Teacher's Aide Fired For Refusing To Hand Over Facebook Password
An anonymous reader writes "You can add this one to the short but growing list of employers demanding access to Facebook accounts. After refusing to give her Facebook password to her supervisors, Kimberly Hester was fired by Lewis Cass Intermediate School District from her job as an aide to Frank Squires Elementary in Cassopolis, Michigan. She is now fighting a legal battle with the school district."
Is it required to break a legal contract with one entity to maintain employment with another?
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
This is not perfect, but one possibility might be to set up a dummy facebook account and give that to them, rather than your real one. However, it is clear, this should be illegal, people who run into this should contact a lawyer and file lawsuits, as well, Facebook has expressed interest in filing lawsuits against employers who do this, so, notify Facebook of this if an Employer, or anyone else, has requested your password.
She will be getting a few years of pay from illegal dismissal.
the school screwed up big time. Michigan is not a right to work state, so they cant fire you for any reason. and this school was retarded enough to publicize WHY she was fired so now it's a slam dunk in court.
If she get's a good lawyer, she will walk away with 10 years of her salary from the school.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
my answer is: the TOS of fb are not acceptable to me and I have not joined because of this.
100% true (for me) and a graceful way to get out of this bullshit rat-race.
even if you do have a fb acct, they are asking you to break the rules. and so, if you have to lie back to them to right that rule breakage, so be it. fight fire with fire, basically.
but still, the more I hear about fb issues, the more I'm glad I never joined. and if I did join, I'd have removed all info and deleted the account after hearing so much employer abuse about this!
--
"It is now safe to switch off your computer."
Another absolutely moronic thing is the article specifically says asking for the password is not illegal under current law, which will make it hard for the aide's case. It doesn't matter that they asked for it; it matters that they fired the aide for refusing to give it up unless the law allows for firing without cause (as I doubt that's granted as a legitimate cause under any state's laws).
The Facebook Facebook terms of use, section 4.8) says
* (According to an earlier comment, that is not true, the administration asked only to view her pages.)
The fact that your constitution is newer means that it is more likely to take into account things that have happened since the 18th century.
The fact that it was not put into place by infallible individuals long ago means that you might be able to change it significantly without someone having to do comparative textual analysis like theologians do on the Bible.
Will it cause you any trouble if it turns out that the people who played major parts in its creation were not perfect and had issues? I suspect not. I have seen some people squirm when they learn that some of their "founding fathers" kept slaves, had affairs, questionable business dealings and were not purer than the driven snow.
Various people in my country's history were extremely dodgy. That is history. I would like some better ones nowadays though.
I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.