Slashdot Mirror
Paul Vixie: 100,000 DSL Modems May Lose Their DNS On July 9
Dante_J writes "Up to 100,000 DSL modems may lose access to DNS come July the 9th, due to scripted web interface changes made to them by DNSChanger. This and other disturbing details were raised by respected Internet elder Paul Vixie during a presentation at the AusCERT 2012 conference."
What DNS issues?
Why don't they just start redirecting web users to a warning page explaining the situation to them at some point before the cut off date?
The FBI has control of the DNS servers. Why can't they just resolve every address to point to a webserver instructing people how to fix their DNS settings?
Looking for a job?
Want your resume written professionally?
DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
Assuming that these were modems provided by their ISP, then the ISP has responsibility here. They can easily watch for packets going to the fake DNS servers, and then warn the customers by email, letter, and even phone. They should have done this back when the issue first arose, with steps to correct the problem included in a letter with the monthly bill.
Presumably they know what IP was being checked for DNS. All an ISP has to do is spoof that IP internally with a manual route to their own DNS server. That should save a few truck rolls.
#naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
I'm sure some companies will want to buy those servers so they can put ads on those error pages that pop when you enter a nonexistent domain.
Why warn them at all? If they can't be bothered to keep their equipment in good working condition, which means free of malware, the rest of the internet doesn't need them polluting the waters.
We don't let people drive cars on public roads that risk the safety of the other drivers. Why should we put up with an infected virus-spewing computer?
John
I have had nothing but good service from TWC here in Austin, I understand that in some other markets though that they do indeed suck.
My experience with DSL though has been nothing but shitty. YMMV.
Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
When it's mostly a router, with a modem grafted on.
"We don't let people drive cars on public roads that risk the safety of the other drivers."
Is that really true? I'm having difficulty believing that.
I think a better car analogy is:
"We imprison people for drunk driving, because it is a felony, unless they are Senators. Why not imprison people who spew viruses and malware too? (unless it's the NSA or RIAA)"
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
I'm not sure I understand the problem...
Did this malware hit the DSL modem web-config page from the Internet to change it's DNS settings?
Or is this Windows malware that, once infecting a PC on the LAN, used that PC to hit the web-config page?
One would assume the web-server in the DSL modem doesn't answer on the public interface or IP, but clearly they fucked up the security to start with so that's not an assumption I want to make.
If this malware hit it from the Internet, then it would be trivial for the ISP to do the same exact thing to put the settings back.
The ISP even has legit and legal access to their customer premise equipment, so it wouldn't be illegal or labeled as "hacking" in that case.
Even if the modem web-config only answers to the LAN IP, and it was an infected Windows box that automatically reconfigured the router... wouldn't there be a password of some sort?
And why doesn't the ISPs maintain a "maintenance" subnet where they CAN access the DSL modem?
All the ISP needs to do is add a route to their core routers for the old DNS server IPs that will be going down soon, and redirect those packets to their internal DNS servers.
Failing That, the ISP can log any customers that access the hijacked DNS IPs, build up a list, and mail out a letter to them postal style. If they don't read their ISPs snail-mail, then they deserve whatever outage they get.
Believe me, once service goes down, they WILL be calling the ISP. I can understand wanting to lessen the massive amounts of calls they are expecting on the 9th, but in order to lessen that flood they will need to do Something. Anything. Anything except the nothing they seem to be doing.
Just setup a web site with all the info they need, which can be accessed with an IP alone. Give that to them on the phone. Include both the address and IP in the snail mail letter.
Hell, at that point the ISP can include a link that when clicked will connect to the internal IP of the router and submit new DNS settings in the GET request. A small amount of javascript will handle if a POST is needed.
There is clearly no password on the web interface to deal with, or they wouldn't have this problem from the malware in the first place, so this should be trivial to fix semi-automated, and likely totally automated with a bit more work.
This sounds more like laziness and ineptness rather than any technical reason for fixing the problem.
The original title had "loose" instead of "lose" and was much more awkward than the title actually published.
Editors EDITING?! What's next? Dogs and cats living together? Mass hysteria?!?!?!?!?
DNS? pshaw!
If you just listened to APK and put everything in your HOSTS file, you wouldn't have to worry about any of this folderoll!
I have had nothing but good service from TWC here in Austin, I understand that in some other markets though that they do indeed suck.
My experience with DSL though has been nothing but shitty. YMMV.
DSL Used to be awesome, esp if you could get a 3rd party provider like Speakeasy. Once AT&T was able to avoid giving access to Speakeasy though, it went downhill quickly and has sucked ever since.
TWC sucks massively here in Arlington,Tx. One of the issues is that they route me through Houston, even if i'm connecting to my work systems a few miles away. But then if I try to access a system in Houston, it sends the traffic down to Houston, back to Dallas, then back down to Houston.
And those are my options. Nearly non-functional DSL limited to 6Mbps [but only actually getting 3Mbps most of the time] or horribly inefficient TWC at 30Mbps but that routes me all over the place and drops packets like nobody's business...
Nothing to see here
Many of these DSL customers will buy a new computer in July. And then will probably switch to cable. I think a tiny minority will realize that their DSL modem is cooked and be able to convince their ISP of the same.
Why would a DSL modem be querying DNS? I can understand this bullshit on msn.com or something, but slashdot?
Some modems implement this , TR-069 (remote config) protocol. At least some of the clueless should have this active, I'm surprised it's not used more widely by ISP's Of course anyone with half a brain will have it disabled,( do you want your ISP to control your router? ) and if you have it disabled at least you know your modem/router HAS a config page but still, it's for exactly this reason it's there.
In 2009, there were 32 million DSL modems in the United States. http://www.internetworldstats.com/am/us.htm
Even if there has been no growth in DSL usage, 100,000 modems represents 0.3% of all DSL users.
BUT, this 100,000 number is world wide modems that have been compromised. That makes the actual percentage of modems affected so small that it hardly seems worth the time to calculate it.
Turn the "bad" DNS off, and most tech support lines will not even notice the increase in support calls.
screw them, they are the infected idiots of the net
So the malware guys found a bunch of unpatched DSL modems with a vulnerability that allowed the resolver to be reconfigured remotely, and pointed it towards the "bad" DNS servers.
So why not just go to the "bad" DNS servers, which they now control, find out the IP addresses of the compromised modems, and use the same vulnerability to reconfigure the resolver to point back to "good" DNS servers?
Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
Seriously, cut off the freaking modems already and give them a message that they need to change. I am SO sick of this issue littering SlashDot.
You can't do that, it would be efficient and sensible. We've eliminated all that sort of thing from both government and public discourse and we're all better off for it.
Now get back on the couch and drink your Reaganade.
peer-to-queer downloads
what an embarrassing Freudian slip.
you're running the buttorrent client I take it?
If DNS changer redirects gov.au then I could be looking at the look-alike DNS changer checker telling me all is fine? They should have listed this as an IP address.
My computer says it is 165.191.2.65 Is that what yours says?
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
I only have 50 of my fav. sites "hardcoded" into it w/ their IP addresses resolved via reverse DNS pings (ping -a in Windows) to the ARPA "TLD" ( .in-addr.arpa ) that maintains that information (so it isn't bogus) via reverse DNS checks!
Then I block off 1,776,632++ KNOWN bad sites/servers/hosts-domains KNOWN to serve up malicious code or malware, botnet C&C servers, bogus DNS servers, adbanner servers & more threats or slowdowns online...
I do so, "automagically" every 15 minutes via a custom hosts file mgt. program that does the following for end users (Calling it "APK Hosts File Engine 5.0++"):
---
1.) Offers massively noticeable increased speed for websurfing via blocking adbanners
2.) Offers increased speed for users fav. sites by hardcoding them into the hosts file for faster IP address-to-host/domain name resolutions (which sites RARELY change their hosting providers, e.g.-> of 250 I do, only 6 have changed since 2006 - & when sites do because they found a less costly hosting provider? Then, they either email notify members, put up warnings on their pages, & do IP warnings & redirectors onto the former IP address range to protect vs. the unscrupulous criminal bidding on that range to buy it to steal from users of say, online banking or shopping sites).
3.) Better "Layered-Security"/"Defense-In-Depth" via blocking host-domain based attacks by KNOWN bad sites-servers that are known to do so (which IS, by far, the majority of what's used by both users (hence the existence of the faulty but for most part working DNS system), AND even by malware makers (since host-domain names are recyclable by they, & the RBN (Russian Business Network & others)) were doing it like mad with "less than scrupulous", or uncaring, hosting providers)
4.) Better 'anonymity' to an extent vs. DNS request logs (not vs. DPI ("deep packet inspection"))
5.) The ability to circumvent unjust DNSBL (DNS Block Lists) if unjust or inconveniences a user.
6.) Protection vs. online trackers
7.) Better security vs. the DNS system being "dns poisoned/redirected" (a known problem for recursive DNS servers via port 51/53 misdirection)
8.) Write protecting the hosts file every 1/2 second (supplementing UAC) - even if/when you move it from the default location via this registry entry (which if done, can function ALMOST like *NIX shadow passwords because of this program):
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\Tcpip\Parameters
And changing the "DataBasePath" parameter there (I do this moving it to a faster media, a "true SSD" using DDR-2 RAM, in the 4gb Gigabyte IRAM I have).
9.) Automatic downloading & Alphabetic sorting of hosts files' records entries (for easier end user mgt. manually) from 15 reliable sources (of 17 I actually use).
10.) Manual editing of all files used (hosts to import list, hosts itself in its default location of %windir%\system32\drivers\etc, the hosts files to import/download & process, & favorite sites to reverse dns ping to avoid DNS (noted above why)).
11.) Removal scanners (if the users decide to remove hosts entries from imported data they can check if the site is indeed known as bad or not (sometimes 'false positives' happen, or just bad entries, or sites clean themselves up after infestation due to vulnerable coding etc./et al)).
12.) Removal of bloating material in many hosts files like Comments (useless bulk in a hosts file that's "all business")
13.) Removal of bloating material in many hosts files like Trailing comments after records (produces duplicates)
14.) Removal of bloating material in many hosts files like Invalid TLD entries (program checks this in a BETTER method than the API call "PathIsURL")
15.) Removal of bloating material in many hosts files like Trims entries (vs. trailing blanks bloat on record entries)
16.) Removal of bloating material in many hosts files like the conversion of the larger & SLOWER 127.0.0
Surely the modem is a layer1/layer2 device, and not anything higher? Why does the modem itself need DNS settings?
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
I've just configured named to ask directly to the root servers. No ISP or fancy easy-to-remember forwarders.
That eye-glasses shadow in his picture sure makes him look evil. But my wife says that she's seen him look like that without his glasses. I remember at LISA '96 I asked him a question (ok, it was kinda stupid) and he responded, "RTMF. Next!" But then again at a later LISA he, even though he was sick as a dog, took the time in the hallway to give my wife a detailed answer to a question about round-robin with CNAME records
I totally respect the man.
-- I have a private email server in my basement.
They're using "OMG the world will crash and burn" as an excuse for the FBI to keep running a DNS surveillance network that some hackers kindly set up for them. Think about it. Why else would shutting down some fucking servers be such a drawn-out process? They don't want to shut them down because they like the information they gain by running them. Otherwise they'd just pull the plug rather than spending years talking about how bad it will be when they pull the plug.
Think about it: We're talking about people having to fix their DNS settings. While trivial shit like this is beyond the ability of a lot of users, so is owning a computer. Yet somehow these people managed to not only get a computer, but they also managed to get it online somehow. While we have no idea how they accomplished that, somehow they did it, and they'll do it again. Thus, there's nothing to worry about.
C'mon, use 4.2.2.{1...6} already !
Can't we just redirect these machines to an anti-malicious site that removes the infection? We know that they're a particular OS with certain known vulnerabilities, after all.
Plus it's not like we're messing with some innocent person's PC, as the computers in question haven't really "belonged" to them for a while now.
Seems u can't n tried hiding his post via bogus downmod -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765 and you're telling lies because apk explains you're incorrect stating he puts "everything" in a hosts file. He doesn't do that. You fail.
Cool - ARIN and other RIRs should just reposses those IPs, and if these DNS modems want to regain their DNS, they should be made to do it via IPv6, not IPv4.
I do not have mod point, so I can't mod you up again
But anyway, I do appreciate what you are doing here
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Adblock doesn't protect email programs external to FF, Hosts files do. THIS IS GOOD VS. SPAM MAIL or MAILS THAT BEAR MALICIOUS SCRIPT, or, THAT POINT TO MALICIOUS SCRIPT VIA URLS etc.
Adblock works great in Thunderbird an email program external to FF (both depend on the Mozilla Found. but are independent). so does noscript. get your facts straight.
"I do not have mod point, so I can't mod you up again But anyway, I do appreciate what you are doing here" - by Taco Cowboy (5327) on Friday May 18, @02:08AM (#40038229)
In regards to the post u replied to & the question I asked there (where I wondered what it is they 'fear' about hosts files & WHY they downmoderate them, with NO COMPUTING TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATIONS WHY like pointing out technical errors in my post to justify a downmod)?
This next quote below is no doubt a possible answer (from someone in the security community I spoke to who also gets harassed/stalked/trolled in regards to hosts files):
---
"I don't actually get time for many sites such as slashdot anymore, but certainly see my fair share of trolls on the MyWot (Web of Trust (I'm a moderator there, and MyWot includes hpHosts in their "ratings")) and Malwarebytes forums, and you're correct - it's always either users of malicious software/sites, or the owners of such, that are doing it." Mr. Steven Burn - services@it-mate.co.uk -> hpHOSTS/malwarebytes http://hosts-file.net/?s=Download
---
* There's the answer MOST LIKELY... in a nutshell!
APK
P.S.=> In my estimation? The downmodders of my posts on custom hosts files are 1 of 3 types of people:
---
1.) A competing product maker who is afraid of hosts files (mostly antivirus OR antispyware people I'd wager, because if you cannot GET to sites that serve up exploits and THAT IS THE #1 CAUSE OF EXPLOITS to "get inside" ala trojans for remote exploitation (even you noted trying it)? You cannot be burned by them... what you cannot touch, cannot hurt you! Period...
2.) A webmaster being cut out of revenues by adbanner blocking (which robs users of money they pay out in speed/bandwidth for websurfing AND screen realestate too).
3.) A maker of DNS server programs (because hosts overcome issues in them, complimenting them in fact overcoming said weaknesses & they're easily controlled BY THE END USER TOO) & hosts help avoid tracking via DNS request logs also, by circumventing them completely for favorite sites users can 'hardcode' into a custom HOSTS file.
4.) A malware maker (per Mr. Burn of hpHosts/malwarebytes in the security community even SECONDING me on).
---
(Take your pick - tell us then, which of those are the downmodders of my posts on the added speed, security, reliability & even anonymity to an extent (vs. DNSBL's &/or DNS request logs) end users gain by using custom hosts files?)...
... apk
"Adblock works great in Thunderbird an email program external to FF (both depend on the Mozilla Found. but are independent). so does noscript. get your facts straight." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @06:11AM (#40039263)
OR Windows LIVE mail? No.
(Thunderbird's just an instance of Mozilla/FireFox browsers put into "email mode"! Thus, it's NOT "external to" the browser family I noted of Mozilla/FireFox like Outlook, Outlook Express, or other email programs are... & AdBlock will NOT work on those, & neither will NoScript!)
* So - YOU get YOUR facts straight & see subject-line above...
(I also never said NoScript wouldn't work for Mozilla/FireFox products - so attempting to put words in my mouth I never once stated? Piss poor result, troll!)
APK
P.S.=> That was SO WEAK, it's not even funny from you... lol!
... apk
Can't hide FACTS & TRUTHS in this post -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40037709
* Face it - All the moddowns in the world (especially those like that one that are NOT technically justified illustrating technical mistakes on MY part, of which ZERO was shown mind you) can't stop truth/facts my post contained + I won't allow you to attempt to "hide them" via your technically unjustified moddowns, & which the downmodders apparently FEAR, badly, because they mod that post down...
APK
P.S.=> So keep blowing your mod points trolls - I'll just drag my post back into view with this reply is all... and you can't stop that, can you? Nope... lol!
... apk
Like here where all u had's downmods that aren't justifiable http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765 and where his post was downmodded but nobody showed any valid technical computing mistakes in it? Talk about 'tipping your hand' as a malware maker probably who fears custom hosts files usage by end users becoming aware of them.
All they had vs. his post was an unjustified mod down http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
just for the record, I found it amusing that this hit (score:0, interesting) last night.
"Adblock doesn't protect email programs external to FF" - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @09:26AM (#40040165)
Moron, what about Outlook/Outlook Express, Windows LIVE mail, & other email programs that are NOT "firefox/mozilla" based?
Hmmm??
(U FAIL!)
Hence WHY you post as "AC" stalking/harassing/trolling me, because you KNOW you're full of it (& technically WEAK in computing)...
---
"not true adblock+thunderbird protects you." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @09:26AM (#40040165)
I suggest you review how "well" AdBlock works on 2 grounds, first:
---
Adblock Plus To Offer 'Acceptable Ads' Option
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/12/12/2213233/adblock-plus-to-offer-acceptable-ads-option
---
ADBLOCK DOES NOT BLOCK ALL ADS ANYMORE BY DEFAULT...
Additionally:
AdBlock runs ontop of already SLOWER usermode/Ring 3/RPL 3 webbrowsers (& hosts are merely a filter for the "Plug-N-Play" designed IP stack, which runs in a FAR faster & more efficient layer of operation & privelege in Ring 0/RPL 0/Kernelmode) adding more processing time CPU usage, memory usage, + other forms of I/O PLUS MORE ELECTRICAL POWER USAGE than hosts files do too...
---
"Thunderbird's just an instance of Mozilla/FireFox browsers put into "email mode"!" - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @09:26AM (#40040165)
Is it based on Mozilla products? Yes... no questions asked & thus, it's just a FireFox engine, and hence WHY (again) AdBlock won't work on other external email programs (some examples I noted are above), whereas a hosts file, will... perfectly!
---
"complete BS. they both use xulrunner and gecko engine but are not the same program at all. Google's Chrome also is xulrunner-based too and Picasa also uses Gecko as well. They are not Firefox." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @09:26AM (#40040165)
Same underlying engine moron, hence WHY AdBlock won't work for Outlook/Outlook Express, or Windows "LIVE" mail (and other external to browser email programs as I noted).
(Sure - You can *TRY* 'mince words', idiot, but that fact remains that it will NOT cover those email programs I noted, when HOSTS files clearly do and more efficiently!)
---
"how am I trolling by straightening technical facts ?" - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @09:26AM (#40040165)
You're not just trolling - U ARE FAILING, & badly... lol!
* Funny how you can't even BEGIN to touch the other 21 points in favor of HOSTS files I noted too, eh?
(LMAO!).
APK
P.S.=>
'WTF ? who's this APK troll ?" - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @09:26AM (#40040165)
Someone whose done MORE in computing, better, & earlier than you have, OR, ever will... because I can certainly state that vs. "anonymous coward" (yourself, a mere troll who doesn't have the balls to confront me with his std. registered user name here no less, because you KNOW you're full of it)... apk
I don't. It's a good read on hosts getting users more speed, security, reliability, and even anonymity to an extent. It's too bad the trolls around here don't want that getting out but it is anyway, as I read it and agree with its points.
Sounds like someone needs to buck up the escalation chain until someone who knows anything gets on the phone.
That's a definite problem. Network admins hate those kinds of shenanigans, provided they know about them. That last part is the hard part - how to get it to their attention.
For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
Some "examples thereof" in a 46:1++ ratio vs. your statement:
---
20++ SLASHDOT USERS EXPERIENCING SUCCESS USING HOSTS FILES QUOTED VERBATIM:
---
"Ever since I've installed a host file (http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm) to redirect advertisers to my loopback, I haven't had any malware, spyware, or adware issues. I first started using the host file 5 years ago." - by TestedDoughnut (1324447) on Monday December 13, @12:18AM (#34532122)
"I use a custom /etc/hosts to block ads... my file gets parsed basically instantly ... So basically, for any modern computer, it has zero visible impact. And even if it took, say, a second to parse, that would be more than offset by the MANY seconds saved by not downloading and rendering ads. I have noticed NO ill effects from running a custom /etc/hosts file for the last several years. And as a matter of fact I DO run http servers on my computers and I've never had an /etc/hosts-related problem... it FUCKING WORKS and makes my life better overall." - by sootman (158191) on Monday July 13 2009, @11:47AM (#28677363) Homepage Journal
"I actually went and downloaded a 16k line hosts file and started using that after seeing that post, you know just for trying it out. some sites load up faster." - by gl4ss (559668) on Thursday November 17, @11:20AM (#38086752) Homepage Journal
"Better than an ad blocker, imo. Hosts file entries: http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm " - by TempestRose (1187397) on Tuesday March 15, @12:53PM (#35493274)
"^^ One of the many reasons why I like the user-friendliness of the /etc/hosts file." - by lennier1 (264730) on Saturday March 05, @09:26PM (#35393448)
"They've been on my HOSTS block for years" - by ScottCooperDotNet (929575) on Thursday August 05 2010, @01:52AM (#33147212)
"I'm currently only using my hosts file to block pheedo ads from showing up in my RSS feeds and causing them to take forever to load. Regardless of its original intent, it's still a valid tool, when used judiciously." - by Bill Dog (726542) on Monday April 25, @02:16AM (#35927050) Homepage Journal
"you're right about hosts files" - by drinkypoo (153816) on Thursday May 26, @01:21PM (#36252958) Homepage
"APK's monolithic hosts file is looking pretty good at the moment." - by Culture20 (968837) on Thursday November 17, @10:08AM (#38085666)
"I also use the MVPS ad blocking hosts file." - by Rick17JJ (744063) on Wednesday January 19, @03:04PM (#34931482)
"I use ad-Block and a hostfile" - by Ol Olsoc (1175323) on Tuesday March 01, @10:11AM (#35346902)
"I do use Hosts, for a couple fake domains I use." - by icebraining (1313345) on Saturday December 11, @09:34AM (#34523012) Homepage
"It's a good write up on something everybody should use, why you were modded down is beyond me. Using a HOSTS file, ADblock is of no concern and they can do what they want." - by Trax3001BBS (2368736) on Monday December 12, @10:07PM (#38351398) Homepage Journal
"I want my surfing speed back so I block EVERY fucking ad. i.e. http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/ and http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm FTW" - by UnknownSoldier (67820) on Tuesday December 13, @12:04PM (#38356782)
"Let me introduce you to the file: /etc/hosts" -
Taco Cowboy disagrees with you http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40038229
APK nukes slashdot trolls again for a downmod of his post I replied to now. Against apk's list of facts regarding custom hosts files and what they can do for the end user of them in more speed, security, reliability and even anonymity? A downmod is terribly obviously lame. Good job as usual apk. Others are agreeing with you on that post apk here http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40038229 too. So now I will just post and drag your post back to visibility despite the trolls modding it down to -1 troll from +1 interesting (which they cannot hide now as its original rating).
TFA says "The affected customer modems make up about a third of the 350,000 to 400,000 internet users believed to still have the DNSChanger malware on either their modems or Windows computers."
I don't get it. Is this malware Windows specific? How does it infect modems? Is a Linux user affected by this? What if you have Linux cabled to your router and a Windows machine using wifi? How can one determine if they have an infected modem?
Free Martian Whores!
How will I get my "Have a Happy BDay"'s on facebook from people who I haven't seen since I was 9??
"then next time get it right 1st time by writing "Adblock doesn't protect most email programs" moron. and "external to FF" doesn't even mean something moron. There is no email program "internal to FF" moron." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
See subject-line & I did have it right - I explicitly noted AdBlock only protects vs. Mozilla/FireFox based programs (and it doesn't even do THAT good anymore by default, lol, since it allows "acceptable ads" by default), which Thunderbird CLEARLY IS, dolt
Thus... you fail as per your usual! AdBlock does NOT protect email programs that are NOT "firefox/mozilla based" as I noted, programs like Outlook/Outlook Express, Windows LIVE mail, & many others like them.
Period.
(Has anyone ever told you how absolutely COWARDLY & craven you are, weasel? It's obvious I have SMOKED YOU so BADLY before here, that you don't DARE "take me on" via your registered 'luser' account name here... right? Absolutely!)
---
"you've shit in the brain or what ? "Firefox engine" doesn't even make sense.." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
Both Thunderbird &/or FireFox USE THE MOZILLA BASED ENGINES THEY HAVE IN COMMON... you even noted that!
(Are you stupid, or just "desperate" to troll? I choose the latter FOR you!)
---
"There is no "firefox engine" moron and never was.." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
Yea, right... & didn't YOU note that ThunderBird &/or FireFox share the SAME MOZILLA BASED UNDERPINNINGS/ENGINES? Yes, you did.
(You make my point for me, & are trying to "mince words" you absolutely pitiful little "ne'er-do-well" cowardly worm of a troll... lol!)
---
"you got no idea what you talking about. ." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
Ahem: FIRST OF ALL, the correct phrase would be "You have no idea what you're talking about" (you illiterate stooge), & secondly?
I'd GUARANTEE that in the computer sciences, I did things DECADES AGO you'll never even get CLOSE to accomplishing in the computer sciences arena... guaranteed!
---
"I suggest you go reading a bit and come back when you've learned all about netscape, mozilla, gecko, xulrunner, "et al." instead of talking out your giant moronic ass.." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
LMAO - says the little trolling "ne'er-do-well" who ADMITTED that Thunderbird & FireFox share the same engines (which WAS my point, & that AdBlock will not protect external email programs like Outlook/Outlook Express, Windows LIVE mail & others like them NOT BASED ON THE MOZILLA ENGINES).
---
"you're saying that picasa and chrome are firefox (same underlying engine moron) ? or implying that IE and outlook express or live mail are the same thing ? you're the moron, moron.." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
IE & OUTLOOK EXPRESS share the same engine for 1 thing. Secondly No, that is NOT what I said - I said that AdBlock won't protect non-firefox/mozilla based external email programs (that do NOT use the mozilla engines that AdBlock only works for, & LOL, not even THAT WELL anymore since it doesn't block all ads!)
---
"I'm done with your aggressive trolling and unjustified attacks moron." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @12:55PM (#40042727)
I was "done with you" the moment you opened your snivelling coward's piehole here, you little "ne'er-do-well" nothing/nobody troll... lol!
---
"You are the kind of moronic person who cannot admit when they made a mistake, ever. Seeing all your moronic posts modd
See subject-line, & then ATTEMPT to disprove my points on hosts files here -> that are PROOF of what they do for end users of them (better speed, security, reliability, + more, & even anonymity to an extent (vs. DNSBL's &/or DNS Request logs)).
* Your bullshit in particular though? Same as it ALWAYS is?? Gets "tired", fast... & old.
(Grow some new material you off-topic "ne'er-do-well" troll!)
APK
P.S.=> What makes ME laugh the most? The clearly off-topic b.s. & downmods of my posts (but NEVER anyone disproving all of their points, or even SOME of them) done by first using your reg'd "luser" account, logging out, & trolling me by AC posts afterwards... lol, these little "ne'er-do-well NOOBZ" think they're "clever" & "fooling us all" with that b.s. (not) - your statements ALONE "project" that much, as to your "modus operandi" & how you do it... apk
Ur an off topic troll who mods down by a reg. /. acc't. n trolls after by anonymous coward posts. Ur online scum n u know it. We do. We know how cretins like u operate n the means u use to do what u do in down moderating others on forums by using multiple sockpuppet accounts, or just downmodding n trolling by ac posts after as you are doing, n you even project it in ur statements (how else would u know how many mod ups he has, or mod downs which u urself did by a reg'd account, one of many u have no doubt? U must think others are stupid. We're not. Grow up u scumbag).
See subject-line, & "rinse, lather, repeat" per this -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40037709
U FAIL TROLLS... all you have is your "effete moddowns" (done by your numerous alternate registered accounts/sockpuppets you use) + off-topic trolling vs. facts I put up on hosts files that show users of them gain speed, security, reliability, & even some anonymity, that you CANNOT disprove... period.
* The second you have to resort to off-topic b.s. &/or using computer technically unjustified downmods is the very SECOND I win... which is, of course, every damned time as usual.
APK
P.S.=> And, you know it... apk
Now, as to your usual b.s. regarding Jeremy Reimer & Thor SCHMUCK, here is my std. reply disproving your b.s. troll:
"THOR SCHMUCK"? LMAO, he refused to answer my points there when I replied (on PING.EXE, SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY, which violate CA's 21 point test via ping of death or altering HOSTS files, & MORE) on his own website... made him look QUITE poorly, easily. With facts, as is my usual style.
Also, my single app (of 40 freeware/sharewares I did years ago, some ending up as commercially sold products or code in them) was lowered to ZERO THREAT LEVELS after I passed all 21 questions for that @ CA no less!
Heck - that SINGLE APP of 40 or so I have written online to date?
It's NOT EVEN SCRIPTABLE FOR ATTACK - whereas by way of comparison? Others are creating apps like it also, in 64 bit no less, per this example thereof:
http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2254:hidden-start-run-apps-in-the-background&catid=70:64bit-process-management&Itemid=136
That one is though...
Does CA list it? Oh, wait a second - CA had to SELL OFF THEIR PC TOOLS DIVISION (it sucked is why, lol):
http://www.updatapartners.com/news/151/Updata-Partners-to-Acquire-CA-Technologies-Internet-Security-Business-Unit-/
Thor SCHMUCK (degreeless wannabe that he is in the computer sciences) is, afaik, the one that submitted my app to CA as a malware!
(It was not intended by myself for that kind of use, I wrote it in good faith for a forums guy that wanted a way to launch OLD Apache server for Windows like a service, invisibly, & since that's only 1-2 lines of code to do? I did! It's not scriptable for attack though, period (no argc/argv code in it is why)).
CA, now there's a story. Ask Computer Associates about their being caught in a millions of dollars financial/accounting scam, here:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/215116/computer_associates_cofounder_led_22.html
Real reputable company, eh?
In fact, I passed every single one of the 21 questions for removal of my ware from their site, & all they ended up doing was lowering it down to a "zero threat level"...
I'm not too concerned about it, because they also do it to others (along with other Antivirus/Antispyware companies, and we all know how "effective" those are, especially lately vs. today's "blended threats").
In fact? I am actually in GOOD COMPANY on that account as others have had it happen to they as well!
Ask Dr. Mark Russinovich of Microsoft or Nir Softer of NIRSOFT if they've ever had their numerous apps libeled along with themselves in the same manner... (answer = they have, so I suppose I am in "good company" here, eh?)
Thor Schrock, lol, another "credible expert" (NOT): That guy doesn't even have a CSC degree or even a single A+ type certification to his name.
All I can say to and about Thor SCHMUCK, is this: GOD BLESS TY TYMKOVICH (LOL, run that by him, it ought to be good for a laugh... the fool got wickedly SUCKERED by him to the tune of $5,500)...
----
JEREMY REIMER??
He got caught by his ISP, Shaw in Canada, for email harassing me as well as impersonating me on his website (along with death threats from he & his pal Jay Little which ended up with a detective Felton in B.C. Canada where Reimer lives taking care of the rest for me).
LOL, Reimer's SO UNQUALIIED, he had to try to bring others, much to his own dismay... especially Fat Jay Little!
Jay Little, who claimed to be an "Exchange Exper
"I'm writing a paper for a special issue of JEPG about him. A very interesting case." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @05:29PM (#40046391)
See subject-line above, & care to show us your:
1.) PhD in the psychiatric sciences? /.'" given in a professional psychiatric environs?
2.) Your license to practice said science??
3.) Your formal examination of myself in regards to my "alleged mental state" from YOU, "Dr. Quack 'the SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of
(Oh that's right - you have "NONE OF THE ABOVE" to your name/credit!)
---
"He has no PhD of any sort" - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @05:29PM (#40046391)
Ahem: DO YOU? See the above... you obviously have "delusions of grandeur", troll, in thinking you're some sort of licensed & practicing psychiatric pro & you're clearly NOT... lol!
---
"and seems to have developed an inferiority complex about it, " - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @05:29PM (#40046391)
Nothing of the kind - I merely point out that YOU, "Dr. Quack, the 'SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of /.'" are unqualified in your attempts @ "forums psychiatry" is all... lol!
Are you a PhD & especially in the psychiatric sciences? Answer = NO.
---
"he's no security expert but keeps acting and posing as one" - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @05:29PM (#40046391)
Thanks for "projecting" that you *THINK* I am a security expert... but I am actually a many time internationally published software engineer (the guys who create the tools the "security pros" ACTUALLY USE, & without them they really wouldn't be very effective after all) who has been well-received in publications, tech trade show contests, & commercially sold code to this day (decades later). However, my posts on security guides I did have done well here on /. too (as proof thereof in modded up posts of mine here in the list below next):
* THE APK SECURITY GUIDE GROUP 18++ THUSFAR (from +5 -> +1 RATINGS, usually "informative" or "interesting" etc./et al):
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2009 -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1361585&cid=29360367
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2009 -> http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1218837&cid=27787281
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2008 -> http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&cid=25093275
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2010 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1885890&cid=34358316
APK SECURITY GUIDE (old one):2005 -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=154868&cid=12988150
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2008 -> http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=970939&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&no_d2=1&cid=25092677
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2008 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1027095&cid=25747655
APK SECURITY TEST CHALLENGE LINUX vs. WINDOWS:2007 -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=267599&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=20203061
APK SECURITY GUIDE:2010 -> http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1638
"he's unable to admit that he's made an error. Making errors happens to everyone and most people are willing to admit it and learn from it. He simply can't." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, @05:29PM (#40046391)
Speak 4 urself troll: U say I put "everything" in my hosts file here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
* I easily & clearly prove OTHERWISE there in the link above... U FAIL!
(Of course, you're also MORE THAN WELCOME to disprove my points there in the link above also on the gains in speed, security, reliability, & even anonymity to an extent that custom HOSTS files give end users of them too... good luck - you'll NEED it!)
APK
P.S.=> Get over yourself, & realize 1 thing: The "trolling likes of YOU"? You will NEVER have the skills in the computer sciences OR INTELLECT to ever "get the best of me" (ever)... period!
After all - You've tried SO MANY TIMES only to fail, & now?
Now, all you have is more off-topic "b.s." which I also trashed soundly here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40050267 and here too (regarding your "delusions of grandeur" @ your playing "The 'SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of /.'" wannabe too, lol) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40050501
You? You make ME laugh, & this? Well... you KNOW I've just GOTTA say it, as-is-per-my-inimitable-style:
This? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'", as always vs. technically WEAK off-topic ad hominem attack attempting & pitifully FAILING TROLLS such as yourself... apk
Vladimir Tsastsin, Timur Gerassimenko, Dmitri Jegorov, Valeri Aleksejev, Konstantin Poltev, Anton Ivanvov.
Why I'm not surprised? Can you see any estonian name here?
Vladimir Tsastsin
Timur Gerassimenko
Dmitri Jegorov
Valeri Aleksejev
Konstantin Poltev
Anton Ivanvov
Erroneously stating I "put everything into my hosts" -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
* Face facts, troll: Even with you posting DAYS LATER (thinking I wouldn't see it no doubt) so you can *try* "get the last word" (off topic as per your usual when you FAIL, and you ALWAYS DO, see the link above, lol)...
Too bad you blew it from the start, eh? LMAO!
"and still, he resorts to "very valuable" (sarcasm) slashdot's upmods of his posts to make his point." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 25, @06:14PM (#40114683)
It's more than you have though, now isn't it? Funny your /. peers tend to outnumber YOUR "opinion" many orders of magnitude:1 as the ratio, eh? Not... lol!
Ahhhh, @ this point?
Well... You KNOW I've just GOTTA say it, as-is-per-my-usual inimitable style vs. cowardly ac stalking/harassing off-topic illogical ad hominem failing attack attempt using trolls like you:
This? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'"...
APK
P.S.=> To THIS line of b.s. from you, noob rookie? I was doing stuff like this BEFORE YOU WERE BORN I'd wager based on this quote from a done-nothing nobody "ne'er-do-well" like yourself:
"Unable to show any of these "internationnally published software", well-received in publications (still waiting for him to show us one of these publications, preferably some peer-reviewed publication, not something like a review by an AC on PCWolrdProNet.com), and I've never heard of the guy in any tech trade show contests." - by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 25, @06:14PM (#40114683)
Ahem: Here's a list below of only SOME of my favorites over time then... Which is MORE than "anonymous coward" troll YOU could EVER do.
So... When YOU can show you've done MORE, BETTER, & EARLIER than I did, troll, per this SMALL ONLY PARTIAL LIST of my "favorites"? That is the day the "trolling likes of YOU" can even BEGIN to *try* to "act my peer" (because until you can show that? You're FAR from my 'peer'):
"My Name is Ozymandias: King of Kings - Look upon my works, ye mighty, & DESPAIR..."
----
Windows NT Magazine (now Windows IT Pro) April 1997 "BACK OFFICE PERFORMANCE" issue, page 61
(&, for work done for EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com on PAID CONTRACT (writing portions of their SuperCache program increasing its performance by up to 40% via my work) albeit, for their SuperDisk & HOW TO APPLY IT, took them to a finalist position @ MS Tech Ed, two years in a row 2000-2002, in its HARDEST CATEGORY: SQLServer Performance Enhancement).
WINDOWS MAGAZINE, 1997, "Top Freeware & Shareware of the Year" issue page 210, #1/first entry in fact (my work is there)
PC-WELT FEB 1998 - page 84, again, my work is featured there
WINDOWS MAGAZINE, WINTER 1998 - page 92, insert section, MUST HAVE WARES, my work is again, there
PC-WELT FEB 1999 - page 83, again, my work is featured there
CHIP Magazine 7/99 - page 100, my work is there
GERMAN PC BOOK, Data Becker publisher "PC Aufrusten und Repairen" 2000, where my work is contained in it
HOT SHAREWARE Numero 46 issue, pg. 54 (PC ware mag from Spain), 2001 my work is there, first one featured, yet again!
Also, a British PC Mag in 2002 for many utilities I wrote, saw it @ BORDERS BOOKS but didn't buy it... by that point, I had moved onto other areas in this field besides coding only...
Being paid for an article that made me money over @ PCPitstop in 2008 for writing up a guide that has people showing NO VIRUSES/SPYWARES & other screwups, via following its point, such as THRONKA sees here -> http://www.xtremepcc
Hi Peter, I love you
With u saying I put "everything into the hosts file" -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40118755 &, I clearly don't
Thus, "U FAIL" (as per your usual vs. myself).
APK
P.S.=>
"Hi Peter, I love you" - by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 26, @04:01AM (#40118997)
You quite clearly have issues: I don't NEED or WANT an "online psycho-stalker" like you... ok? Thanks... apk
I don't put "everything" in my hosts file as you stated & U blew it, troll -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
* "Read 'em & WEEP", troll... u fail!
---
As far as THIS from you? Hehehe:
"He's also keeping records of all his upmods on slashdot but of none of his downmods (too many of these), thinks that there is a Great Conspiracy against Him and will keep answering as long as you post a line after him."
I have tons of upmods though... especially for a TOTALLY AC POSTER (which is hard for us to get since the forums board by default tends to "bury us" below registered users posts).
AND
Anyone can follow someone around tossing bogus downmods around here IF they have a registered 'luser' account after all, which is what you're projecting you do to myself in your statement above & other times too
---
So... who else KNOWS this goes on here?
Mr. Bruce Perens does:
"It just takes one Ubuntu sympathizer or PR flack to minus-moderate any comment. Unfortunately, once PR agencies and so on started paying people to moderate online communities, and to have hundreds of accounts each, things changed." - by Bruce Perens (3872) on Friday July 30, @03:55PM (#33089192) Homepage Journal
SOURCE -> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1738364&cid=33089192
Obviously You're now just PROJECTING you do that to me downmodding my posts unjustly However, I could honestly care less - as I don't get "karma" points as an AC poster!
Plus, everytime I get an "unjustified moddown"? Yes - Those get bookmarked too... Especially vs. transparent unintelligent jackasses like yourself (for proofs of it, which I have tons). So, it's PRETTY OBVIOUS You do that, & stalk me as you do now too (that's against laws you know)...
You do it, albeit by "ac posts" because you KNOW I keep favorites/bookmarks of all the times I dust those who *TRY* "take me on" & fail... Hence, lol, why you troll/harass/stalk me by ac replies nowadays & for MONTHS now... lol!
Why?
Simple - you've FAILED too many times vs. myself... and you know it! So you "stalk/harass" me by ac trolling posts, only to amuse me, & to fail again on YOUR part, making ME, look good as-per-my-usual vs. yourself & your MANY "fails" vs. me... lol!
Basically, you KNOW you can't ever "get the best of me" on computer technical debate information OR anything else...
You also know IF you post as your normal "registered 'luser'" account here, I'll toss back SO MANY OF YOUR PREVIOUS "FAILS" vs. MYSELF, you'd be a worse laughingstock than you are now...
(I know it, YOU know it, & now? Everyone ELSE here knows it... lol! I love it... it's SO obvious!)
APK
P.S.=> Lastly/Bottom-line here: IF all you have in this life is trolling others, and THEN (lol) UTTERLY BLOWING IT RIGHT OFF THE BAT (as shown above)?
LMAO @ U... bigtime, as-per-my-usual vs. yourself, the "ac stalker/harasser" troll... & YOU KNOW I've just GOTTA say it, as-is-per-my-usual-inimitable-style:
This? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'", as always, vs. the cowardly little worm of a stalker I am replying too... lol! I get that "last laugh" & YOU make it EASY for me... everytime!
... apk"
but ... but ... Peter, I truly do love you ! like any man on earth would instantly fall in love with you. you're so great. why do you reject me like that ?
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40128305
* Yes folks - it's TRULY that simple to dispatch off-topic illogical failing ad hominem attack utilizing trolls...
APK
P.S.=> Especially ones that obviously have SOME sort of "issues" that stalk/harass others online with quotes like these:
"but ... but ... Peter, I truly do love you ! like any man on earth would instantly fall in love with you. you're so great. why do you reject me like that ?" - by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27, @11:30AM (#40128537)
Whew... Man, YOU'RE "StRaNgE", no questions asked.
(Seriously: I don't need your stalking & that's breaking laws too on your part... you are indeed, "troubled" to say the least).
Now, lastly, as far as my being "great"? Hey - thanks, IF YOU SAY SO, for once you MAY be correct (quite a change for you, eh? LOL!)
Makes me feel like Duke Nukem & his NEW BOOK (lol) "Why I'm SO great" -> http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&site=&source=hp&q=%22Duke+Nukem+Why+I'm+so+great%22&btnG=Search&gbv=1&sei=SE7CT4CiL_G36QHW9qmvCg
hey moron, care to show us your PhD in the psychiatric sciences, moron ? Your license to practice said science, moron ?? Your formal examination of myself in regards (sic) to my "alleged mental state" from YOU (sic bis), "Dr. Moron Quack 'the SiDeWaLk-ShRiNk of /.'" given in a professional psychiatric environs (sic ter) ?
Now, lastly, as far as my being "great"? Hey - thanks, IF YOU SAY SO, for once you MAY be correct (quite a change for you, eh? LOL!)
you, great ? you're the worst moron on earth, moron, this guy had it right from the start, you moron:
AC explaining us who apk is said: "Oh I forgot to tell you: he does not understand sarcasms"
"you, great ? you're the worst moron on earth, moron, this guy had it right from the start, you moron:" - by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27, @05:20PM (#40130499)
Didn't NEED 2 be 'great' to defeat U, dolt, lol. See here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
(YOU did THAT, to yourself... lmao, & that's the BEST PART, lol!)
---
"hey moron, care to show us your PhD" - by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27, @05:20PM (#40130499)
LMAO - I didn't require a PhD to "nuke" you: YOU made that VERY EASY for ME, with your own screwups... lol!
* See link above... lol!
APK
P.S.=> I love it... YOU are SO EASY to "get the better of", it's NOT EVEN FUNNY anymore... apkb
"hey moron, care to show us your PhD in the psychiatric sciences, moron ?" - by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27, @05:20PM (#40130499)
apk said: I didn't require a PhD
hey moron, you're a paranoiac nutjob, completely crazy and you should take your medications for your schizophrenia, moron.
and it seems I don't require a PhD to say so, since so many people already told you so and since you don't need one, moron. you're outnumbered 100:1 on this one, nutjob, because you're the only one crying like a baby that you're not crazy whereas we are 100s to calmly assert that you are, moron
U blew it right from the get-go here & u know it -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765 ,I know it, & everyone reading, knows it.
* Yes, that's right - U FAIL, as-per-your-usual vs. myself troll - U said I put "everything" into my custom hosts file? WRONG! See link above!
"Eat Ur Words", lol...
QUESTION:
How do your words taste now that you must eat them, flavored w/ the "bitter taste of self-defeat" + YOUR OWN FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH with them?
(LMAO @ U TROLL - since only a troll like yourself would "blow it" out of the gate as YOU DID in the link above... hilarious!)
APK
P.S.=> The off-topic illogical failing ad hominem attack attempting little obsessed troll's PROJECTING his own "issues" & is absolutely being "the pot calling the kettle black" also (in his futile & WEAK attempts @ "offsetting" his BLOWING IT COMPLETELY HERE, lol, w/ more of his b.s.!)...
... apk
really ? you keep answering ?
this can only mean one thing: you keep track of all your posts on /. until comments are closed (about 20 days or so), and since you post a lot of your pointless spam, it means that you're either a) a student, b) unemployed or c) not doing your job properly. If I were your boss I'd fire you for not actually working.
and you didn't take your medication yet ? you should ask your boyfriend to prepare them for you, sweetheart.
Absolutely (see subject above) & quit projectin ur other issues w/ medication, being unemployed, etc./et al from you in your off-topic illogical ad hominem attack attempting FAIL here, lol!
(Which again, You project that you obviously have personal experience with in addling ur brain SO BADLY w/ your "meds" that you "blew it" right from the start here -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765 , lmao!)
* Yes, that's right - U FAIL, as-per-your-usual vs. myself troll - U said I put "everything" into my custom hosts file? WRONG! See link above!
APK
P.S.=> Answer this QUESTION, troll (seeing as how you AVOIDED IT to no end earlier, lol, "gosh, I wonder WHY?", lol... NOT!):
How do your words taste now that you must eat them, flavored w/ the "bitter taste of self-defeat" + YOUR OWN FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH with them?
(Again - see link above, after all, you ONLY DID THAT TO YOURSELF... lol, blowing it here, pitifully...)
(LMAO @ U TROLL - since only a troll like yourself would "blow it" out of the gate as YOU DID in the link above... hilarious!)
hahaha :D.
I'm sorry, I just had a vision of you in your mom's basement, desperately clicking the refresh button of your IE6 every 5 minutes, hoping that someone has answered one of your spamfest/trolling, and having an orgasm whenever you get one because it means that someone, yes someone is actually and finally interacting with you.
oh man that vision was hilarious ... except for the orgasm. you're gross man !
because that's what you do all day long, don't you ? amiright ?
apk blathered: quit projectin ur other issues w/ medication, being unemployed, etc./et al
oh it seems like I triggered a sensitive point here ... so unemployed it is ! you're so easy to read, a true child.
to sum up: unemployed, no wife, no child, spending all your time on the Internet, keeping track of all your posts and who answers what. Get a life dude !
btw you obviously have not idea of how and when to use respectively "etc." and "et al". I suggest you stop misusing both, now, especially together.
Flavored w/ the 'bitter taste of defeat' + ur foot in ur mouth -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
* Hmmm?
(Additionally - Right from your 1st attempted trolling/harassing post of myself, you FAIL right outta the starting line no less... lol!)
LMAO!
Hey, it was great winning here... your own screwups make it & you KNOW I just GOTTA say it) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'"...
APK
P.S.=> Whatever other fantasies you had about me you scrawled, all I can say to any of them is simple, & this:
Once more - Quit projecting YOUR FAULTS onto me - it only "shows your tell" & your own issues... apk
And there we are ... by answering you just made our point :-)
unemployed, no wife, no child, spending all your time on the Internet, keeping track of all your posts and who answers what
Care to disprove ANY of these ? moron ...
Flavored w/ the 'bitter taste of defeat' + ur foot in ur mouth -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2857487&cid=40034765
* You keep AVOIDING that SIMPLE QUESTION... Why?
Answer = LMAO - We KNOW why... lol - you BLEW IT right from the start here...
(Utterly hilarious: U FAILED & right from your 1st attempted trolling/harassing post of myself here... lol!)
APK
P.S.=> Whatever other fantasies you had about me you scrawled, all I can say to any of them is simple, & this:
Once more - Quit projecting YOUR FAULTS onto me - it only "shows your tell" & your own issues which have NOTHING TO DO with the topic @ hand - thus, not only do you have to "eat ur words" but you're also "off-topic"... apk