Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Degree For a Late Career Boost?

Qbertino writes "I'm in my early 40s, and after a little more than 10 years of web, scripting and software development as a freelancer and some gigs as a regular, full-time employee, I'm seriously considering giving my IT career a boost by getting a degree. I'm your regular 1980s computer kid and made a career switch to IT during the dot-bomb days. I have quite a bit of programming and project experience, but no degree. I find myself hitting somewhat of a glass ceiling (with maybe a little age discrimination thrown in there). Since I'm in Germany, degrees count for a lot (70% of IT staff have a degree) so getting one seems fitting and a nice addition to my portfolio. However, I'm pondering wether I should go for Computer Science or Business Informatics. I'd like to move into Project Management or Technical Account Management, which causes my dilemma: CS gives me the pro credibility and proves my knowledge with low-level and technical stuff, and I'd be honing my C/C++ and *nix skills. Business Informatics would teach me some bean-counting skills; I'd be doing modelling, ERP with Java or .NET all day. It would give me some BA cred, but I'd lose karma with the T-shirt wearing crew and the decision-makers in that camp. I'm leaning toward Business Informatics because I suspect that's where the money is, but I'm not quite sure wether a classic CS degree wouldn't still be better — even if I'm wearing a suit. Any suggestions?"

32 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Glass Ceiling @40s by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm curious when people find the glass ceiling beginning to show it's face in their respective countries. The age discrimination the poster hints are starts pretty early in the USA, I've seen it start in as early as one's late 20s (though usually it seems to pick up in the early 30s).

    1. Re:Glass Ceiling @40s by Matheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At that young it's not as much age discrimination in the US as it is $$ discrimination. They are saying that because you are older you expect more pay and therefore if we can find someone fresh out of school who can do the same job we'll hire them because we can pay them peanuts.

      Honestly, in person, the only people I have run into complaining about age discrimination before showing lots of grey hair haven't put forth the effort to keep their skills fresh and are completely surprised why no one will just hand them a job. Interviewing for a high paying, higher level position when unfortunately they are only qualified for the entry level / junior positions still. This is probably true in all trades to some extent but in the computer field I think more than others if you are not constantly learning new things, adding new capabilities to your repertoire then you are moving in reverse. There are too many people resting on their laurels and I will hire a young kid a couple years out of school long before I'll hire someone who has demonstrably become stagnant.

      If anything, for the OP's OQ, reverse age, or at least experience, discrimination helps him. If I'm hiring someone fresh or recently out of school then their schooling will play heavily into whether I bring them into an interview or not. Once someone has 5-10 years of experience under their belt, as he says he has, I rarely even look at that part of the resume as, frankly, it's not relevant anymore.

    2. Re:Glass Ceiling @40s by Mr+Z · · Score: 4, Funny

      We should set RidiculouslyCleanPC (2637867) and LookAtThatCleanBooth (2637863) up on a date. Maybe they can spend some quality time cleaning each others... erm... PCs.

    3. Re:Glass Ceiling @40s by ghostdoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no ceiling that I'm aware of, but there is a major reluctance to pay wages above the initial 3-5 years. Especially when most of those 5 year folks churn out almost the same quality code as brand new grads.

      Except that they don't. All the studies done have shown that experience really counts for code quality and productivity.

      Of course, that's assuming the rest of the development chain is working. If the management have poorly-conceived ideas and don't listen to their techies about what's feasible in the first place, then they might as well employ actual monkeys in the coding role because the project's going to fail regardless.

      --
      Business/App ideas are like arseholes: everyone's got one, they're mostly shit, but very rarely they contain a diamond
    4. Re:Glass Ceiling @40s by khallow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At that young it's not as much age discrimination in the US as it is $$ discrimination. They are saying that because you are older you expect more pay and therefore if we can find someone fresh out of school who can do the same job we'll hire them because we can pay them peanuts.

      I doubt it's wage discrimination simply because who's paying the older workers that extra money, if they aren't employing them? I think it's simply that young workers can and will put up with more crap than older workers. They have more time (less commitments and more ability to maintain weird hours) and they're less experienced in the ways of business (that is, more gullible, less cynical). If you want someone to dump 80 hours a week into a salary job for a projects that's probably going nowhere, it's not going to be a 40 year old with a couple of kids.

  2. MBA might be a good choice. by MaerD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait.. wait.. hear me out. The MBA will give you insight into how those who are MBAs think (and therefore, most of management). Also, your experience will say "I can do IT/CS", while the degree will say "I can do business". Which means you're more likely to be able to make a jump to management if you find your career options topping out on the IT/CS end.

    And you'd be following in the footsteps of Alan Cox.

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    1. Re:MBA might be a good choice. by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes an MBA might be a good choice depending on the person. As an IT manager myself, I work(ed) with and supervise a variety of individuals who are very well suited for IT but are not at all suited for management.

      Just because you earn an MBA doesn't mean that you will suddenly have the personality or qualities required for IT management.

      ---

      On a related note: I chose to go with an MPA instead of an MBA. Why? Well, I'm personally interested in the public sector but both types of degrees provide a fairly similar background--just with one providing more for the public sector's unique needs.

      I still get the HR, finance, etc, etc, etc, but I have the ability to leverage both sides of the fence more easily. If the government changes its focus to move away from "smaller" to "larger" I may have an advantage that MBA degree holders do not.

    2. Re:MBA might be a good choice. by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 4, Informative

      You will need an undergraduate degree before an MBA

      You often don't need an undergraduate degree to do a post-graduate degree like an MBA - I didn't - if you can demonstrate long term, relevant experience. It would depend on the institution where you were doing the MBA, many offer this option.

      The "work experience" option exists for a degree like an MBA, because the OP would have worked in a business environment for most of his career. There is an understanding that an undergraduate degree prepares you to a specific level and often work experience can teach the same level of preparedness to complete a post-graduate degree (note, that's your ability to study, not your preparedness to work in a specific job).

      There are technology/management post-graduate degrees also, which is what I did, and I do not have an undergraduate degree, and that's never been an issue for me. For the most part it's been having a degree of some kind that gets the "tick" when applying for jobs, again at least in my experience.

      You would often need to complete the initial graduate certificate (in my case, that was 4 subjects) with a specific grade point average to be able to continue on to the full degree.

      And that was going to be my suggestion to the OP - not to do a full degree initially, look at post-graduate options that he may have access to as a mature-age student. Advantages include, there is an early exit point (graduate certificate, graduate diploma) and they are faster to complete, as there are less (but harder) subjects. In my case my degree was 12 subjects, the undergrad would have been 24... I finished it in 2 years, while working full time.

      consider enhancing your portfolio with a PMP certification.

      I completely agree - PMP or maybe CAPM if he doesn't have the PM experience to do the PMP straight away - and/or Prince2 (just do the foundations cert if you're short on cash). These are "quick wins" also, doing them is an instant line to add to your resume.

    3. Re:MBA might be a good choice. by frost22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nice of you to recognize that you (and nearly everybody else) is blowing hot steam.

      There is no college in Germany. Until very recently, we didn't even have Bachelor degrees at all. There are full universities and "universities of applied science". (Fachhochschulen). The latter are, in theory, not staffed and equipped for research and cater to a lower qualified student tier, but these days everyone and his dog are offering masters programs under the new Bologna rules, and depending on their motivation and other factors they may or may not do research.

      I do assume the OP has the necessary requirements for university attendance (Abitur for universities, "Fachhochschulreife" plus relevant experience for universities of applied science).

      The MBA market in Germany has become especially intransparent. Here Bologna has really ruined the educational system. Crappy provincial Fachhochschulen compete with first rate universities offering the same title. Moreover, the MBA is NOT part of the "consecutive" system (where a Master require a Bachelor) but are basically given to everyone who completed the course, whatever its requirements were. There are MBAs that can be had after 2 years of distance learning.

      If you want a regular masters degree in Business Administration, otoh, you'll get a M.A. in Business administration. Bologna at its finest.

      --
      ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
    4. Re:MBA might be a good choice. by tirefire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... so little true entrepeneurship in Germany. It's striking how many of the biggest tech companies around today (Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, Google, and I could go on) were founded by innovators who dropped out of college/university/whatever to pursue their ideas. Luckily there are enough people who are more impressed by ideas and hard work than your pile of Bologna.

      All excellent points. I'd like to add a couple of my own that are from the same vein...

      When I encounter people old enough to start facing age discrimination in their line of work (age 40+, seems like), I notice that all the ones with really successful and lucrative careers have one common trait: they don't need to look to other people for job openings; job openings look for THEM. If you are playing your career right, by the time you're getting old you'll have made as many casual friendships with former co-workers and bosses in as many different businesses/universities/whatever as humanly possible. Even if you're not looking for a new job, hopefully old co-workers from a few years back are calling you out of the blue and offering you interviews for positions. I mean, some of your favorite old co-workers are definitely managers now. When people are starting a new company or a new project and they're looking for people to add to the team, they're asking each other "Who's good? If we could pick anybody we wanted, who would it be?" Even if you're not the most brilliant person they've ever worked with, all people have a favorable bias for someone they've met, unless you were a total dick to them or something. But if they have an opening, I'm sure they would much rather interview you than a bunch of random strangers.

      Notice that the words "diploma", "degree", and "title" are missing from the last paragraph? That's because smart, adaptive, practical people (the exact kind of people who will NOT be prejudiced against you if you are old) aren't interested in the "right" degree or the "right" certificate from the "right" institution, they're interested in people who get results, no more, no less. Considering that the entire American system of giant research universities with heavily layered bureaucracy and titles like "PhD" was imported straight from Germany in the early 20th century, I wouldn't be surprised at all if Germany suffers from the same cancer of worship for meaningless titles that you see in so many Fortune 500 and public sector workplaces.

      TLDR: A nice diploma from a nice university is useful for gaining access to anti-meritocratic institutions like large corporations that cannot accurately judge employee worth. Practical knowledge, experience, and professional contacts are more valuable if you want to work in a place that doesn't resemble a Dilbert cartoon.

  3. Business Informatics by gristlebud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since you're doing this for the money, and hitting the "glass ceiling", honing your business skills will give you the best chance of moving into a position where you can make significantly more money. You say that you want to go into project management, and having business skills in achieving the trifecta of a successful project (scope, schedule, and budget) will go far. Since you've spent a significant part of your career in deep technical fields, it will also give you a different perspective on what your employer thinks is important. It will also give you a hand-up on your peer competition, because being able to tell when the tech folks are bullshitting the "suits" is extremely valuable.

    --
    OK...
    I can do this. I am, after all,
    a superhero!
  4. Re:Any suggestions? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Age discrimination must be the government's fault since no business would ever discriminate against any particular group of people for fear of going instantly bust due to the magic market fairy [/libertarian]

  5. Seconded. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure that any limits are really ageism and not related to whether you have a degree or not. It's all about how many hours-per-week they can get out of you for $X per month. The older you are the fewer those hours are.

    Even if the hours you do provide are really worth more in terms of productivity because your experience means that you do not go off on unproductive tangents.

    But just in case the limit really is the degree .... get the fastest cheapest degree you can. It does NOT matter what the subject is. As long as it is fast and cheap. It is just the first step and at this point you really aren't concerned about making the correct relationships with the other kids in the frats.

    THEN start working on an advanced degree in the subject that you really want. Such as computer science. Or whatever.

    1. Re:Seconded. by ghostdoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that any limits are really ageism and not related to whether you have a degree or not. It's all about how many hours-per-week they can get out of you for $X per month. The older you are the fewer those hours are.

      Even if the hours you do provide are really worth more in terms of productivity because your experience means that you do not go off on unproductive tangents.

      I see the same ageism (Australia), and definitely the same need for paper qualifications.
      But I took the need for paper qualifications to be a reflection of today's reluctance to make judgement calls. If two candidates walk in and one has a degree and the other hasn't then the HR drone is immediately biased to take the one with the degree regardless of experience (because graduates are better than non-graduates right?). Taking the non-graduate requires a judgement call on the relative worth of their experience, and judgement calls expose you to liability.

      As the entire software industry knows, experience trumps any formal education for productivity in coding. Yet there's still a lot ageism around, an impression that somehow good coders are in their 20's and work 12+ hours a day (when every single formal study done has shown that a project staffed by inexperienced coders working long hours is pretty much a guaranteed fail).
      I have a partly-formed theory that it's because the young inexperienced candidate reacts to the PHB's ideas with 'wow great idea I'll get working on it immediately' while the older hand responds with 'yeah we tried that five years ago and it failed because...'

      But just in case the limit really is the degree .... get the fastest cheapest degree you can. It does NOT matter what the subject is. As long as it is fast and cheap. It is just the first step and at this point you really aren't concerned about making the correct relationships with the other kids in the frats.

      THEN start working on an advanced degree in the subject that you really want. Such as computer science. Or whatever.

      To a certain extent this is true, in my experience, but why bother getting the bachelor's degree? Most uni's will accept your experience instead of a bachelor's and you can go straight to the interesting bit.

      I'm in very much the same situation as the OP, and I've done two things:
        1. Started an MBA, which has been useful and interesting, and provides all the credibility I need for the paper-brained. I'd massively recommend this over starting a bachelor's degree because you'll be mixing with people in their 30's and 40's and not sitting there in a class full of kids wondering wtf you're doing there.
        2. Refocused on consulting/coding for small companies and startups. They really value the experience and what works rather than what looks good on paper, and they're not afraid of judgement calls. Also, no HR drones - you get interviewed by the founder, usually in a pub.

      good luck

      --
      Business/App ideas are like arseholes: everyone's got one, they're mostly shit, but very rarely they contain a diamond
    2. Re:Seconded. by dadioflex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If two people walk in to an interview with the HR Drone, who is an actual real life (the nature of IT being automated systems, the snake that eats its own tail, suggests a future when we are able to do away with the IT guys altogether because the agents they created are as good as them and because they aren't real people with issues and lawyers we don't need as many HR people anyway. So rue the day that dawns upon an HR free world for that will be the day when the machine has taken over and all your qualifications and experience will count for naught as you drive the treadmills charging their batteries. I digress.) person by the way, will probably hire the one with the best interview technique, if their experience is similar. Qualifications don't count in actual interviews. Qualifications count in the screening process prior to getting an interview.

      A forty-something wanting a degree to boost their career in IT, is akin to a chimp that wants to learn to smoke cigarettes because it'll make them more like a person. If you're still shuffling code at forty your career has gone so far off the rails that a degree won't save it. If you're a smart, accomplished, hard worker, you should be looking to retire by the time you're in your mid-fifties. If that isn't likely right now with ten years to go, then the cost of a degree isn't going to help you achieve it.

      OP is making the classic mistake of thinking that his lack of opportunities can be fixed by a magic bullet. A degree course is not that magic bullet. Work harder, work better doing what you do and everything else will fall into place. At your age you shouldn't need qualifications to characterize who you are. You should have a body of work, and a trail of satisfied clients, employers and work-mates reinforcing it. You should be able to name names and call upon personal endorsements. You should be beyond this.

  6. Get an MBA if you want a boost by HunterZero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know how it is in Germany, but here in the USA (especially in the Silicon Valley) if you want a late career boost, go get an MBA. Having an MBA isn't a four-letter word around here, especially if you get one from a good program. MIT has an excellent executive MBA program that can be done remotely, and everyone I've encountered with one has been top-notch. Same goes for an MBA from Stanford or even the other colleges local to the area.

    Having an MBA opens a lot more doors for you. If you already have a good amount of experience in IT and Software Development, go get a degree in something outside of those fields to help expand your options.

    You could also get a degree in something you enjoy personally but won't directly get you a job. Education doesn't just have to be for professional development.

    --
    "They told me it was impossible. I replied with maniacal laughter." http://www.mydailyrant.com/
  7. Is any degree late in life a good decision? by taxman_10m · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything you go for will take time and put you into debt. What are the odds you will make enough money so that the degree pays for itself? It's something I've thought of myself. I'd rather plug along and slowly build or maintain what I have rather than incur a great deal of debt. Maybe a cert here and there, but that's it.

    1. Re:Is any degree late in life a good decision? by Lurks · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "What are the odds you will make enough money so that the degree pays for itself?"

      I'm a little loath to reply to this on the basis that the vast majority of posts from the Slashdot crowd on anything to do with university tend to view education as all about money. I suspect that's a heavy cultural bias from the US... anyway.

      As someone who is a 40-something about to finish a degree this year, I have some experience of this but for me, at least, your question loads the dice. I was earning plenty of money doing what I was doing before, I just didn't like it. I'd be happy to earn a living, doing something I love and that is what, in my experience, most mature students are doing back at university.

      Granted that might be a little skewed because useless public services like healthcare and universities cost more in the US than anywhere else in the world, and maybe you do feel some pressure to get a career result to pay back the debt. That said, there are cheap or even free ways to get educated if you're willing to move beyond the top-tier universities.

      Finally, I'd add this: It's easy to make the decision to go to university to study something based on some sort of future goal. What universally happens is that by the end of the degree, you have a different idea about what that goal is. It's also quite hard to motivate yourself, do well, and even benefit particularly well from a degree if you aren't really interested in the subject.

      So my advice is this: do a degree in something you're really interested in and when faced with choices, go for the flexible choices. There is every chance that you'll run into some niche off of something you're interested in which will turn out to be a gold mine. It happened to me. I found a field that blended my previous skills with what I was learning and it's the best thing that ever happened to me.

  8. Long view by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where do you want to be 10-15 years from now? Aim towards that.

  9. Well, hope this helps. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    . . .my bachelor's dates to 1983. Lot of been-there-done-that IT engineering since then. 2006, got TOLD that if I wanted to advance, I'd need a Masters' and at least one advanced certification. I went and got a Masters' in Management Information Systems online (fairly painless, other than writing 20-30 pages every weekend) and followed it with a CISSP cert and a CEH cert. Income is up 50% since I started the Master's program. Except for a few things, like an introduction to Forensics, and crawling into database theory, it wasn't anything new and/or hard. And most of my fellow students (who were either just out of undergrad, or late 20s) weren't much competition. The few that WERE, I'm still in contact with: their inputs and opinions are as valuable as anything I'd learned in the classes. Mind you. my employer paid for most of it, I had (at max point) about 7K in student loans. But considering the uptick in salary, even doing it ALL on student loans would probably have been somewhere between a good and very-good investment. Your mileage may. of course, vary: I was a security geek BEFORE my Masters', CISSP, and CEH. . . but all three combined opened doors and definitely raised compensation. . . .

  10. No Degree. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop working for Faceless Corps and switch to a smaller company where you rub elbows with the Owners daily. They are not stupid and do the "only youngsters here" stupidity. They realize the older worker is a pro in the field they have been in for the past 20 years and use them to compete with the morons that have MBA's

    I'll never work for another Fortune 500 company again. I prefer having beers at the end of the day with the guys that own the business.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Informatics is more likely to be useful by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

    The submitter's not in America, he's in Germany, so ranting about US attitudes is off-topic. I don't know much about the German market, but having a BA is pretty commonly useful in business, and if you're thinking about doing project management professionally, here in the US it helps to have some professional certification in that. Also, I don't know how much college you have taken already; whether you're looking for two years or four can make a big difference in your plans.

    If you haven't had a good course in algorithms and data structures, you'll benefit from that, and you're going to need math if you don't have that, but you can take those along with the Business Informatics, and if you're thinking about going into management, you're not going to be doing compiler design or operating system development yourself anyway.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Informatics is more likely to be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you haven't had a good course in algorithms and data structures, you'll benefit from that

      Having taught at the undergraduate level and currently working on a PhD in CS, I disagree with this advice. If you have 10 years experience, you've probably already figured out what a linked list, red-black tree, graph data structure, etc. are. You probably know how to implement various sorts, graph searches, spanning trees. The things you will likely run into in a CS degree that you haven't had to deal with in the past are the theoretical side. Turing Machines, paradigms (depending on how the course is taught), formal languages (as in regular languages, context free languages, context sensitive languages, not formal programming languages), operating systems, maybe some AI, networking, discrete math. Outside of the CS-based courses, you'll have all the standard gen-eds. Depending on how curious you've been since high school, you might already have covered large swaths of this, or maybe you would do well to take those.

      In short, view a CS degree as a way of broadening your world, but don't for a second think you are going to "hone your C/C++ and *nix skills". As most employers complain, CS isn't really about programming so much as it is about the theory that underlies why programming works (or doesn't). It will inform your programming a great deal, but it really won't make you much of a better programmer/designer/software engineer than simple working experience can do.

  12. Re:what's your advantage? by Auroch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Degree may not boost your career, do you see so many jobless PhDs around ? Take some risk to start up your own company may give you a boost.

    Because you posted AC, I'm going to assume that you don't realize that a Ph.D can take, on average, between 6 and 10 years, lacking any undergraduate work. Also, starting your own company may give a boost - but that's not really answering the question.

    There is one thing that the AC/OP got right - the type degree doesn't matter nearly so much (notice: I qualified that with "nearly") as the fact that you hold a degree. What I'd suggest, is to get a degree in the type of management that you'd like to be - If you're planning on overseeing a bunch of programmers, figure out what they would have, and try for that. In other words - your "promotability" doesn't depend on your degree, it depends on the success of your direct reports (your area of responsibility).

    If you connect with your direct reports in a way that makes them more productive (and it sounds as if you plan to use the degree to do this), then going "higher" will happen. You'll be a top performer, as a manager, and in most companies, performance is the #1 factor in promotion. Isn't that your goal?

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
  13. Re:Any suggestions? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Try telling any libertarian that logical and realistic piece of common sense.

  14. Career Boost in 40's by David_Hart · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm in my 40's and just completed a Masters degree in IT Management from Brandeis University, I already had a Bachelors in both Business and Computer Science. The degree spanned two employers, both of which offered employee education reimbursement.

    I guess you could say that I am now three degrees above zero... ; - )

    A Masters degree is 10 courses and can be completed in 3 to 5 years when going part-time. For most Master's programs, if not all, you first need a Bachelors degree. Some educational institutions will recognize work experience as an equivalent.

    It sounds like you have not completed a Bachelors degree. A Bachelors degree takes 120 credit hours or 30 per year over 4 years. It's a lot of work and time which is why most students go full time. Basically, you wouldn't be completed in time for it to help your career.

    The first step to get a Masters degree, assuming you are working full time and are not a contractor, is to determine if your employer has an education reimbursement program, what their limits are per year, and what you need to do to apply. If they do, you next need to research the type of Masters degree you want and the schools. Narrow down the schools to your top 5 and begin calling their Admissions department to determine if you can use your work experience and what, if any, additional courses you will need to take. While doing this, talk to your manager and let him/her know that you are interested in advancing your career by taking a Masters degree. Go into how it will prepare you to take on a greater leadership role, in project management and as team lead. Once you have all of the information about the school, put it together in a package with your employer education application and begin the employer approval process. Once approved at work, you then need to apply to the school and get accepted. The rest is just a lot of hard work...

    David

  15. Re:Law... by gpmanrpi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yah, about that lawyer thing. I have a degree in CS. IAAL and got my degree from a decent Florida Law School. However, I just started medical school to get out of the legal field. Law is an odd field. There are many states where there are actually too many lawyers. You can make a respectable living as a lawyer, but it won't be doing the "cool" stuff you normally think of. If you are not in the top 10% of your law class, many of those "cool" jobs will not be even an option until you get 2-5 years of experience doing something horribly boring for very little pay. Also coming from an IT field you may undervalue yourself in the work that you do, I know I did. Also, whatever you do, don't do family law. Please I did, and it was what turned me off of the legal profession completely. That is my 2 cents.

  16. Re:Wow! by Mr+Z · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mr. Plow, that's his name, his name again is Mr. Plow.

  17. Re:Any suggestions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Libertarians are perfectly aware that people have prejudices and do not recognize the need to do anything about it.

    If a "prejudiced" employer only hires young people and an "enlightened" employer only hires experienced people, and the "prejudiced" employer outperforms the "enlightened" employer, then he has proven that his "prejudice" is a correct reflection of reality. Results speak for themselves. If the "enlightened" employer wins, than kudos to him.

    You don't get magical treatment just because you are old. Why don't we force the NBA to hire 50 year old to play basketball?

     

  18. Career Boost by hackus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is what I did, last year I came off a really good year, 6 figure income from my personal consulting business so I took a year off, and went back to UW-Madison to finish my foreign language requirements and took one advanced course towards degree CS credit.

    I however, am back to work full time with my business and am making Bioinformatics tool sets for the mobile genomic researcher.

    Now, if you can take a year off an pay for cash all of your expenses, plusd have a independant income like I have then you can do what you want.

    However, even I would never consider taking all the time off to get a CS degree. That would be nuts and too costly.

    So I do it when I have the time and money.

    If you are thinking about taking off, or quitting your job, and taking out loans, you should see a doctor and have your head looked at to insure you haven't had a recent stroke or something.

    -Hack

    PS: It was a nice vacation too. The student lifestyle is pretty nice. Most of my friend at my age (47) look at me in wonder because they have no independent income, have a huge mortgage, and are in my view no better off than I am with thier degrees in hand. (Certainly far more stressed out it would seem.)

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  19. Re:Game the system by frost22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have SO no idea what the working environment in Europe is, especially in Germany. A university degree is the entry card to a very invisible club. I work in a Telco, and that sector has had many lateral recruits in the 90s. One of my colleagues is a journeyman pastry chef. Another one is a licensed railway train driver. We have tons of physicists, electrical engineers, a few engineers of other disciplines, chemicists, a few MBAs, even a Master of Divinity, all doing IT and network engineering work.

    Those without a university degree usually don't play in the same level though (exceptions do exist, but are rare). And even among those - Germany has an extensive sub-university education system. Folks with a technical journeyman qualification can easily find a job elsewhere. Those without have a very very hard time. They are chained to their current job - because to the HR dept in another company they are just a guy without papers.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  20. re: constantly learning new things by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree with much of what you said here. But the problem I've always had with the idea that a "good" I.T. worker being one who is constantly learning new things and adding items to a resume is, it's not that realistic when one works for a small to mid-sized company. (Even more unrealistic given a slow economy.)

    I've been pretty much self-taught and self-motivated to try out new technologies and computer solutions since I got into this stuff in the mid 1980's, but I've never been the type to hop around from job to job. Most of my job changes actually came about only because the place I worked for closed up. (I started out working for several "mom and pop" type computer stores, for example, all of whom eventually went out of business.)

    The problem is, my peers in I.T. who were basically "in it for themselves" without much regard for their employers racked up more impressive resumes than me, especially in the dot com boom days, when it was possible to accept a position, stay JUST long enough to claim you were responsible for X,Y and Z (cool new technologies of whatever type the place happened to be using), and then jump ship in the middle of a project for better pay at the next place needing someone who used those same technologies before. Lots of burnt bridges behind them? Sure -- but there are plenty of companies out there, especially for the young and single who can move from city to city if and when it's needed.

    I, on the other hand, honestly hated the stress and uncertainty of job interviews ... and just wanted a stable job doing what I enjoy.

    So where did that get me? Well, I was able to ride out much of the commotion from all the failed start-ups when the dot com era went bust, so that was a plus I guess. But the places I've worked for 5+ years in a row always stuck with the same "tried and true" technology. Sure, we'd do incremental upgrades on such things as Microsoft Office, or migrate Windows Server to newer versions eventually. But there's really only so much "resume building" one can do by staying at the same company, when their budget doesn't allow for buying lots of new software or hardware -- and they're (rightly, IMO!) trying to avoid high costs of re-training people on all new ways of doing things, once they've got something in place that's effective.

    I guess what I'm trying to say here is -- it's not necessarily "resting on one's laurels", just because one hasn't added all sorts of new products to a resume. But I really do think recruiters and hiring managers look at it that way, most of the time. If a business paid me for 5-6 years to take care of the same set of technologies for them, that likely means those were good, solid choices that really got them their money's worth. There's no negative in having a deep familiarity with such solutions, vs. the next guy who can list of 5x as many technologies -- most of which were failures, so got removed after money was WASTED on them.