Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

ICANN Names New CEO, Will Pay Him $800,000 To Run the Internet

Posted by Soulskill on from the i-just-be-he-cann dept.

darthcamaro writes "ICANN has officially hired a new CEO to replace the Rob Beckstom. ICANN industry unknown Fadi Chehade is taking the top job — but there is a catch. He can't start for another 90 days, even though ICANN has been looking for a new CEO for months. Even better is Chehade's salary. ICANN will pay him $800,000 a year. Is the CEO of ICANN one of the highest paying jobs in the Internet governance landscape?"

16 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. CEO Pay by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it's not the highest paid it probably should be. If someone can run ICANN they can run a lot of other stuff too. Competition for qualified talent is difficult at the CEO level.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:CEO Pay by Herkum01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, I mean, he has to run the business unit, ensure that sales and marketing are doing their jobs and that products are delivered to stores. Oh wait, HE AIN'T running a business at ALL!

      People keep trying to rationalize these salaries as if there is some CEO shortage. Really it all about the good ole boy network and I will pad your salary and you pad mine. I remember after the banking crash in 2008 and they had someone reviewing salaries at banks. Every banking officer claimed that they were above average and deserved a raise!

      I tell you what, lets set some goals for this guy as a CEO and if it meets them then he can have his huge salary. Otherwise this is just a welfare check to the overpaid.

    2. Re:CEO Pay by hondo77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Competition for qualified talent is difficult at the CEO level.

      Says who?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:CEO Pay by cjcela · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mod parent up. He is right on the money.

    4. Re:CEO Pay by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should have used sarcasm tags.

      The thing I've seen over the years is that the good CEOs make a big difference for their companies. With the effects of their decisions being as important as they are they can swing billions of dollars one way or another.

      The bad ones can ruin a company, or at least drive it into the gutter.

      The problem is that both the good and bad get extremely high pay, and only the good ones are worth it.

      The way CEO incentives work is all wrong.

      Then the way boards and CEOs interact is often broken too.

    5. Re:CEO Pay by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      the average CEO made 380 times what the average worker made in 2011.

      No. The average CEO made far, far less than that. The figure you quote is only for CEOs of 300 of the largest public corporations. It doesn't include the millions of smaller corporations.

    6. Re:CEO Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apparently, you're right if you count only the salary, in which case a CEO makes roughly 90 times the worker salary. If you include all income, it is close to 500 times the worker salary. Sorry, but I don't see how this can be justified in terms of productivity or management skills or whatever.

      In 1970, CEO salary and bonus packages were typically about $700,000 - 25 times the average production worker salary; by 2000, CEO salaries had jumped to almost $2.2 million on average, 90 times the average salary of a worker, according to a 2004 study on CEO pay by Kevin J. Murphy and Jan Zabojnik. Toss in stock options and other benefits, and the salary of a CEO is nearly 500 times the average worker salary, the study says.

      From here

    7. Re:CEO Pay by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      John Postel used to do the same job of ICANN CEO and an entire swathe of their senior management for free. That was only 20 years ago.

      While the net may have increased in scale since then, its complexity has not, and its has not grown to the point where someone needs to be paid $800,000 a year plus bonuses etc just to keep it all ticking over.

      As for the "competition" at the CEO level; while there is indeed a worldwide race to the very bowels of vapidity, fecklessness, and incompetence in this field, again, the cream of this crop are not worth paying $800,000 a year for.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    8. Re:CEO Pay by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm curious: how much do you think that someone who runs the internet should be paid?

      2.718 times the average industrial wage.

      I believe that's somewhere in the region of $135,000, but I don't have exact figures for the median US wage. The multiplier is obvious.

      Do you think it should be less than priceline.com ($50M), Qualcomm ($36M), Viacom ($31M), Time Warner ($20M), and eBay ($15M).

      Yes. Moreover, I think that such salaries should not be permitted in publicly listed, limited liability companies.

      Presumably, he has the skillset to do most of these jobs.

      A screaming money casting its dung around the office probably has the skillset to run run them as well, since running them into the ground appears to be the only thing modern CEOs actually do in return for their compensation. That and engage in crime, but I digress.

      I find that I am comfortable with this number.

      Then doubtless you will be comfortable with the corresponding increase in your tax bill required to pay for it and the multitude of linked salaries. Moreover, you will of course be perfectly contented in seeing your own wages decrease in value of in real terms to support the increasingly bloated and unearned salaries of the class you so admire. Enjoy your banana republic.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:CEO Pay by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's so difficult that most corporations never manage it and yet they continue year after year

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:CEO Pay by expatriot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You had my interest until you suggested RMS running the internet. 800k is a bargain if that is the compitition.

  2. Reason by leromarinvit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: Why do you pay your CEO so much?
    A: Because ICANN.

    --
    Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
  3. Only fair by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They got all those millions selling useless TLD's, they have to spend it somewhere.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  4. Ruin the internet? by gstrickler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or am I the only one who first read it that way?

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  5. Why do we even need ICANN? by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What does it do? It doesn't administer number resources - IANA, ARIN, RIPE, and *NICs do that. ICANN doesn't administer root servers (various companies do that).

    WTF is he doing?

  6. Re:Hey, I'll do it for half that. by amoeba1911 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pay for performance is a world-wide metric.

    Please stop perpetuating lies. It's an old wives tale that has absolutely no scientific backing. Evidence shows the opposite: high compensation has a detrimental effect on productivity of creative white collar employees. (This does not apply to manual labor workers)

    http://blog.ted.com/2010/05/31/dan_ariely_asks/

    So yeah, I would like the guy getting paid $100k instead, and use the remaining $700k to add new fiber infrastructure.