Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Tsunami Ghost Ship Spotted Off Canadian Coast

An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from an article in Inhabitat: "After Japan was hit with a devastating earthquake in March 2011, the Pacific nation was rocked by a massive tsunami that destroyed thousands of coastal houses, cars and boats and swept millions of tons of debris out into the ocean. Now, it looks like some of that debris could be approaching North America. Last week, an unmanned boat identified as a Japanese fishing vessel was spotted off the coast of Canada, indicating that after more than a year, some of that debris could still be on its way to American and Canadian shores."

145 comments

  1. "Last week" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That would be "last week" from last week when inhabitat got the story a week late? The boat was sighted March 20th.

    1. Re:"Last week" by able1234au · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the Marie-san Celeste

    2. Re:"Last week" by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be "last week" from last week when inhabitat got the story a week late? The boat was sighted March 20th.

      Ha. Wait until next week. "Ghost Ship Closing In on American Coast!".

      Slashdot will report that sometime in August.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:"Last week" by msauve · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: News for people who don't follow the news.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:"Last week" by ozmanjusri · · Score: 0

      At least all the radioactive particulates ejected from Fukushima will make it glow in the dark and be highly spooky, if not clearly visible at night.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:"Last week" by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Or even the Marie, sans Celeste.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    6. Re:"Last week" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what the Japanese call "sento erumozu faya."

    7. Re:"Last week" by jamrock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the Marie-san Celeste

      I think you mean the "Maru Celeste".

    8. Re:"Last week" by slashmydots · · Score: 2

      You seem to be forgetting that they're operating on quantum nuclear irradiated ghost time. You have to compensate for that in the math. Let me see here...um...it seems that once you adjust for irradiated Japanese ship ghosts displaced in quantum reality it actually occurred...it hasn't occurred yet. It will occur next week lol.

    9. Re:"Last week" by Tim12s · · Score: 1

      I say we take off and nuke the ship from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    10. Re:"Last week" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      La Marie-Celeste, sans Marie et Celeste?

    11. Re:"Last week" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nani?

    12. Re:"Last week" by tinkerton · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was the Kobayashi Marooned.

    13. Re:"Last week" by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's from Fukushima, It's already nuked

  2. Always first out with the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone else reported this two weeks ago. Can't wait for Slashdot's report on the Moon landing.

  3. FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    FOR SALE

    One slightly used Fishing Trawler. Low hours, 2x Marine Diesels that ran like a dream when last started.
    There has been some maintenance deferred last season, but otherwise perfect.
    All controls Japanese.

    $3,000,000 obo.

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have clean title?
      Yeah, this is a bigger question than what is looks like

    2. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by scheme · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you have clean title? Yeah, this is a bigger question than what is looks like

      The parent isn't far off from the truth. I think salvage law would award a moderately large percentage (20-50%) of the value of the ship to anyone that boards and salvages the ship. Even a crappy boat would probably be worth six figures so any salvage crews could be looking at a decent amount of money if they succeed.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    3. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would think a greater percentage - it has essentially been abandoned with no attempts ( at least not reported ) to recover.

    4. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by utkonos · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but salvage law only begins to apply when a vessel has sunk.

    5. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by scheme · · Score: 4, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but salvage law only begins to apply when a vessel has sunk.

      Nope, from my understanding it also applies to ships in distress or which are sinking or those that have been abandoned.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    6. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, no, you're NOT trying THATagain!

    7. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by cifey · · Score: 2

      Does it have gas or nucular power?

      --
      Hello Cruel World
    8. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by alienzed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop Trawling.

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    9. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. Almost as soon as a vessel is abandoned (and even before in some situations) it is potentially salvageable under various justifications, but if ownership can be determined there are rules for how the ship can be disposed of before any title can pass to a new owner. Basically, you can salvage it, but that doesn't mean you own it, although it does mean you are entitled to some compensation from the owner before they can retake possession of it. Even if the vessel is crewed salvage fees may still be owed. More details here.

    10. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      You're correct, as far as I know. One of the requirements for being part of an RNLI crew is that you relinquish salvage rights to vessels you aid.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    11. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "...Not responsible for trauma caused by ghosts, dead bodies, or any other Halloween-like apparitions."

    12. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Do the nuclear irradiated Japanese quantum displaced ship ghosts come standard or is that extra in the fine print?

    13. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong

      You'd need to study hard for several years to get that good.

    14. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by Toad-san · · Score: 2

      If I had enough truly mad money .. I'd tow her in, get her serviced, fuel her up, and sail her back to Japan.

      To give back to her owners with a big red bow and a US flag :-)

      I don't know if that kind of trawler (a squid trawler, probably purely coastal) has that kind of range, but I'd sure give it a shot! Hell, that must be the most seaworthy ship in all the oceans!

    15. Re:FOR SALE: Fishing Trawler by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Shipping cost to the midwest? And will you use Fedex, UPS or USPS?

  4. I love Slashdot by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The thing I love most about Slashdot is that they wait until I've completely forgotten reading a story before they post it, so its like a whole new experience.

    1. Re:I love Slashdot by Sez+Zero · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot: It's not news, but it might be new to you!

    2. Re:I love Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot:deja news

    3. Re:I love Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people complain about the stories being late? Why not submit stories when you first hear about them, instead of doing nothing and then complaining when someone else submits them later?

    4. Re:I love Slashdot by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's not the problem. The problem is the massive delay between something being submitted to /. and it making the front page. That's the issue.

    5. Re:I love Slashdot by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

      Hit the nail on the head. Can't count the amount of times I've heard a news story which is perfect for Slashdot and then went to check the firehose to see if anyone else has posted it only to find at least 4 or 5 entries for the same story. 12 hours later the story appears on slashdot.

      Don't get me wrong I know Slashdot gets a large number of submissions and it takes time for people to review them, but perhaps get a few more posters/publishers so that it doesn't take as long to go through submissions. Its not like Slashdot doesn't have hundreds of regularly commenting users who have a solid head on their shoulders, can hit a spell check button and pass stories through a bullshit detector before letting them hit the front page.

      --
      There is no -1 disagree
    6. Re:I love Slashdot by vjoel · · Score: 1

      The thing I love most about Slashdot is that they wait until I've completely forgotten reading a story before they post it, so its like a whole new experience.

      Slashdot: news for amnesiacs, stuff that... whatever.

      --
      What part of `yes no` don't you understand?
  5. Unmanned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Last week, an unmanned boat identified as a Japanese fishing vessel

    I'm confused. Does this ship have ghosts on it or not?

    1. Re:Unmanned by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is swarming with ghost fish.
      Equip your holy weapons, physical damage can't hurt them.

    2. Re:Unmanned by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be silly!

      ...

      Obviously, the ghosts were women.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Unmanned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're trying to be funny but just in case... A ghost ship usually refers to a ship that has been abandoned, aka unmanned. A ship full of ghosts would be a haunted ship.

    4. Re:Unmanned by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      > Last week, an unmanned boat identified as a Japanese fishing vessel

      I'm confused. Does this ship have ghosts on it or not?

      He said unmanned, not unghosted.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Unmanned by alienzed · · Score: 2

      All the ghosts were female.

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    6. Re:Unmanned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. Does this ship have ghosts on it or not?
      Yes, but only Scooby-Doo ghosts.

    7. Re:Unmanned by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Recent research has shown that the standard procedure of forcing the ghost fish to watch entire seasons of Japanese anime nonstop will also be ineffective in this particular case. WHAT WILL WE DO?!?! oh wait, the Sex in the City movie is out on DVD. That'll send em swimming.

    8. Re:Unmanned by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Don't be insensitive, ghosts were people, too.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. no ghosts by eyenot · · Score: 1

    if (!deadPeopleOnBoard) ship.ghost = false;

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:no ghosts by ThePeices · · Score: 4, Funny

      Protip; write efficient code:

      ghosts = false;

    2. Re:no ghosts by pspahn · · Score: 2

      Bah, speak for yourself!

      While.boat=isfloating.for.each.members(as member).while.member=dead.for.each.limbs(as limb).check(necrosis).if(necrosis is not apparent).ask(member.name()).if(member.name is just a bunch of GRAWLWLW and stuff).determined=ghosts.

      Now THAT'S a statement!

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:no ghosts by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      What if it's in a while(ship.ghost){} loop?

      Or worse, while(ship.ghost=ship.total) {}? :p

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    4. Re:no ghosts by PNutts · · Score: 2

      Scope creep. Looks like someone lost the SOW.

    5. Re:no ghosts by Pirulo · · Score: 1

      > ghosts.nil?
      > true

  7. Sweet! by DSS11Q13 · · Score: 2

    Free boat!

    1. Re:Sweet! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Well, maritime salvage laws probably apply... so, yeah. Free boat!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No maritime salvage laws do not apply. They only apply after the registered owner is contacted to see if they want it back.

    3. Re:Sweet! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, maritime salvage laws probably apply... so, yeah. Free boat!

      Actually, now that I've done some googling, I'll have to retract my statement. No free boat for you!

      The popular belief that a salvor becomes the owner of the property, at least if it was abandoned by the owner or was derelict, is erroneous. The owner may always reclaim his property from the salvor on paying salvage money. The salvor, for his part, has a maritime lien on the salved property (in an amount determined by national statute or juridical custom) and need not return the property to the owner until his claim is satisfied or until security to meet an award is given. An owner who elects not to reclaim his property cannot be made liable for a salvage reward.

      http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/519995/salvage

      The objects salvaged always remain the property of the original owner, but the original owner is responsible for compensating the salvor (person doing the salvaging) for their time, effort, and the danger they went through to salvage the property. So if you find a 5 million dollar yacht that has slipped loose from its moorings and is adrift, you do not get to claim it. (Which is a good thing if it is your 5 million dollar yacht which your bone-head brother-in-law borrowed but then, like an idiot, forgot to drop anchor when he took the tender ashore to go to a party, get wasted, and find with some bubble-headed island girl half his age to spend the night with.) However, you can hold onto it until the owner pays you for the boat's retrieval.

      Having said that, apparently the owner of the boat no longer wants it back, so the question of ownership is up in the air.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Sweet! by scheme · · Score: 2

      You don't get to claim ownership but if you get to keep possession until the owner gives you a percentage of the vessel's worth as compensation for rescuing the boat, that's still pretty nice. I'd be fine with 10% of the value of that yacht for boarding it and bringing it back to shore. If the conditions are hazardous, you get more. However, this is according to wikipedia and you'd probably have to consult a maritime attorney to get a more definitive answer.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    5. Re:Sweet! by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Having said that, apparently the owner of the boat no longer wants it back, so the question of ownership is up in the air.

      I believe you just laid out the rules of ownership. The owner still owns it. Whoever salvages has a maritime lien, and apparently the owner has already said he won't pay it.

    6. Re:Sweet! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      Having said that, apparently the owner of the boat no longer wants it back, so the question of ownership is up in the air.

      I believe you just laid out the rules of ownership. The owner still owns it. Whoever salvages has a maritime lien, and apparently the owner has already said he won't pay it.

      He probably already got an insurance settlement and replaced it, so getting this "lost" boat back could create a PITA situation for himself... and really, who knows what shape its in after drifting across the Pacific... It's been adrift for a year. I understand why he doesn't want it back.

      --
      Who did what now?
    7. Re:Sweet! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      No maritime salvage laws do not apply. They only apply after the registered owner is contacted to see if they want it back.

      And, actually, they did locate the owner and he said he did NOT want it back.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:Sweet! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Thing is, the owner may have put in a claim with an insurance company, in which case the insurance company may now be the owner, depending on how the law works in Japan. Complicating matters is the report that the wreck is drifting north-east and has crossed into US waters. The US coast guard may decide to sink the vessel, as it is heading towards some busy shipping lanes. They have dropped a marker buoy onto the ship.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Sweet! by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I suspect an insurance company probably technically owns it now. I doubt they want it either - its scrap value after paying any salvor's fee probably wouldn't make it worth it.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    10. Re:Sweet! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      (Which is a good thing if it is your 5 million dollar yacht which your bone-head brother-in-law borrowed but then, like an idiot, forgot to drop anchor when he took the tender ashore to go to a party, get wasted, and find with some bubble-headed island girl half his age to spend the night with.)

      Everybody has got a story to tell, and I have to ask, what did you tell your sister?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    11. Re:Sweet! by necro81 · · Score: 1

      He probably couldn't claim it anyway, as I suspect he's gotten an insurance payout by now. His insurer, however, might be interested in a salvage operation.

    12. Re:Sweet! by necro81 · · Score: 1

      So if you find a 5 million dollar yacht that has slipped loose from its moorings and is adrift, you do not get to claim it. (Which is a good thing if it is your 5 million dollar yacht which your bone-head brother-in-law borrowed but then, like an idiot, forgot to drop anchor when he took the tender ashore to go to a party, get wasted, and find with some bubble-headed island girl half his age to spend the night with.)

      Impressively detailed story, sir. Speaking from experience?

    13. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(Which is a good thing if it is your 5 million dollar yacht which your bone-head brother-in-law borrowed but then, like an idiot, forgot to drop anchor when he took the tender ashore to go to a party, get wasted, and find with some bubble-headed island girl half his age to spend the night with.) "

      You say that like it's a bad thing!

  8. automated fishing ships by google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the flagship in googles new project for automated fishing vessels
    successfuly launched from japan via massive natrual disaster and scheduled to land in north america sometime this week

  9. Want a ship? by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know I can't grab your ghost ships.

    1. Re:Want a ship? by PessimysticRaven · · Score: 2

      Seriously? No one but this ONE lone comment?!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9A0jZef5ZmI

      --
      Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
    2. Re:Want a ship? by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was actually referring to this...

    3. Re:Want a ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awesome bro')

    4. Re:Want a ship? by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      Spoon!

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    5. Re:Want a ship? by buglista · · Score: 1

      Best advert *ever*!

  10. Reminder by symbolset · · Score: 0

    Public safety officials warn that Japanese tsunami debris washing up on Pacific shores may be radioactive.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats most likely uneducated speculation rather than fact. The meltdown didn't occur until well after the Tsunami swept everything out. The reality is all that debris was swept out to sea well before the plant melted down a week later. The radioactive materials leaked into the ocean weeks after the earthquake and would have been dispersed locally not on boats and stuff swept out by the tsunami.

    2. Re:Reminder by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Public safety officials tend to be conservative with unknowns. This debris was not that far offshore and directly downwind from three nuclear meltdowns with considerable airborne release of radioactive material. People should use due care when interacting with it.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Reminder by Microlith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of the initial material release was Iodine, the vast majority of which has since decayed.

      Of course, your statements are completely un-sourced so unless you can link to such a statement you either tried, and failed, to be funny or are just spreading nonsense.

    4. Re:Reminder by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      But it makes for great copy on the Tee Vee:

      "Killer Japanese Debris Headed for the West Coast! Film at 11!"

    5. Re:Reminder by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, you're right. I remember reading initial reports expressing concern, but apparently NOAA has given the all clear. Never mind.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Reminder by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Oh wow, you're right. I remember reading initial reports expressing concern, but apparently NOAA has given the all clear. Never mind.

      Uh, yeah. About that. From your link:

      There is consensus among scientists that this is highly unlikely, for several reasons:

      [...]

      For more information on radiation monitoring and safety, go to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

      Right. The EPA and the FDA. So the consensus is among EPA and FDA scientists? Someone else can go out there and get that shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Reminder by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Good job on your illiteracy. Note the bit you quoted:

      For more information on radiation monitoring and safety, go to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

      Italics mine. They're pointing people to those sites for additional information on the topics of radiation monitoring and safety. Neither the EPA nor FDA have a hand in this. Good job at failing utterly at reading comprehension in favor of omgnuke paranoia.

    8. Re:Reminder by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's no significant information in the linked article, and that's the only citation that explains where they might have gotten the goods. If they include a bibliography I'll be happy to examine it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Don't go explore it! by Zorque · · Score: 1

    We all know that's how horror movies start.

    1. Re:Don't go explore it! by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Funny

      That ship will begin the zombie apocalypse.

    2. Re:Don't go explore it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know that's how horror movies start.

      Meh

      It could have been a great seafaring adventure story instead. And adventure movies can be seen more than once - not so much with horror and mystery movies.

    3. Re:Don't go explore it! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      What was made public about the ship, that she was a Japanese fishing trawler, that she was swept out to sea in a tsunami and was lost... none of that is true. The ship was a secret government project to create a fishing trawler capable of faster-than-light travel. The ship doesn't really go faster than light. It creates a gateway to jump instantaneously from one point to another oceans away. It's called a gravity drive. I built it.

      The mission was going perfectly, they reached safe distance using conventional engines. They had the go-ahead to use the gravity drive and open the gateway to Antarctic whaling waters. And then, they just disappeared, vanished without a trace.

      Until now.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re:Don't go explore it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberate tute mei ex inferese?

    5. Re:Don't go explore it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction.

      Nuclear Zombie Apocalypse! Much more intriguing, isn't it?

    6. Re:Don't go explore it! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      That's the spirit! It glows with excitement; a tasty treat for the mind's eye.

    7. Re:Don't go explore it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prepare your Alices!

    8. Re:Don't go explore it! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'll take 3. One to cook, one to clean, and one to, um, explore my imagination.

  12. LAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Code? Good grief. LAME!

  13. Sink it by HangingChad · · Score: 2

    an unmanned boat identified as a Japanese fishing vessel was spotted off the coast of Canada,

    Use it for torpedo practice. Once it floats into your territorial waters just sink the damn thing. Problem solved.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Sink it by darrenm · · Score: 2

      We couldn't if we wanted to. We only buy overpriced, used subs from Britain that aren't safe, let alone ready for combat. Currently we don't have any submarines that have attack capabilities... so if you want to take over Canada, now is the time. http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/74078-second-hand-subs-bad-deal-canada-says-british-mp

    2. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think we have only 1 working sub right now out of the deal.

      In a submarine war, we'll use strong words in 2 official languages no less to express how displeased we are. When all else fails, we'll apologize and surrender in English or French too.

    3. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Canadians shouldn't need a submarine to sink an unmanned fishing vessel.

      Just get a member of the Canucks to sink a puck in it.

    4. Re:Sink it by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The problem will be solved when an abandoned Japanese sub washes up on the pacific shore, fully armed.

    5. Re:Sink it by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfff, that may be true on the east coast, but over here in BC we have war canoes armed to the teeth with rabid beaver catapults. Attack at your own risk!

    6. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you realize the crew was in suspended animation.

      Either that or they're Vampire Ninjas.

    7. Re:Sink it by Maow · · Score: 2

      an unmanned boat identified as a Japanese fishing vessel was spotted off the coast of Canada,

      Use it for torpedo practice. Once it floats into your territorial waters just sink the damn thing. Problem solved.

      Except for the oil & diesel leak we'd have created in our own waters.

      And the loss of salvage or scrap value.

      And the cost of the torpedo, unless a practice shot is, in fact, useful.

      Probably a few better things could be done with it.

    8. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called pollution.

    9. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had just that thing happen in December of '41 .. We put it in a museum. I guess the Japanese don't want it back

    10. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, one sub. First fired a torpedo literally a couple of weeks ago on March 16th, more than 10 years after buying them. It launched an unarmed dummy torpedo, but, hey, maybe now they'll try some real practice.

    11. Re:Sink it by Catmeat · · Score: 1

      Since this thread has already established that the boat is still a valuable asset that remains the property of the owners. Sinking it when it could be salvaged with little effort would presumably open the Canadian authorities up to an immediate lawsuit from the owners.

    12. Re:Sink it by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the squadrons of trained Killer Whales! You're more than capable of repelling any invasion that comes in tiny, fragile boats.

    13. Re:Sink it by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Pfff, that may be true on the east coast, but over here in BC we have war canoes armed to the teeth with rabid beaver catapults. Attack at your own risk!

      There's got to be a Monty Python tie-in somewhere to be had there, but all I can come up with are catapulted cows, killer bunnies, and pining for the fjords.

    14. Re:Sink it by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    15. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada doesn't need a military they have the US protecting them.. Do you think for a moment that the US would allow anyone to even come close to Canada?

    16. Re:Sink it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaping from tree to tree, as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia. The Giant Redwood. The Larch. The Fir! The mighty Scots Pine! The lofty flowering Cherry! The plucky little Apsen! The limping Roo tree of Nigeria. The towering Wattle of Aldershot! The Maidenhead Weeping Water Plant! The naughty Leicestershire Flashing Oak! The flatulent Elm of West Ruislip! The Quercus Maximus Bamber Gascoigni! The Epigillus! The Barter Hughius Greenus!

      With my best buddy by my side, we'd sing! Sing! Sing!

      [singing]
      I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay.
      I sleep all night and I work all day.

  14. Re:Don't go explore it!(Spoiler in post) by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    It did have one or 2 freaky moments. And at the end when she's being carried off the cruise ship and sees what's his name and the gold being loaded on board was kinda cool. But yeah, it could have been executed better, but it could also have been a lot worse.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  15. Ship travelling with currents means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't worry so much about the ship and ghosts that may be on it or not, but rather about the three-eyed fish and two-headed sharks, that will be following in it's wake.

    1. Re:Ship travelling with currents means by Larryish · · Score: 1

      As a Japanese fishing vessel, it is more likely to be crewed by little bitty one-eyed snakes.

  16. Sounds like my ex-girlfriend by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Marie. Marie Celeste.

  17. To hell with Armageddon... by Stizark · · Score: 1

    It's Ragnarok:

    A ship journeys from the east, Muspell's people are coming,
    over the waves, and Loki steers
    There are the monstrous brood with all the raveners,
    The brother of Byleist is in company with them.

    Alright, not really. But I do take this as a sign my imagination still works.

  18. YAY !! MORE CHEAP ASIAN CRAP !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it's only Candida's problem !! We in America know good crap when we see it, and that shit don't cut the mustard !!

    1. Re:YAY !! MORE CHEAP ASIAN CRAP !! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Um... It drifted into US waters on the 31st. Slashdot is a week late with this story, remember?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  19. Its already taken care of by hedgemage · · Score: 1

    Nothing to worry about. Apparently the case of the Japanese Ghost Fishermen has been resolved by four teenagers and their great dane. Old Man McGee was responsible for the whole mess and was apparently trying to distract attention from his illegal human trafficking operations.

    1. Re:Its already taken care of by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Nothing to worry about. Apparently the case of the Japanese Ghost Fishermen has been resolved by four teenagers and their great dane. Old Man McGee was responsible for the whole mess and was apparently trying to distract attention from his illegal human trafficking operations.

      You ever notice how they never uncovered any drug smuggling rings?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Its already taken care of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they would have got away with it too, if it wasn't for those damn kids.

    3. Re:Its already taken care of by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And they would have got away with it too, if it wasn't for those damned Pikachus.

    4. Re:Its already taken care of by sjames · · Score: 3, Funny

      I suspect they did, but Shaggy smoked the evidence.

  20. Freaking Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their going to be getting all of the good stuff. Here on the Washington coast
    I guess we be getting the lighter stuff, like bodies and stuffed Pokémon's.

    1. Re:Freaking Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you already get enough of that from California?

  21. Old man Mcgee says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damnit, if it wasnt for those meddling kids I'd have something to post on Slashdot!

  22. Waiting for it to hit the US by Animats · · Score: 1, Informative

    The location, 150 miles south of the Haida Gwaii islands, is about 200 miles west of Vancouver. The currents along the Pacific coast of North America run southward, so the ship is going to drift into US waters soon. The U.S. will probably get stuck with the bill for towing the thing before it hits something. It's floating high in the water, so the hull is in good shape.

    1. Re:Waiting for it to hit the US by FridgeFreezer · · Score: 2

      Those insenstive Japanese bastards are too busy playing with their nuclear meltdown and fishing corpses out of the rubble to think about the impact this has on decent hard-working Americans. I mean, hundreds of tons of scrap steel will probably only just cover the cost of towing it away. You're welcome, world!

      --
      There is no music - home taping killed it.
    2. Re:Waiting for it to hit the US by plopez · · Score: 1

      There is a thing called "Maritime Insurance". If insured it probably will be either overhauled and sold or scrapped to by the insurance company to recoup insurance losses and rescue costs. If not it may become the property of the towing company to recoup expenses. As the US, Canada, and Japan probably have reciprocity on maritime rescue (the US fishes their boats and sailors out of the water, and Japan fishes the US and Canadian boats and sailors out of the water) Coast Guard or Naval expenses are considered a "wash".

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  23. Re:Unmanned [vs. unghosted] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    A ghost ship usually refers to a ship that has been abandoned, aka unmanned...

    Let's see how this works:

    1. Ghosts are not men

    2. Socrates is a man

    3. Socrates died

    4. Therefore, Socrates is a dead man

    5. Therefore, Socrates is not a ....

    Ah hell, never mind.

  24. But.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

    How about Ghostscript?
         

    1. Re:But.... by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm pretty sure any scripting for it would have to run in the shell.

  25. Pi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is there an Indian boy and a Bengal Tiger aboard?

  26. another proof of colonization of America by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    I love this phrase: "colonization of America"

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  27. had to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all your ghost ship belong to US.a

  28. not a ghost ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A ghost ship is the type of thing you see in Scooby Doo. This is a derelict.

  29. got that healthy cool blue glow by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Better watch out for Attack of the Mushroom People!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  30. Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they meant Gift Shop, not Ghost Ship.

  31. North Pacific Gyre by plopez · · Score: 1

    This article makes me wonder what may have been sucked into the North Pacific Gyre. I might be interesting to find out.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  32. So to board it you need transient curse! by madhi19 · · Score: 1

    And or a cursed weapon preferably plus five at least!

  33. Glad I don't have to go on-board by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    A ghost ship from the land of a nuclear meltdown? We're talking Event Horizon scale stuff here. Probably some kind of mutant ghosts.

  34. You didn't mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't mention that it glows nicely in the dark!