Why Desktop Linux Hasn't Taken Off
alphadogg writes "It's free, easier to use than ever, IT staffers know it and love it, and it has fewer viruses and Trojans than Windows. So, why hasn't Linux on the desktop taken off? When it comes to desktop Linux, the cost savings turn out to be problematic, there are management issues, and compatibility remains an issue. 'We get a lot more questions about switching to Macs than switching to Linux at this point, even though Macs are more expensive,' one Gartner analyst says."
Ah yes, here you are again.
I've had Windows break during upgrades. Windows is so terrible. *cough*
Ah, generalities and anecodes...
Because the actions of a few give you license to bash an entire community.
Perhaps if done with less arrogance, aggressiveness, and spite it might go over better. Or you could just ignore them, instead of "waging war" and becoming their polar opposite.
If you thing "average usres" are enough immersed in hacker minutae to know of the existence of arguments between different linux hackers, then you must know very different "average users" from me.
Not only that but another big turn off is that documentation often tends to be non-existent, incomplete, confusing, or simply wrong then, to make matters
Because the documentation for the other operating systems is so damn awesome. Oh wait. It isn't.
when inexperienced users venture into the forums looking for guidance, the replies are usually along the lines of RTFM emphasized with varying degrees of condescension. Very rarely will you find a simple, clear set of instructions on how to perform a specific procedure.
This sounds like just about every operating system forum ever. Condecending experts is not a Linux specific phenomenon.
SJW n. One who posts facts.