Slashdot Mirror


Diamonds Used To Increase Density, Performance of Phase-Change Memory

Lucas123 writes "Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have shown they can increase the density, performance and the durability of phase-change memory (PSM) by using diamonds to change the base alloy material. Instead of using the more typical method of applying heat to the alloy to change its state from amorphous to crystalline, thereby laying down bits in the material, the researchers used pressure from diamond-tipped tools. Using pressure versus heat allowed them to slow down the change in order to produce many varying states allowing more data to be stored on the alloy. 'This phase-change memory is more stable than the material used in current flash drives. It works 100 times faster and is rewritable millions of times,' said the study's lead author, Ming Xu, a doctoral student at the Whiting School of Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. 'Within about five years, it could also be used to replace hard drives in computers and give them more memory.'"

36 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Boring by approachingZero+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously. Who didn't already suspect diamonds would increase the performance of phase change memory?

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  2. All Chinese authors by Frans+Faase · · Score: 2

    I noticed that all the authors are Chinese. You would almost get the impression that research (in hard sciences) in the USA has been taken over by Chinese.

    1. Re:All Chinese authors by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      Well, when you've got a billion and a third people, a history of oppressing intellectuals, and a (relatively) immigration-friendly neighbor, these things happen.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:All Chinese authors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Discounting the fact that simply because the researchers are not named "John" and "Sally" they must not be American... Contemporary American society does not value education in general and have no respect for science, engineering and R&D. Accordingly we are producing less scientists and engineers. We are investing less into long term R&D on both the public and private sector which further depresses the draw of talent into the fields.

      So, I would expect this trend to continue until businesses can stop looking at the next quarter and start looking 10-20+ years down the road. The federal government on the other hand needs to realize that funding blue sky research brings us things like the Internet and we could use more of that too...

      In closing we are pretty much hosed as long as we value reality tv, athletics and wealth more than discovery, knowledge and the common good.

      Good luck!
      - anon

    3. Re:All Chinese authors by goruka · · Score: 4, Informative

      US is not immigration friendly, not even relatively:
      http://usvisa-info.com/en-MX/selfservice/us_immigrant_visas

      Most Chinese students are actually on student visas. They usually get a 1yr extension for work, and from there they go to H1B if hired somewhere, and Green Card if they really want to stay, but that costs a lot to a company so it must be really worth it.
      The question is, do most of the Chinese students stay in the US? or do they go back to China and work there?
      If this means something: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/mar/28/china-us-publisher-scientific-papers , I don't think most are staying.

    4. Re:All Chinese authors by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would you want to stay in a country that is fairly hostile to the way you look, has a very different culture and set of basic values and generally tends to villify your culture and homeland?

      US used to be a place where migrants could actually feel welcome but those times are firmly in the past.

    5. Re:All Chinese authors by chrisxcr1 · · Score: 2

      1,000,000,000.33 people

    6. Re:All Chinese authors by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The U.S. population is about 13% foreign-born, which is pretty high. Lower than Canada (19%), but higher than most other countries. For example, only 9% of the UK population is foreign-born, 4% of the Italian population, 2% of the Japanese population, and... 0.3% of the Chinese population.

      It's not necessarily actually easy to get into the U.S., but overall, a lot of people do so anyway. And unlike many other countries, the U.S. has automatic citizenship from birth, which means any offspring of the foreign-born population (a full 1/8 of the country!) are automatically citizens, which is a much friendlier path to citizenship than most countries have.

    7. Re:All Chinese authors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I sure am glad not to be a third of a person.

    8. Re:All Chinese authors by Surt · · Score: 2

      Dwarfism is an unpleasant condition indeed.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:All Chinese authors by gQuigs · · Score: 2, Informative

      US used to be a place where migrants could actually feel welcome but those times are firmly in the past.

      When, exactly was this?

      http://www.dosomething.org/tipsandtools/background-discrimination-against-immigrants

  3. Neal Stephenson hits another one by notcreative · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Diamond Age begins.

  4. So... by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great work, guys! Now, do you have a suggestion on how to put several trillion tiny diamond presses inside my SSD "within about five years"?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:So... by ComfortablyAmbiguous · · Score: 2

      Except the diamonds are used during the manufacturing process to lay down the bits, not during usage when changing the bit values. It's kind of hard to imagine moving the tiny presses up and down 100 times faster than current speeds...

  5. Replaces HDD? Again? by tomhath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many times over the years have we heard that claim? Does anyone remember "bubble memory"? Is was going to replace magnetic media. Optical drives were going to replace magnetic media. SSD were going to replace magnetic media. Now diamonds? Okay. But until then, get off my lawn.

    1. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does anyone remember "bubble memory"? Is was going to replace magnetic media. Optical drives were going to replace magnetic media. SSD were going to replace magnetic media.

      One out of three isn't bad. Okay, so SSDs haven't completely replaced magnetic media, but in some contexts, they have. Nobody carries around floppies these days, and laptops are clearly heading in that direction, too.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by bmo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >Does anyone remember "bubble memory"? Is was going to replace magnetic media

      No, it wasn't. It was going to replace transistor RAM. In some specialized cases it did but it was expensive. It had a density much greater than TTL RAM but slow, but it had the advantage of being non-volatile.

      >Optical drives were going to replace magnetic media.

      But they did, for much of removable magnetic media. When was the last time you installed software with floppies? When is the last time you saw someone back things up to floppies? While tape is the gold standard, it's far too expensive for joe-consumer to even consider.

      >SSD were going to replace magnetic media.

      They have replaced magnetic media all over. What the hell are you talking about? They are spectacular for system drives on desktop computers and netbooks.

      >get off your lawn

      I remember when talking to a computer meant sitting at a paper TTY and banging out on the keyboard, and stacks of cards.

      Get off mine.

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by bmo · · Score: 2

      That's why you use it for a system drive.

      You don't store movies and such on it. You have a 2TB external drive for that if you've got an ultraportable or net-top. And heck, at that point, you just buy 5200RPM "green" drives because they're cheaper.

      And that way, if you don't feel like lugging around the external drive, you can leave it at home plugged into the server and stream from it over the net.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Actually I'm personally not so sure about SSDs when you consider they seem to work on the hot/crazy scale. Now sure they may figure out and fix the problems or they could just as easily have a real nasty bug show up like the infamous Jaz Drive "Click Of Death" and scare off the public. I know that after I had a couple of my gamer customers buy really nice SSDs and both failed in less than a year and a half I personally will be staying away from SSDs for at least another year. Sure hard drives fail but they nearly always give a warning first, these SSDs? Zip, just one day they flipped the switch and nothing, not even the BIOS/EFI would recognize them.

      So if they can give me the speed of SSDs or better and the long life of HDDs? All for it, bring it on. But I think I'll let some other sucker test them first, thanks.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Does anyone remember "bubble memory"? Is was going to replace magnetic media. Optical drives were going to replace magnetic media. SSD were going to replace magnetic media.

      One out of three isn't bad. Okay, so SSDs haven't completely replaced magnetic media, but in some contexts, they have. Nobody carries around floppies these days, and laptops are clearly heading in that direction, too.

      So you're saying that soon people will not carry around laptops either? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      If the BIOS doesn't recognize them then that's a controller failure, not the flash memory.

      Maybe you should stop trying to buy the absolute cheapest SSD possible, I"m pretty sure you wouldn't apply that sort of philosophy to other things in life.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:Replaces HDD? Again? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Did you miss the "Gamer customers" part? One bought top o' the line OCZ and the other Intel. Both drives were replaced but that didn't help the data none. Nice to see there are still plenty of loonies that treat tech like ballclubs and automatically assume "Ur doin it wrong" because God Forbid their God may be false. All Hail The One True God!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  6. Re:GST being used in rewritable optical media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, it is write-once optical media that uses organic dyes, whereas rewritable media (cd-rw, dvd-rw, dvd-ram, etc...) use a phase change metallic alloy. However, I agree with all of your other points about the article.

  7. Re:Boring not tunneling by approachingZero+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That does seem to render the breakthrough without virtue, at least from an economic standpoint at this time. Seriously though, history is replete with innovation that cannot stand on its own initially that later becomes indispensable. Like sticky notes.

    --
    'I don't know what it's called. I just know the sound it makes, when it takes a man's life.' ~ Four Leaf Tayback
  8. Funded by DeBeers by SirBitBucket · · Score: 2

    This study brought to you by the DeBeers cartel... Where we artificially inflate the value of a diamond to $5000, when based on supply and demand, it would be worth about $85... Monopolies, or oligopolies in the form of cartels are not so good for consumers... I want to form a toilet paper cartel...

  9. Re:Boring not tunneling by GaratNW · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You understand that lab made diamonds are chemically identical, and have identical properties, to mined diamonds? And are orders of magnitude cheaper to create. Does that instantly make this viable? No. Does it mean that the fact that diamonds, which are themselves kept artificially priced high by cartels such as De Beers, will be the most cost prohibitive part of improving longevity and speed, and reducing cost in PCM? Seems unlikely to me. But who knows. Don't get caught up on the fact that it's diamond though.

  10. Re:5 years? by Surt · · Score: 2

    It's five years because that creates a sense of urgency for angel investors to get in on the ground floor.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  11. Diamonds are a misdirection: this isn't about them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a fairly standard alloy for PC memory. These are common in next gen memory--look up ovonyx, or current Samsung NOR for a similar technology. And to be fair, most people in the memory industry do think that some sort of FeRAM or ReRAM or PCRAM will be important in 5 years, as a different leg in the memory heirarchy.

    In any case, the point of this research was to use diamonds to take a look at the pressure/temperature phase diagram of the alloy. There is no intent or interest in making the material with diamond. Instead, knowing that you can get performance by going to another phase (which isn't simply accessable with tuning temperatures), you can
    1) Change out the layer you are growing on
    2) Add a stressor layer (Si3N4 is common) and temperature cycle.
    3) Do some sort of tricky flash anneal to recrystalize
    4) Add a quaternary alloy to improve the phase space.

    In short, there will never be diamond involved, unless there is a C stress layer (unlikely).

    This is all pretty standard stuff. THe diamond portion is a side note--that is how they applied test pressures. Practical devices may come out of this based on alterations of other sorts

  12. Re:GST being used in rewritable optical media? by EETech1 · · Score: 2

    You mean your recolwikipedialection? Or did you recolgooglelection it to find a real source:)?

    Cheers

  13. Re:Boring not tunneling by NalosLayor · · Score: 2

    Lab made diamonds are cheaper to create than gem grade consumer diamonds. I'm no expert, but I thought that industrial grade diamond (e.g. tiny ones, which this would DEFINITELY USE) was really cheap by virtue of being pretty abundant.

  14. Re:Boring not tunneling by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gem grade consumer diamonds can be created in the lab as well. Up to 25 carats has been done, if memory serves me. There are tell tale signs usually, although I won't call them differences. Those diamonds still are diamonds, but tend to fluoresce in ways that mined diamonds would only do when they are a specific color variation like blue diamonds. Also, the labs are playing ball with the mining cartels and making sure that they inscribe serial numbers on their stones, so you know it was lab created.

    Long story short, if there was a need to suddenly have to produce a lot of gem quality diamonds to save the Earth or something, you wouldn't have to rely on DeBeers to mine them for you. They wouldn't necessarily be cheap, but they would be a hell of a lot less expensive than current diamond prices.

  15. You watch too much Fox News by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2

    The white non-Catholic population are primarily contained in the Bible Belt. Everywhere else people generally don't care the way you look. Many of them are friendly and adopting to the Chinese culture too. I am not talking about your local chop suey place but things like the idea of Zen, the rising popularity of acupuncture and herbal medicine etc. is a sign of the times.

  16. Re:Boring not tunneling by camperdave · · Score: 3, Informative

    Manmade diamonds also do not have inclusions (bits of sand, or other impurities that get embedded in the crystal).

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  17. Re:diamonds are forever by alannon · · Score: 2

    Even assuming that bulk transmutation of elements is a "trivial breakthrough", Osmium is actually much less abundant than gold (citation). You're right that the value is what the market says it is, but wrong in thinking that being able to turn one into the other would cause the price of gold to plummet. Osmium is simply not as _useful_ of an element compared to gold, regardless of its rarity.

  18. Diamonds by revelation60 · · Score: 2

    A nerd's best friend.

  19. Re:Boring not tunneling by azalin · · Score: 2

    Lab created diamonds (at least small ones) are not that expensive. If you need an example check for diamond (dust, but still) covered blades (for stone cutting) in your local hardware store. Artificial diamonds are used in thousands of machines for very different tasks already. So that wont be a big deal