Slashdot Mirror


Science Reveals Why Airplane Food Tastes So Bad

Hugh Pickens writes "At low elevations, the 10,000 or so taste buds in the human mouth work pretty much as nature intended. But step aboard a modern airliner, and the sense of taste loses its bearings. Even before a plane takes off, the atmosphere inside the cabin dries out the nose. As the plane ascends, the change in air pressure numbs about a third of the taste buds, and at 35,000 feet with cabin humidity levels kept low by design to reduce the risk of fuselage corrosion, xerostomia or cotton mouth sets in. This explain why airlines tend to salt and spice food heavily. Without all that extra kick, food tastes bland. 'Ice cream is about the only thing I can think of that tastes good on a plane,' says Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University. 'Airlines have a problem with food on board. The packaging, freezing, drying and storage are hard on flavor at any altitude, let alone 30,000 feet.' Challenges abound. Food safety standards require all meals to be cooked first on the ground. After that, they are blast-chilled and refrigerated until they can be stacked on carts and loaded on planes. For safety, open-flame grills and ovens aren't allowed on commercial aircraft, so attendants must contend with convection ovens that blow hot, dry air over the food. 'Getting any food to taste good on a plane is an elusive goal,' says Steve Gundrum, who runs a company that develops new products for the food industry."

11 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah... except at 35,000ft it's pressurized to 8k by gavron · · Score: 5, Informative

    The modern airliner cabin is pressurized to a pressure altitude of 8,000ft.
    That means that as you go from airport altitude to your cruising altitude the cabin only increases
    in pressure to feel like 8,000ft.

    That's below the 10,000ft where the OP claims cotton-mouth, and below the 14,000 where you
    can't breath, and well below the 35,000 OP cites as cruising altitude.

    See: http://tinyurl.com/brmpv3j

    The original article is just pure hogwash.

    E

  2. Sure blame the taste buds... by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blame the taste buds? That's like blaming the controller when you suck at video games.

    1. Re:Sure blame the taste buds... by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

      The usefulness of your analogy gets a score of 2 pencil sharpeners out of 89.4 green elephants.

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  3. Re:The good old days... by Dave+Whiteside · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they removed the kitchens to cram in more people

    --
    who where what when now?
  4. Re:Yeah... except at 35,000ft it's pressurized to by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    If cottonmouth tales away your sense of taste, then why does everything taste so much better after a big doob?

  5. Re:The good old days... by GmExtremacy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do they still let people get on planes? What if one of them is a terrorist!?

  6. Re:The good old days... by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the era of internet searches for flights basically the only thing you compete on is price and times. Everything else only matters to business customers who are contented with champagne and seats which don't jam their knees into their chins.

    And safety regulations, which, despite the talking points of some political parties, do exist for a reason.

    When the experience of travel matters (say a cruise) you can pitch a more expensive product than the next guy as a different experience that justifies a higher cost. But people view the air travel portion as an inconvenience (which I suppose it is) that must be endured rather than a value added part of the experience. No one likes flying anymore, and if you still do, there are some TSA screeners who will adjust your excitement to approved levels.

  7. Cheapskates! by fleeped · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From TFA, 2nd page, shows the mentality:

    FOR airlines like Delta, these are not trivial matters. A decision a few years ago to shave one ounce from its steaks, for example, saved the airline $250,000 a year. And every step of kitchen labor increases costs when so many meals are prepared daily. An entrée accounts for about 60 percent of a meal’s cost, according to Delta, while appetizers account for 17 percent, salads 10 percent and desserts 7 percent.

    Delta also calculated that by removing a single strawberry from salads served in first class on domestic routes, it would save $210,000 a year. The company hands out 61 million bags of peanuts every year, and about the same number of pretzels. A one-cent increase in peanut prices increases Delta’s costs by $610,000 a year.

    The tastebud stuff sound like pathetic excuses..

  8. Re:What a load of BS! by tepples · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a slight difference between 5000 feet and 30000 feet.

    Likewise, there's a slight difference between the outside and inside of the cabin at 30000 feet.

  9. Re:The good old days... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    You got dehydrated in a hour? Who are you, Sponge Bob Squarepants?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  10. Re:The good old days... by nanoflower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You were doing okay until that last statement. It's a popular myth that drinking a soda will dehydrate but studies have shown that the water loss due to the small amount of caffeine in a typical soda is greatly outweighed the water provided by the soda. So if you drink multiple sodas all day long you won't end up dehydrated due to the caffeine (though you may gain weight from all of the 'empty' calories.)