Slashdot Mirror


Australia's Largest Police Force Accused of Widespread Piracy

beaverdownunder writes "UK software giant Micro Focus is demanding at least $10 million in damages from the New South Wales police for widespread use of unlicensed copies of its ViewNow software it is alleged were used by members to access the COPS criminal intelligence database. Although other government organisations also alleged to have mis-used the software have settled with Micro Focus, the NSW police refuse to do so, instead seeking to fight out a battle in Federal court."

4 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. why are we even using this word. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it seems whenever a major multinational corporation or government entity is charged with piracy, they arent. theyre simply "out of compliance" or "underlicensed" or some other equally innocuous amorphity they can escape through hiring a compliance officer, cutting a comparatively insignificant check, and saying theyre sorry. when a private citizen is charged with piracy its almost always widespread, intractable, correlated to violent terrorism, and prosecuted at the fervor of a rape case. its exactly the opposite of what it should be.
    if as numerous industries do you are trying to make the case for intellectual property, it seems to do irreparable harm to the thesis to have a double standard for something so dire. if indeed using BusyBox and not adhering to the GPL or downloading the latest Nine Inch Nails album and not paying for it is just the same as stealing a car, then the logical conclusion is this police department should be disbanded. but if in practice we see a double standard then we're led to consider legitimately that piracy probably isnt as demonic as copyright clearing houses would hope you will believe.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  2. Re:Are the cops getting cut off from the internet? by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Also note that when Micro Focus started investigating the cops illegal software copying, the cops began deleting the software from a number of systems.

    That is willful destruction of evidence of a crime.

    Sure, right, because that could have been in no way a move to cease breaking the law by keeping it.

    Kind of the same way a drug dealer flushes his goods down the toilet when the police arrive to serve a warrant - he's not destroying evidence, he's just trying to cease breaking the law.

  3. Re:Thieves by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Police department wants to fight it out in federal court to try and establish their right to steal software? Hmm...

    It's possible that the contract is not as clear as Micro Focus makes out it to be and the police department thought they had a site license. Since the police department is willing to fight rather than pay up, it's quite possible that the contract is unclear enough that they could win - if it was really a clear 6500 seat license contract, it's not likely that the police department would pay millions in legal costs to delay an inevitable $10M penalty.

  4. Re:How dare they! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why my minions will all have stylish uniforms. It gives them legitimacy.

    You'd be amazed at where you can go with a clipboard and a high-viz jacket.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/