Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Operators: Creating Artificial Demand For Capacity?

An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Broadband Convergent: "We all have been taught the basics of supply and demand since high school. If demand is high, prices rise. If demand is low, prices fall. Simple, but true; yet this concept can be manipulated artificially if, as seen with the latest projections of mobile operators, that higher demand means higher prices. Are the dire predictions being promoted by operator's a true demand, as we have been told, or capacity hoarding that will lead to artificially higher prices and more profits for the mobile industry?" The gist seems to be: operators have no incentive to maintain good infrastructure because it costs money and the artificial scarcity of capacity allows them to charge more.

4 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which is where competition is supposed to come in. If there is that much profit sitting out there, then there is an incentive for other players to enter the game, or for existing players to differentiate with high quality. Unfortunately, it often doesn't happen quickly, and sometimes needs some governmental encouragement. This is especially true with services that have such a high barrier to entry, like mobile.

  2. Re:Doesn't the iPhone and AT&T prove this wron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This works as long as there are competitors that are providing sufficiently better service. If there's a market containing, only, say, three companies, and barriers to entry are sufficiently high to block any new firms from forming, it's entirely possible that all three would, individually, seek to keep capacity as low as possible and just assume that the others will do the same. It's a prisoners' dilemma, sure, but those don't always preclude unspoken collusion when the number of participants is sufficiently small.

  3. QOTD by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    operators have no incentive to maintain good infrastructure because it costs money and the artificial scarcity of capacity allows them to charge more.

    Which wouldn't be a problem except the government created the teleco monopoly by creating a resource scarcity, namely exclusive contracts, tower permits, etc. The cost of entry into the market is so high that there can be no new players except from related businesses who feel like blowing a few billion cutting the red tape will go over well with their shareholders.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  4. Re:Doesn't the iPhone and AT&T prove this wron by nitehawk214 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Collusion is illegal.

    Well, thanks there, Capt. Obvious... hard to recognize you without the cape, lol.

    One would think Captain Obvious would always be easy to recognize.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust