What if a bionic prosthesis is available that could get you back into your old profession again, but costs $5,000,000. What is your stance on the drunkard being forced to work for the rest of their life and pass on the debt to his/her descendants to pay off the procedure?

    I, for one, would love to see this sort of scenario play out (not the injury to the victim of a drunk driver). We are approaching the point where certain physical harm CAN be repaid, but at much higher a cost than juries would normally approve of.

    1. Re:Liability/insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is your stance on the drunkard being forced to work for the rest of their life and pass on the debt to his/her descendants to pay off the procedure?

      His/Her descendants have about as much guilt as you or me, passing on a debt to them wouldn't be right.
      This is the kind of thing you should have an insurance for, not assume that someone who didn't have anything to do with it should pay for.

    2. Re:Liability/insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your stance on the drunkard being forced to work for the rest of their life and pass on the debt to his/her descendants to pay off the procedure?

      Cool! Just like North Korea? They have the best criminal justice system. Gotta eat mice to live for another day of beatings! =D

      I'm just kidding. I hope you and your decedents die in a fire. See what I did there? =)

    3. Re:Liability/insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your stance on the drunkard being forced to work for the rest of their life and pass on the debt to his/her descendants to pay off the procedure?

      My position is that it shouldn't make any difference if the guy was drunk or just a shitty driver to start with. I don't care if some soccer mom had a head full of pills or if some teenage bimbo was busy texting pictures of her fat ass. Negligent driving is negligent, regardless of the particular form it takes, and my arm won't grow back just because the driver was doing something which is more socially acceptable than drunk driving.

    4. Re:Liability/insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was drunk he deserves that. If he was not drunk and it was just an accident he should be covered by the vehicle insurance, and if he lacks the insurance he again deserves that. In most countries vehicle insurance is even mandated by law.

    5. Re:Liability/insurance by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Call me old-fashioned and socialist, but here in the UK third party liability insurance would cover these costs and no jury would be involved. It might be tricky convincing the insurance company to pay $5m though. The solution to that is to nationalise the people who make the bionic arms and reduce the absurd profiteering.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Liability/insurance by Anonymus · · Score: 1

      Unless they're being used as money shelters in some way, passing debt on to descendants is barbaric.

    7. Re:Liability/insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's stupid. Now, I never drink and drive, but let's say for this argument that I did, and the above happened. We have to take some assumptions however.

      1. The debt would never, ever be passed onto anyone else, because it wuld never be passed onto anyone else. As another AC responder said, they would be just as guilty of anything as the dog next door. No country on earth would force this.
      2. Any of anyone's insurance doesn't protect them somehow. Not that I'm even sure if your insurance covers anything if you're drunk driving, but that's besides the point... any insurance is irrelevant to the debate.
      3. I'm not a 1%'er (safe assumption anyway, but just stating it to avoid confusion), because otherwise that 5 mill would be... y'know... feasible, and all of this would come down to who has the better lawyers anyway.
      4. That 5 million dollar request wasn't shut down by the courts as unconstitutional for being cruel and inhuman punishment to someone who will never see 1/10th of that in their entire lives.

      Now, I have two choices before me:
      a) Work as hard as I humanly can, and will for the rest of my natural life, only to have my wages garnished to the point that I'm barely not starving.
      b) Say 'fuck this' and bugger the hell off, refusing to pay.

      In my eyes, the odds that a massive multi-country manhunt will happen for a drunk driving accident is ridiculously slim to nil. I'll have to live with doing work under the table or something, but that'd be a thousand times better than living in poverty even if my job is giving me double or triple minimum wage... and knowing that every cent would be going to a person who, albeit is horribly injured by me, was making more money in a single month than I would see in a decade prior to the accident.

    8. Re:Liability/insurance by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Your hypothetical hypothesis is bullocks, as the Brits say. No jury would award only a year's salary to someone who could no longer work in their profession. As Judge Judy says, "that's redikolus".

      However, I think an optician could still work with only one arm, but costing a homeless person an arm is going to cost you millions, let alone a professional. So you might want to stay off that phone when you're driving, and make sure your insurance is current.

    9. Re:Liability/insurance by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      You move to a country with a civilized health care system. I can't see the most advanced bionic arm ever made costing more than 100k to make, after R & D.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  30. If it was my arm, first, the steampunk. by hackshack · · Score: 2

    Doesn't this sound a bit drastic? Damn, if it were me I'd be hax0ring it.

    There's groups on places like the Open Prosthetic Project, who could design something for a use case like this. Probably for less than the cost of a "replacement."

    Why remove her hand, when you could support it with a rigid exoskeleton? Minimalist carbon fiber spars and rings (a ring around each knuckle), very light but strong, and little external actuators that sit in the wrist / forearm. Nylon worm gear and a little 12V DC motor for each digit. Run back to an Arduino or similar and pull input from the last-known-good nerves around the base of the arm. Basically support the (numb) arm in position and have the exoskeleton move it around. Lock the wrist in the first iteration as you refine the design. Lots of little vacuum actuated suckers that keep the whole shebang stuck to the skin (creepy, but secure!)

    A hundred bucks of carbon fiber, maybe a couple thousand bucks of really good fasteners and electronics, tubing, motors, pump, rubber and CNC work. $10,000 a month (for 3-6 months, depending) to a hacker who knows what he's doing.

    Just sayin'.

    1. Re:If it was my arm, first, the steampunk. by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust an open-source hacker to program my artificial arm. Documentation would be limited to object member descriptions and the damned thing would probably integrate a webcam so it could give Steve Ballmer the finger every time it saw him.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
  31. Touch me.... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    I'm asking for... a friend.

    Facebook (and others) will never be the same after this....

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  32. Bionic? What about Biotic? by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Before going the route of DarthVader, would they not see if they can't do a full hand transplant. I seem to recall a successful one being accomplished already in the not so distant past.

  33. And? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I would trade in my fully working arms to get bionic replacements.

    Hell, I would have my head transplanted onto a fully functional robotic body.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. May be her best bet by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    The problem with the suggestions of restoring function to her existing one is that it ignores that there is a definite time limit to being a candidate for any sort of nerve restoration or, for that matter, any form of electrostim manipulation--if her hand is withered as the article says, she's out of this window. Once the muscles have atrophied away practically entirely (and she's been without movement of it for over a decade, so this is likely) the odds of getting it restored to more usefulness than a permanently attached blunt object is...somewhere up there with an angel coming down from Heaven and giving you a spaceship, ownership of an Earth-sized mass of precious metals, and magic powers. (No, aliens that look like angels would not count. The odds of the existence of supernatural beings from the afterlife who appear in nighties with bird wings is part of the calculation of the probability of the cited event.)

    More importantly, once you start getting phantom limb pains, the window for getting the nerves reconnected is definitely gone. Phantom limb comes from your brain reassigning the blocks that had been originally used by the now-lost part of the body (or what it is 'reading' as lost) to new places. Yes, you could probably take terrible advantage of this and find the patch of skin that has been granted use of that part of the somatosensory map, but it tends to be somewhere on the face. (2nd choice is probably the hands, if that wasn't what was lost, followed by either the feet or...let's call it the crotch, OK?) This would be probably less desirable, from a purely aesthetic point of view, especially if the phantom limb sensations are actually due to your underwear irritating the area between your legs as opposed to your cheek or foot being itchy.

    Incidentally, the model she's interested in would be reading the lower arm, not the back muscles for its 'input.' Given that you actually use the muscles in your forearm for much of your hand motions, it might actually give her a decent chance should we be able to regrow hands within her lifetime at actually being able to get a flesh-and-blood hand that's as functional as a bionic one would be. Her current one is definitely shot if it's withered--implanting new muscle to any great extent is probably a significantly more complex task than regrowing or even transplanting--and keeping it would actually likely lower the chances of success with a regrown as she will keep losing muscles and nerve supply to the part. (The classic mnemonic here is that you use it or lose it.) The bionic hand might be able to at least slow the rate of loss.