Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Headphones, Earbuds, Earphones?

alexbgreat writes "What do you think is the best set of head-mounted loudspeakers for the money, with a cost of less than $50? Here are some featuresthat would be stupendous to have (in descending order of importance): noise isolation (not cancellation), flat/near flat response (I need to be able to hear bass, but I don't need my eardrums blown out), long-term comfort (earbuds usually hurt for me), and durability. Over-ear is preferred to anything on- or in-ear. Boom mics are permissible, as I may well use it as a broadcast intercom headset." If you have experience using headphones from different price ranges, feel free to share that as well.

21 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. Sennheiser PX100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Downside: almost transparent to sound. People can hear what you're listening to and the isolation you get is next to none. Still, audio quality is great for the price, they're light and very comfortable.

    1. Re:Sennheiser PX100 by gstrickler · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll second that recommendation. I've had several sets of Sennheiser headphones over the years, and they've all had excellent sound quality. They've always been excellent build quality too.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  2. Monoprice! by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bought two pairs of Monoprice 8323's and I think they are fantastic. I keep one at home and the other at work.

    I've never been disappointed with anything I've bought from Monoprice.

    These same headphones are available from other people (Kicker and others) for significantly more money.

  3. Re:They cost about $79 by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Funny

    oh, and 10 shitloads = 1 fuckton, just so's ya know.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  4. Go to AVS forum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    or Head-Fi. They aren't audiophile dumbasses but also they aren't the broke neckbeard losers that inhabit slashdot listening to their $5 Jensen headphones.

    1. Re:Go to AVS forum by Iskender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually we use much more expensive headphones so that we can have noise-cancellation for the rustling of the beard. Do not under-estimate us.

  5. Re:20 dollar sonies by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this will sound petty, but I'd rip my intestines out with a fork before buying something branded with Sony, given their recent history of putting out crap hardware, screwing customers over, distributing malware, suing music fans, losing online customer's data, etc.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know. "But that wasn't their headphone division!" Still, I don't want that company seeing one red cent of mine. Sorry headphone division of Sony, but your parent company is scummy, so you have to pay the price of their shenanigans. I'm hopeful that there are plenty of alternatives for 20 bones that are just as good or better.

    To anyone reading this, please remember all the times you've read an article here about Sony and though, "Wow, that's bad." Please don't fall into the "But their [whatever] is pretty good, so I'll make an exception and buy it." It's putting money in their pocket that they use to keep screwing people over so that we can see even more articles here about their spectacular douchebaggery.

  6. HeadRoom by juventasone · · Score: 4, Informative

    HeadRoom tests more headphones than probably anyone. They're unbiased enough to say when a $40 pair is better than $100 pair that they sell.

    1. Re:HeadRoom by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're unbiased enough to say when a $40 pair is better than $100 pair that they sell.

      I have no experience from HeadRoom ( I am sure they are good if you recommend them).
      But I did use to work in an electronics store as a teenager, and I just want to say that it is quite possible for the reseller to have better margins on a $40 pair than the $100. Especially when the cheaper product isn't all that well known and the more expensive one is. So that is not really a foolproof sign that they are unbiased.

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
  7. DIY Custom Molded on the cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you want comfort and ultimate noise blocking you can do a DIY version. I made a pair and they were fantastic and comfortable.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmk-y_9exJ8&feature=player_embedded

    Just pick up a set of decent earbuds, I used skullcandy ones when I did mine, and a radians custom earplug kit ($11).

    http://www.amazon.com/Radians-Custom-Molded-Earplugs-Red/dp/B002XULPSQ

  8. http://www.head-fi.org/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:http://www.head-fi.org/ by Prune · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know Jude personally (the guy that runs the site), and I can tell you that threads get deleted if they criticize any of the products of companies sponsoring the site. And there's quite a few of those. It's a very biased site as a result of persistent and biased moderation (not the users themselves). The old headwize used to be much better; at this point, one is best to refer to diyaudio.com (no commercial conflict of interest) and also the measurements and recommendations at headphone.com (commercial, but have managed to be very objective from what I can tell; plus I tend to look at the measurements more anyway).

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    2. Re:http://www.head-fi.org/ by Prune · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unless you poorly review the product of one of the site's many sponsors, and then when a critical mass of this has accrued, posts, entire threads, and/or users are "disappeared", which Jude (site owner) freely admitted in the sponsors-only forum.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  9. Re:I know the answer! by dcl · · Score: 4

    I was under the impression hardly anyone could tell the difference between lossless and a v0 mp3 on even pretty decent gear....

  10. Re:20 dollar sonies by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony is a large company and they put out many things. If you have a beef against them for whatever reason then more power to you. However the question was posed about sub $50 dollar head phones and I happen to have picked up a pair of Sony's for a road trip and I was very impressed with the quality, fit and portability. If your still upset about the rootkit and the removal of PS3 Linux that's fine. That doesn't apply to me however and I'm just giving advice and the OP can use it or lose as he or she chooses.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  11. Re:Bose by Prune · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The lower end Etymotic earbuds are also around $100 and much better than the Bose.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  12. Re:20 dollar sonies by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Part of the method used to protest bad corporate behaviour is to boycott them. The other part is to spread the word. Only being boycotted by the people you've screwed over probably wouldn't even do much damage to Sony, (although it would be much more than most)

    To stay on-topic, my favourites headphones are these JVCs at about $50, They have a cheaper pair for about half the price (HX-33s?) that are almost as good. They isolate noise enough tthat I wear them while woodworking or mowing the lawn. Great sound, and I can wear them comfortably all day. You can actually get them on sale for about half the price listed on occasion. They seem quite sturdy, but I'm not that rough on headphones despite wearing them so much.

  13. Re:20 dollar sonies by Sorthum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I very much agree with you. The entire *reason* that those companies have so many divisions is that they want goodwill you feel towards one of their products (say, the Discman of old) to transfer over to other lines of products (say, their headphones).

    However, what this means is that when one division (or, in this case, several) radically screw the pooch, a lot of people associate the negative experience with the company as a whole. Ergo, due to the CD / DRM issue almost a decade ago, I won't buy a Playstation, a VAIO, or a $20 pair of headphones that say Sony on them.

    It's not just *GOOD* feelings that transfer over, Sony.

  14. Re:They cost about $79 by catmistake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not as good as $200 Bose

    Just something to consider... I know what you're saying, but "good" of course has different meaning for different applications. I've never heard Bose headphones, but I have heard other Bose audio, and while it sounds very nice, for what is popular today in what people want to hear, in my experience, Bose can almost never actually be considered having fidelity, that is, faithful to the actual audio that is being amplified... because I have discovered they are always incredibly bass heavy. In a studio, this might be fine for cans for a drummer... if an expensive option. For purely enjoying music, they are pleasant I have little doubt, Bose does some pretty incredible things. But you're hearing more than the artists intended, FWIW. I'm no Bose expert, haven't listened to any of their headphones, but I would expect if you tried to mix music with them, all your music would end up sounding weak in the low end... because you're mixing with a heavy bass handycap. If the music you listen to is traditionally bass heavy anyway, I wouldn't expect Bose to be considered good for that application, unless you just really love low end and don't mind that you're hearing more of the headphones and less of the music.

    Again, I am no expect, but I would consider the best headphones those that faithfully reproduce music flatly, in all its gory sonic imperfection, and not try to boost any frequencies because the sound of it happens to be popular right now.

    I like Bose radios for their compactness... big sound, small box... but I have no delusion as to whether the audio coming out of it is actually really what I am listening to... if that makes any sense (how much is the artist, how much is Bose?). Most people would hate the way studio monitors sound, but if Bose made such a thing in a compact box that didn't boost frequencies and faithfully reproduced the signal no matter what it was, I'd be all over it.

    ...just my uninformed $.02... YMMV

  15. Re:They cost about $79 by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    You don't need to state that. Of course it's a metric fuckton, everyone knows an imperial small fuckton = 6.235 imperial large shitloads.

  16. Bose noise cancelling by careysb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know what you mean about the exaggerated bass, that's is exactly what I experienced with their speakers in their show room. However, I purchased their original noise cancelling head phones ($300) when they first came out because my cubical was immediately below the heating and air conditioning system. The head phones DID NOT exhibit the same bass boost that their speakers did and the noise cancelling ability was outstanding. I've tried other noise cancelling head phones just as a point of comparison and none did as good a job. The tonal range seemed to be evenly distributed and the ability to reproduce sounds accurately was good as near as I can tell. Also, Bose will (or at least did) give you a $100 credit if you brought in an old pair for replacement. Seems like an absolute necessity if you work in a cubical environment.