Slashdot Mirror
Antibody Cocktail Cures Monkeys of Ebola
ananyo writes "Monkeys infected with Ebola have been cured by a cocktail of three antibodies first administered 24 hours or more after exposure. The result raises hopes that a future treatment could improve the chances of humans surviving the disease caused by the deadly virus, which kills up to 90% of infected people and could potentially be used as a biological weapon. Most treatment regimes tested to date only improve chances of survival if administered within one hour of infection (abstract)."
Oooooook?
I guess my league name of Ebowla is on it's way out...
Hit it hard and hit it fast, it's the same epidemiological solution to a zombie uprising.
Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
Anyone who actively develops bioweapons is a criminal. He or she is a direct hazard to humanity and needs to be removed from society as soon as possible. We have seen what happens when a particularly virulent illness from MomNature herself wreaks havoc, like the 1918 flu or Bubonic Plague. To deliberately take something such as Ebola and weaponize it shocks the conscience. Unlike nuclear weapons which simply level cities and cause localised radioactive areas, bioweapons are the gift that keeps on giving and do indeed go wildly out of control once they are deployed. This is not idle speculation. We proved it with smallpox blankets.
If you develop bioweapons, you need to be in jail, or dead.
--
BMO
The odds of weaponized Ebola are fairly small. Viruses are inherently hard to treat so this would have the potential for treating that entire class of virus. A similar approach may even be potentially an option for AIDs since a small percentage of the population produces the antibodies for AIDs. There is reason to think it might work on AIDs since one man was cured when he received a bone marrow transplant from some one that has the natural immunity. The trick is producing enough of the right antibodies.
This problem will never go away.
People don't learn the proper lesson from damocles. Instead of discovering that being in power is inexoribly linked to the threat of being cast down, and that the chair is so cursed, and should only be sat in as a necessity, they instead clamor for it, and seek to cut the sword hanging over their heads down by force, and remove those intrinsic threats by violence.
When you take a position of power, and realize that the general public can and will do you harm if you are a tyrant (the public is one manifestation of the sword above damocles, held aloft by but a single hair), you realize that the public is then your enemy, and must be eliminated.
The fear caused by getting into that chair, and the fear of being forced out of it by violence drives people and governments to fits of unparalleled paranoia, violence, and twisted crimes of passion.
The creation and deployment of biological weapons is inevitable, now that we know how to make and use them.
This will always be true as long as there is a big chair to sit in.
There will always be such a chair, as long as mankind makes cities and nations.
It is a crime that the simple civics lesson of this simple story is only given a passing footnote, if at all these days.
To kill anyone who would make and use these weapons, is to kill all ambitious world leaders.
I really didn't think they would have live monkeys running around being infected with Ebola. I realize it's at a lab or something, but aren't they kind of difficult to contain or isolate biologically?
~S
That "kills up to 90% of infected people" comment is something of an exaggeration. From reading Richard Preston's "The Hot Zone", I recall that the dominant families of Ebola virus are the Sudan strain(s) and the Zaire strain(s). The Zaire strain will really fuck you up; that's the one which kills up to 90%. The Sudan strain is much less dangerous (statistically speaking), and kills something like 40-50%. There's even a new strain which broke out in a medical research facility in Reston, VA in 1998 which was contagious only to monkeys.
It sounds pedantic and insensitive to point out that some strains kill only 50% when even that number is horrific, and sounds totally incidental to mention a non-lethal strain, but actually the Reston and Sudan strains are more concerning in many ways than the extremely lethal Zaire varieties.
Extremely contagious, quick, and deadly diseases like Ebola Zaire often go too quickly for their own good. They can kill everyone so fast that even if the victims travel or meet an ignorant medical response, outbreaks wind up limiting themselves because the incubation isn't really that long and you certainly aren't moving around to spread the disease anymore once you're dead. Several times major outbreaks in African villages burnt themselves out with only the most rudimentary quarantine measures, and there were some major scares when people with Zaire strain took international plane rides that should have lead to global devastation if the disease were really that efficient in spreading. (It is astonishingly contagious in certain circumstances and certain phases of infection, but its contagiousness to people in the immediate area is only correlated to it's potential global virulence, not explicitly and solely causal to said potential.)
On the other hand, diseases like Sudan and Reston Ebola might become much worse health threats than the exceptionally deadly types of Ebola. Something like Ebola Sudan, which kills slower and kills relatively fewer people, could travel much farther and wider than the Zaire types. There could be longer periods in which people are shedding virus while they're still largely pre-symptomatic, longer periods of disease and recovery where they're extremely contagious but still require medical care and community to some degree, etc. I don't recall whether it applies to Hemorrhagic fevers, but there are also viruses people carry and periodically shed for life, as well, like herpes viruses. So a disease that kills a smaller percentage and presents less quickly/dramatically can be far more dangerous than the quicker, more brutal members of its pathogenic family
Along the same lines, the Reston variety of Ebola could be the freakiest of all, given some bad cosmic luck. Something very closely related to a lethal human illness can spread in birds, monkeys, pigs, etc. until it's downright common, and then suddenly re-develop the qualities to infect and kill humans. Now you have something which can be unpredictably spread by a population of carriers which can't be quarantined or predicted even half as well as you could manage human beings. That's why they follow the development of flu strains in birds, pigs, monkeys, and ruminants every year; you never know when something will show up that could make the Spanish flu look like a weekend with the sniffles.
So in summary, the headline makes Hemorrhagic fevers look worse than they really are (although even the 'nicest' ones are fucking terrifying), and it's actually the gentler varieties that are most likely to fuck up humanity one day.
Check out the book The Hot Zone, by Richard Preston. It reads like fiction, but is non-fiction about several ebola outbreaks. Including one at a primate facility in Reston Virginia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hot_Zone
The world is made by those who show up for the job.
Oh, and I guess humans, too.
Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
Very insightful comment. For possible ways forward through a transformation of prespective, see my essay:
http://www.pdfernhout.net/recognizing-irony-is-a-key-to-transcending-militarism.html
"Biological weapons like genetically-engineered plagues are ironic because they are about using advanced life-altering biotechnology to fight over which old-fashioned humans get to occupy the planet. Why not just use advanced biotech to let people pick their skin color, or to create living arkologies and agricultural abundance for everyone everywhere? "
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
Doesn't this make it easier to Weaponize Ebola? You'd be pretty stupid to release ebola on your enemy if you weren't sure your own population wouldn't get infected. But if there's a cure, you can mass produce it for your own people and unleash the virus on your enemies...
U.S. Department of Agriculture, under partnership with Department of Army, enriched sheep anthrax for weopons. Also this same facillity perfected Lyme Disease to be distributed on Ticks. Many more, all at everyone's expense.
read more about Lab 257 by Carrol, where Plum Island was so-mismanaged that it ruined the entire continent without one hint of blame.
They're not just evil, they're insane. Once released, you can't control where they go, a lesson that should have been learned from the Bubonic Plague, but apparently neither Soviets nor Americans learned our lessons from history. :(
I'll drink to that.
Burp~ :D
I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Except when craven, arrogant, ignorant politicians overule the smart people and move an animal disease center from an isolated island to the edge of a large university campus - in eyesight of the stadium, coliseum, rec center, *and* the vet/med emergency room. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bio_and_Agro-Defense_Facility
WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?
Oh good, now we can save monkeys from ebola. We were starting to run low on monkeys. /pro-robot
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Now I don't have to worry about my monkey getting Ebola any more.
What? No! They used monkeys, sir, not fine apes such as yourself, and I'm quite sure the researchers involved are fully aware of the difference.