Slashdot Mirror


Ron Paul Effectively Ending Presidential Campaign

New submitter Dainsanefh sends this quote from the LA Times: "Ron Paul, Mitt Romney's lone remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, announced Monday that he would stop spending money on the party's 11 remaining primaries, in effect suspending his campaign. ... Apart from President Obama and Romney, Paul has raised more money than any other White House contender this year – more than $36 million. His calls for strict adherence to the Constitution and his no-nonsense manner have spawned a vocal and well organized group of followers, but not enough to give him a realistic shot at the presidency."

14 of 745 comments (clear)

  1. Wrong by tmosley · · Score: 5, Informative

    He is no longer seeking primary votes, and is instead focusing 100% on taking delegate positions. This race is not over.

    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's over in that there is absolutely no chance of anyone other than Romney taking the nomination.

    2. Re:Wrong by tmosley · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that the delegates that you and the MSM count as being Romney's are 75% Paul people, and they are unbound by party rules.

      Whoops.

    3. Re:Wrong by flitty · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/with-romney-all-but-the-nominee-ron-paul-snags-delegate-majority-at-maines-gop-convention/2012/05/06/gIQAjJS05T_story.html There are several stories very similar to this, if you care to read them. I'm no Ron Paul supporter, but he is working the delegate strategy, not the Popular vote money strategy, which is very savvy.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    4. Re:Wrong by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

      >>>>>Paul has been gaining delegates and winning states (at least 8 so far)

      It's now 12 states. After this weekend it will likely be 14.

      >>Yes, I'm sure that all those delegates that are technically not bound to Romney will suddenly discover their deep and unabiding love for Paul

      No need.
      They already love Paul. There are already known Paulbots who got themselves elected in states like Massachusetts. The Paulbots versus the Romneybots is ~70% to 30%..... and we're seeing that same pattern in state after state.

      >>I really wonder what will happen to all you Paul-fans when Romney gets the overwhelming number of delegates during the Convention

      Nothing.
      Because I'm expecting it. Yes I want Paul to win but I'm not naive'. I expect Romney to win the 1st round delegate voting ~60% to 40% (same result as Virginia when Paul/Romney ran head-to-head). The end. He's got the support of the RNC Leadership and they WILL make him win, no matter what it takes.

      If it turns-out I'm wrong, and Paul pulls a miracle to win the convention, I'll give the guy $5,000 with a note, "I was wrong to doubt you."

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  2. The end of one battle, not the war by SteveFoerster · · Score: 4, Informative

    He's trying to put like minded people in as state GOP officers, and to amass delegates. And he'll keep doing that until all the primaries and caucuses are over this summer.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    1. Re:The end of one battle, not the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not completely familiar with US politics, but does this mean that he's going to continue running under a third-party ballot?

      No. Nothing has really changed except not wasting money on campaign stops, which is very costly. He's still 100% in the race.
      Many of his followers use the internet to their advantage - there's simply no point in reiterating the same points over and over when you can hop on Youtube or elsewhere and find plenty of information.
      He's still on the Republican ticket, he's still pushing for the presidency, and most of all, he's getting precinct delegates to join the fight which has the GOP scared shitless. Win or lose the presidency, liberty-minded folks are taking over the Republican party conventions and will have a huge say not only in this election cycle, but the next on who becomes the nominee.
      Ron Paul has refused to go into debt for his campaign, unlike his rivals. Unlike Romney who spends $40,000 per day of taxpayer dollars for secret service protection, he has refused it, even though he's legally entitled to it.

    2. Re:The end of one battle, not the war by ep32g79 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kinda like what happened in Oklahoma , where the RNC tried to railroad the convention by refusing to follow Robers Rules of Order and Romney supporters physically assaulting Ron Paul supporters?

  3. misrepresentative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    He is not actively campaigning in the primaries because he is focused on the delegate process. He has a plurality of delegates in more than 5 states, so he will be on the ballot at the convention. If he stops Romney from getting the majority, then 2nd round of delegates can all vote for whoever they want to.

  4. Nice twisting. by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

    He stopped spending money on ads, and is diverting the money to the state conventions (where he's winning). It seems a logical stance to take if his goal is to win the delegate vote.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Nice twisting. by milbournosphere · · Score: 4, Informative

      I copied the text from wikiquote. In true Monty Python style, the actual name of the character is 'The Dead Body That Claims It Isn't.' I won't lie, I learned something, too. :)

  5. Wrong by J'raxis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Paul campaign is redirecting their attention to the delegate strategy---which is turning out to be very successful. This is being discussed at The Daily Paul. They predicted that the media would intentionally misrepresent this as Ron Paul ending his campaign, and they were right.

  6. Re:Needs his organizers to stay on message. by pgfault · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Constitution and Bill of Rights say nothing about the "separation of church and state." It simply states that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This is the very first sentence in the Bill of Rights, so the Framers considered it to be pretty important. The "wall of separation" was built by Thomas Jefferson in his letter to the Danbury Baptists. http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html. In this letter Jefferson refers directly to the text in the First Amendment, with no additional context.

    From everything that I've heard from Ron Paul, he adheres to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, nothing more (building huge wall) and nothing less (infringement on the free exercise thereof).

  7. Re:so what? by FrootLoops · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently you're referring to the notion that Ron Paul is a great admirer of Ayn Rand and/or follows her philosophy. I hadn't heard that before, and a brief search turned up no real support for that view*. Your post is at best woefully incomplete and at worst simply irrelevant. How you got so many up-mods is beyond me.

    * One site implies that Ron Paul's son Rand Paul was named in Ayn's honor, but his actual name is Randal and his wife shortened it to Rand from Randy. Another article says "Dr. Paul has said he is a great admirer of Ayn Rand", though I was unable to locate any direct quote to support this statement. This article is similar. I was unable to locate anything short of a few fringe views. Libertarians and libertarianism was apparently influenced by Ayn, but by no means exclusively.