Slashdot Mirror


Apple To Help Foxconn Improve Factories

An anonymous reader writes "In a welcome move, Apple has agreed to help share initial costs with Foxconn in improving the factories being used to manufacture iDevices. From the article: 'Foxconn chief Terry Gou did not give a figure for the costs, but the group has been spending heavily to fight a perception its vast plants in China are sweatshops with poor conditions for its million-strong labor force. It regards the criticism as unfair. "We've discovered that this (improving factory conditions) is not a cost. It is a competitive strength," Gou told reporters on Thursday after the ground-breaking ceremony for a new China headquarters in Shanghai. "I believe Apple sees this as a competitive strength along with us, and so we will split the initial costs."'"

166 comments

  1. Apple cares by Chend · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this is great move by Apple. It also shows that they care about other things than profit, unlike *ahem* certain privacy violating company Mountain View that just decided to pack their packs and leave after they couldn't compete with Baidu.

    On top of that this is also interesting view to changes in worlds politics. We haven't had such industrial revolution since the US started growing. It also shows that the hybrid socialist-capitalism system that China (and somewhat Europe too) has is a great strength compared to the US hard stance on pure capitalism. Having spent time the China and other places in Asia I must also say that the people are much nicer and reasonable. It is often impossible to deal with Americans, but Asian people still enjoy good old talk, socializing and being together. Also the cheer amount of their population and business culture, with a still relaxed life helps them.

    I am more than interested to see this change in politics, and as I am already living in Asia (I moved here from Europe), stuff is about to get great soon.

    1. Re:Apple cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that this is also interesting view to changes in worlds politics. We haven't had such industrial revolution since the US started growing. It also shows that the hybrid socialist-capitalism system that China (and somewhat Europe too) has is a great strength compared to the US hard stance on pure capitalism. Having spent time the China and other places in Asia I must also say that the people are much nicer and reasonable. It is often impossible to deal with Americans, but Asian people still enjoy good old talk, socializing and being together. Also the cheer amount of their population and business culture, with a still relaxed life helps them.

      So did you spike your apple kool-aid with grain alcohol? Don't be daft, this is a corporate decision, not a government issued one. And it was made because Apple was getting a black eye from all the bad publicity of working conditions while making iProducts. (The suicides didn't help either.) Sometimes markets are driven by social and environmental impact. (This explains the Prius, for starters.)

    2. Re:Apple cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do honestly think Apple would be doing this if they didn't think it would increase their profit margin in the medium to long term at least?

      You do?

      Well, you see, I have this bridge I need to sell...

    3. Re:Apple cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not to increase profits, definitively to protect them...

      Consumer backlash is fickle mistress and not one to bed toyed with.

    4. Re:Apple cares by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do honestly think Apple would be doing this if they didn't think it would increase their profit margin in the medium to long term at least?

      So what? If people's lives are improved, does it really matter what motivations are behind it? If this increases Apple's profit, that is a good thing, because it will set a good example for other corporations.

    5. Re:Apple cares by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      bed toyed with?

      I'm not sure what kind of kinky shit you're into, backlashes being 'bed toys' now :-P

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:Apple cares by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I think the point was, while peoples lives are being improved, it is silly to say it shows that they care about other things than profit. From reading the article, the main reason looks to be that they want to increase or at least ensure their profit.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    7. Re:Apple cares by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. I'm a Mac user, but I don't see this as a 'great move' or any indication that Apples cares about anything but profit. This is a cheaper way to address the PR issues associated to the FoxConn problems.

      Go post your crap to dev\null.

      I would like to see all the other Fortune 500 companies that FoxConn manufactures goods for make the same kind of effort as Apple is in this case, but it certainly isn't a river bullet for the problems Foxconn workers face.

    8. Re:Apple cares by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      but it certainly isn't a river bullet for the problems Foxconn workers face.

      That should be silver bullet. Damn you auto correct!

    9. Re:Apple cares by archshade · · Score: 1

      So what? If people's lives are improved, does it really matter what motivations are behind it? If this increases Apple's profit, that is a good thing, because it will set a good example for other corporations.

      Improved living conditions are of course good.

      This however is (I believe the correct) corporate decision. People, and not just those on Slashdot had started commenting on the conditions of foxconn workers. This is buying good public image. On the other hand this may be an example of capitalism working. Apple saw a danger of losing sales unless they improved their image over the issue. I'm assuming they looked at the best way to improve there image, and doing something to fix the problem was the best solution.

      --
      Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
    10. Re:Apple cares by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Rather than create a new account for each story you want to troll, why not just log in with the same one each time?

      What is the point in creating a new account for each new troll? People who come here often can spot you easy enough.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    11. Re:Apple cares by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Look, JEEEzus, I just had this talk with Cheeseburgers in the other Apple thread. If you're going to shill in public, where people can see you, you have to WARM UP with a couple of unrelated posts. You can drop the account AFTER you shill, but if it's your only post, ever, it's disregarded! Our job is to shape and influence public perception of our clients, not just make a transparent "YAY APPLE" post and disappear. They're going to go with another PR group if you keep up this subpar work!

      See me in my office at 4:30 and remember, COFFEE IS FOR SUCCESSFUL SHILLS. You can't have any.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    12. Re:Apple cares by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Because bonch thinks no one notices.

    13. Re:Apple cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, bonch.

    14. Re:Apple cares by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      bonch has been a terrible shill for a while now. Shouldn't you have already fired him by now?

    15. Re:Apple cares by RMingin · · Score: 1

      Tenure is a horrible, horrible thing. I'll keep working on it.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    16. Re:Apple cares by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Here is my current theory.

      Bonch works for /.

      He puts up arguments that go completely opposite the standard /. view creating arguments and page views.

      He is a paid punching bag.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    17. Re:Apple cares by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      1. Public complains about egregious working conditions at your company.
      2. Improve working conditions a little and start a massive PR campaign to show that you care about more than just profit.
      3. Profit!

    18. Re:Apple cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right. Especially in light of how the /. editors do nothing to stop him and continue to accept his submissions.

  2. oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh.

  3. In other news... by Troyusrex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fox to help hens improve hen house. Farmers think everything will turn out just swell.

    1. Re:In other news... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fox to help hens improve hen house. Farmers think everything will turn out just swell.

      Consumers worried safer hens will result in higher egg prices.

  4. Good news for everyone but the haters by danaris · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think this is great move by Apple. It also shows that they care about other things than profit, unlike *ahem* certain privacy violating company Mountain View that just decided to pack their packs and leave after they couldn't compete with Baidu.

    Indeed, this is not a big surprise to me, but it is definitely welcome news.

    I just wonder what the Apple haters are going to say to justify their mindless frothing that Apple would never do such a thing, because they're only interested in profit...

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    1. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, this is not a big surprise to me, but it is definitely welcome news.

      I just wonder what the Apple haters are going to say to justify their mindless frothing that Apple would never do such a thing, because they're only interested in profit...

      Dan Aris

      Apple wouldn't be doing this if they didn't think the (relatively trivial) added costs were worth the significant PR boost that it produces. Apple's success is, after all, largely predicated on their excellent marketing and consumer image, and the idea that their product was assembled with the blood of the workers (almost literally) doesn't exactly help that.

      Either way, it's a good thing and Apple and Foxconn should be congratulated for taking this step, provided they actually follow through, and don't stop as soon as media attention disappears. I very much doubt either Foxconn or Apple would be doing this if it wasn't for the massive media attention they've received recently. Proof, of course, is the fact that they didn't do anything before the suicides hit the news.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by danaris · · Score: 2

      Proof, of course, is the fact that they didn't do anything before the suicides hit the news.

      Factcheck: The suicides were not at an Apple Foxconn plant. I'm pretty sure I recall reading that they were at an XBox 360 plant, but I could be misremembering. It was definitely something non-Apple, though.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    3. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by HarrySquatter · · Score: 0

      He didn't say they were. Defensive much?

    4. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Twat. Apple have made billions from near slave and child labor. Now they're spending 0.01% of that to improve their image. How about not exploiting foreign poverty and having factories on home turf?

    5. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those Mad Hatters, and I've never hated Apple because of Foxconn, it's the fact they are litigating any company that moves (among dozens upon dozens of other reasons). I personally think this is a great gesture on their part and hope that the effects actually make changes this time (as in, this isn't the first, and Foxconn makes more than just apple products).

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    6. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I just wonder what the Apple haters are going to say to justify their mindless frothing that Apple would never do such a thing, because they're only interested in profit...

      Oh, I don't know, how about "words are cheap?".

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      That's a very, very convincing Factcheck you presented there.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    8. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Sun Danyong, a 25-year-old male, committed suicide in July 2009 after reporting the loss of an iPhone 4 prototype in his possession

      Source, and before he did so he claimed "claimed he was beaten and his residence searched by Foxconn employees." The mass suicide threats were at an XBox factory, but the others were spread around (can't seem to find the exact locations). In any case, Apple is clearly not directly responsible for the conditions that led to these suicides: Foxconn holds that responsibility. It is clear, though, that Apple, Microsoft, and others have not been as careful with their manufacturer choice as they should have been, and all of them should work to ensure their manufacturer doesn't act unethically. Again, kudos to Apple for doing something, at least.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    9. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying that it was the red ring of suicide?

    10. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by toriver · · Score: 2

      "Near slave" how? They pay more than the average pay for the region, and though a few minors did work there, that is illegal in China so Apple were in the clear on that too - it was Faxconn's fault. Do you think the Foxconn workers should go back to being subsistence farmers in the countryside instead of making money? You seem to think that American standards of living and levels of income should be the norm...

      Now, what you should worry about are all the OTHER factories making shit for Cisco, HP, etc. that are NOT improved, do NOT increase pay as much as Apple's factories have done, but that you gladly ignore in your blind hate. Fucking double standards.

    11. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news for the Chinese! More money from Americans!

    12. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't improve conditions at the xbox factory that foxconn runs. They're fucking evil I tell you!

    13. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In one sense, BUT the real issue is the continuing long hours that people work for relatively low pay.
      60 hour is illegal in China. If Apple wants to lead the way it should ensure that Foxconn complies with the labor law.
      Simple really.

    14. Re:Good news for everyone but the haters by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Now, what you should worry about are all the OTHER factories making shit for Cisco, HP, etc. that are NOT improved, do NOT increase pay as much as Apple's factories have done, but that you gladly ignore in your blind hate. Fucking double standards.

      Exactly. There's many many other big electronics factories especially in southern China and Taiwan. For example Cal-Comp is known to make stuff for Asus.

  5. Cynical by Crasoose · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hope its just me being the cynical bastard I am but why do I have the funny feeling this money won't go towards improving conditions? I hope "splitting initial costs" means apple will be expecting some inkwork before they give over some money.

    1. Re:Cynical by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it will...because the truth is that Foxconn is not at all bad when you look at working conditions in China across the board. So, if Apple publicly does this and makes Foxconn a great place to work, they can then turn this whole perception around by highlighting what it's like for the workers who make HTC/Samsung/Motorola/etc devices.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    2. Re:Cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will help to change perception. Perhaps they are planing to paint the outside of the factories in pink with pretty unicorns :-)

    3. Re:Cynical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They work at FoxConn, too.

    4. Re:Cynical by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      They're painting wall sized murals of Steve Jobs and have ultra high tech monitors constantly playing the Macintosh 1984 commercial, except the Chinese translation has the narrator saying:

      "And you'll see why 1984 was just like 1984. Now get back to work."

  6. Won't matter by bonch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Despite being the most proactive when it comes to labor abuses, Apple will remain the primary target of critics who use Foxconn as a means to attack the company for personal reasons, even though Foxconn is not an Apple subsidiary and makes electronics for practically every major vendor in the industry, from Dell to Sony to Google. However, these other companies will receive no scrutiny.

    1. Re:Won't matter by hey · · Score: 2

      They are being reactive -- not proactive.

    2. Re:Won't matter by bonch · · Score: 0

      No, reactive would be addressing things after they happened. Apple's annual reports show that they have maintained a proactive stance, instituting rules and inspections to prevent managerial abuses and other labor violations. As Foxconn's likely biggest client, they have the bargaining power to do that. Like I said, some people have personal reasons for hating Apple and simply use Foxconn as that tool.

    3. Re:Won't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most other companies don't charge an enormous premium on their products and can't afford to. Most devices (TVs, phones, computing devices) decrease in cost-to-public (i.e. you and me) after the initial "me first" cost privilege, and some more later. Add in that all other closed ecosystems (XBox, PS3, Wii) heavily subsidize the hardware because they make their money back on software sales. Add in that it's reported (google it, you'll find a few references) that most of the money they make are from hardware (and not music or application sales)?

      P.S. Google also makes no readily available commercial hardware, so I'm not sure what you're talking about here.

    4. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Google isn't a Foxconn customer, bonch. Nice try, though.

    5. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Really? Care to prove that they did anything before the Foxconn suicides hit the press?

    6. Re:Won't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Apple-hater, it's in every one of Apple's annual shareholder reports. They're a public company and put one out every year. I also love how you prove the OP's point about how no scrutiny is given to any of the other companies who use Foxconn. You only zero in on Apple!

    7. Re:Won't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they didn't do enough to prevent the workers from killing themselves en masse.

      Internal reports don't count for very much when you're own workers prefer death to making iPads.

      And that's only at Foxconn. What about the constant use of conflict minerals mined by child slave labor in Africa?

    8. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 0

      Did you even bother to read what you posted? From the first report:

      In the summer of 2006, we were concerned by reports in the press alleging poor
      working and living conditions at one of our iPod final assembly suppliers in China. In
      response, we conducted a thorough audit of the facility and worked closely with the
      supplier to correct any practices or incidents that did not conform to our Supplier Code
      of Conduct.

      Huh, so they didn't even do an audit after reports in the press came out. Were you intentionally trying to prove me right?

    9. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and according to their own reports they didn't start auditing until after the poor work conditions came out in the press. Which would make them "reactive" not proactive thus proving bonch the shill wrong.

    10. Re:Won't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google own Motorola and Motorola are a Foxconn customer therefore Google are a Foxconn customer.

    11. Re:Won't matter by bonch · · Score: 0

      You asked me to prove that they did "anything before the Foxconn suicides hit the press." I did.

      Now you're moving the goalpost because I gave you proof that auditing and conformance has been a long-standing supplier policy that improved worker conditions. From the paragraph following the one you quoted:

      This audit and the actions that followed have improved the working and living conditions at this facility. The housing conditions are better, pay practices are clearer, and employee benefits have expanded in the areas of educational programs and recreational options. Also, this supplier has incorporated the lessons learned into the design of new facilities.

      If you're asking me to prove that Apple possesses telepathic ability and can sense events before they occur or before anyone reports about them, you're asking for the impossible, and nothing anyone can say will satisfy you. But Apple always conducted annual audits, interviewed employees, and enforced their "Code of Conduct" before the Foxconn suicides, and they cancel contracts with non-compliant suppliers.

    12. Re:Won't matter by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Actually, they've been auditing for a long time, and have public reports on such things going back a long way (ie, predating the "suicide factory" news reports by years) but it's clear you didn't actually check that. They're also not simply checkbox-style reports that never find any problems. They have dropped suppliers in the past who have failed to meet the standards Apple has laid out. The only thing that has changed in the wake of the bad press is that they're putting more of a PR effort behind what they're doing.

      The same thing happened when Greenpeace went after them on environmental issues - scoring them worse than companies who actually had a much worse record, but who had published roadmaps on how they were going to become more green. Apple simply didn't tell anyone aboutit, but was already way ahead of several companies that scored better on Greenpeace's charts (already eliminated BFRs, PVC, lead solder, much reduced expanded polystyrene in packaging etc). They were proactive in that arena too, they just weren't very vocal about it.

      You seem to have an axe to grind, and you're certainly free to do so, but you should probably look at the the facts before trying to "prove shills wrong". Apple's supplier audits are public, and have been for some time.

      They're certainly not perfect, and profit is obviously their overriding goal, but trying to claim anything other than the pursuit of the almighty dollar is merely a reactive stance to quiet down the media is just disingenuous.

    13. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Actually, they've been auditing for a long time, and have public reports on such things going back a long way (ie, predating the "suicide factory" news reports by years) but it's clear you didn't actually check that.

      Yes, I did. I even read and quoted their own report.

      In the summer of 2006, we were concerned by reports in the press alleging poor
      working and living conditions at one of our iPod final assembly suppliers in China. In
      response, we conducted a thorough audit of the facility and worked closely with the
      supplier to correct any practices or incidents that did not conform to our Supplier Code
      of Conduct.

    14. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the Motorola Mobility purchase hasn't actually gone through yet so they are still a separate company hence why they are still trading stock under their own symbol. So, no, Google is not a Foxconn customer. Nice try though, bonch.

    15. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      From you:

      No, reactive would be addressing things after they happened. Apple's annual reports show that they have maintained a proactive stance, instituting rules and inspections to prevent managerial abuses and other labor violations.

      From Apple:

      In the summer of 2006, we were concerned by reports in the press alleging poor working and living conditions at one of our iPod final assembly suppliers in China. In response, we conducted a thorough audit of the facility and worked closely with the supplier to correct any practices or incidents that did not conform to our Supplier Code of Conduct.

      So they don't address things after they happened...yet Apple's own words clearly states they didn't do something until...after it already happened and came out in the press. You're a terrible shill, bonch. Apple should have fired you a while back.

    16. Re:Won't matter by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about that one, but the other audits that have been carried out, on a regular basis, since Apple began to use outsourced factories. Still, your own link there already contradicts your earlier claim here regarding suicides:

      Really? Care to prove that they did anything before the Foxconn suicides hit the press?

      Since that extra PR audit was in response to some media attention in 2006, which is long before the "Apple Suicide Factory" stuff started showing up. Back in 2006 Apple was a much smaller player in the tech world compared to its position now and no one outside the rumour sites was paying much attention (this was a year pre-iPhone). Most talk about Apple in the press back then was about how Apple might have a popular music player, but that they weren't going to get anywhere in the PC market and that they were slowly dying - summer 2006 was a year after their switch to x86, so many were predicting their demise now they were "just a regular PC maker with an expensive case".

      Doesn't change the fact that they were still conducting their own supplier audits, on working conditions and environmental issues (such as management of waste and the sourcing of raw materials from "ethical" suppliers further down the chain.

    17. Re:Won't matter by bonch · · Score: 1

      They proactively instituted rules and inspections to prevent labor violations and improve conditions--before the Foxconn suicides--and I proved it. All you can do now is latch onto an audit of an iPad factory six years ago in response to a press report.

      You're bad at this. Work on your trolling skills or go back to posting anonymously.

      Next.

    18. Re:Won't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO, you're a Google shill. I didn't write the post you're replying to, but looking through your post history, holy shit are you a kook, defending Google and underage porn. As for your post, Google has made its own branded devices and used Foxconn as a supplier.

      So much for that "permanently at -1" thing, eh? I love how much I get to you.

    19. Re:Won't matter by hey · · Score: 1

      If they were truly proactive they would have make sure things were good before giving the work to Foxconn.
      eg they could have done the work in a country with humane labor laws.

    20. Re:Won't matter by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Really? I have plenty of downmodded posts where I've criticized Google. I've also never defended underage porn. Is trying to smear me the best you can do, bonchy?

      Also, those Google-branded devices were made by HTC and Samsung. But don't let facts get in the way.

    21. Re:Won't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Apple-branded devices are made with parts from Samsung too. If Google paid HTC and Samsung to make them, they were participants in the system that ultimately contracted Foxconn--Foxconn made devices for Google.

      Your weird campaign to smear me has obviously failed, so I'll be straight with you. I have absolutely no idea why you target me or think I'm a paid shill, especially if you've been critical of Google and gotten downmodded for it like I have. I don't have 20 different sock puppet accounts like you always claim, and I genuinely didn't write all the posts you've been claiming are mine.

      I'm just some guy who finds it hilarious when people flip out over the fact subscribers can get first posts, so I write big effortposts full of researched links and submit them the minute the story goes live. Kills time at my office job. I had a Slashdot admin once tell me that my posts got more moderations than any he had ever seen.

      Just look at the meltdowns the trolls have when I post. Someone actually claimed that I "created five new accounts today" in response to a single, innocuous post I made. Entire threads go back and forth, accusing every person posting of being a shill. The shit is hilarious.

      Anyway, this was amusing for a while but has gotten boring, so take care.

  7. Let me see if I have this straight.. by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me see if I have this straight... Apple and Foxconn are working to improve worker conditions - when they and their "independent audit" claim that worker conditions aren't bad in the first place, and the article that ignited the firestorm was discovered to be fiction?

    Interesting.

    1. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I read when I read the summary. If the complaint was deemed an "unfair" judgement by public perception, then what exactly are they improving?

      More doublespeak.

      Perhaps they'll add a coffee machine (that charges 25 cents, that's practically their whole days pay!), and call it "improved".

    2. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by halivar · · Score: 1

      In the corporate world, it doesn't really help to get defensive over negative perceptions. Even if they are false; telling people they're wrong, misinformed, or stupid is bad PR. Just say you'll fix it, add a couple more holidays to the work calendar, and move on with life.

    3. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's what's going on, in a nutshell:
      1. The conditions at Foxconn are dangerous, cruel, and completely unacceptable to Western sensibilities.
      2. The conditions at Foxconn are completely legal, better than other plants, and probably considered ethical by Chinese standards.

      In other words, this whole brouhaha says more about outsourcing manufacturing to China in general than anything about Apple or Foxconn specifically. Basically, if Americans and Europeans really thought about who was getting killed and maimed and exploited in order to supply their cheap stuff, they'd never accept it, but because it's far away and not talked about they're effectively putting it out-of-sight-out-of-mind.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, if Americans and Europeans really thought about who was getting killed and maimed and exploited in order to supply their cheap stuff, they'd never accept it, but because it's far away and not talked about they're effectively putting it out-of-sight-out-of-mind.

      Morlocks and Eloi.

    5. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Well the article that ignited the controversy *was* fiction - it was admitted by the original author.

      The audits did turn up issues that needed to be corrected, just nothing on the scale suggested by the sensationalist and inaccurate press. Even so, the conditions are not as good as a "western" plant, but are still much better than most of the outsourced factories in and around the region (Disclaimer: this does not mean 'oh well, that's ok then' or any justification for lack of improvement). There is clear room for improvement. That requires investment.

    6. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is known to be fiction. The author calls it "theater," and says it wasn't meant to be taken as factual.

      Conditions at FoxConn are unacceptable by American standards, but are very good compared to what Chinese workers have to deal with in general.

      You can take that to mean that we shouldn't be shipping work to China so we can keep workers in quality conditions, but that doesn't help the plight of the Chinese worker at all.

    7. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you don't have it straight. Apple published a report showing that things could be improved. You know how that Google thing works?

    8. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Caratted · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't work in PR. I think a majority of readers will respond with thoughts somewhere along the lines of "figures." Relatively speaking, the conditions aren't bad. Americans spouting their mouths off about how awful "we" treat these Chinese people, as if that were our responsibility... they will continue to have a negative impact (and thus be a focus for PR's spending, regardless of how redundant the investments may seem to be) until the magnifying glass is off Apple's chapped ass.

      Being one of the most popular tech companies with a liberal profit margin, you can bet this won't be the last recourse, unless something drastic happens and nobody cares anymore. In the mean time and outside the magnifying glass, the cost is offset because decisions like this are just what they need to convince another couple hundred school districts to purchase iPads.

    9. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. Plausible deniability works just as well in the corporate sector as it does in government.

    10. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      And still, claiming that a companies that makes record profits should spend a part of them improving the conditions of its workers and therefore contribute to the betterment of the working conditions in China, does not shock me.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    11. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      In the corporate world, it doesn't really help to get defensive over negative perceptions.

      like "you're holding it wrong" ?

    12. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      . Basically, if Americans and Europeans really thought about who was getting killed and maimed and exploited in order to supply their cheap stuff

      You think Chinese workers have it bad? The entire globalized supply chain for electronics is fraught with suffering and forced labor conditions that make the Foxconn workers look pampered [1]

      [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_minerals

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    13. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Basically, if Americans and Europeans really thought about who was getting killed and maimed and exploited in order to supply their cheap stuff, they'd never accept it

      Why? It's not like they're going to get killed and maimed less if they weren't working Foxcon jobs.

    14. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by halivar · · Score: 1

      A classic example. Now, in that case they really were in the wrong. But they compounded it by not just giving people what they wanted to here: "We will fix it."

    15. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by halivar · · Score: 1

      *hear

      I blame 4 beers and Jaeger shots.

    16. Re:Let me see if I have this straight.. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, I agree with you that the lives of industrial workers everywhere that work to give us our cheap stuff is fraught with conditions of suffering, forced labor (including outright slavery), misery, warfare, and death. You're right that the Chinese workers are just one of the larger places where this is happening - in other industries, it's the sweatshops in Indonesia, the maquiladoras in Latin America, and so on.

      My point is that American and to some degree European society and economy is set up so that we never acknowledge that fact, and never ever ever consider doing something significant about it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  8. Maybe open a plant in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You would think that with the 39 BILLION in profit, they would have opened/re-positioned that plant to gie jobs to the US,

    But Noooo
     

    1. Re:Maybe open a plant in the US? by halivar · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely zero incentive to do so.

    2. Re:Maybe open a plant in the US? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      You would think that with the 39 BILLION in profit, they would have opened/re-positioned that plant to gie [sic] jobs to the US ...

      They can't do that because the US simply can't match what Foxconn can do in China.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    3. Re:Maybe open a plant in the US? by toriver · · Score: 1

      I am sure the Apple investors would love the idea that Apple should ditch profits in favor of throwing money on some pipe-dream where you can magically drum up hundreds of thousands tech workers in an American city to make electronics. Remember, assembling an iPhone is not the same as flipping a burger.

  9. Good news. by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    That's good news. It's good to see a corporation spend a little more to ensure that it's workers are living good lives.
    If only they had decided to spend a little more to ensure that local workers were living good lives.

  10. Doesn't make sense by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Troll

    Do honestly think Apple would be doing this if they didn't think it would increase their profit margin in the medium to long term at least?

    Yes, some companies care about conditions of the workforce.

    It wouldn't impact profits if Apple did not do this. They could easily have ignored the complaints and let it blow over, and continued to do the same thing to help chinese workers that the makers of whatever devices you prefer to use do (i.e. nothing).

    The only return on Apple for this is felling slightly better about themselves.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And preventing the loss in revenue from when it doesn't 'blow over'.

      Even in the article they state that they expect it to be required if they want to remain competitive - in other words, they would expect to lose profit if they didn't do this. Given Apple's track record, I'm inclined to say their personal warm squishy feeling gets circular filed with anything else not deemed fiscally beneficial.

    2. Re:Doesn't make sense by scot4875 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, some companies care about conditions of the workforce.

      If they gave a fuck about the conditions of the workforce, they'd do their manufacturing in the US. Or some other 1st world country with laws that protect their workers.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    3. Re:Doesn't make sense by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the real question is that if they're not planning on exiting hw business anytime soon.. why not run their own assembly plants?

      the reason to outsource ownership of that part of the business is to have flexibility for quick exit, but with apple that doesn't seem like a good reason right now.

      and they have the cash.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Doesn't make sense by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I wish I had MOD points today, because that is how I feel about especially since Apple's profit margin is so high.

    5. Re:Doesn't make sense by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Who knows what will be their next cash cow.

      It used to be computers, err Macs.

      Then it was MP3 Players.

      Now it is iPhones.

      So, which type of plant should they build?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    6. Re:Doesn't make sense by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I don't know, by your logic, it sounds something like:

      If you gave a fuck about the well-being of your friends, you'd dump your poor friends and make friends with the rich and wealthy people (who make their first world laws to protect themselves from "exploitation"), instead of giving assistance to your less well-off friends.

      I'm not saying companies that choose to employ a workforce in cheaper countries are doing "charity", but then it's totally insensitive for you to just shunt off the world's problems by pretending the third world doesn't exist. Yeah you try to go to Shenzhen and convince those workers to leave their current jobs because it's just a shitty job (or better, convince Apple to to really ditch foxconn and move manufacturing to the US). You'll find that the workers' alternative is working in even worse environments. Not _your_ problem, right? As long as it makes *you* feel good that the jobs are finally coming home and your "1st world laws" are protecting (read "entitling") the people around you to all sort of benefits for doing the same quality of work that could be fairly done for a fraction of the cost, right?

      I mean, solving poverty is easy. Just ask all the third world countries to legislate away poverty by mandating a minimum wage of $1000 an hour. See, lawyers in new york make at least that much and they're barely human! The shitty governments don't do that only because they're corrupted and greedy, otherwise poverty will be solved in a day!!

      In fact, why don't you set up a zero-world country in an artificial island on international waters and make your own laws that mandate the minimum wage is a million dollars an hour. I mean, anything less is exploitation!!!! I'm sure all you ethical moral do-gooders will flock to this island and live happily ever after.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    7. Re:Doesn't make sense by toriver · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if they wanted to make around 1/100th of the number of devices since you simply cannot get that many people here. Apple DID do their manufacturing in the West at one point: They ended up with too few units to meet demand, at too high price compared to their competitors who moved production to the East.

      But I guess you are saying that none of Foxconn's customers - Cisco, HP, etc. - give a fuck. It's OK, as long as you direct your anger at all of them.

    8. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could make an ICs, PCBs and LCDs fabs.
      Then they could have an assembly plant with reconfigurable lanes.

      Using that setup, you could produce all the things you mentioned.

    9. Re:Doesn't make sense by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Yes, some companies care about conditions of the workforce.

      If they gave a fuck about the conditions of the workforce, they'd do their manufacturing in the US. Or some other 1st world country with laws that protect their workers.

      --Jeremy

      Why do you blame companies for taking f*cking tax breaks for shipping jobs overseas? The neo-liberal/conservative agenda for the past 40 years in Congress has been all about serving corporations.

      At some point you realize the game is fixed and you play by the rules established. Apple isn't some paragon or iconoclast as much as their founder Steve Jobs is idealized as being: they play by the rules established and they play it well - look at their support for media content companies - they have saved that corrupt industry from complete collapse - if they did otherwise, they would have been shunned or even attacked.

      The US citizen and employees (99%) need to seize the power and message and force their governmental representatives to repeal the horrendously anti-labor stance that prevents companies like Apple from bring manufacturing back home - by eliminating tax cuts for shipping jobs overseas in the first place and giving long-term tax incentives for companies that bring those jobs back and keep them here.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    10. Re:Doesn't make sense by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      What a lot of people don't realize is that we don't have the engineering mindtrust in the US anymore to manufacture a lot of these components. It's not as simple as just building factories here, we need the skilled labor as well.

    11. Re:Doesn't make sense by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      I can answer that for you!

      Robots aren't quite good enough to do the entire thing just yet.

      I'm sure Apple would love to bring manufacturing home to the U.S. It would be a big bit of PR, and would give them complete control over the product.

      But with U.S. labor laws and wage expectations they won't do it with actual people -- they're too expensive. As a profitable company with a non-charitable set of obligations to the board and share holders U.S. workers for manufacturing is out of the question.

  11. Still no factory in the USA by scubamage · · Score: 3

    So the factories still will exist inside China, where human rights really don't matter. God forbid they spend those "several million dollars" in the US to open a factory and do the production stateside where human rights can be guaranteed.

    1. Re:Still no factory in the USA by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 0

      Wait until Romney gets into office. He'll END human rights and we will get all our jerbs back.

    2. Re:Still no factory in the USA by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And make iPads cost ~$10,000 a piece? Get real. Until the process can be completely mechanized, there will be no plant in the US. The US Manufacturing industry is gone. We need to embrace that fact and move forward.

    3. Re:Still no factory in the USA by Xarin · · Score: 1

      So the factories still will exist inside China, where human rights really don't matter. God forbid they spend those "several million dollars" in the US to open a factory and do the production stateside where human rights can be guaranteed.

      There won't be a factory in the United States until the whole supply chain is in the United States. It is just too inefficient to have a large distance between one's suppliers. This is explained nicely at http://www.scribblingonthesidewalk.com/post/20567905034/why-apple-cant-build-ipads-in-the-us

    4. Re:Still no factory in the USA by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the issue isn't really the labour cost (it would add about $50 per iPad to the cost, according to some), it's more the logistics of the parts that go into assembly, with the exception of a few specialist pieces, that are all made in and around the same place.

      The availability of a large enough workforce is also an issue in the US, despite the high unemployment rate.

    5. Re:Still no factory in the USA by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      The US Manufacturing industry is gone.

      Not true at all - if the US manufacturing industry was a country all by itself, it would have the sixth largest economy in the world with a GDP of over two trillion [2010] dollars.
       
      What's actually happened is three fold: the manufacture of consumer goods has fled overseas, the productivity of individuals has gone up, and automation has taken over in a big way since the digital revolution. Yes, the manufacturing sector employs a hell of a lot fewer people than it did forty years ago, but no - it hasn't gone away. (In fact, over the last decade it's been growing.)

    6. Re:Still no factory in the USA by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      http://www.connectorsupplier.com/sound_off_bishop_iPhone_Manufacturing_US_11-15-11.htm
      Estimates place the cost of manufacturing in the US at about $20 higher per unit than in China, and this is without taking shipping costs into account. Not the $9500 you are estimating.

    7. Re:Still no factory in the USA by Brietech · · Score: 2

      I don't think the logistics are really all that difficult - most of the parts (CPU, DRAM, probably LCD screen, etc.) in an iProduct aren't made in China either. They're made in Japan, Germany, the USA, or South Korea, shipped to china and assembled for $8/board at a contract manufacturer like Foxconn.

      To make an iPhone (which sells for $5-600) probably costs apple $200, of which ~$10 is final assembly. The US doesn't really have the enormously large-scale contract manufacturers like Foxconn that Apple can say 'here, make 10k of these a day 6 months from now.' Apple could probably build a highly-automated factory in the US that could probably assemble iphones for $50, upping their total cost to $240 or so, but then they would have to run and operate a factory - something they haven't really been in the business of doing for the last decade or so. In addition to being more directly responsible for the welfare of their workers (it's easier to say 'we treat our workers well, we're not responsible for our contract manufacturers'), they would be shouldering more of the risk for no gain in profit. Apple can say, Sorry foxconn, we don't need anymore ipods', and then it's Foxconn's job to figure out what to do with their expensive factory.

      --
      I'm perfect in every way, except for my humility.
    8. Re:Still no factory in the USA by s.petry · · Score: 1

      It is not just the supply chain. It's the ability to tell 5000 workers that they are now on 18 hour days on a corporate whim. It's the ability to pay those same people generally a dollar a day, then take most of that back in housing and food fees because you force them to live at the factory. This, is all about profit margins and has nothing to do with supply chains.

      We now have Corporate mouth pieces and politicians claiming that the US is just lazy, or it's because of better workers. Bullshit to all of it.

      My simple answer to both of those is to pay the Chinese factory worker what you would pay an American worker and see what happens. Suddenly prices would also increase much higher than it would to build them in America. Shit, pay them US minimum wage and watch what happens. How about being force to treat them with the same rules as ANY Western workers have? OSHA safety laws, FMLA, ADA, required overtime restrictions, shift premiums, paid Holidays, Sick time and Vacation time. Hell, coverage for when their left arm gets burned off by a hot glue gun that blows up instead of the current "your fired because you can no longer produce" action.

      Oh, for posterity.. simply because it would really mess up China I would like to see them force the pay to be American rates. Talk about a fast way to fuck up a very large economy!!

      In short, you are falling for the propaganda these assholes keep spewing to make more and more and fuck everyone else over in the process of making more. History is really a great thing. Look at the end of the great Monarchies, Feudalism, and mercantilism for how things play out. If you study the history, you will get a good idea of how far we are and how fucked up we'll get before the masses start cutting people's heads off in town squares.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:Still no factory in the USA by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      apparently they would still do profit at current pricing if it added fifty bucks to the price of manufacturing - at those profitability numbers _any_ expense can be said to be the reason to not run the factories in usa. afaik/iirc jobs opinion was that he couldn't hire enough really, really good manufacturing automation engineers in usa to make it more profitable/feasible than the foxcon way of manufacturing(how can you make cheap, cheap watches in swizerland? high grade automation) and obviously running a direct foxcon clone in usa would come with bunch of problems apple isn't really keen on tackling(or no one else really).

      the real grumble might be that it wouldn't up the quality at all to do the devices in usa and frankly the rest of the world doesn't care that much if it's manufactured in usa - nobody really checks if their nokia was made in china or finland either really.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Still no factory in the USA by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      The logistics only work out that way because America has shipped so much of their manufacturing to China already. They're becoming locked in. If they're using that as an excuse for why they have to continue to manufacture in China, then be prepared for a delay between the point that manufacturing in America makes financial sense, and the point where they actually bring manufacturing back to America. (If it ever happens).

    11. Re:Still no factory in the USA by toriver · · Score: 1

      They could hire execs from Electronic Arts, where "crunch time" never ends...

    12. Re:Still no factory in the USA by s.petry · · Score: 1

      What you point at is an obvious failure by the company in determining whether or not they have a future. While probably an okay thing for a software only company, how the dynamics of this mentality is working with very large hardware industries is rather scary. Logically, if you were a stock holder would you put your investment funds long term in to a company that would be out of business if China closed the border for any reason?

      This same risk game was played with the Automotive companies, Housing, Foreign Debt, and is still being played now.

      I'm not saying that a portion of your assets should be in high risk categories mind you. But nearly everything is now riding at this level of risk.

      Well, I guess it's okay since the US Government will just print money to give to the rich dummies who lose everyone else' money. Been doing it for quite a while now already.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    13. Re:Still no factory in the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The availability of a large enough workforce is also an issue in the US, despite the high unemployment rate.

      [citation needed]

      Also known as, "that's a lot of crap". Apple didn't have any trouble staffing their facilities here in the USA. Rather than open some more of them, they contracted manufacturing from China. Period, the end. Game over man, game over.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Still no factory in the USA by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the numbers of people employed to do that sort of work? It's vast, and there simply isn't that level of workforce available in the US - certainly not one that can live within walking distance/on site of the factory. It's purely a numbers game.

      Apple has US manufacturing facilities (the original iMac, for example) but the number of workers needed to make iOS devices is *much* higher than anything they ever had in the US iMac factory.

      Even if Apple wanted to build a Foxxconn-sized factory for all of their iOS device manufacturing needs in the US they simply wouldn't be able to staff it effectively.

    15. Re:Still no factory in the USA by jrumney · · Score: 1

      It is not just the supply chain. It's the ability to tell 5000 workers that they are now on 18 hour days on a corporate whim. It's the ability to pay those same people generally a dollar a day, then take most of that back in housing and food fees because you force them to live at the factory.

      Foxconn workers are on about $5 per day. While that may not seem like a lot to someone living in the West, it compares favourably with the $1 per day they might make in their hometowns, even after taking out the fees for boarding in company accommodation, which is usually cheaper, cleaner and better maintained than what they might get from private landlords in the area. Yes the working hours are terrible, leaving the employees exhausted and with no time for any life outside work, but many, if not most, of them see that as a positive - they'd rather work their asses off and have more money to send to families back home than pissing it away in a bar or shopping for crap they don't need on their time off.

    16. Re:Still no factory in the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the numbers of people employed to do that sort of work? It's vast, and there simply isn't that level of workforce available in the US - certainly not one that can live within walking distance/on site of the factory.

      "The factory"? In this country, we open another factory close to where the workers are, we don't expect them to walk halfway across the fucking nation to assemble iPods.

      It's purely a numbers game.

      Yes, it is. And if this were your whole comment it would have been insightful. As it is, you're just making excuses for assholes, which makes you an asshole by association.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Still no factory in the USA by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      I see that you clearly don't understand the economics of this, which is presumably why you're not head of hardware and supply chain at Apple.

      "The factory"? In this country, we open another factory close to where the workers are, we don't expect them to walk halfway across the fucking nation to assemble iPods.

      What the hell are you talking about? Where exactly do you put the factory "where the workers are" when there is no single place in the USA to build your factory where there's a large enough workforce to staff it? That's the whole point. The link is already in this thread - the US simply doesn't have a workforce capable of staffing a factory of the size Apple needs, and breaking it up into multiple smaller factories to put several "where the workers are"? Please, that's just naive.

      I'm not "making excuses for Apple", I'm merely laying out the facts of reality. I understand that you hate Apple with some sort of burning child-like hatred like a kid who loses all perspective when the topic comes up, but you hating them doesn't change the facts at hand. There's no "excuses" to be made for them, it's simply not possible for Apple to build a factory of the size they need in the USA. Hatred of them has nothing to do with it. It's not a situation unique to Apple either - the US just doesn't have the strong manufacturing base it once had, and a single company making consumer electronics can't change that on its own, regardless of how much cash it has in the back. The laughable comments I've seen on this story about how Apple could take "a few million" and set up something on the scale of its leased iOS hardware assembly lines in the US demonstrates how little armchair quarterbacks on /. really understand about the whole situation.

      The economics simply do not add up. Where they do, Apple does use US manufacturing, as do other large consumer electronics makers, but for handheld assembly of phones and iPads? Not feasible. It's not "excusing assholes" to point that out. Something being economically and physically possible to do does not depend on whether they are assholes.

    18. Re:Still no factory in the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? Where exactly do you put the factory "where the workers are" when there is no single place in the USA to build your factory where there's a large enough workforce to staff it? That's the whole point.

      Uh, why on earth do all the workers have to be in a single place? That's not an advantage, it's a drawback. A single factory is a single point of failure, or did you learn nothing from the hard disk shortages?

      the US simply doesn't have a workforce capable of staffing a factory of the size Apple needs, and breaking it up into multiple smaller factories to put several "where the workers are"? Please, that's just naive.

      Please, that's just good sense. It doesn't make sense to put all your eggs into one basket when the basket is as big as it would have to be for all of Apple's eggs.

      The economics simply do not add up.

      That's true, but it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with how many workers are available in a country which had over 10% reported unemployment at the time when they were closing factories in California, the most populous state in the nation; a country which has far more unemployment than that today. The economics don't work out because the employees in China are paid far less to work in conditions that our workers would win lawsuits over with the least evidence, and we don't place import tariffs on goods from those nations to make up for the difference in the cost of employment. Period, the end.

      Something being economically and physically possible to do does not depend on whether they are assholes.

      It's not about being assholes, it's about being evil.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Still no factory in the USA by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It's not about being assholes, it's about being evil.

      Yes, that's right. The board of Apple sits around all day not thinking about economics or profit, but how best to be evil. *eyeroll*

      Look, I'll still be here when you grow up.

    20. Re:Still no factory in the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's not about being assholes, it's about being evil.

      Yes, that's right. The board of Apple sits around all day not thinking about economics or profit, but how best to be evil. *eyeroll*

      You're being a stupid fuck. They don't sit around trying to figure out how to be evil; they are evil, so they will do anything for money. This does not distinguish them from the vast majority of corporatists out there, of course; I didn't say they were more evil.

      Look, I'll still be here when you grow up.

      No, you won't. You're not here now. You're off in fucking la-la land.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Still no factory in the USA by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It's not about being assholes, it's about being evil.

      Yes, that's right. The board of Apple sits around all day not thinking about economics or profit, but how best to be evil. *eyeroll*

      You're being a stupid fuck. They don't sit around trying to figure out how to be evil; they are evil, so they will do anything for money. This does not distinguish them from the vast majority of corporatists out there, of course; I didn't say they were more evil.

      Look, I'll still be here when you grow up.

      No, you won't. You're not here now. You're off in fucking la-la land.

      They *are* evil? Jesus, just listen to yourself. Really, take a step back and listen to what you're saying. If anyone is in "la-la land" it's not me.

      If your definition of "evil" is "will do anything for money" (presumably with the laws of the United States given that they have to operate there) then we really have nothing to discuss.

      So, what are we talking about here that qualifies them? Suing Android manufacturers? Having a premium pricing structure? Running a closed source operating system on mobile devices? Controlling the user experience and distribution platform on mobile devices? I'm struggling for things they do that apparently make them uniquely evil compared to every other consumer electronics company in existence.

      Or perhaps *all* consumer electronics companies are evil too? I assume that's the only possible position here, unless you're a hypocrite, which is always possible.

      The other thing you might have to do is consider your definition of the term "evil". As a matter of interest (and I'm not trying to draw comparisons here, just clarifying terminology), how would you describe something like the Khmer Rouge or a certain German political party that had some success in Europe in the early to mid 40s? I mean, if "being evil" is only about doing anything to make money, then I assume we're going to have to come up with a different word to describe them, otherwise the term will just be so broad as to be meaningless.

  12. Attempting to Straighten Things Out by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Okay, you don't seem to be a troll so let me help you out.

    I think this is great move by Apple.

    I think we can all agree on this.

    It also shows that they care about other things than profit ...

    Well, that depends, doesn't it? I think this became an issue when "reporters" made it an issue and Apple surmised that it might affect their bottom line. Never mind that everyone else is likely just as guilty as Apple, they're the biggest target so it's up to them to make the first move. In the end, they're probably doing this so it doesn't cost them sales from the hippies.

    ... unlike *ahem* certain privacy violating company Mountain View that just decided to pack their packs and leave after they couldn't compete with Baidu.

    There's so much wrong with this statement I don't even know where to start. Google has some privacy violations here in the United States but they're pretty mild compared to what the Chinese government does to its citizens and dissidents. By the way, that's why Google left (really was forced to leave) China as they refused to adjust their search results to comply with the Socialist party's orders in China. They were actually trying to stand up for the citizens and left in protest.

    We haven't had such industrial revolution since the US started growing.

    I guess I don't know what you mean by "the US started growing" but there are other nations, like Japan's Meji Restoration that were considered amazing industrial revolutions. History is peppered with nations each taking great strides to push themselves forward -- although they are not always pure of motive. Maybe you should check out the section on child labor.

    It also shows that the hybrid socialist-capitalism system that China (and somewhat Europe too) has is a great strength compared to the US hard stance on pure capitalism.

    I hate to break it to you but almost every nation runs on a hybrid socialist-capitalist system. Even the United States. We may have started closer to the Capitalist side but we're making "progress" to meet China halfway as they approach from the other side. I'm not even going to open that can of worms in this discussion but if you're interested you should check out pollution control laws in the United States versus China (Hint: China is very pure capitalism compared to the US on that one).

    Having spent time the China and other places in Asia I must also say that the people are much nicer and reasonable. It is often impossible to deal with Americans, but Asian people still enjoy good old talk, socializing and being together. Also the cheer amount of their population and business culture, with a still relaxed life helps them.

    Forgive me if I am mistaken but this feels suspiciously similar to the Chinese water army that is paid to frequent forums in support of something. Provide something measurable and we'll talk. Even a concrete anecdote about your vast experiences that give you credence to speak on behalf of all Americans. I can tell you right now that people in Minnesota are quite nicer than people in New Jersey. I'm sure China has the same dynamics.

    I am more than interested to see this change in politics, and as I am already living in Asia (I moved here from Europe), stuff is about to get great soon.

    You should read "The Good Earth" by Pearl S. Buck, the Chinese people have never had it better! You say stuff is about to get get great soon and I think you're enjoying a Golden Age! I would, however, be interested to learn what European country you left that is in such a worse state than China.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Attempting to Straighten Things Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you right now that people in Minnesota are quite nicer than people in New Jersey.

      Well this is obviously a post by the Minnesotan lake water army. Come down to Newark and we'll knock your fucking teeth in for spreading those filthy lies.
      I don't know who this eldavojohn person is, but they're obviously a shill for those semi-Swedish a-holes.

  13. investing.... by psherma1 · · Score: 1

    Y could Apple not "invest" in US manufacturer? Maybe pay a company with better working conditions here in the United States to manufacture their parts?
    Still not enough profit margin?

    Guess I'm really old-fashioned, still an American trying to buy American, (when I can.)

    1. Re:investing.... by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      It already does, so I'm not sure what your point is?

      It sunk a great deal of money into Samsung's Texas operation where the new A6 chip is being made for Apple as well as other investments in US businesses (although not all manufacturing related).

  14. Re:But... but but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on mods! Displays of mental illness like the above shouldn't be visible when browsing at 1.

  15. Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I just wonder what the Apple haters ...

    "Haters"

    WTF is a 'hater'?

    Oh wait I know - one who criticizes something that another is irrationally attached to. Like Apple fanbois who need to grow up and realize that Apple is just another multinational corporation that will exploit labor.

    Anyone who uses the term "hater" is a fucking moron.

    Ergo - danaris is a fucking moron.

    1. Re:Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by danaris · · Score: 1, Troll

      No, a "hater" is the opposite of a "fanboi". If the latter is one who supports a particular brand, person, or other entity no matter what, then the former is one who opposes it no matter what.

      There are very few terms which, by their very use, can indicate an extremely low level of intelligence. I do not believe that "hater" is among them.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    2. Re:Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WTF is a 'hater'?

      You are.

      You see this one word and then irrationally jump onto a guy you don't even know and call him a fucking moron. OK maybe you're not an "Apple hater" (though I wouldn't bet any money on this), but you sure are a "Danaris Hater".

      I guess you're a "sydneyfong hater" too, you're very welcome to be one.

      You need to grow up and realize that slashdotters posting here are just another bunch of random people who likes to express their own views (even if it doesn't align with some pet peeve of yours) and do NOT (generally) exploit labor. It's generally not part of etiquette to "criticize" people with words like "fucking moron", but hey, if you want to really act like one by calling people names, that's your choice really.

      PS: How old are you really? I mean I can see why some people around here don't like the business practices of Apple, but to take it _personally_ and attack other people who like their products, it's sounds like you guys have been dumped by a girl who ran away with an Apple fanbois or something, or got beaten up by the school bully for "not-being-cool-enough-to-own-an-iphone" or some stupid shit like that...

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    3. Re:Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a "hater" is the opposite of a "fanboi". If the latter is one who supports a particular brand, person, or other entity no matter what, then the former is one who opposes it no matter what.

      There are very few terms which, by their very use, can indicate an extremely low level of intelligence. I do not believe that "hater" is among them.

      Dan Aris

      Please don't feed the trolls.

    4. Re:Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Haters gonna hate.

    5. Re:Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Also sensing a shill.
      2:31 Article submitted
      2:33 first post is positive towards apple and negative towards google
      2:35 First response is supportive of first post and apple, and negative towards any contradictory posts

      Thats not suspicious in the least, no sir.

    6. Re:Dumbest fucking meme ever - you moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, the trolls are feeding each other. It's kindof cute. Maybe they'll go form a little troll colony and make babies... or kill each other. Who knows?

  16. I bet by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, they are going to ship them a couple thousand of their new product: iBullwhip

  17. It makes perfect sense by voss · · Score: 1

    Even if only 1 out of 100 Apple Ipad customers were concerned about that, it would still be worth it. Apples customers are concerned about human rights or at least they think they are. They dont have to satisfy everyone but if they make 9 out of 10 concerned people satisified at a small cost that leaves 1 in a 1000 and they likely wont be satisified no matter what apple does.

  18. New Factory by kryliss · · Score: 1

    Has twice the amount of bathrooms and now with running water!!

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  19. Whatever, Apple by doston · · Score: 1

    If Apple was sincere about conditons for factory workers, they'd simply build their products in a country with enhanced worker protections, even if the cost was greater. Yeah, I've heard the argument that they'd never be able to make the iPhone anywhere else because the factories can't retool fast enough elsewhere. That's a bunch of bull. It adds cost and that's the real problem, right, Apple?

    1. Re:Whatever, Apple by toriver · · Score: 1

      How long would you be willing to wait for your iPhone at 1/10th of the production capacity that the lack of manual labor and increased worker protection in the West would lead to? And would you demand the same from Foxconn's other clients like Dell and HP? And will you be the one to go to China and tell the now unemployed workers that they are better off earning nothing as subsistence farmers?

      I have seen good arguments for why the retooling/quick turnaround in Chinese factories is a fact, but they are crushed by your unbeatable "that's a bunch of bull" well-documented argument...

    2. Re:Whatever, Apple by doston · · Score: 1

      Your "I've seen some good arguments" is about as compelling as "that's a bunch of bull"... Real well documented.

  20. Rationalization by TopSpin · · Score: 1

    Why I'm ok with my Chinese manufactured iPhone/Pad

    - or -

    Apple/Foxconn worker and environmental exploitation rationalization worksheet

    Check all that apply

    [ ] Making iPhones in a Chinese factory is better than being a Chinese peasant
    [ ] iPhones/Pads would cost too much if I had to pay my fellow citizens to make them
    [ ] iPhones/Pads would cost too much given environmental regulations I vehemently insist on for myself
    [ ] All the other manufacturers are doing it too
    [ ] Some/Many/Most Chinese workers appreciate 70 hour weeks and breathing my aluminum dust
    [ ] It's not Apple, it's Foxconn
    [ ] It's not Apple, it's the Chinese government
    [ ] It's just capitalism at work
    [ ] It's just communism at work
    [ ] Apple's disposable workers are paid better than non-Apple disposable workers
    [ ] Apple's auditors didn't find any serious issues
    [ ] Some day the Chinese will be too wealthy to exploit
    [ ] Your Android is Foxconn too
    [ ] You're an Apple hater using Apple as a scapegoat
    [ ] I also work 60/80/100/120 hour weeks at my IT job
    [ ] Apple designers are in the US
    [ ] The US did the same thing to the British
    [ ] The US had slaves once too
    [ ] The US has prison labor today
    [ ] It's up to the Chinese to stand up to their oppressive government
    [ ] There are lines of willing workers outside Foxconn factories
    [ ] If any company were to stop the exploitation, I really think it'll be Apple
    [ ] Your free Linux runs on Chinese hardware too
    [ ] Foxconn workers think they have it great, so it's ok!
    [ ] Foxconn worker suicides are lower than Chicago's murder rate
    [ ] We can't pollute the whole world!
    [ ] Half of all US households have an Apple product
    [ ] If we don't exploit them they'll never develop

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    1. Re:Rationalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just about covers it.

  21. America doesn't want those jobs (and shouldn't) by Mad+Leper · · Score: 1

    Americans won’t take manufacturing jobs unless they’re very well paid, require little education or skill and have plenty of benefits. While those jobs used to be had in America long ago when steel and the auto were king, Americans now hand those jobs off to imported labor (Mexico and elsewhere) rather than do it themselves.

    America does not have the infrastructure or manufacturing flexibility that China has now. A design change at Foxconn that takes a week would likely require months at an American plant. No sign that any American investors are willing to put up the funds or resources to match what China has now (and has been building up for decades) or set up the massive supply chains and shipping systems that Foxconn has access to now.

    You don’t want those jobs anyway, the good jobs (design, research, software, marketing and yes even retail) are the ones you want and all those are already in America.

    1. Re:America doesn't want those jobs (and shouldn't) by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      That is a well written expression of contemporary conventional wisdom. Group-think, in other words.

      The US government has an outfit called the ATF. They are responsible for, among other things, the regulation of imported firearms. They enforce detailed and burdensome standards on foreign manufacturers that export guns to the US. The US also collects an excise tax (for which few exemptions exist) of between 10-11% on imported firearms.

      This is highly unusual. Almost no imports suffer such burdens. 70% of all imports to the US are tariff free, and most of the remaining 30% are fossil fuels, which means most manufactured goods are tariff free.

      The result of all this is telling. In the US there are multiple, large, profitable firearms manufacturers that have built large advanced manufacturing facilities and are employing thousands of well paid, unionized workers.

      The conventional wisdom you offer would have us believe that these US manufactured products would be wholly unaffordable due to the cost of US labor and regulations. The truth is that Sturm Ruger, for instance, has had to stop accepting new orders because, despite their vast and entirely domestic manufacturing operations, they can't keep up with demand. The guns are entirely affordable as evidenced by very high sales.

      The truth is our leaders and captains of industry don't believe your conventional wisdom either. Having publicly acquired a black eye due to the failure of certain high profile investments, the US government felt the need to protect another domestic industry with a brand new tariff.

      We know exactly what to do to protect domestic industry and we know it works. We just don't bother. The truth is we would rather that nasty industry business be kept far away, preferably somewhere that has next to no regulation and an amble supply of disposable, exploitable labor to maintain those "low, low" walmart prices.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:America doesn't want those jobs (and shouldn't) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those "good jobs" will follow the manufacturing jobs as time passes.
      I worked for a big us router company. Company hired a shit ton of Indians and RIFed some us engineers
      The managers were kind of gloating about it, that it showed the expendability of engineers.
      Then another round of layoffs occurred, Out the door went engineers and managers.

  22. new China headquarters by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    I am sure the rank and file labor view this as an execellant use of funds. What could be more ebenficial to the company the improving the working conditions for the PHB.s.
    P.S. Anyone have equivalantly disdainful/derogatory ideograms for PHB?

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  23. These should be American jobs. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    But no one has any sense of giving back to the community that made their success possible, so forget it.

    1. Re:These should be American jobs. by toriver · · Score: 1

      They were American jobs, but then the competitors moved their manufacturing to China and Apple reached a maximum factory throughput that meant they were unable to meet demand. So they did the sensible thing and cut costs while increasing production, just like HP and others were doing. And they have generated a shedload of non-manufacturing jobs.

    2. Re:These should be American jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just Sun Tzu's Art of Warfare in action: use your enemies resources against them.
      Apple is simply helping China to devour America.

      Apple transfers tech know how,and money from America to China.
      What could go wrong with that?

    3. Re:These should be American jobs. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they would if it were economical. Apple used to manufacture in the USA (and still does for some specialist parts like the A5/A6 CPU), but for the bulk of it there simply isn't the capacity, especially in manpower, to be able to work in the volume Apple requires.

      It's not unique to Apple either - the US (and many "western") nations gutted their manufacturing industries because they felt they no longer needed them since they were moving up in the world and we'd all be prosperous and stable with white-collar-only industries like the financial sector.

      Western countries that *have* kept their manufacturing abilities and still value them like Germany are doing rather well for themselves. The US, sadly, is not in a position to be able to provide the capability even if Apple wants it - money only goes so far. Rebuilding America's manufacturing base is going to take a lot more than just one company with a huge cash reserve and a desire to make consumer electronics.

  24. Make any excuses by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Make any excuses you want for apple but the fact remains the people of China are not a free people.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:Make any excuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the trend continues, nor will be Americans either

  25. Improve factories my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanna bet much of the money will be in the form of a coverup? It's cheaper to coverup the truth than to fix it. Maybe more death threats to the employees that speak out? Bribe law officials to help as well? They'll do anything, but will stop short of threatening their profit margins.

  26. Publicity stunt by Squidlips · · Score: 1

    Just BS to cover their image. If Apple really cared about workers, they would manufacture in the US or Europe. They don't care.

    1. Re:Publicity stunt by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      They'd love to, I'm sure (after all, it's great PR) and they used to manufacture in the US but there simply isn't the capacity to do it in the US or Europe any more.

      *Maybe* Germany, but even there in a country with a consistently high performing and well-funded manufacturing sector, they just don't have the manpower to be able to do the sort of volume and timescale that Apple needs. It's not just a case of saying "we'll build the factory there!" - you need employees to staff it and the scale of the workforce at Foxconn's multiple plants are simply way over what you'll be able to manage in any European or US setup.

      Saying that, Apple does do some manufacturing of components in the US, namely in Texas via Samsung's chip fab there. They just sunk a ton of money into it so Samsung could extend it further, although the raw number of job increases was not huge due to the nature of chip fabrication. It's nowhere near the worker density of an assembly line.

  27. Greetings! by eldavojohn · · Score: 2

    Well this is obviously a post by the Minnesotan lake water army. Come down to Newark and we'll knock your fucking teeth in for spreading those filthy lies. I don't know who this eldavojohn person is, but they're obviously a shill for those semi-Swedish a-holes.

    *pulls his New Jersey to Minnesota Translation Guide off the shelf and blows the dust off it*

    Let's see here ... ah ... Well, hello to you too, doenchya knoe! Why it sure is a fine pleasure to meet such a strapping orange colored lad like yourself! You just come back from a Charley in the Chocolate Factory production or something?

    Oh, right, I need to translate this cordiality so that you can understand it ... "How's the fauwkin' weather ova there, ya fauwkin' prick? You look thirsty, can I offer ya some pop ... er ... fauwkin' yagga bawmbs?"

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Greetings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two nights ago in a dream you played the same chord....I don't remember which/probably don't have the ear for specifics anymore. It got hum-drum. Sorry. You got bored/were impatient. Duh?! You were always faster. Especially with listening/tones/harmonics/music theory. I gave up when it got hard.

          You knew.
      You always knew.

      Kate and her mom were in it. Ruth had a blue coat and hat. K8 didn't say anything, but stood right by her.

      Six or so months ago in a dream you played peacemaker/war Ender with an arrogant, but capable math-head from my past (who, if I wasn't smarter/more equipped ...was abusive. (don't hate him or I...blame the culture Which we were raised.) (We can change it by acknowledging it.).). You made peace. Somehow. I cannot remember. And when it happened I didn't really understand. (You know am in/get in over-my-head). Somehow your presence reassured of hope in progress....forgiveness of idiocracy ....when the future depends on flexibility/integration/pursuits of openness and equality.

        Thanks for being you. (say that to a lot of y-chromos....that may/maynot deserve ....and in real life I wish you'd protected me from the violation of major dangers....womanhood is on the fine line of non-existence. Sorry if that hurts to hear...if you still care/and aren't angry about how things ended.)

      For defending our Home from a-holes. Thank you. For writing like you do/defending writers who know/do better than you or I...thank you. For being and continuing to represent MN arts and sciences....thank you. For shutting other jerk faces down when boundaries are necessary to maintaining the health of the whole....thank you. For shaming the sh::head people in power in countries where the majority of voices aren't acknowledged or heard....thank you. Thank you.

      For being aware of the world we are in and looking out for our future interest.
      Amen.

      ( first spoken word....ask mom!....happened in Holy.....she'll defend integrity and the goodness of heart in..All....especially kids.....Pre-knowledge of Is.)

      Thank you.

      miss you like crazy.

      Come back and don't leave when you can/ if you want to.

          Dwntwn needs (more) life and we need you.

      (if not....concentrate on being happy/getting Good tired like you knew before we knew.....will try to0.)

      3,
      Home

      Otherwise known as Cloud Woman

  28. They already do by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If they gave a fuck about the conditions of the workforce, they'd do their manufacturing in the US.

    Some of the A5 manufacturing is done by Samsung in Texas.

    The other parts they can't produce here, not enough scale.

    Go ask the maker of your phone why they are not building here.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  29. Save your Homeland: Do Not patronize Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is stealing tech, how long before there is a cPhone? When they have stolen enough!.

    Apple is a traitor.
    China is out to destroy America; Apple is over there helping them to do it.

    I see "Free Tibet" bumper stickers around.
    We need Free America bumper stickers.
    The US is becoming "The Eastern Province" Look around. Open your eyes.

    Save your Homeland: Do Not patronize Apple

    .

  30. Why China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If apple wants to spend money, why not spend it on creating manufacturing jobs in the US and get out of China?

  31. New Improvements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suicide Nets around the building that stop you fully, rather that breaking your fall just enough so that you don't die but are still lame for life! Also, fresh air from above the septic field, rather than from above the engine test plant next door. Oh, and one more thing: only 60% of employee pay will go toward providing fresh gruel every day, instead of the 85% employees are charged for their daily gruel as the case is now. A happy employee is a 1200 calorie/day employee!!!

  32. Fair Trade Campaign by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    It might be possible to set up a Fair Trade label (like found in coffee, fruits, textiles, etc...) for electronics too. Then you could easily buy stuff that is known to be made in conditions that meet certain requirements. Hey, why not?

  33. The World of Android Smart Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The World of Android Smart Phones http://www.androidiscover.com/