Slashdot Mirror
Sprint CEO Defends Company's Decision To Bet It All On the iPhone
zacharye writes "Sprint chief executive Dan Hesse is being watched closely by the company's board of directors, but the CEO has to answer to investors and subscribers as well. Last year in October, Hesse revealed that the company is placing a massive $15.5 billion bet on Apple's iPhone, and in a recent interview, Hesse defended the move, which has been criticized by a number of industry watchers. From the article: '“Subsidies are heavy for the iPhone. This is the reason why a high percentage of new customers is important,” Hesse said during the interview. “But iPhone customers have a lower level of churn and they actually use less data on average than a high-end 4G Android device. So from a cost point of view and a customer lifetime value perspective, they’re more profitable than the average smartphone customer.”'"
They pay more and use less? What a shocker! Who would have thought?
It's not even that. What he's saying is that 4G Android users use more data than iPhone (i.e. 3G) users do (shocking!) since iPhone is currently still 3G/"3.5"G, and the Android users are more likely to demand the newest gadgets (i.e. "higher churn"). Which is naturally worse for the phone company who wants you to buy whatever phone, keep it forever, and never use the speed you're paying for while still continuing to pay for it.
The problem is that newer, 4G iPhones are likely to attract exactly the same crowd. So unless Sprint's new business model is to keep selling obsolete iPhones forever, they had probably better get a new plan.
The SprintUsers site had an interesting commentary regarding a recent WSJ article on Hesse:
http://www.sprintusers.com/could-hesse-lose-his-job
Today’s Wall Street Journal has a rare, insider-rich piece targeting Hesse. A betting man would say his own board of directors had a lot to do with the story. No, no one on the board is quoted directly. But the picture the WSJ paints is certainly a flattering one of an engaged, hands-on board. They are served well by this story.
You don’t see this sort of knifing when an exec is secure in his job. It usually means board members are trying to distance themselves from a CEO’s plans gone wrong so they don’t get personally sued by shareholders. Or they’re getting ready to fire him.
Just last month, Sprint made an abortive attempt at a merger with MetroPCS, which was championed by Hesse but ultimately shot-down by the board. I have a feeling the company is going to experience a coup d'etat any day now. Well, whatever -- as long as my legacy SERO plan keeps working.
In the one corner Apple, in the other such winners as HTC, Motorolla, Nokia and Sony Ericsson. CEO's always get fired if they back the wrong horse, but he picked the one with the right odds.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
This is how you utilize a first post?
What a waste.
.Net. It sounds like Mr. Hesse is actually doing that.
Now, when it comes to the topic at hand: Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer were fond of using the phrase "bet the company" on certain initiatives, such as
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
The Apple crowd is by far the most vocal? In my college experience it was the Apple haters that were the most vocal.
My UID is prime... is yours?