Slashdot Mirror


New Jersey Mayor and Son Arrested For Nuking Recall Website

phaedrus5001 writes "The mayor of West New York, New Jersey was arrested by the FBI after he and his son illegally took down a website that was calling for the recall of mayor Felix Roque (the site is currently down). From the article: 'According to the account of FBI Special Agent Ignace Ertilus, Felix and Joseph Roque took a keen interest in the recall site as early as February. In an attempt to learn the identity of the person behind the site, the younger Roque set up an e-mail account under a fictitious name and contacted an address listed on the website. He offered some "very good leads" if the person would agree to meet him. When the requests were repeatedly rebuffed, Joseph Rogue allegedly tried another route. He pointed his browser to Google and typed the search strings "hacking a Go Daddy Site," "recallroque log-in," and "html hacking tutorial."'"

24 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Should have used Duck Duck Go by evilRhino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Using Google for criminal enterprises is bad news bears.

    1. Re:Should have used Duck Duck Go by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Funny

      They probably figured out his search history by using his local browser history when they would have confiscated his PC as evidence. So that wouldn't have helped. Also... "recallroque log-in"? Ha, I guess some people really do think Google is magic and can pull answers out of thin air. And "html hacking tutorial"? That's almost cute.

    2. Re:Should have used Duck Duck Go by stanlyb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, you are wrong, they figured out his search history directly at the source. With other words: GOOGLE. Oh, and btw, if you try to search for something illegal, at least have the intelligence to do it from brand new (or stolen) computer, without any ID already entered, with just created email accounts, from any "Free" wireless spot, and once you are done, you better burn this computer. Just an advice....

    3. Re:Should have used Duck Duck Go by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If only the CEO of google, Eric Schmidt, had reminded us that they're bound by the law to hand over information to the authorities.

      Remind me again why he was lambasted for that?

    4. Re:Should have used Duck Duck Go by Grygus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes.

    5. Re:Should have used Duck Duck Go by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just use TOR. And don't say "tor can be compromised". That's only true if they are already monitoring you.

      ...unless you happen to pass through an FBI-run exit node.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  2. Quick, someone call the cops! by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's going to hack into our div tags!

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  3. Genius! by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Funny

    Googling for "recallroque log-in" is just pure genius. Why hack if google will just point you straight to the credentials you need!

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  4. Actually... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Try searching for, "This document is confidential" on Google. You would be surprised by what sort of things turn up.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Actually... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That how I get the non public face email account to CEOs.
      It's funny when you send an email to a CEO, then get a call from the VP to take care of the issue. Lat time I did it, the issue was solved in a day, and they had to change global websites.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. That's all? by meerling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    " three counts of intentionally accessing computers without authorization or intentionally causing damage to a protected computer"

    You'd think the threats and other stuff would kick on a few other charges than those. ianal but I bet even I could find at least a half dozen additional things to nail them with.

    I wonder if they'll let him keep his job. (Politics are bizarre.)

  6. Re:So easy to get search terms from google by alfoolio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At first glance the FBI seems overkill but the 'relatively minor case' involved an elected official engaged in federal crimes. That pretty much is right in the FBI's bailiwick.

  7. Re:So easy to get search terms from google by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where do you think the term "warrantles searches" came from? Judge Napolitano can't stop talking about them.

    The U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act gave the FBI the power to write their own permission to enter a premise, or demand data, without a judge issued warrant. CISPA will make it even easier. No need for paperwork at all.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  8. Minor? by oGMo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Suppression of free political speech and intimidation by an elected official is a "minor case"? If so, it shouldn't be.

    That said, I have to wonder if this wasn't a corruption investigation by the FBI in the first place, though you'd think if it was, they'd jump at the opportunity to "meet".

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  9. Re:So easy to get search terms from google by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see...
    A politician who performs an obviously illegal act in full violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution - check.
    A politician who tries nuking a website/server that is parked somewhere across state lines - check.

    Yep. I can see a good warrant coming off of this one. And given the interstate angle, it's not odd at all.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  10. Meme warning by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great. Now every website hacking attempt would be called "going rogue". All "roguelike" discussions will be censored and prosecuted. And God help you if you are found in possession of a certain amulet...

  11. More importantly...Don't phone "Victim 1" after. by Lashat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This article indicates that Roque the Younger called "Victim 1" to 'say that the page had been taken down by “high government officials and that everyone would pay for getting involved against Mayor Roque.” '

    Now that is poor hacking skills!

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76723.html

    --
    For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
  12. Re:Slashdot down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They messed up the link when it was first posted. It's fixed now.

    Geez... slashdot's editors screw up once in 15 years and you're all over it. Cut them some slack. Do you expect them to get the summary perfect every time?

  13. Re:Party afiliation not important by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Funny

    You left out the bit about how lefties are all godless blasphemers who want to destroy the natural order of the world by allowing women to go around with their heads uncovered or even drive cars.

  14. Re:Party afiliation not important by scot4875 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Democrats attack their own when they do stupid shit like this. Republicans attack their own when they do something as unbelievable as suggesting that, hey, maybe gay marriage won't destroy the nation, or that maybe taxing the people who have all the money isn't socialism.

    --Jeremy

    --
    Jesus was a liberal
  15. Re:good thing by rrohbeck · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Set up a honeypot with a web front that calls for the recall of a politician you don't like
    2. Wait for it to be attacked by that politician
    3. Tell the FBI
    4. Lulz!

  16. Re:So easy to get search terms from google by lennier · · Score: 4, Funny

    The U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act

    You know, I always wondered why they named a key piece of legislation "U Sap at Riot".

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  17. Security? by increment1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Checked GoDaddy whois, and the domain was registered using their Domains by Proxy service to hide the registrant. This seems to imply that Domains By Proxy was hacked / socially engineered in order to compromise the account. Worse, it appears that this was accomplished by someone with little to no computer or hacking experience.

    The article does not go into detail about how the hack was actually accomplished, other than mentioning it was via a reset email. I am curious what this actually means for the security of domain names registered on GoDaddy using Domains By Proxy. Are they truly that easy to hack?

    I tend to register all of my domains using the proxy service simply to avoid spam in my inbox.

  18. Re:Why the surprise? by artor3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bullshit. Just off the top of my head, there was David Vitter, who got caught with prostitutes, and Mark Sanford, the guy who went "hiking" with his not-wife from Argentina. Both definitely worse than sexting women who were willing participants (Weiner's "crime"). And yet neither was run out of office. Why? Because Republicans don't give a shit about morals when it would put them at a disadvantage.

    Of course, if you get all your news from Fox and similar propaganda outlets, you'd be likely to believe that only Democrats get caught in scandals. Maybe you should step away from the bullshit spewers before you become one of them. That is, if it's not already too late.