Slashdot Mirror


University of Florida Eliminates Computer Science Department

DustyShadow writes "The University of Florida announced this past week that it was dropping its computer science department, which will allow it to save about $1.7 million. The school is eliminating all funding for teaching assistants in computer science, cutting the graduate and research programs entirely, and moving the tattered remnants into other departments. Students at UF have already organized protests, and have created a website dedicated to saving the CS department. Several distinguished computer scientists have written to the president of UF to express their concerns, in very blunt terms. Prof. Zvi Galil, Dean of Computing at Georgia Tech, is 'amazed, shocked, and angered.' Prof. S.N. Maheshwari, former Dean of Engineering at IIT Delhi, calls this move 'outrageously wrong.' Computer scientist Carl de Boor, a member of the National Academy of Sciences and winner of the 2003 National Medal of Science, asked the UF president 'What were you thinking?'"

40 of 628 comments (clear)

  1. Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    n/m

    1. Re:Computers are a fad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      640K comp sci grads should be enough for any country.

  2. The Department of Redundancy Department by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we study the same things in other departments without having a dedicated Computer Science niche to go with Computer Engineering, Software Engineering, etc.?

    1. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At the school I went to, computer science degrees were part of the school of liberal arts and sciences (in the same building as astronomy, physics and math) and IT degrees were part of the school of business. It worked fairly well as there wasn't much overlap between the two and the CS students (a very small program compared to IT) benefited from being close to the math and physics departments.

    2. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

    3. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, no... Physics is to Mechanical Engineering as Chemistry is to Chemical Engineering as Computer Science is to Computer Engineering.

      Science is very, very different from engineering. Science is focused on the theoretical, while engineering is focused on applying that theory to the real world, subject to various resource constraints.

      Given that they are so different, it makes absolutely no sense to try to group them together, especially in some attempt to "save money".

    4. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like this one? They're cutting CS to save $2m. Meanwhile, their $99m/yr athletics program is getting a modest boost... roughly $2m.

      I think even their underwater basket weaving majors can do the math on that one.

    5. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can we study the same things in other departments without having a dedicated Computer Science niche to go with Computer Engineering, Software Engineering, etc.?

      Not in sufficient depth, at least in my opinion. Complexity theory? Database theory (yes, theory, not just "here's how to write a simple SQL statement)? Compilers? These could all be in other departments, but an undergrad pursuing a degree in another field will not have enough time to study computer science in any respectable depth. Double major is not the answer if CS is spread over more than two other departments. Spreading CS across math and engineering departments deprives students of the chance to become computer scientists.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    6. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Informative

      They don't make money from ticket sales... they make money from ticket sales?

      Someone skipped logic 101...

    7. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone skipped logic 101...

      He probably went to UF...

    8. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Informative

      Separate budgets. Athletics pays its own way. Nuking the entire athletic dept. wouldn't create any additional money for CS.

    9. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by geoffball · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The UF athletic depart makes most of its cash from the television contracts of the football and basketball teams.

    10. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Computer Engineering/Software Engineering isn't the same as Computer Science.

      In Computer Science we usually take a course in Computer Engineering and a course in Software Engineering, to get some concepts from those other areas of study into the students. However Computer Science, real Computer Science, is less about the technology, and more about the Mathematics of performing optimal computations.
      Software Engineering isn't as much about optimal computations, it is more of a way of getting the software to work, and building larger complicated systems, which need to be maintained over time.
      Computer Engineering is more of a hardware level approach, where the goal is is optimize basic elements but not complex systems.
      Computer Science is in the middle. We use the optimized basic elements that the Computer Engineers make, and we create more complicated computations using them. Then Software Engineers take what the computer scientists have made and implement them into a practical design.

      When it gets to real life jobs, all three areas of studies often give us a similar career path. However depending on your study you have different approaches to the problems we face.
      So lets say a for a Job of a Software Developer (with 5 years experience)
      When there is a problem to be solved.
      A computer Engineer focused person, would use the features in the hardware to leverage more Optimized Lower level commands to their beck and call to help them solve issues, now this will create a fast solution, but may not run on other platforms.
      A Computer Science focused person, would try to separate themselves from the hardware a bit more, and go into creating logic and routines, these routines will tend to be rather optimal, however they will probably miss something the hardware gives us for free, but will run on other platforms.
      A Computer Engineer, will create code in a clean well documented manner, it will often be the less optimal, and slowest solution. However it will tend to run well on other platforms, easy to maintain, and usually more stable.

      They all approach problems differently and when you get them together to work on a problem, you can get some heated discussions, but if they actually work well together they come up with some very good solutions.
      Dropping Computer Science is a bad idea, because then you will loose the middle of the road approach in computing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Chillas · · Score: 5, Informative

      They do not make money. The median net loss of each of the Division 1A schools' athletic programs is in the vicinity of $7 million annually.

      --
      --- Math illiteracy affects 8 out of every 5 people.
    12. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Rostin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The majority operate at a loss, but many, including UF, do make money.

    13. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find both of your examples to fall into the realm of technical certificates, not University level study.

      I've always thought of CS vs IT as Engineer vs Technician. One designs the other implements and operates.

      For example a CS student should understand compiler theory including things like language tokenization, code generation, parse trees and the like.

      An IT student needs to know "./config && make && make install" and have a working knowledge of an IDE like Visual Studio or Eclipse along with be fairly proficient in a language or two.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    14. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Lluc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Computer science is a programme of study not an entire department.

      Only if you're at a bad school.

      For example, the University of California at Berkeley with its combined EECS dept? They're only ranked #1 in the 2010 US News ratings...

    15. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way to save UF CS department is to get donations from CS alumni or to make donations directly to the CS department.

      You may be right, but this is a desperately sad state of affairs. Tuition of the students attending should be sufficient to pay for the CS department. If it's not, they shouldn't have a CS department. I know many are desperate for uniformity, but it's really OK if not every single institution offers exactly the same programs of study. Schools also do a ridiculous bunch of things that I, as a former tuition paying student, don't want them spending my money on. Stop that.

    16. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who the fuck cares if it makes money - it's a STATE UNIVERSITY not a CORPORATION. It doesn't have to "make money". It has to Educate People. Eliminating the CS dept while boosting Football is embarrassingly retarded. You want to know why America is Collapsing? Bullshit like killing the CS dept while boosting Football is why the USA is Collapsing. It's being crushed by a massive case of the stupids and a malingering condition of ignorance complicated by fantastically poor judgement.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    17. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What money is UF Athletics getting from the State? Please tell... What money is it even getting from the Academic side of the University??

      This is a BS argument. The athletic dept ultimately gets their cash from the basis of their fan base, and where exactly do you think they get their fans from? By and large it is their university affiliation. To think that the athletic dept gets nothing from the university besides cash is a completely myopic viewpoint. If the UF football team was instead the "Gainesville football team", how many fans would they have?

      Athletic depts in general should be kicking back a lot more than they do to their university hosts, because frankly without them nobody would care who they were.

    18. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point is to EDUCATE, NOT MAXIMIZE REVENUE. The PROFIT is a well educated citizenry.

      --
      Good-bye
    19. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most CS majors arent going to know how to work on a real internet router.
      University education isn't supposed to be vocational training. In academia you learn academic concepts, not on the job skills.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    20. Re:The Department of Redundancy Department by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if you eliminate whole departments, you lose interdisciplinary links. You eliminate any quality in classes that other majors need. If UF offered computational neurobiology for example, it probably won't for very long now. Can't really see how the students are going to learn the upper-level computing skills they'd need. They'll try to compensate by having some biology professor who kinda knows computers try to teach the class, but the result will be less well-rounded students.

  3. "What were you thinking?" by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "What were you thinking?"

    Well, probably something along the lines of "That department did not publish well enough and the students did not bring in enough money".

    1. Re:"What were you thinking?" by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking as a refugee from academia after spending most of my adult life attending or working at colleges, I would say this is exactly right.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:"What were you thinking?" by mattbelcher · · Score: 5, Informative

      This might have been true in the past but it isn't true of the current CS department. Since UF was designated a "Research 1" university, the CISE department has made huge strides to increase its research competitiveness. They have won 12 NSF CAREER awards for young faculty, received 11 best paper awards at major conferences in the last 5 years, and have quintupled their external research grant funding.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  4. Official Response from UF: by Metabolife · · Score: 5, Funny

    NERDS!!!!!

  5. not eliminated? by jank1887 · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTFA:

    The majority of students would be transferred to the hardware-oriented ECE department
    The CISE department would be converted to a teaching-only department
    50% of faculty would be transferred to other engineering departments (ECE, ISE, and BME)

    so, if it will be a teaching only department, that doesn't seem the same as eliminated. They'll move the engineering in with the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, and it seems leave CISE to teach programming.

    1. Re:not eliminated? by CowTipperGore · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed. TFA is very misleading and inaccurate opinion piece written by a contributor who usually focuses on healthcare issues. If you read the items he references in his hack job, you'll see that CISE program is not eliminated at all. The computer engineering programs are being moved from CISE to the Electrical and Computer Engineering department. Graduate programs and research work will continue in computer engineering there. Most graduate programs and research work in CISE will be eliminated, but the computer science BS and MS programs will remain. The projected savings are $1.36 million out of a $4 million in cuts across the university.

      For what it's worth, this article is one of several opinion pieces carried by Forbes attacking this decision and all are full of inaccuracies and outright lies. Computer science research is being cut. The computer science programs remain. Computer engineering research remains but is moved into Engineering instead of CISE.

  6. hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm curious: why Computer Science? The program shouldn't be very expensive on a per-student basis, especially compared to the physical sciences. Was the department just uniquely dysfunctional or under-performing? Why not cut, say, physics? Not that Physics should be cut either, but the choice of Computer Science seems arbitrary.

    1. Re:hmm by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They're saying it was inefficient to have it as its own department separate from computer engineering and software engineering disciplines.

      But I wonder where one would study advanced topics in computing now. Maybe the answer is "not at the University of Florida."

  7. They can save much more by aglider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    by dropping all the departments!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  8. Re:No problem! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not at all. The sports program is independent and actually feeds millions of dollars into the school.

    Bringing sports into it may lead to discussion on cultural values - but the money spent by the school on academics and sports are not related.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  9. It's all about saving money by overshoot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Florida has to cut the budget somwhere, and universities are hotbeds of radical socialist indoctrination. Especially computer science. Now, if the CS department could pay its own way like football does that might be different.

    Fortunately, Florida State has found a solution to the problem: their economics department has found a sponsor who will provide lots of funding in return for veto power over new faculty hires. UF is no doubt looking for to improve on the method.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  10. Re:Drop football, save $100 million by Amouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and this is where i have to ask what is the core competency of a university? to make money? to entertain fans? to educate students?

    Just be cause you can make money at something doesn't mean you should focus resources on it, unless it's one of your core competency.

    If it really is a "profit center" and something they can make money from, great but they need to contract control of it out on set terms and use the money generated by it to increase the educational offerings and make it easier for them to achieve in their reason for being, educating students.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  11. Going backwards? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speaking as a Gator who went to school back when if you wanted to study computers you had to go into the Engineering School it sounds like they are moving backwards. As in like when I went to UF if you wanted to study CIS you had to take Calc 1-3 (ok...most of us were fine with that), Chem 1-2 (hum...), and Physics 1-2 (gahhh?), along with some other very non-CIS related but much more related Engineering classes. In effect if you wanted to learn to be a programmer, network engineer, or even a web designer you had to have the background of a EE.

    It was total overkill and drove a lot of students away from the department. But at the time, late 80's-early 90's, the whole PC thing was still relatively brand new so that a large institution like UF had not adapted its curriculum was no huge shock. Disappointing yes but not all that shocking.

    Now TFA is very light on details on how what the new curriculum for students would be. If they are indeed going back to asking CIS students to have EE level requirements. So this might just be a bit of good ol' yellow journalism. But it is indeed worth of some attention such that we can full details on how and why this is happening.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  12. There's plenty of that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work for an engineering college at a big university and we have some departments that really need cutting. I'm talking departments that, literally, have less than 10 students. Well when you have low enrollment numbers like that you don't really bring in the money to support a department head, a few professors, support staff, and so on. They are a drain on resources and need to be cut.

    One way or another, a department needs to bring in enough money to support itself. Now that could be directly bringing in money through research grants, but can also be through tuition. Departments that do a lot of teaching but little to no research can be plenty valuable because if students are coming for those classes, they are bringing in tuition dollars.

    If they can't bring in money to support themselves, meaning pay the salaries, capital and operations costs, all that kind of thing, then they need to be cut in size or eliminated entirely. It is neither fair nor smart to say "Let's grab money from a successful department and use it to prop up an unsuccessful one."

    1. Re:There's plenty of that by MxTxL · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is neither fair nor smart to say "Let's grab money from a successful department and use it to prop up an unsuccessful one."

      It would not be smart if your only goal is to run the University as a business, where you cut unsuccessful revenue centers and fund/build/grow the more successful ones to focus on profitability of the corporation. From that respect, economy of scale works the same way as it does at Coca-cola or Wal-Mart. Cut the under-performers. It is cheaper, easier and more profitable to pump out 10 million of the same widgets than it is to pump out very small batches of all-different widgets.

      HOWEVER

      If you are a believer in the concept of academic freedom and in the power of diversity of knowledge and thought (idealistic, I know) then it is vital that more successful departments fund less successful ones. I, for one, want there to exist people who study Latin, despite there being a limited usefulness for it as a career. I want people who study ancient Macedonian philosophy, basket weaving, Sanskrit and all the other fields that most people might deride as training for a career at McDonalds. I want there to be someone who knows everything there is to know about the inner politics of ancient Sumeria. The sum-total of human knowledge is vast and it is important that it be preserved but also expanded with the rigor of academic scrutiny.

      I want this done, because the concept of Academia demands it. If we churn out millions of kids at a time all with the same thoughts and ideas gleaned from mass-market jobs training programs, we will lose the intellectual diversity that is needed to preserve academic and scientific expansion. There may be nothing that someone studying ancient Indian tapestries can ever tell a nuclear engineer that will advance his work, but both types of people are necessary to increase the useful progress of art and science.

      I understand that the bills need to be paid in order to keep the lights on, and also that there are fields that have much more use in the real world as careers. There are certain fields that have more utility in advancing cutting-edge science and, rightly, should receive more attention for their greater potential to advance the human race. However, we shouldn't neglect more arcane knowledge entirely because of this. The more popular fields need to subsidize the less popular ones, less we risk whole branches of study dying off. This is not the most efficient method of creating profit for the university, but that shouldn't be what universities are all about. They should be about increasing the sum-total of human knowledge in all branches.

  13. Here's why they cut Computer Science by ggraham412 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A number of posters have been wondering why UF cut the Computer Science department. It is because the administrators at the University of Florida want more funding from the state of Florida, and a useful and popular STEM program is a higher value hostage than, say, any Arts and Humanities program.

    My basis for this is OP's linked article in Forbes, which quite transparently links the elimination of the department with state budget cuts. Could you imagine how that would read if UF threatened closure of a Literature department and elimination of courses in postmodernism and semiotics? Most sane people would yawn at that.

  14. Re:CS is redundant by V!NCENT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What kind of a shitty university do you get these from? In my country (not the US), I'm not even halfway and already I had to learn:
    1. Operating System design;
    2. industrial processor assembly languages;
    3. UML;
    4. java;
    5. C;
    6. C++;
    7. Processor designs;
    8. Math;
    9. Logic;
    10. MySQL;
    11. Unix and Windows networking;
    12. Internet protocols (TCP/IP, UDP, etc);
    13. Networking architecture (internet tiers, wireless networking, industrial ethernet, etc.)
    14. Logic boards (breadboards, soldering, reading ARM specs and erreta's etc.)
    15. Writing a Bluetooth device driver;
    16. Game design (3D modeling, OpenGL, storyboarding, etc)
    17. Professional skills (project management, documentation, etc.)
    18. Optimizing algorythms;
    19. Learning industrial processes;
    20. What did I miss?

    Sound like the level of eduation in your area sucks balls...

    --
    Here be signatures