Slashdot Mirror


Why Kids Should Be Building Rockets Instead of Taking Tests

An anonymous reader writes "MAKE Magazine founder Dale Dougherty has an article in Slate about how educators are missing the punchline when it comes to getting kids interested in learning. He describes a recent visit he made to a middle school: 'The science lab was empty, as were the library and the playground. It was not a school holiday: It was a state-mandated STAR testing day. The school was in an academic lockdown. This is what the American public school looks like in 2012, driven by obsessive adherence to standardized testing. The fate of children, their schools, and their teachers are based on these school test scores.' Dougherty's preference would be to more tightly integrate basic engineering projects into the science curriculum. 'I see the power of engaging kids in science and technology through the practices of making and hands-on experiences, through tinkering and taking things apart. Schools seem to have forgotten that students learn best when they are engaged; in fact, the biggest problem in schools is boredom. Students sit passively, expected to absorb all the content that is thrown at them without much context. The context that's missing is the real world."

1 of 381 comments (clear)

  1. Teach the test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Teaching the test beats teaching nothing at all. Parents are the problem, but given a political unwillingness to fix the problem, having teachers teach the test beats having them teach nothing at all. By the way, if the test is reflective of what we want the students to learn, than teaching the test is not actually a "bad thing". It's a bad thing to teach only the test, but again, it beats teaching nothing.