Slashdot Mirror


Arrested CERN Physicist Gets 5 Years For Terror Plot

An anonymous reader sends this followup to news we discussed in 2009 of a CERN physicist who was arrested for allegedly being in contact with al-Qaeda. The physicist, Adlene Hicheur, has now been sentenced to five years in prison. "He came under suspicion when threatening messages were sent to President Sarkozy in early 2008. The security services uncovered a series of email exchanges between Hicheur and an alleged al-Qaeda member called Mustapha Debchi. After his arrest in 2009 police found a large quantity of Islamist literature at his parents' home. At the start of his trial the 35-year-old scientist admitted that he had been going through a psychologically 'turbulent' time in his life when he wrote the emails. He had suffered a serious back injury, for which he had been taking morphine. But he always denied he intended to carry out any attacks."

36 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. didn't actually intend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that's OK then, let him go.

  2. Re:What a dick. by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2

    Yeah! Just leave that to the birds! :-)

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  3. Re:What a dick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's a fracking wanker? Is that like, someone who jerks off to the extraction of shale oil?

  4. Re:What a dick. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or *use* CERN to destroy the false vacuum.

  5. Thought Crime by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As far as I can tell this guy did not actually do anything. He got 5 years for a thought crime.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Thought Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      He did confess to writing the threatening emails. that is considered a crime.

    2. Re:Thought Crime by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      You know, with shoplifters, you can't arrest them until they leave the shop with the goods. And that's a good thing. There's always the outside chance that the frozen chicken they've stuffed up their jumper will be presented at the checkout before they leave.

      With terrorists, it's not such a good idea to wait until they've actually committed the physical crime. That tends to cost a lot of lives.

    3. Re:Thought Crime by slew · · Score: 4, Funny

      As far as I can tell this guy did not actually do anything. He got 5 years for a thought crime.

      Given this person is a theoretical physicist, perhaps thinking about, but not doing, is sufficient evidence of something? Just a thought ;^)

    4. Re:Thought Crime by tomhath · · Score: 3, Informative

      He sent threats to the president of France. That a crime most countries would take pretty seriously.

    5. Re:Thought Crime by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hardly. Conspiracy and planning to commit a crime is a crime, for good reason. Do we wait for a murderer to shoot someone before we can arrest and charge him? No, and for good reason.

      Thought-crime is quite different from actively communicating willingness to be part of an "active terror unit" (as TFA says).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    6. Re:Thought Crime by tomhath · · Score: 2

      They did exactly that. Threat is 5 years, acting on that threat is life without parole. People are arrested and convicted of that crime in the US on a fairly regular basis.

    7. Re:Thought Crime by BootysnapChristAlive · · Score: 2

      Someone is generally innocent until they do/try to do something. Otherwise it's just a thought crime (unless they were threatening to do something and those threats were very likely to be carried out).

      I understand the desire to protect people, but not at the cost of individual rights. Everything else is just "for the children"/TSA mentality.

    8. Re:Thought Crime by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With terrorists, it's not such a good idea to wait until they've actually committed the physical crime. That tends to cost a lot of lives.

      There are steps in between thinking about something and doing it. For example, I could write a description of the orbital corrections required how to fly an asteroid into London during the Olympics. I could hate the Olympics enough to want to do it. Unfortunately, since I lack a space program, I can't actually do it. Arresting me for doing it would make no sense. On the other hand, if I'm threatening to set off a car bomb and I'm sitting at home with a van full of fertiliser and home-made detonators, the security services would be negligent if I were allowed to go for a drive.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Thought Crime by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the fact that it is considered a crime is the point. We have so few actual terrorists that we need to start arresting people who merely fantasize about it. Whatever happened to "sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me."

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    10. Re:Thought Crime by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      So you want to convict people of just thinking about terrorism? You do realize that the definition of "terrorism" is going to continue to expand? Eventually it will include some activity that you think about.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    11. Re:Thought Crime by Jonner · · Score: 2

      Contemplating violence is quite different from taking concrete, provable steps toward that goal. The article is extremely light on what this guy planned to do or what steps he took.

    12. Re:Thought Crime by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      There are steps in between thinking about something and doing it.

      Yes, and he took some of them. Thus making it more than a "thought crime".

    13. Re:Thought Crime by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      I agree with your post, but just a technical point - a person is not a murderer until they have actually murdered someone. If you arrest the person before they kill someone then attempted murderer is probably more accurate, assuming the planned crime was obvious.

  6. Re:What a dick. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nice guess: "General director of the National Police Frederic Pechenard stated in November 2009 that Hicheur planned to attack a base of the National Defence in Annecy, which harbours the 27eme bataillon de chasseurs alpins, involved in Afghanistan." (Wikipedia.)

    In short, it looks like he was a scientist who hated the government, not someone bent on destroying the accomplishments of western civilization.

    Interestingly, the BBC article calls CERN "Cern" as though it were a person. To whom do we address our complaints?

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  7. Higgs Boson is great! by MRe_nl · · Score: 4, Funny

    And Standard Model is His prophet!

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:Higgs Boson is great! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Have you heard the good news of our Super-Symmetric Savior?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Higgs Boson is great! by MRe_nl · · Score: 2

      Begone, Fermion apostate!

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  8. Re:Aside from this strange story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's a typical courtroom sketch in France, pencil and watercolor on paper. There are a handful of journalists specialized in courtroom sketch in France, so you've got to recognize their artwork. This one is signed Benoit Peyrucq from Agence France Presse. Just google his name to find more drawings from his hand.

    More examples of French courtrooom sketches
    http://www.iconovox.com/blog/2009/09/29/le-dessin-au-tribunal/
    http://traitsdejustice.bpi.fr/home.php?lg=fr&id=78

  9. "intent" is the concept in question here by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you threaten mayhem, it is a not a "thought crime" to catch you and punish you on that basis

    if you threaten mayhem it is a statement of intent, for which you can, and should, be punished

    for example, if i were to threaten the life of the president, i would get a visit from the secret service, and i should get such a visit, and i should be punished

    if i call my girlfriend and tell her i am going to kill her, she should call the police, and the police should visit me, and they should visit me, and i should be punished

    this is not rocket science here folks. if you make a statement of intent to do bodily harm, it is going to be taken seriously, and it should be taken seriously

    now mod me troll and go back to being flabbergasted at a simple commonplace and normal legal convention

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  10. Disagree on simplistic view... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    for example, if i were to threaten the life of the president, i would get a visit from the secret service, and i should get such a visit, and i should be punished

    You'd probably get a visit but you should NOT be punished.

    In this instance the jail time comes because he went beyond stupid threats into contacting someone else about details that might bring threats to fruition. A much grayer area than mere threats...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  11. Re:Seriously? by geekoid · · Score: 2

    one data pooint without context. Well done. Now you can forgo thinking all together.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Re:What a dick. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think I read before that BBC policy is to only capitalize the first letter of acronyms, as distinct in this context from initialisms, which are when you abbreviate something with the first letter of every word but don't pronounce the result as if a word e.g. Cern vs EPA.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  13. Re:What a dick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Interestingly, the BBC article calls CERN "Cern" as though it were a person. To whom do we address our complaints?

    To Bbc?

  14. Re:I wonder about the sentence disparity by chadenright · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We're selectively breeding for an inability to commit murder. Social engineering at its finest!

  15. Re:What a dick. by SomePgmr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe a battlestar pilot with a habit of rubbing-one-out on the hangar deck after a successful run against the toasters.

  16. Missed opportunity for DCRI/DGSE by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What ever happened to old fashioned spycraft? You know who he is, put him under surveillance, monitor his emails/phone/travel/visitors, he's in contact with al Qaeda, let him run with it. If he is directed to meet any local AQ contacts, bam, new surveillance targets. If he organises an actual attack, you intercept and now you have him and possibly a whole local cell, and not just for writing a few stupid emails. Hell, if nothing happens, then arrest him, wave terrorism charges at him, but only to turn him and send him out to work for you; give him a better story to lure out AQ, say he has access to radioactive material for a dirty bomb, but needs explosives and a bomb maker...

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  17. What a fucking farce. by euxneks · · Score: 2

    The security services uncovered a series of email exchanges between Hicheur and an alleged al-Qaeda member called Mustapha Debchi.

    OK, Alleged. Someone alleged to be part of the Al-Qaeda. Why would that be a crime?

    After his arrest in 2009 police found a large quantity of Islamist literature at his parents' home.

    This is utterly ridiculous! What the fuck? Where is his religious freedom? I'm atheist as fuck, but if this dude had Christian literature it wouldn't have even garnered attention. Fuck everything about this.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  18. Re:What a dick. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    This is not in any way standard English

    Of course not, there's no such thing.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  19. Re:Hmm by Roachie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes.

    Next question.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  20. Thought != Stated intentions. by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Issuing death threats in writing or over the phone is a crime in most places, when done in a manner that can be recorded a direct threat of violence ceases to be a thought crime and becomes a stated intention, (metaphorically, it's a declaration of war). OTHOH, 5yrs is way over the top for such a trivial offence against the peace the rest of us actively maintain, especially since he had time to act on his threats but chose not to. A weekend in the slammer would be more than enough to convince him he's not as 'smart' as he thinks he is.

    I think more fair chunk of the violence in the world could be averted if someone steps in early and cools things down with a glimpse of the consequences (or a distractingly funny one liner), but 5yrs is stepping in with jackboots since it's longer than most people get for carrying out their verbal threats of violence.

    In other words, there are no GoodGuys(TM) in TFA, it's not a matter of choosing who's right because neither side has a moral or ethical leg to stand on.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  21. Re:What a dick. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

    Eh it makes a certain kind of sense, but someone below said they do PC as Pc which is even dumber.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are