Microsoft To Buy Yammer?
An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft seems to have a pocketful of billions sitting around. First Skype, now Yammer – an enterprise social network service launched back in September 2008 that looks almost like Facebook minus the title bars. According to Bloomberg, the deal could reach up to a billion dollars. To date, Yammer claims 200,000 companies which include more than 400 of the 500 Fortune companies. One reason for the purchase may stem from their social-like Sharepoint platform which has been a lost cause to solutions by Salesforce.com and Oracle."
My employer tried Yammer, then installed Sharepoint. Nobody used Yammer after Sharepoint became available, and not many use Sharepoint now. People don't tend to post drivel about work like they do about their personal lives.
What's the point in buying all these startups? I really don't see that it works out much in the end. Is it about patents? I simply don't see the justification to buy startups that are here today and gone tomorrow. Rather than spending billions to buy current competitors, why not pump those same billions into improving existing products. For every startup that produces lots of useful things, there seems to be ten that do nothing but cost cash because either the buying company does nothing with it or the innovations that the company that was acquired are technically meaningless.
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
I don't think that the acquisition/mergers of tech companies are anything to worry about, its just another bubble. What I imagine is happening is:
High-Ranking manager: I've heard that X buzzword is the next big thing (the cloud, social networking, etc.) what do we have that is in X buzzword?
Tech-Manager: Well, we have Y product but you disbanded that team...
High-Ranking manager: no problem, get me a list of the leading innovators in X and we'll buy one of them
And that dystopia won't happen because unlike governments, everything a corporation does is to make a profit. It makes a profit by improving people's standard of living. I don't know about you but (outside of government) I have not paid for a thing or supported a corporation that does not raise my standard of living. If a corporation stops improving my standard of living for the price they charge, I'm not going to support them and so they get no money from me. If there are more like-minded people like me, they still want my money so they make products to improve my (and others) standard of living so they will support that corporation.
Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
Is it a bad sign that I saw your long post and immediately suspected it was another spam message for that scam service?
(I refuse to name it to avoid helping their SEO efforts)