Slashdot Mirror


Judge Allows Bradley Manning Supporter To Sue Government Over Border Search

Fluffeh writes "David Maurice House, an MIT researcher and Bradley Manning supporter, was granted the right to pursue a case against the government on Wednesday after a federal judge denied the government's motion to dismiss. 'This ruling affirms that the Constitution is still alive at the US border,' ACLU Staff Attorney Catherine Crump said in a statement. 'Despite the government's broad assertions that it can take and search any laptop, diary or smartphone without any reasonable suspicion, the court said the government cannot use that power to target political speech.' The agents confiscated a laptop computer, a thumb drive, and a digital camera from House and reportedly demanded, but did not receive, his encryption keys. DHS held onto House's equipment for 49 days and returned it only after the ACLU sent a strongly worded letter."

13 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. I'm hoping by Lucky_Pierre · · Score: 5, Funny

    For change.

    --
    "Whenever the cause of the people is entrusted to professors, it is lost." ~ V.I. Lenin
    1. Re:I'm hoping by rastos1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm hoping ... for change.

      Here. My $0.02. They are now yours. That's all you'll get.

  2. Re:Not held in contempt? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only that, but it's meanIngless since everyone holds the DHS in contempt.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  3. Look Out! by exomondo · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's got a strongly worded letter!

  4. Re:Inconsistent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amendments are obviously written in order of importance. Border searches are more important than the 4th amendment but less than the 1st. I think that it in fact lies somewhere between the 2nd and 3rd amendments in terms of importance.

  5. Re:Strongly worded letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, but I can point you to the many strongly-worded letters I've sent to politicians, manufacturers, restaurants, and TV Guide, concerning various topics. They're all excellent examples of strongly-worded letters that had no effect.

  6. Re:Not held in contempt? by Nyder · · Score: 5, Funny

    If being in contempt of DHS was punishable, we would all be in jail.

    They are working on that.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  7. Re:Inconsistent? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amendments are obviously written in order of importance

    Oh shit, that means I have to give up alcohol!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  8. Can We Search You ? by rust627 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes We Can !

    --
    da da da dum indeed.
  9. Re:Strongly worded letter by iamgnat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Return his equipment OR ELSE.....!

    We'll put you in the COMFY CHAIR!

  10. Re:Inconsistent? by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait a minute! Doesn't this mean if they copy the contents then they may be pirating software, films, and music? .

    Someone call the RIAA, maybe these two behemoths can bludgeon each other to death over a long drawn out battle and leave the rest of us the fuck alone for a while.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  11. Re:Strongly worded letter by Inda · · Score: 3, Funny

    As an Englishman, I can obtusely say that that's no strongly worded letter.

    Where's the wit? The wow-words? The insulting, demeaning tone? The hidden threats?

    And, at five pages, that novel was four pages too long.

    God save the Queen.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  12. Re:Inconsistent? by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    See, I've always recommended this map, also by the ACLU, that shows exactly where in the US your civil liberties are being protected properly.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/