Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Aussie Politician Threatens To Contact Employers of Satirical Article "Likers"

Posted by samzenpus on from the what-not-to-do dept.

Chuq writes "Tasmanian Liberal candidate for Bass, Andrew Nikolic, was the subject of a satirical article by NewExaminer on Facebook. Nikolic didn't like it, which is understandable. However he then went to considerable lengths to identify the people who liked the article, find out their employers (via their Facebook profiles) and 'name and shame' them on a follow-up post on his own page. Andrew Nikolic has a history of poorly handling conflicting views on his Facebook page, resulting in creation of another page, 'Andrew Nikolic blocked me.'"

10 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. warning: don't post! by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    NOTICE TO SLASH DOT USERS

    All posts on this article will be taken to constitute mockery of Tasmanian Liberal candidate for Bass, Andrew Nikolic, and the Slash Dotters in question will be dealt with accordingly.

    --
    10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
    1. Re:warning: don't post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Be more specific. With a Cucumber? Broom Handle? Butternut Squash? Live Squid? What?

  2. Not even a politician by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's not even a politician - he's preselected to run as a candidate in the as-yet-unscheduled federal election, which isn't likely to occur until 2013.

  3. Get this guy out of politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As far as I'm concerned, any politician who gets in a hissy fit over political satire simply doesn't have the balls to be a politician, regardless of any actual policies. Move over and make way for someone who can take a bit of criticism.

  4. Cyberstalking ? by redelm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know what qualifies as cyberstalking under 'stralian law, but this looks like it might qualify. I don't know any law that limits cyberstalking to just one target. Digging out an employer is quite an intrusion, obviously intended to intimidate.

    Of course there will be some Parlimentary Privilige, but I believe that applies only to comment on the floor, not elsewhere.

  5. The handlers are using handcuffs... by samazon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Having worked on a political campaign.... It's getting more and more difficult to keep the "nastygrams" away from the candidate and his/her family these days. When you're on the trail especially, it's important to make sure that (a) your candidate stays focused and (b) your candidate's family and friends know that lashing out against these attacks makes the candidate look worse. It's hard to do that when everybody's Facebooking away at home with private accounts (and fake accounts... sigh...) - suffice to say, if any politician reacts like that to something so petty on Facebook, what other unreasonable reactions will s/he have?

    $0.02 - Nikolic needs a better campaign manager, if s/he is letting him do this kind of crazy shit.

    --
    I have the hiccups.
  6. Re:This guy's a liberal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    he's a "big L" Liberal.

    Confusingly in Australia, the Liberal Party are the conservatives and the Labor Party are the liberals (with the Greens to the left of them).

    Of course, our Liberal Party would probably be to the left of the US's congressional democrats on most issues..

    --Q

  7. Re:Typical neoconspam by caffemacchiavelli · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't care about the troll, but for anyone who doesn't want to look it up:

    "Liberal" in Australia's Liberal Party refers to economic liberalism, not center-left politics. They're pretty firm in right-wing territory, including the obligatory hate against homosexuals and women's rights. Add gun crazies, religious zealots and Birchers and you'd have the GOP*.

    *I'll refrain from making the obvious "Remove gun crazies, religious zealots and Birchers from the GOP and you're left with nothing" joke. Well, maybe not.

  8. Re:Typical by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a bit of a shock, I know, but those strange and barbarous foreign people are allowed to use words in a way that is different than their use in the US. I'm not sure why Jesus allows it; but it happens.

    In this case, the Tasmanian Liberals are more or less similar to those American 'Conservatives' who are still pretending to endorse the 'compassionate conservative' label.

    Note key phrases such as "We believe in the importance of the family and that the standards of a free society should support family ideals.", "We further believe government should not compete with an efficient private sector", "We believe that Australia has a constructive role to play in maintaining international peace in alliance with other free nations", and "We further believe that competitive enterprise, the free choice of consumers in the marketplace and individual effort will maximise economic growth and national prosperity.".

    You'd need a local observer to say to what degree these reflect genuine classical 'Liberalism', in something resembling the 19th century sense, and to what degree they reflect the rhetorical coating of a group of privatization-crazed crony capitalists with strong ties to local extraction industries and an enthusiasm for foreign policy adventurism; but these are not the 'liberals' in the American sense of the term...

  9. Who else? by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Tasmanian Liberal candidate for Bass, Andrew Nikolic"

    So who do the Liberals have running for lead singer, guitar and drums?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank