Slashdot Mirror


IETF Attendees Reengineer Their Hotel's Wi-Fi Net

alphadogg writes "What happens when a bunch of IETF super nerds show up in Paris for a major conference and discover their hotel's Wi-Fi network has imploded? They give it an Extreme Wi-Fi Makeover. Members of the Internet Engineering Task Force, who gathered for the outfit's 83rd meeting this week in France, discovered as they arrived at the Hotel Concorde Lafayette that the Wi-Fi was flakey and became flakier still as scores more attendees arrived and tried to connect, and the wired net was having issues of its own. Working behind the scenes, a team of IETF attendees negotiated with the hotel and were granted access to the wireless network, and began rigging up all sorts of fixes, which even included taping a Nexus S phone to a ceiling and turning off the radios on numerous access points to reduce noise."

120 comments

  1. the phone by C0R1D4N · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone please explain the usefulness of taping a phone to the ceiling to me.

    1. Re:the phone by Spad · · Score: 2

      Ad hoc wireless access point, one would presume.

    2. Re:the phone by AntmanGX · · Score: 5, Informative

      "There was no WiFi signal when on the desk in front of the window in my room, but after some experiments, I discovered that the signal was quite good... on the ceiling of the bathroom," emailed Marc Petit-Huguenin.

      "I have a Nexus S phone, so I taped it on the ceiling of the bathroom, and used tethering over Bluetooth to bridge the gap to the desk," he explained. This is a slow connection, but good enough to send emails over SMTP or use vi [the popular Unix text editor] over SSH."

      FTA

    3. Re:the phone by tzot · · Score: 2

      Translation: “I can't bother to RTFA, tell me the tl;dr version”.

      --
      I speak England very best
    4. Re:the phone by Night64 · · Score: 0

      have you tried RTFA?

      --
      Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
    5. Re:the phone by schitso · · Score: 1

      FTFA:
      "'There was no WiFi signal when on the desk in front of the window in my room, but after some experiments, I discovered that the signal was quite good... on the ceiling of the bathroom,' emailed Marc Petit-Huguenin.

      'I have a Nexus S phone, so I taped it on the ceiling of the bathroom, and used tethering over Bluetooth to bridge the gap to the desk,' he explained. This is a slow connection, but good enough to send emails over SMTP or use vi [the popular Unix text editor] over SSH."

    6. Re:the phone by geekmux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Someone please explain the usefulness of taping a phone to the ceiling to me.

      It's part of the IPv7 protocol. Don't worry, you'll see them release a paper next week on it...and I'm sure industry will get right on implementing that...sometime in 2037.

      In other news, it was reported that part of the re-engineering of this Wi-Fi network was implementing IPv6...unfortunately, they could find no one outside of the IETF super nerds who knew what the hell it was for...

    7. Re:the phone by mellon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh come on, why does it have to be useful? The hotel let us do it! (I'm guessing that it had a USB ethernet dongle, but I wasn't there, so I don't know for sure.)

      I feel very fortunate that a majority of my business travel is to IETF meetings, because this is the only time that I ever experience functional internet in a hotel. It can be pretty fantastic--in Hiroshima, the WIDE team rewired _all_ of the IETF hotels, which is about five different hotels. In almost every IETF since Seoul, the IETF NOC has provided the connectivity for the conference hotel for the duration of the conference, and the connectivity has been excellent.

      It's too bad that hotels can't afford to pay IETF geeks to fix their connections on a more general basis, and that there isn't a commercial provider that's able to provide a similar level of service for a price hotels can afford. Sometimes I think we ought to have an independent hotel WiFi rating service, so that hotels would have to actually compete on the basis of the quality of their Internet service.

    8. Re:the phone by rvw · · Score: 2

      Someone please explain the usefulness of taping a phone to the ceiling to me.

      It is there to hide it from Inspecteur Clouseau!

    9. Re:the phone by SailorSpork · · Score: 4, Informative

      In other words, it was a short fix so he could get initial wireless access to the network from his own computer so that they could get in an poke around some more. They did not deploy smartphones around the whole hotel as a permanent solution. I think the whole Smartphone thing was played up to make the article seem more appealing, but after he did that it looks like they used more mundane, standard approaches to tune and adjust the network to get it running to spec.

    10. Re:the phone by buchner.johannes · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone please explain the usefulness of taping a phone to the ceiling to me.

      It's part of the IPv7 protocol. Don't worry, you'll see them release a paper next week on it...and I'm sure industry will get right on implementing that...sometime in 2037.

      Obviously in 2037 we have to tape our phones to the ceiling when we wear our pockets inside-out.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    11. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which hotels in Hiroshima are IETF hotels?

    12. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely played bttf2 reference

    13. Re:the phone by idontgno · · Score: 3, Funny

      This will coincide nicely with the revival of the fashion of wearing an onion on your belt.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    14. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking to God?

    15. Re:the phone by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having all hotels provide connectivity suitable for a LARGE group of internet junkies is financially stupid.

      Most hotels have adequate coverage for their normal guest load, so they use the cheapest provider capable of providing that adequate coverage.

      No other event in the hotel is going to require the connectivity perfection that an IETF conference is going to require, its a waste of money for them to engineer and build out an IETF compatible network. Its far simpler to get some joe the plumber from the PCGuys Shop down the street to throw in a DSL line and enough APs that no one bitches, and for the most part, works just fine.

      Not every hotel NEEDS that kind of connectivity. For instance the hotel I went to for my wedding had absolutely shitty connectivity and if you asked they would politely respond, aren't you here for your wedding sir? And they were right :) Disney has absolutely shitty connectivity and their response is rather atypical for Disney in that it is intentionally bad, you're not supposed to be dicking around on the Internet at Disney.

      They also don't need to pay for DS3 or so of bandwidth for the hotel if it isn't filled with bandwidth hogs (which I actually doubt the IETF are, probably the opposite but just making a point.)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    16. Re:the phone by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Bah. There is other technology than DS3s for high-speed internet, many of which are much cheaper.

      If you can't get a 50mbps connection for your hotel, for less than the cable bill, than you are doing it wrong.

      The last thing anyone wants, in this day and age, is some cheap ass hotel trying to serve over a hundred customers with an ADSL connection.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    17. Re:the phone by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      If you know some trick to get 50mbps to an arbitrary location for less than a cable bill, I'd absolutely love to hear it.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    18. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A hotel gets a cable bill and you get a cable bill. The numbers are different though. Regarding the argument that a hotel should provide more bandwidth: The TV usually provides some revenue (via pay-per-view). Free Wifi doesn't. If it's too good, it will be used for VoIP and then it eats into the phone bill. Wifi just needs to be "good enough" that you can put it on the list of amenities.

    19. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those big yellow ones?

    20. Re:the phone by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      That is some real MacGuyver networking there. I can picture Richard Dean Anderson saying, "I need some duct tape and a cell phone!"

    21. Re:the phone by phorm · · Score: 2

      Why not just use a repeater instead? Maybe not as much geek-cool factor, but faster and less of a PITA.

    22. Re:the phone by jmauro · · Score: 1

      At this point cell phones have pretty much killed charges for room charges from the phone. I don't think I've used a phone in a room in like 15 years.

      Having bad WiFi is one of the things that can drive business customers from staying there, and business customers are usually the most profitable customers for a hotel.

    23. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had RTFA you would know that coverage wasn't the big issue. It was poor network planning. They had too much equipment in too little space with poor frequency planning. The Hotel payed for more equipment then they needed which provided worse performance then less equipment with better planning.

    24. Re:the phone by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Because they didn't have a repeater in their pocket?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    25. Re:the phone by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were too many active radios, and the spectrum was too crowded. They even switched to a four-channel layout instead of the three-channel. (We informally use a five-channel model in my apartment building, what with all the various tennants' APs and routers finding the least crowded piece of spectrum in their immediate area.

    26. Re:the phone by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Where there's a hotel capable with 500 rooms, there's likely to be a cable ISP within easy reach. The larger the hotel, the more cheap bandwidth is geographically handy.

    27. Re:the phone by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      Nor was he happy to see them. *eyebrow waggle*

    28. Re:the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, they've gotten IPv7 working? I'm worried about the paranormal aspects. http://www.google.com/search?q=IPv7&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=blO&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&sclient=psy-ab&q=IPv7+lain&oq=IPv7+lain&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3...12846l16345l0l16546l9l8l1l0l0l1l124l723l6j2l9l0.frgbld.&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1d5c249636b87e94&biw=1706&bih=942

    29. Re:the phone by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 2

      Dude I'm wearing my pockets inside out as soon as 2015 hits.
      At least get the reference right ;)

    30. Re:the phone by mbone · · Score: 1

      For instance the hotel I went to for my wedding had absolutely shitty connectivity and if you asked they would politely respond, aren't you here for your wedding sir? And they were right :)

      Haven't been to many IETF weddings I guess.

    31. Re:the phone by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      Actually though, IPv7 predates IPv6!

      The experimental IPv7 protocol was specified in June 1993 in RFC 1475 while IPv6 was specified as in December 1995 as RFC 1883.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    32. Re:the phone by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Precisely my point. You don't want your chain of hotels to become associated with 'receiving a more favorable internet connection via a pair of acoustic couplers.'

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  2. This Just In! by nemui-chan · · Score: 2

    Nerds get together and do nerdy stuff en masse!

    1. Re:This Just In! by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Nerds get together and do nerdy stuff en masse!

      At least they weren't genetic engineers.

      (a get-together of plastic surgeons, on the other hand...)

    2. Re:This Just In! by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Nerds get together and do nerdy stuff en masse!

      Ah, that explains all those dudes at the park dressed up in medieval garb and why I got hit in the head with a beanbag.

    3. Re:This Just In! by michrech · · Score: 1

      Lightning Bolt! Lightning Bolt! Lightning Bolt!

      --
      bork bork bork!
  3. Nexus S phone??? by niftydude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I am a fan of the samsung line of android smartphones, but using a high-end smartphone is one of the most expensive options for a wifi router that I've ever heard of.

    I don't see many hotels running with that solution.

    --
    You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    1. Re: Nexus S phone??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      you are a fscking idiot.

    2. Re: Nexus S phone??? by yincrash · · Score: 1

      It was just for one guest who realized he had great wifi reception on his bathroom ceiling and used the nexus S to bluetooth tether to his laptop.

    3. Re: Nexus S phone??? by metalgamer84 · · Score: 2

      Read the article before posting to keep yourself from looking like an idiot next time.

    4. Re: Nexus S phone??? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I am a fan of the samsung line of android smartphones, but using a high-end smartphone is one of the most expensive options for a wifi router that I've ever heard of.

      I don't see many hotels running with that solution.

      You should look at the price of Cisco AP's - you can easily pay more than the price of an unlocked Nexus for a single AP. (but it's a lot more capable as an AP than the phone)

    5. Re: Nexus S phone??? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe the summarirs could actually summarize the article instead of doing shitty local news teases?

    6. Re: Nexus S phone??? by DroolTwist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or.. maybe you could RTFA. The summaries are to give enough information to let you decide if you are interested in reading the article. If the summary is going to cover every single detail, they may as well just paste the entire article in the summary section, and do away with the links.

    7. Re: Nexus S phone??? by niftydude · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, you could have politely pointed out my error like yincrash did above, but chose not to. Now I'm going to have to get medieval on your ass. When dealing with the pain, please remember you brought this on yourself.

      Whilst thine contention that I readeth not the article is in good sooth, thine attitude lacketh charm and grace.
      Prithee consider the comeliness of thine words, lest good folk consider thee knavish.
      Thou art an embossed carbuncle.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    8. Re: Nexus S phone??? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      That has to be the most literal interpretation of "get medieval" I've seen anywhere.

      Pray, sir, that you may accepteth my earnest compliments on thine craft of the Anglo script!

    9. Re: Nexus S phone??? by slshwtw · · Score: 2

      "thine contention" / "thine attitude" / "thine words" - should all be "thy"
      "thy" = "your", "thine" = "yours"

      "I readeth not" = wrong tense, I think you want "I didst not read"


      - archaic grammar nazi

  4. Summer blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't wait until Micheal Bay directs a movie about this.

    IETF Agents struggle to defend paris against an onsluaght of transforming alien turtles and explosions

    1. Re:Summer blockbuster? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Can't wait until Micheal Bay directs a movie about this...

      Why? Are there massive explosions and car chases when you configure your AP? If so, you might be doing it wrong.

    2. Re:Summer blockbuster? by firex726 · · Score: 2

      SHUT UP.
      You might give him ideas.

    3. Re:Summer blockbuster? by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Can't wait until Micheal Bay directs a movie about this...

      Why? Are there massive explosions and car chases when you configure your AP? If so, you might be doing it wrong.

      Or very very right, depending on how you look at it. Seriously, if you can get your AP to explode, literally, just by configuring it, I would be impressed.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:Summer blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It brings a whole new dimension to the term "wardriving".

    5. Re:Summer blockbuster? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. Michael Bay could shoot "Sex in the City" with massive explosions and car chases.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    6. Re:Summer blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that only happens if google's self-driving cars are using the wifi connection to triangulate for their navigation....

  5. So now I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Where the fucking network kludges I have to unfuck come from. FOSS-tard dumb asses.

  6. Jury Rigged WiFi by na1led · · Score: 0

    So these nerds Jury Rigged the WiFi in the motel, and when they are gone, the whole network collapses.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Jury Rigged WiFi by robot256 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know if what they did qualifies as jury-rigged. They basically mapped out the entire network and assigned RF channels and power levels so that adjacent floors would not interfere with each other. Seems like whoever installed it before just threw up an access point in every other room and left it on full power. What the IETF guys are doing is certainly not totally optimized yet but it's a big improvement over what was there before.

    2. Re:Jury Rigged WiFi by chelliot · · Score: 2

      We will remove the connection to their uplink, so performance will go down when we leave. However, they are keeping our configuration changes, so I expect the performance to still be significantly better than it was before we arrived.
      Chris.

  7. Oh, so it's not just San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wi-Fi at my hotel for GDC last month was unusable. These places need to step it up if they're going to partner with tech-oriented conferences like these.

  8. I have been in hotels with a cable co wifi modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been in hotels with a cable co wifi modem in the room (good as I needed to reboot it aka unplug and replug to get it working)

  9. Please explain by pesho · · Score: 2

    Can somebody explain to me why did these guys go to this conference? In my experience there are two reasons to go to a conference:

    1. Business - meet people learn new things

    2. Pleasure - screw the talks and go skying

    This conference is in Paris of all places and if they don't care about the place and the talks why the hell did they go there. I am pretty sure every single one of the participants has better internet connection at home.

    1. Re:Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because those guys have jobs and need to be able to access the network at those jobs. If you'd read the article you would know that they were reengineering the network specifically so that their VPN connections wouldn't drop constantly.

    2. Re:Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Pleasure - screw the talks and go skying

      Don't you mean "screw other attendees"?

    3. Re:Please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was an IT conference. There were no humans identifiable as female present, except for the terrified hotel staff who had to face hordes of raging nerds, each of whom was trying to out-impress the cute lady at the hotel concierge desk. That being said, there quite possibly was still some "screwing of the other attendees" going on, since they were bored and internet was down, but who are any of us to judge?

    4. Re:Please explain by chelliot · · Score: 1

      1. Business - meet people learn new things

      Please read up on what the IETF does. We meet to design the protocols that allow the Internet to work. Our primary focus is not to meet people or learn new things, although both things happen as secondary outcomes. Your ability to transmit your message above is because of the work we do.

      This conference is in Paris of all places and if they don't care about the place and the talks why the hell did they go there.

      The selection of the sites for the IETF meetings is complex and many variables go into the mix. We try to encourage participation in the IETF around the world while somewhat equalizing the inconvenience of travel by having meetings at locations around the world. Few cities have conference centers with enough meeting rooms in the right mix of sizes for us. We are very sensitive to price, while wanting the facility to allow us to install our own network. There has to be enough hotel rooms close to the conference center for 1200-1600 attendees. Adequate restaurants, climate, stability of the government, openness of the Internet in the country, and an almost endless number of other variables are used. Paris was chosen for many reasons.

      I am pretty sure every single one of the participants has better internet connection at home.

      We had two 1G uplinks. No, (almost) no participant has better internet connections at home.

      Chris.

    5. Re:Please explain by FunkDup · · Score: 1

      screw the talks and go skying

      Can I come Skying? I have no idea what it is but it sounds really fun!

      --
      Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds -- Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Please explain by mbone · · Score: 1

      Well, except for Peter Lothberg, whose Mom has better Internet connection.

  10. Lower power by ai4px · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I like what I've read in the article so far. One of the mantras of ham radio is use as little power as possible to communicate. I love that these guys were smart enough to turn off some access points entirely, to reduce receiver sensitivity and transmitter power. It seems they reduced the number of access points to 3... one for each non-overlapping channel. Great!

    1. Re:Lower power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "It's a 2.4Ghz infrastructure in a highly 3D and rather radio transparent environment -- where the three non-overlapping channels [all that are possible in that band] are a real problem."

      They're in Paris. There are four non-overlapping channels in Europe: 1, 5, 9 and 13. While it is customary to use 1, 6 and 11, especially in settings where international visitors are expected, if the network really needs 4 channels, they are available and should be used.

      The proper way to fix the Wifi in multi-story buildings is with directional antennas, to reduce the 3D problem to multiple 2D problems.

    2. Re:Lower power by chefmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      And that's ultimately what Chris did: we're now operating on four channels. Well, six, actually -- some of the APs could operate in the 5 GHz spectrum, so rather than leaving them off, they were re-purposed for the equipment that could use them (which offloads all the Macs and iPads from the 2.4 GHz spectrum, bringing the noise floor down). So now, running down one side of the building, we have 1, 5, 9 and 13; and then on the other side, 13, 9, 5, and 1. The APs on the tips of the building (it's shaped like an American football in horizontal cross-section) are on the 5GHz channels 40 and 44. The pattern is reversed for every other floor, to provide as much vertical spacing as possible.

      This should help you visualize the layout: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-iesg-11-ietf-operations-and-administration-plenary.pdf

      Keep in mind also that the APs, when we showed up, were turned up all the way up. Look at the diagrams, and keep in mind that these are small rooms (the building is maybe 150 feet wide along its longer axis), and you begin to see how the deployment failure was pretty complete before we got here.

      Of course, we didn't show up with 300 directional antennas to fix the APs themselves. All we could do is change their configuration. The change has been dramatic.

    3. Re:Lower power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also the Europeans can't magically increase bandwidth - so there are also only 3 non-overlapping channels but in this environment it seemed to be reasonable to choose 4 partially overlapping channels risking somewhat higher interference which is possible in case the tx power is reduced ... pure basic radio engineering works!

    4. Re:Lower power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 4 practically non-overlapping channels because there are 2 more channels in Europe. American Wifi goes to 11, European Wifi goes to 13! The channels are not hard limited at +-11MHz from the center frequency. Even 1,6,11 has overlap. The interference with 1,5,9,13 is not much worse, especially when the access points are not close to eachother.

    5. Re:Lower power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we didn't show up with 300 directional antennas to fix the APs themselves

      Not you, of course. I meant to preempt the notion that WLAN technology can't be any good if IETF guys can't fix the WLAN in a way that provides connectivity to everyone.

      The switch to 4 channels is mentioned later in the article. I was surprised by the earlier rather absolute assertion that 3 is "all that are possible in that band". Stopped reading to comment, continued reading. I guess you guys are not complete idiots after all ;)

    6. Re:Lower power by ai4px · · Score: 1

      About converting the 3d problem into multiple 2d problems by using high gain antennas is abso-freaking-lutly a good solution. I've always pictured an isotropic radiator as a balloon in my head. If you add gain, you squish the balloon in one axis and it expands out all around perpendicular to that axis. Zero signal straight off the tip of the antenna. Ideally a high gain antenna would radiate out 360 in a plane and APs on adjacent floors would not hear each other. They could also make sure the APs were in stacked directly on top of each other on the various floors.

    7. Re:Lower power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are not four non overlapping channels. 1 6 11 do not overlap. If you change to 1 5 9 13, you get overlap. It is better in most environments to use 1 6 11. If you only have European clients, use 1 7 13. Assuming no one using your network bought their hardware anywhere else in the world.

    8. Re:Lower power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NonOverlappingChannels2.4GHzWLAN-en.svg
      Are you still using 802.11b or do you turn that off because slow clients slow the whole network down?
      Either way there is still interference, but with 802.11g/n, the actual channels do not overlap. There's also interference when you use 1,6,11, because there is no sharp signal cutoff at the channel edges.

      If you don't need 4 channels, it's usually better to use 1,6,11, even if you could use 1,7,13, because some devices sold in Europe don't have support for the extra channels and some devices which could use these channels are misconfigured not to.

    9. Re:Lower power by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Never mind the spec; 1, 6, and 11 do overlap (albeit only slightly) in real life. Go buy a 2.4 GHz spectrum analyzer, bring up three APs on those three channels, and see for yourself what the power curve is.

    10. Re:Lower power by chelliot · · Score: 1

      Well, to be pedantic, 8, actually. I used 36, 40, 44, and 48, two on each end of each floor (each floor of the concorde looks like a 2D football).
      Chris.

  11. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Suggestion to the Hotel... Instead of relying on a bunch of guys with flashy badges talking endlessly about how smart they are, why not just hire a network consulting firm to do a generic network topography and build out the network correctly?"

    Because they are a Hotel, and don't give a shit if their network is flaky. They have been using Microsoft products for more than a decade, so when things sometimes work and sometimes don't, then that is just them darn computers behaving flaky as always.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  12. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know those 802.11 wireless standards implemented in just about every wireless network device in the world? These guys wrote them. Literally. Rest assured they understand what they're doing.

    You have a point about future support, but characterizing them as just a bunch of guys with badges who barely have a clue makes you seem ignorant.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  13. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Amouth · · Score: 1

    Suggestion to the Hotel... Instead of relying on a bunch of guys with flashy badges talking endlessly about how smart they are, why not just hire a network consulting firm to do a generic network topography and build out the network correctly? The stuff is not rocket science...

    That is what they did.. but as we all know.. while it's not rocket science.. there are a lot of "network consulting firm"s that can't do it.

    and while some of it was guessing - remember that this isn't "their" network.. and they had no working set to start with and no idea where some of these AP's where.. and again.. it wasn't their job or reason for being there.

    in hind site they might want to think about going the way of defcon and bring in their own network to their next get together.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  14. No giant dinosaur?! No go! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    You're right. There's absolutely *nothing* to see or do in Paris.

  15. toney by magarity · · Score: 2

    " they arrived at the toney Hotel Concorde Lafayette"

    Do you mean "tony" as in "upscale and/or fashionable"?

    1. Re:toney by mbone · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what they meant, the Hotel Concorde Lafayette ain't it.

    2. Re:toney by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's kind of an overpriced crap pit with chronic theft problems in which the staff appear to be complicit (if not the actual perpetrators). But that wasn't really the main thrust of the article. :)

  16. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, these guys are really, really good. They know what they are doing, and have been doing it, successfully, for several years. For several years before that, we didn't do so well. These guys have all the tools, and mostly, the experience. They can do it quick, and work within the constraints of the existing system. A regular network consulting company would take a couple of weeks, do a poorer job, insist a lot of new equipment is needed and charge an arm and a leg, which is why the hotel didn't do it. In a few hours they mapped the network, analyzed the configuration, designed a new plan, deployed it, tested it, and made it work. They did it on a product line they had not dealt with before. It was very impressive.

    The actual fun issue is: they logged all the original state. They have a tool that maintains the entire configuration. They can leave it in one of two conditions: exactly the way it was before they changed everything, or in the state it is now. The hotel can make that choice.

  17. Happens all the time by mbone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The IETF basically re-engineers the Hotel's network every place they meet. The big difference is, sometimes they get permission to do this before the meeting, and sometimes (as here in Paris), they don't get this permission until after the Hotel's network melts down.

    (By the way, I am at the meeting, and I heard that the Hotel's IT head has now been fired. This is not too surprising when one of the major fixes was to turn off
    the majority of the access points.)

    1. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The access points have been turned back on, but on different channels. The transmit power has been upped to the default value again as well. In the end the best result came from just changing the channels: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-iesg-11-ietf-operations-and-administration-plenary.pdf

      If the hotel fired the IT guy because he had not provided them with as good a network configuration as a hotel full of IETF engineers did, I think they're going to be surprised when they hear what kind of salary a top notch network specialist can command in Paris. (Their first attempt even made things worse for some attendants! Getting Wifi right for a lot of heavy users is not easy.)

    2. Re:Happens all the time by chelliot · · Score: 1

      The solution was in many changes. That included changing the lowest allowed speed and broadcast/multicast rate to 2Mhz (from 1) for the 2.4G APs and changing the receiver sensitivity on the AP radios by changing the Colubris wireless interface config "distance" from "large" to "small". Often it is a set of small changes that, together, effect change far larger than they do individually. You can see the incremental improvements in the bandwidth graph in the presentation.

      I suspect that the channel reallocation was the most important change, but the time is too short to test all combinations and determine the impact of each change.

      Chris.

  18. Extreme Wifi Makeover by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would so watch that show! Every week, they take us to a company to look over their pathetic network and re-do it properly and with moar power. I can see it now...the teary-eyed IT manager is brought in to see his new network...it'd be like Bob Vila for geeks.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    1. Re:Extreme Wifi Makeover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would so watch that show! Every week, they take us to a company to look over their pathetic network and re-do it properly and with moar power. I can see it now...the teary-eyed IT manager is brought in to see his new network...it'd be like Bob Vila for geeks.

      Wrong. The Teary-eyed IT manager is fired. And the ensuing publicity is enough to blacklist him for some time.

    2. Re:Extreme Wifi Makeover by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm renting a room right now, and pretty much had to do a wifi makeover to get good connectivity in the basement. The signal was very spotty, and it seemed like we would have to reconnect every few minutes if anyone upstairs was also using the signal.

      They didn't want to run wires down to the basement, but I found that there was great wifi signal in the wine cellar around the corner. I bought a wifi extender to bounce the signal around the corner. It helped a little bit, but my system would still bounce between the repeater signal and the weak access point upstairs every once in a while. I guess the repeaters only work well if you're well beyond the range of the original access point, and I'm sure it was causing more congestion since it was repeating everything on the same channel.

      Then I found if I set it to wifi-tether mode and ran a CAT5e cable to my computer, it would work much better than my computer's wifi. With the big antennas, it did a much better job holding on to the weak signal. But the bandwidth still wasn't ideal, was only getting 15Mbps instead of the full 25Mbps.

      Also there were more devices we wanted hooked up to wifi, so I ended up setting it up in wifi-tether mode, and ran the long cable to an old wifi access point I had in our area running on a different channel. I'm actually using the old wifi access point as a wifi bridge (it's plugged into one of the LAN ports instead of the WAN port), so it doesn't act as another router hop, and the DHCP / gateway is served directly by the landlord's wifi AP. Not exactly an advertised setup with the wifi repeater, but now all of our devices get a wonderful and stable signal... definitely happy to have this flexible wifi repeater unit in my toolbox.

  19. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

    I wish I could mod you up because the parent definitely seems to be significantly ignorant, rofl.

  20. Not a systemic problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently stayed in some hotels in Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia - Hotel Istana, Park Royal to name a few. The wifi was perfect in all areas of the room, in the buffet area and most areas of the lobby. I'm highlighting this so that people don't think all hotels suffer this problem.
    When I was at breakfast, many people had laptops and smart phones, so there was a fair amount of taxing of wifi bandwidth. I recall a few couples streaming video over the web, which sounded fine (I couldn't see the image).

  21. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The stuff is not rocket science..."

    Apples to apples, please. If I could, I'd be well on my way toward a certification in rocket science as well.

  22. 83rd meeting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 'Internet' hasn't been around for 83 years. So, how many meetings per year are needed?

    1. Re:83rd meeting? by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 'Internet' hasn't been around for 83 years. So, how many meetings per year are needed?

      In the early days, it was less regimented, and sometimes as frequently as 4 times a year. For the past few decades, it's been a pretty steady spring/summer/fall meeting schedule.

  23. And in a related story... by sfhock · · Score: 1

    a team of IETF engineers who were granted access to the Hotel Concorde Lafayette's Wi-Fi network received complementary hookers and champagne, and had all of their room charges dropped. Some of the hookers who could be reached for comment called the IETF engineers "extraordinarily poor tippers".

    --
    "Let's go find some Turian and beat the shit out of him ... That always cheers you up!!"
  24. But but.... by Dareth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nobody ever got fired for listening to a vendor. They all have your needs and best interest at heart when they quote you the bare minimum you absolutely need to buy.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  25. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

    These IETF dudes sound like the A-Team of IT. They just roll into town, unfuck the network, and are gone just as mysteriously.

  26. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know those 802.11 wireless standards implemented in just about every wireless network device in the world? These guys wrote them. Literally. Rest assured they understand what they're doing.

    You Seem to be confusing the IETF with the IEEE...

  27. Beef by gottabeme · · Score: 2

    The changes made by the IETF makeover team included:

    - Decreasing the AP receiver sensitivity ([changing] HP/Colubris configuration "distance" from "large" to "small");

    - Increasing the minimum data and multicast rate from 1Mbps to 2Mbps;

    - Decreasing the transmit power from 20dBm to 10dBm;

    - And, turning off the radios on numerous APs to reduce the [RF] noise.

    "In the process, we've hacked netdisco [a network management tool that maps MAC addresses to IP addresses to pinpoint switch ports] to be able to discover the hotel infrastructure and rancid [a free tool that monitors a device's configurations and maintains a history of changes in a Concurrent Version System (CVS) repository] to be able to at least minimally work with HP/Colubris APs, and added their private subnet to our management station to facilitate discovery, scripted changes, and monitoring," Elliott wrote, describing something close to a NOC trouble-shooting system put together on the fly.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  28. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they seem to work together on that :
    www.google.com/search?q=IEEE+802.11+Liaison+Report

  29. No, the purple ones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only horse thieves and bootleggers from Missoura wear the yellow ones.

  30. This is unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my early days of contracting I was staying at a cheap hotel where the owner lost his system and the back-ups. I negotiated payment in beer and did a forensic recovery.....

    Doesn't everybody?

    1. Re:This is unusual? by chelliot · · Score: 1

      I was on vacation in Hawaii on the big island in probably `94 or before and fixed the network at the Volcano Arts Center. The director gave me a nice discount for anything at the center and we ended up going to a mutual friend's house, where they fixed us a traditional Hawaiian dinner. I also had to hack my Pentax MX camera when the shutter button fell off while we were on top of Puu Oo looking down into the most breathtaking view I've seen.

      Awesome vacation. And, no, not unusual, for this crowd.

      Chris.

  31. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by tqk · · Score: 1

    These IETF dudes sound like the A-Team of IT. They just roll into town, unfuck the network, and are gone just as mysteriously.

    I wish they'd roll into ICANN and do the same.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  32. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by chelliot · · Score: 1

    in hind site they might want to think about going the way of defcon and bring in their own network to their next get together.

    We do. However, most of the time that gear is used for the convention center and not for the hotel. This time we deployed 50 Cisco 1200 APs, 11 24-48-port switches, 9 smaller 8-port switches (mainly for rooms needing multiple wired connections), and two Juniper routers, each connected to a 1Gbps uplink using different paths to the rest of the Internet.

    We did consider deploying some of our leftover APs (some 20 more 1200s, and some 1131s that we only use for outlying areas) in the hotel, but there really wasn't time, nor was it practical due to the number of floors (33) and the number of access points already on each floor (10). In Taipei we deployed around 20 APs in the main hotel. Each venue is unique.

    Chris.

  33. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by chelliot · · Score: 1

    We tried. We sent in one of our best:

    http://cavebear.com/index.php?option=com_bookmarks&Itemid=67&mode=2&catid=-1&navstart=0
    Search for ICANN.

    Chris.

  34. And a taste of the prequel... by chelliot · · Score: 1

    I spent much of last Friday (before the IETF meeting started) tying the hotel wireless infrastructure to our dual gig uplinks in the convention center. An amusing part of this was that to find the fiber that went between the convention center and the hotel required us to dig out our own documentation from when we used this facility in 2005. One page allowed us to locate where the fiber terminated in the conference center--a room on the roof of the center. We then had to get one of the conference staff to climb into the equipment cage as they never used it and had lost the key.

    Imagine using an elevator that required calling security to enable it to go to the top floor, winding around and ducking under giant HVAC equipment in a dust-covered room, and turning on the lights to see a 8-foot high equipment cage. Imagine the staff member using a pallet as a stepping stone to get into said cage. Imagine that the lights are on a timer and go off automatically in 5 minutes, leaving said staff member to try to climb out in the dark. Fortunately, I was there, outside the cage.

    It's always interesting when we know things about the facility that the staff doesn't.

    That said, both the convention center and the hotel staff have been great to work with, the key has been found--and no one has been fired, as far as I know. Certainly the same folks I've been dealing with are still employed here.

    Chris.

    1. Re:And a taste of the prequel... by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Thank you for participating in this thread. I have enjoyed reading your perspective in addition to the article.

  35. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Amouth · · Score: 1

    I fully understand that each venue is unique but to come into something like this - and have that many professionals unable to do their jobs, should be considered unacceptable especially for this group of people.

    The only real way to avoid this problem is in planning, I understand you plan on the convention center, but you should also plan on the logging. (i made the assumption in my first comment that the conference was being held at at the same place as logging (30+ floor hotels normally can handle conferences of that size)

    In the future you should plan ahead for this, not so much in bringing your own hardware (only if you have to) but rather ensure that the venue you select can actually support what you are doing, in this case it couldn't.

    Everyone seems to love fixing on the fly, firefighting is glorious, but in reality planners are the people that make things happen. and we are only reading about this because of the failure of planning.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  36. Wifi Analyzer by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    If you have an Android device, Wifi Analyzer will do a pretty decent job showing you what's on each channel and what the crossband interference might look like.

    Using CyanogenMOD, I also quite often set my phone up as an HSDPA-wifi, HSDPA-USB, or even wifi-usb tether, depending on my situation... and it usually works much better than whatever lousy wifi access point I might encounter in public.

  37. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by mbone · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I don't think you understand. Planning for IETF meetings now start 3 years in advance. We send people to every hotel months before the meeting, specifically to check out the network. We always ask for permission to modify the hotel network (and, generally we get it). (We just went through a long involved process to convince a future hotel of the benefits of doing this.) The NOC team moves into the hotel a full week before the meeting to set this up. But, even with all of this, shit happens. The IETF stresses really stresses the network, and has a history of uncovering problems.

  38. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by martas · · Score: 1

    Commenting to undo accidental "overrated" mod (meant funny). Also, I love the word "unfuck".

  39. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by Amouth · · Score: 1

    That sounds great - but what is seemingly described here does not reflect what you just said. I understand "shit happens" but what is described here (having to re-config it on the fly without knowing where things are) shows a lack of planning, particularly proper scoping of the facility ahead of arrival.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  40. Re:Wheres the Beef?? by tqk · · Score: 1

    Fascinating reading, thanks. It confirms my knowledge of the situation adding much interesting color. However, I can't see any dates in there later than 2003. Might it not be time to revisit the issue, perhaps with more than one guy's efforts (bright and insightful though he may be)?

    FYI, this (bottom of the page) doesn't exist. I'll see if I can find it at EFF (they probably moved it in the interim).

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.