Slashdot Mirror


Terminal Mixup Implicates TSA Agents In LAX Smuggling Plot

First time accepted submitter ian_po writes "The U.S. Attorney's office has filed indictments against 7 people, including two Transportation Security Administration Screeners and two former TSA employees, after federal agents set up several smuggling sting operations. The alleged smuggling scheme was revealed after a suspected drug courier went to Terminal 5, where his flight was departing, instead of going through the Terminal 6 checkpoint his written instructions directed him to. Court documents indicate the plan was to return to Terminal 5 through a secure tunnel after being allowed through security by the accused Screener. The courier was caught with 10 pounds of cocaine at the other checkpoint by a different TSA agent. If convicted, the four TSA employees face a minimum of 10 years in Federal prison." If ten pounds of anything can get onto a plane by the simple expedient of bribery, please explain again why adult travelers, but not children, must remove their shoes as they stand massed in an unsecured part of a typical U.S. airport.

28 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. The Weakest Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As always, the weakest link in anything security related are humans. This begs the question of whether we really need the TSA

    1. Re:The Weakest Link by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who guards the guards?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:The Weakest Link by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 5, Informative

      Since they where caught, and are being tried, apparently someone is watching them.

      Caught by the drug runner's stupidity. Dude went down the wrong line, that's how they got snagged. I wouldn't say the TSA "caught" them by their elite skills.

    3. Re:The Weakest Link by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This begs the question of whether we really need the TSA

      No. I'd say it answers the question quite succinctly.

    4. Re:The Weakest Link by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      This begs the question

      Raises.

      Sorry. I need help.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:The Weakest Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No TSA didn't catch them, TSA was allowing them to go through with the contraband and letting them use their secure employee areas to skip the other TSA checkpoints run by agents who haven't yet been paid off. Seriously though, this is more of a failure of the drug war, no other country is 1 gram of cocaine worth 20 bucks sorry, but making it so illegal has made it extremely profitable and this, being the USA, makes it irresistible since we're all 100% entirely profit motivated.

    6. Re:The Weakest Link by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Quite right. You would (probably not) be surprised to learn that the rank and file airport workers, you know, those minimum wage folk who flip the burgers, empty the trash, haul the bags, and fuel the aircraft (more on that in a moment) go to work in the secured areas without going through screening of any kind. Well, there's that pre-employment background check, but that's... let's call it "less than exhaustive".
      My spouse used to work for one of the companies that fuels commercial aircraft at many of our nation's major airports. These workers have an extremely important job, and as you might expect, they have access to extremely sensitive parts of airport and aircraft. Nevertheless, their background checks are (or were) done by the cheapest contractor they could find. The results were... spotty. It seems reasonable to assume that the same goes for workers at the terminal food courts, news stands, custodial services, etc. Those poor smugglers could probably have bought the services of a Cinnabon worker for a lot less than a TSA agent.

    7. Re:The Weakest Link by alexo · · Score: 5, Funny

      This begs the question

      Raises.

      Sorry. I need help.

      Beg for it.

    8. Re:The Weakest Link by tqk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since they [were] caught, and are being tried, apparently someone is watching them.

      Caught by the drug runner's stupidity. Dude went down the wrong line, that's how they got snagged. I wouldn't say the TSA "caught" them by their elite skills.

      Considering all that we've been hearing about the TSA's investigative skills, I don't understand why anyone's surprised by the way this story's playing out. It just looks like more of the same that we should expect of them. Incompetent bunglers tripping over themselves and *wonder of wonders* an idiot falls into their laps. Woohoo! Got one. The surprise is they actually noticed.

      What a waste of money "security theatre" is. It's not even all that entertaining.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:The Weakest Link by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      no other country is 1 gram of cocaine worth 20 bucks sorry, but making it so illegal has made it extremely profitable and this, being the USA, makes it irresistible since we're all 100% entirely profit motivated

      The USA is high, but not the highest:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/27/how-much-is-cocaine_n_883853.html

      $154/g - Norway
      $129/g - Finland
      $120/g - USA
      $104/g - Greece
      $104/g - Sweden
      $99/g - Italy
      $97/g - Austria
      $97/g - Ireland
      $94/g - Denmark
      $87/g - Luxembourg

    10. Re:The Weakest Link by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh and LMFAO at that article you linked, yeah a slideshow of some scenic places tells me a whole lot about how much people pay for cocaine

      If you read the captions on the slides, the pricing is right there. I'm sorry that you were distracted by the pretty pictures, I didn't create the slideshow.

      Yeah that's end user price I was talking about dealer rates...When you buy a kilo u ain't payin to 120 per gram, not if you intend to make money that is. You're talking about something that doesn't have a real cost to manufacture so at dealer levels they basically define the price at however much they want to move to keep their rep up this week.

      Why would you quote prices in gram for volume pricing that's usually purchased in kilos?

      In any case, the wholesale price of cocaine in the USA ranges from $14 to $39 per gram:

      http://www.narcoticnews.com/Cocaine-Prices-in-the-U.S.A.php

      While in the UK, you'll pay around 60 US dollars for a gram:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8044275.stm

      You may pay less if you're purchasing cut cocaine.

      And those numbers look suspiciously like averages...I mean, noones payin for a gram of anything illegal by the dollar, they pay in intervals of 5 because some drug dealers will actually shoot you in the head if you try to give them 1's or change. In other words, this article is bullshit.

      You are kidding, right? How else would you represent the price of cocaine in a country if not using averages? Would you just pick the price at some random street corner and use that as the price for the entire country? And then would you convert from whatever currency they use, then round to the nearest 5 US dollars since that's how a street dealer in the USA would price it?

  2. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The government assumes as usual that terrorists don't have money... why would they they only live in tents with sand all around.

  3. Bribery, huh? by Bieeanda · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly this indicates that travelers should be tipping their screeners more, and more often.

    1. Re:Bribery, huh? by oddjob1244 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      From TFA:

      TSA employees took payments of up to $2,400 to provide drug couriers unfettered access at LAX over a six-month period last year.

      Up to $2,400 bucks. That's less than the cost of a first class ticket for the average Joe who doesn't want to deal with TSA. It's also well within the budget of a terrorist organization. That's awfully cheap.

    2. Re:Bribery, huh? by DarkTempes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course they wouldn't possibly lie to you about what you're helping them smuggle.

    3. Re:Bribery, huh? by tftp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, here's the question though, would these screeners have 'ignored' an explosive for $2,400?

      Do these screeners have a portable chemical lab kit right next to the pornoscanner? Are they trained chemists who know what to do with this lab kit to tell the difference between a drug and an explosive?

      Of course, once the screeners are paid the courier carries whatever he pleases, and nobody is going to check what it is.

      I think a TSA agent is probably more likely to turn a blink eye to cocaine than an actual threat to people's lives.

      Cocaine may be more destructive than explosives.

    4. Re:Bribery, huh? by aintnostranger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      do you think the TSA guys checked that the guy was carrying what he told them? Oh, we are going to accept your bribe, but we'll check your package. I don't think so.

    5. Re:Bribery, huh? by Rhys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you're saying that the TSA guy who took the bribe trusted the obviously trustworthy guy trying to bribe him that it was really coke, as opposed to say, 10 lbs of plastic explosives?

      Security theater to catch the rare stupid attacker and enrich the buddies of those in congress and nothing more is all it is.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    6. Re:Bribery, huh? by tftp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Drugs and wars over drugs killed more people than all airplane crashes, by all causes, combined.

    7. Re:Bribery, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Much as the recording of them accepting a bribe to let the explosive through would look very different than them performing their job duty without corruption..

      So - if the scenario goes like this:
      1) You accept bribe to permit 'cocaine' through, and the smuggler films you doing this
      2) Later on, a bomb is smuggled through while the smuggler lets you in on the fact that you were filmed.
      3) You: either report the issue and risk (perhaps reduced but still significant) prison time when the terrorists cooperatives release the video through anonymous means, or let the person through and cross your fingers.

      If you're the kind of person that accepted the bribe in the first place..
      you're probably the kind of person that would do 'b' and hope for the best..

      that's the problem with corruption - it corrupts.

  4. TSA corruption?! by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who would have thought?!?!

    Seriously, though, as someone that proctored the TSA tests for years, believe me, I'm not surprised at all. Half the people I sat for the tests seemed to be under the influence of some type of narcotics, not to mention the gang tattoos and shit.

    The test itself was stellar, too, asking hard hitting questions like "Have you ever lived in a house you thought was haunted?" I wish I could say I was kidding, but I'm not.

    Remember this next time they've got their hand in your 8 year old's waistband....

    1. Re:TSA corruption?! by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Have you ever lived in a house you thought was haunted?"

      Wait, which is the right answer?

      "No, because ghosts are afraid of the invisible goblins that follow me everywhere."

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  5. Why? Because by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

    If ten pounds of anything can get onto a plane by the simple expedient of bribery, please explain again why adult travelers, but not children, must remove their shoes as they stand massed in an unsecured part of a typical U.S. aiport.

    Because the TSA isn't about security, it is about making people feel secure. Well, that and wasting billions of federal dollars on "security" equipment manufactured by private companies run by buddies of TSA directors and/or former TSA directors. I'm not actually sure which one is their main goal, right now.

    Kudos to the Terminal 6 guy for actually noticing the 10 pounds of cocaine. I would not want to be a TSA agent who got thrown into Federal prison. That does not sound fun, at all.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  6. Be fair, guys! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those poor TSA agents thought that it was the CIA's cocaine they were waving through. They were just doing their jobs.

  7. Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it's possible to move ten pounds of cocaine through an airport, it's just as possible to move ten pounds of explosives. Hell, the TSA agents don't even need to know it's a bomb. If they think it's just drugs they probably won't care. Terrorists don't even need to get a bomb on a plane. They'd do far more damage setting it off in the airport, probably killing a larger number of people and likely resulting in air travel being grounded around the country for a few days while the powers that be try to figure out what happened and whether other airports are at risk.

    Really, the only way to make it stop is to completely leave the Middle East alone, in which case they'll probably go bother someone else or each other. The only other alternative is to make sure they know that if they bomb our airports, we'll hit them back with one hundred times as much force and an equal disregard for human life. Either way, the TSA becomes completely pointless.

  8. Crime sans punishment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd like to think that since these people were in positions of power regarding 'Homeland Security', TSA agents after all, are supposed to be there to stop threats right, that such a violation of public trust and authority would warrant them much harsher penalties than some common bloke caught smuggling dope. Sadly I know this not to be true.

    I've always thought that Federal employees, be it lowly TSA employees, postal workers right up to Supreme Court Justices, should be held to a much harsher judicial standard than your every day citizen, or local and state public servant. Why? Because the amount of power within the system that is retained by those positions, makes the violations of it that much more severe because they breaking the public trust.

    In short, if the system is rotten from within, kinda hard to support in it theory, much less in practice.

  9. I don't get it by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm annoyed by the TSA as much as the next guy, but it's their job to screen people and baggage for threats to aircraft (snow globes, nail clippers, pasta sauce, hand grenades etc.). Since when is it their job to detect drugs? That's the job of the police, not the TSA. Cocaine and meth are not threats to aircraft.

  10. Terminal? by su5so10 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How could it be a terminal mixup if no one died?