Slashdot Mirror


Early Exposure To Germs Has Lasting Benefits

ananyo writes "Exposure to germs in childhood is thought to help strengthen the immune system and protect children from developing allergies and asthma, but the pathways by which this occurs have been unclear. Now, researchers have identified a mechanism in mice that may explain the role of exposure to microbes in the development of asthma and ulcerative colitis, a common form of inflammatory bowel disease. The researchers show that in mice, exposure to microbes in early life can reduce the body's inventory of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells, which help to fight infection but can also turn on the body, causing a range of disorders such as asthma or inflammatory bowel disease (abstract). The study supports the 'hygiene hypothesis,' which contends that such auto-immune diseases are more common in the developed world where the prevalence of antibiotics and antibacterials reduce children's exposure to microbes."

13 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. This explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All those bullies sticking my head in the toilet were just trying to help expose me to germs. I should send them a thank you note.

    1. Re:This explains it by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, what kills 1 out of 2 kids every generation makes you stronger. That's how evolution works. But it doesn't mean we want it.

    2. Re:This explains it by andy1307 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Right?

      Ever since my lobotomy, I've been bench pressing 300 pounds!!

    3. Re:This explains it by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ever since I had a lung removed I cut my smoking in half.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  2. Of course it is by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Humanity (or human like creatures) survived for several hundred thousand years without modern medicine. If the body was not capable of developing defenses to disease we wouldn't still be here.

    1. Re:Of course it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, the average life span of human being was around 30 years in those early days at best. It is modern medicine and general quality of life that extends that to 70+ years.

    2. Re:Of course it is by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not entirely true. Grains harvested in the Mesopotamian region for the past 20,000 years contain a fungus that produces potent antibiotics. This was discovered by analyzing those who drank beer (albeit over a paltry 8,000 years) and finding the residue in the bones. Once the source was traced back to the fungus, it was obvious that anyone eating grains in the Middle East since the advent of farming (20,000 years ago) will have had "modern medicine".

      http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/09/antibiotic-beer/

      Before then? Well, honey is another rich source of antibiotics. It's also a hygroscopic material, so applying it to burns will not only kill bacteria but will also reduce inflammation, build-ups of toxins, etc.

      It's unclear when Neolithic man first developed brain surgery, but there's no question that he did and that patients survived.

      So man has had a LOT of medical assistance for a very long time. Not as much as in modern times, true, but it wasn't zero. Not by a long way.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Of course it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Typically these numbers include an extremely high infant mortality rate, without which the difference is significantly smaller.

  3. Re:Sorry by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finding this hard to swallow personally. I was born with pneumonia and had chronic infections early in life. In my 20s I am still plagued by allergies, asthma and generally poor health despite generally good habits as far as diet, exercise, and hygiene. I cringe when I think about what kind of state I'd be in if I didn't.

    The theory goes that it's too late for sloppy hygiene to help you much, now, but if you ate more dirt as a kid, you'd be healthier.

    Most of my anecdotal observations in life tend tend to agree: life in a bubble isn't good for you, even if you never leave it.

  4. Re:Sorry by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most of my anecdotal observations in life tend tend to agree: life in a bubble isn't good for you, even if you never leave it.

    Ah, but the big questions remains unanswered: Does the basement count? Do Dorito bits count as dirt? Are keyboards a good source of antigens for the early immune system?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Re:Sorry by MaxEmerika · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Getting sick isn't the point. In fact, it might be exposure to relatively harmless microbes that helps stave off auto-immune disorders. The problem is that antibacterials/antimicrobials kill everything, not just the bugs that pose a threat.

  6. Just a hypothesis by Stickerboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a good one, but there are several competing theories out there too. One of the best I've seen is the correlation between acetaminophen use in children and the development of asthma in children. It just so happens that clean, microbe-adverse developed nations have much more access to acetaminophen than dirty, unsanitized third world countries....

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  7. Re:Glad this is finally being proven. by SpeZek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only a few select sources of food are overly-infected with nasty things, specifically beef supplies (which are just horrible for you in general)

    Most other things are completely safe eaten raw. That includes milk

    I hate to break it to you, but milk and beef comes from the same filthy animal.