Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Advice On Child-Friendly Microscopes?

OceanMan7 writes "My 7-year-old son is getting very interested in microscopic things — from bacteria to parameciums (paramecia?) Not being a biologist, I would appreciate advice on what type of microscope to get. I'd be operating it and he viewing with supervision. I'd like something better than a toy and plan to buy it used, if possible. Extra points if it's stereo and also allows me to view opaque objects at low magnification."

21 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. USB Microscope by RackinFrackin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd suggest a $100 or so USB microscope. You can use it to look at opaque objects, and you can have the picture on your computer screen. That would be a big help when trying to point out what the kid is seeing.

    1. Re:USB microscope by durrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Safety, because microscope accidents are the number #1 reason for death in children 5-15

    2. Re:USB Microscope by John+Bokma · · Score: 2

      I recently bought a Celestron USB Microscope and returned it. It's just a cheap webcam with a bad lens in front. The LED lighting worked erratically.

    3. Re:USB microscope by dkettmann76 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Buying Tip: Magnification of 1000x is required to see bacterial pink-eye

  2. Re:Burn ants by durrr · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ant burning ones are called magnifying glasses.

    Anyway, Stereo microscopes generally have less magnification, forget viewing bacteria with these, if you want to study the surface structure of wood or insect eyes, then sure, get a stero.

    Otherwise, get a classic 'university-grade' turret microscope with one oil immersion objective.
    Consider however that you may need dyes to stain your samples or you won't see all that much unless you get a phase contrast microscope. Consider also that you need thin translucent slices if you want to view tissues. If you just want to explore your saliva or the fauna in forest ponds, then you don't need as much.

    Also, there's no microscopic pornography or ultraviolence so I'm pretty sure you can let him operate it all on his own, just make sure he doesn't oil up the normal objectives or store the slides in his mouth.

  3. webcam by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the webcam models works well with kids because its cheap and displays on a big monitor, so you can look at stuff together. Some of the better ones show up as if they're normal webcams so you can have some weird internet chats with friends and family (G+ hangouts?) "Hey grandma, look at this giant ant leg" etc.

    The other alternative is ebay. A kid is much better off with a worn out but "real" microscope that's probably cheaper than a hunk of Chinese plastic anyway. Some people are weirdly proud of being completely mechanically inept... they are a bad target market for used scopes.

    Another alternative is new chinese steel. At a place like lwscientific.com you can spend about the cost of a good video card and get a new, "real" student grade scope that'll last forever.

    Absolute worst case scenario is a cheap hunk of Chinese plastic with "900x" magnification listed on the box right next to ridiculous artists interpretations and electron microscope images. Oddly enough the marketing is just about as misleading and poor for other optical devices like telescopes.

    You mentioned "parameciums". Its easy to find samples of plain ole dirt, grass leaves, etc. If you want "real prepared slides of weird or interesting organisms", go somewhere like carolina.com, "life sciences" "microscope slides". Note that a good prepared, preserved, stained slide is gonna be like $5 per slide. There are somewhat dodgier suppliers at a somewhat lower cost, but not as cheap as you'd think. On the other hand, my kids find it infinitely more interesting to run around in the yard, pick something up off the ground, and look at it under the 'scope.

    Maybe the best place to start a kid with microscopes is a hand held magnifying glass. Much as you're supposed to "do astronomy" by starting with eyes first, then binocs, then get a scope...

    I have no financial connection with any of the above other than spending money on stuff like this.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  4. Humm 7 y.o by JamesP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get a toy one

    At 7, it will be great

    Get preferabily one with >= 50x mag, so you can see cells, etc

    Later you can think of a better one

    I really don't remember how old I was when I got my first (toy) one, but it was a built-it-yourself kit

    Then I got one that was 100x-300x-600x (which was 'more real') and it was lots of fun

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:Humm 7 y.o by fermion · · Score: 2
      The thing is optics in a microscope are fragile. The controls are build for adult like dexterity and size and strength. A kid can use it, I was doing microscopy in elementary school, but never really working the controls. If you want the kid to be fully engaged with the instrument, you have to buy an instrument made for the kid.

      I would also suggest that unless the primary goal i to teach how to work a microscope, mount slides, that sort of thing, a less traditional style might be in order. The eyeclops, for instance, used to have a hand held unit with a screen and memory stick storage. It let the kid go out, magnify things, and create a collage or whatever. No slicing, no mounting, none of that fun stuff, just analysis.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Humm 7 y.o by dbc · · Score: 2

      So.... I'm thinking you're not a parent, and that you are not speaking from actual experience. This is pretty much the exact opposite of advice I gave below. A toy microscope will be nothing but frustration and will kill the child's interest. My daughter had a proper microscope at 7. I had a proper microscope at 8. A toy microscope is nothing but demotivating frustration in a box.

      Motor skill considerations are key, though. I'm on the board of a small science education non-profit, we teach kids from ages 5-12. At 7, there are fine motor skill limitations that won't be resolved until somewhere in the 11 to 13 year old range. We spend a lot of time designing lessons around that. So a microscope for a 7 year old needs smooth controls. No toy will have smooth controls. Only better lab microscopes will have suitable controls.

      When you do have children, don't hold them back by giving them crap imitations of real tools and instruments -- that's just cruel. Unfortunately, it's not unusual.

  5. Re:Intel QX3 by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 2

    Hear hear. I had one of the old Intel QX microscopes and loved it. Any USB microscope will let a child see things on a nice big screen and many of them, like the QX3, are ruggedized for kids. It's pricey, though, compared to other desktop USB microscopes of which there are many, as other posters are mentioning (search Amazon), but the design should make it worthwhile. I haven't used the software in a while; it was a bit buggy last time I played with it, but hopefully it's improved.

    If you really want eyepieces, there are some that do double duty -- Celestron makes entry-level microscopes that have replaceable eyepieces (so you can use it like a traditional microscope or mount a camera on it, but not both at the same time), or ones with LCD screens directly built in instead of traditional viewfinders.

    As you near the $250 barrier you can get scopes that start to do double-duty, and your options increase. These are more lab-ready and may need more oversight for a 7-year-old, and frankly I find them harder to use for kids, but the ability to look through an eyepiece to set up and focus a shot and then discover the results on a computer make for good two-person work in parent-child fashion.

  6. Hay Infusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't comment on modern microscopes because I haven't used one in years. But whichever one you decide on, be sure to concoct a hay infusion. Get a jar full of pond water and add a handful of hay or even grass clippings. Put it aside somewhere in the garage where it can stink without bothering people too much. It will yield up the most wonderful assortment of one-celled critters for your microscopic viewing pleasure--paramecia, volvox, those wonderful beings called stentors--and lots of other great stuff besides.

    I write this with appreciation for the best high school biology teacher of all time, Mr. Ford, whose hay infusion was legendary for the amazing odors that emanated from it. He would periodically add more pond water or hay. A beatific smile would come over his face, and he'd say, "Oh, yeah. That's really ripe!" In all fairness, he also taught me the virtues of meticulous notes and drawings. But I suspect most of his students remember his hay infusions. Enjoy!!

  7. Re:Burn ants by bmo · · Score: 5, Informative

    >Consider also that you need thin translucent slices if you want to view tissues

    You can make a microtome out of a bolt and a nut. UNF or UNEF thread pitch is helpful

    Screw nut on to end of bolt by a couple of threads.

    Put sample in cavity at end.

    Pour paraffin wax into cavity and let cool to hold the sample in place.

    Take a razor blade, screw bolt into nut by small partial turns and slice off thin slices of your sample on to slides.

    taa, daa.

    --
    BMO

  8. Re:Intel QX3 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

    Intel QX3

    Maybe a decade ago.

    Have you seen what you can get for that sort of money these days?
    http://www.aliexpress.com/wholesale?SearchText=microscope&CatId=0&manual=y&SortType=price_desc&filterCat=100005627%2C190405%2C15370799&page=31

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  9. Edmund Scientific by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

    In 2000 Edmund Scientific was purchased by Science Kit and Boreal Laboratories, a western New York based science supply company. Science Kit and Boreal Laboratories is part of a group of companies that provide science supplies to elementary, middle, and high schools as well as colleges and universities.

    Edmund Scientific sells high quality beginner and student microscopes in all price ranges.

    Edmund's prepared slide sets have been in their catalogs for decades. You really can't go wrong here.

  10. When I was a kid by BlueBat · · Score: 2

    My father got us a real microscope. One that used batteries for the light or we could flip the light and use the mirror. It worked great and we took care of it and it was still in working condition the last time I saw it 10 years or so ago. I am now 45 so it was a quality built one, very sturdy. Children can be taught to respect their equipment, I would say for the first little while you supervise until he understands that he needs to be careful with it. Preparing slides you should probably help him with for a good while as you need a sharp knife or scalpel to do properly unless you are just looking at liquids. But glass slides could be sharp as well.

  11. Re:Burn ants by bughunter · · Score: 2

    You know, some days I can hardly remember a name to save my life.

    But things like this I will never, ever forget.

    And hopefully, some day, I may even get to use it.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  12. Child Friendly you say . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Usually, that means inexpensive and military grade toughness. Two things rarely found in a precision optic :D

    However, depending on your budget, you have a lot of options. First, some clarification.

    You mentioned stereo being a plus. This can mean two things. Stereo objective, or stereo eyepieces. Stereo objectives are
    typically found on lower power scopes used for close up work on things like circuit boards, coins, stamps, gems, jewelery, insects, etc.
    Stereo eyepieces ( binocs ) are can be found on both low and high power ( compound ) scopes and are typically an upgrade ( read that, more $$$ )

    Considering the age of your interested viewer, you probably want to start on the low end and work your way up if they continue to express
    an interest in the field as the years go by. The internet has many sites that sell scopes, some of which I would consider to be in the budget
    range for the average seven year old. Some I've used in the past: ( in no particular order )

    http://www.microscope.com
    http://www.microscopenet.com
    http://www.microscopeuniverse.com

    Even Amazon and Ebay would probably be valid places to look.

    Prices are typically dictated by type, options and manufacturer.

    That said, consider the following:

    The low end high power setups are going to start around $100 USD for monocular ( single eyepiece ) systems with a 1D stage ( It only moves
    up and down ) and LED light source. Probably what you're going to want to look at for a starter scope.

    Mid range will get into Binoc ( dual ) eyepieces, better light sources ( variable halogen ), better / more objectives and a multi-dimensional stage.
    ( stage movement up / down, slide movement forward / back / side )

    High end simply builds on the mid range with better quality components and glass.

    For a seven year old ? I would start with something along these lines:

    http://www.microscope.com/best-seller-omano-om116l-school-microscope-p-741.html
    http://www.microscopenet.com/monocular-compound-microscope-40x400x-with-tungsten-light-p-99.html
    http://www.microscope.com/omano-omtm-85-monocular-teaching-compound-microscope.html

    or, if you really want the binocs, maybe something like this:

    http://www.microscope.com/omano-om118-b4-compound-microscope.html
    http://www.microscopenet.com/binocular-compound-microscope40x1000x-light-p-415.html

    It's certainly an interesting hobby. I have a pair of scopes ( low power and a compound ) on my desk here at home I use to look at whatever
    strikes my fancy. Personally, I would rather have the physical scope vs the USB. That's just a personal preference though.

    1. Re:Child Friendly you say . . . . by Immerman · · Score: 2

      USB versus physical scope is a toss-up. You'll get better image clarity with a physical scope unless you're using a really good USB camera - the less expensive ones tend to be web-cam class.

      On the other hand a USB scope makes it easier involve friends in the experience since they can all see what's going on at once, plus with halfway decent software they can easily capture photographs and video. Good digital zoom can actually draw out a surprising amount of detail provided a bicubic or better filter is used (so software based, not whatever crap might be built into the camera). It also eliminates the learning curve on keeping eyelashes out of the way and reduces image jitter due to muscle-induced vibrations in both the eye and hand. Software is key in this case though - there's some really bad microscope software out there.

      There's also the option of a physical scope with a projector hood, common with child-oriented microscopes - they tend to be dim, but you get a (small) "on screen" image without pixels, so a magnifying glass can be used to observe finer detail, and a normal camera can be used for photos/video. http://www.amazon.com/Kids-Authority-Childrens-Microscope-Projector/dp/B005J5D576

      Obviously any screen-based 'scope will lack stereoscopic display, which as others have pointed out will also add significant expense. For the same expense you could add much greater magnification, which if they're interested in microbial life may be better investment, 1-2000x is great for observing populations, but barely enough to see the most obvious individual details. Personally I have to agree with the sentiment expressed by several others - kids' interests are often passing things so unless you're hemorrhaging money get them a decent starter 'scope, then if they're still interested by Christmas you can get them a truly good one and they'll be better able to appreciate just how awesome it is. As a general policy that will let let you fund their exploration of a lot more fields of interest, while simultaneously allowing you to provide them with much better equipment for the interests that end up truly captivating them.

      Also, as a tangential point, for low-level magnification a high-power magnifying glass large enough to have a fair-sized region where both eyes can see the target is a great stereoscopic magnifier - it's worth drawing children's attention to the fact since it's not immediately obvious and can require a bit of conscious alignment for maximum effect (close one eye then the other to get your target in the "average center") .

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  13. Re:Burn ants by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    I would patent it if it wasn't in the Tasco microscope manual I had as a kid.

    --
    BMO - passin' on knowledge through the generations.

    nothings stopping you, just put a "view the image with a computer" to the end.

    on the sidenote, what's a good usb microscope?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. Get a proper microscope by dbc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get a decent microscope. "Child friendly" means "not frustrating" -- good light, smooth focus, good light, real optics, and good light. Mechanical stage for bonus points, because little fingers have a hard time moving the slide around in tiny increments.

    Stereo vision isn't a big deal, but with a child of 7, I *strongly* suggest getting a "dual head" microscope. This is designed for teaching, the student has one viewing tube, and the other viewing tube can be used by the teacher or the eyepiece of the second tube can be replaced with a standard microscope video camera eyepiece. That way a parent can help with focusing, which is tricky for kids to learn. You can also talk about what they are seeing and give them a guided tour.

    Remember that real optics will give a much, much sharper view than any USB microscope or video eyepiece, so adjust expectations accordingly, but we've found that it is a much more fun family activity when the microscope is set up with video in the second tube so that everyone can see and talk about the video while taking turns looking at the eye-poppingly sharp view through the optic path.

    We bought our home microscope here:
    http://www.hometrainingtools.com/microscopes/c/10/
    they seem to have decent prices on nicer microscopes.

  15. to make or to build, that is the question by cherax · · Score: 2

    American Science and Surplus has a nice collection of used microscopes (and lots of other very cool stuff) at very low prices. Their inventory changes frequently.

    Celestron makes a $50 webcam-like (USB) eyepiece camera for telescopes, but it works nicely with microscopes as well. Celestron also sells inexpensive mechanical microscopes.

    For thin specimens or slices, you want a compound microscope. For stereo images, you need a stereomicroscope (a.k.a. dissecting microscope). The two have very different designs. The stereomicroscope has two identical objective lenses next to each other, like the two lenses in a stereo digital camera. Unless you need very high magnifications, you can do pretty well with any of the "toy" USB devices that has a built-in webcam and a single magnifier lens (e.g. RadioShack zOrb for ca. $40).

    You can build your own compound microscope, which might make a great project for a 7-year-old: http://www.funsci.com/fun3_en/ucomp1/ucomp1.htm

    Finally, you can make a Leeuwenhoek microscope (the original microscope design, from the 1600s) with a single spherical lens of 2-3mm diameter and some ordindary household materials. You can make the lens if you have a torch or Bunsen burner, or get one from Edmund Optics (edmundoptics.com). Lots of how-to sites on the web, e.g. http://bizarrelabs.com/micro.htm (one design on this site uses a drop of water as the lens).

    Sounds like a fun project.