Why Desktop Linux Hasn't Taken Off
alphadogg writes "It's free, easier to use than ever, IT staffers know it and love it, and it has fewer viruses and Trojans than Windows. So, why hasn't Linux on the desktop taken off? When it comes to desktop Linux, the cost savings turn out to be problematic, there are management issues, and compatibility remains an issue. 'We get a lot more questions about switching to Macs than switching to Linux at this point, even though Macs are more expensive,' one Gartner analyst says."
The issues with Linux have not changed in the past 10 years. It's disappointing that no progress has been made.
Jesus, that's pure 100% unadulterated BULLSHIT. Sorry, dude, I'm calling you out as a damned liar. I guess MS shills have mod points today or you'd be at -1 for your malicious lies.
Sure it's easier to install than it used to be, but for most people it's not as simple as putting the disk in and running the installer.
No, it is just that simple. Windows is the OS that's a pain in the ass to install; at least until XP (haven't installed any newer versions of Windows so MS may have actually gotten their act together).
Despite the fact that it's become easier, it's still not easy enough for the general public.
More lies. Anyone who can use Windows can just as easily use KDE. And in truth, KDE is actually EASIER to use than Windows in almost all respects.
Why are you MS shills so afreaid of Linux? Scared you'll lose all your PC Repair business if folks started using an OS that just works?
Free Martian Whores!