Slashdot Mirror


Solar Geoengineering Could Lead To Whiter, Brighter Skies

cylonlover writes "We've heard reports that placing small, reflective particles into the upper atmosphere could actually improve crop yields, but would also significantly reduce the amount of electricity generated by solar power plants and do little to arrest the acidification of the world's oceans. Now another potential side effect has been theorized by Californian researchers, who say that solar geoengineering could lead to brighter, whiter skies, and sunsets with an afterglow (abstract)."

13 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Night lights. by sackbut · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am sure for both amateur and professional astronomers that this would result in horrible seeing conditions as well. Please look at http://www.darksky.org/. Dark night time skies are hard enough to find due to light pollution even now. Better than global warming I guess!

  2. Add a tag to the story by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  3. The haze is white in the city, violet from afar by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The effect they describe can be seen in Atlanta on particularly bad days (although it also sometimes has a greenish yellow tinge in the spring when the pollen counts get insanely high.) What really hit me in the gut, though, was seeing the city from atop a mountain a hundred miles away. The Blue Ridge mountains around us were all surrounded by clear blue skies, but Atlanta to the south was shrouded in what looked like a gray-violet miasma. The same smog that turned the skies white inside the city was gray from a distance.

    I think we need to be more concerned with pulling crap out of the atmosphere than putting more stuff in it.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:The haze is white in the city, violet from afar by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're not suggesting that humans could possibly affect nature or the weather, are you? As all the AGW will tell you, there is absolutely no way we puny humans could possibly do anything to change weather patterns, affect rain or pollute the air.

      What you're seeing is a natural event, something that comes and goes over the centuries. It happened in the past and will happen again (sorry for the BSG reference).

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:The haze is white in the city, violet from afar by malhombre · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I grew up in the hills of southern California in the 60s. That was before much had been done to improve air quality. We had the most beautifully colored sunsets back then. Of course, some fool had to go and ruin it all for me by explaining the fact that all those amazing colors were sinister poisonous gases and not some awesome gift of nature. Then one day I flew into LA and down through a cloud of nasty brownish gray smog that made me want to hold my breath until we landed. So much for the magic of childhood.

  4. Re:Sounds like the cons outweigh the pro's. by RaceProUK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All ideas should be considered, no matter how ridiculous. Not all should be practised though.

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  5. Humans F-up everytime they toy with nature by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well almost every time. Like the damming of rivers which kills fish and blocks the natural flow of sediment. Or levees that make rivers flow faster and, when the flood happens, is far worse than a natural un-leveed flood. Or putting-out forest fires such that, when a fire happens now there's massive overgrowth that turns a small blaze into an inferno that makes the ground into glass.

    Isn't it about time we learn to LIVE with nature, instead of trying to engineer it and screwing up? Over millions-of-years nature has reached a natural balance with its flow-of-rivers, floods, and the occasional fire (trees developed fire-retardant bark). All we humans manage to do is frak it up.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  6. As someone in solar science... by sugarmatic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...I have to say this is a really stupid idea. It would absolutely prevent ground-based solar observation of the corona, important to astrophysical studies and space weather. To give an idea of how difficult it is already, one must image or analyze brightness levels on the order of a millionth of the brightness of the solar disk to do real science, on time scales of five minutes or less, at very narrow wavelength bandwidths. There simply aren't enough photons to average out the noise with sky brightness levels above around 20 ppm on time scales that are meaningful, and detector noise makes measurements above 30 ppm sky brightness pretty much futile.

    There are not very many places on earth with the necessary to make even part-time measurements as it is.

    The night time folks will be screwed as well.

    The winners will be a few large multinational corporations with the funds to corrupt policy. The losers will be the rest of us.

  7. Re:Sounds like the cons outweigh the pro's. by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Between solar, wind, and nuclear it's not hard to do, it's just not very popular with the big oil interests that control our politics.

    It's also not popular with the people that protest against oil and oil interests. They won't let us invest in new nuclear reactor technology or build new plants, then complain when all the nuclear plants we have are old and outdated.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  8. Re:Sounds like the cons outweigh the pro's. by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clearly the correct (and most feasible) approach to us putting too much CO2 into the atmosphere is to put less CO2 into the atmosphere

    Yep. That's why I never exercise. Clearly the correct and most feasible approach to putting too much food into my mouth is to put less food into my mouth.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  9. Re:If you dump al that light on crops, by rufty_tufty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RTFA
    Photosynthesis is more effective in diffuse light.

    Easy to imagine that with light coming in from many angles the particles in plant cells that have the chlorophyll are illuminated from more sides therefore more efficient.Also leaves that aren't perfectly lined up with the sun get more light than they otherwise would.

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  10. alienz, really?!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whatcouldpossiblygowrong?

    Seriously, have these guys never seen the matrix or highlander?

    So we need to avoid any potential sequels ?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Re:If you dump al that light on crops, by Khyber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Photosynthesis is more effective in diffuse light."

    No, it's really not. Chlorophyll has a neat mechanism by which light tends to (usually) work in one direction. You can test this for yourself. Obtain a test tube of chlorophyll in a suspended liquid solution. Take an incandescent light. If you put the test tube directly between you and the light at eye level, you will see it as mostly red. Any other direction, you see it as green.

    Also, making the skies BRIGHTER (as per TFS and TFA) means increasing photon flux density. The current limit for most plants to withstand light falls between 1500-1800umol. After that, you rapidly begin approaching photosynthetic poisoning (AKA bleaching0 of plant tissues. Many food crops, especially vegetative ones, don't tolerate very high light levels. Most lettuces prefer roughly 300-600 umol, and start doing undesirable things at anything much higher, like bolting and not creating a compact head, or outright turning white.

    This is one of the worst ideas I've heard coming from Californian scientists in a long long time. Makes me glad to be working with better-educated European horticultural companies.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.