Slashdot Mirror


Bryson Crash Reveals Threat of Headless Government

Hugh Pickens writes "According to Business Week, the traffic accident that left U.S. Commerce Secretary John Bryson unconscious and alone in his bashed-up Lexus on June 9 raises questions about why the 10th official in line to succeed the president was left so vulnerable. It also highlights potential gaps in security for senior U.S. government officials, who receive varying levels of protection. 'They lost track of him,' says James Carafano, a terrorism scholar at the Heritage Foundation. 'Post 9/11, that's a bit of a head scratcher.' Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who are high in the line of succession and have national-security responsibilities, are provided protection 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but other federal officials, even in cabinet-level positions or other top posts, often travel without the security details that even a big-city mayor or state governor would be provided. Threats to cabinet-level officials aren't overblown, says Norman Ornstein, a congressional scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, who has urged that the government revamp its succession plans and says a nuclear bomb hidden in a suitcase detonated in Washington could leave a headless government. 'The lack of interest in continuity may stem from the same reasons some smart people refuse to create wills, even though failure to do so leaves behind horrific messes for their loved ones,' writes Ornstein. 'Yet the threat is real. Our leaders' failure to establish plans to ensure that our Constitution survives is irresponsible.'"

29 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Who gives a shit by PNutts · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the Secretary of Education we have to protect. So say us all.

  2. Really 10th in line? by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly we narrowly escaped what would have been a disaster for our entire nation. Hyperbole much? Gee wiz

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Really 10th in line? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ya really. Aside from cabinet officials, you then have members of both legislative houses, theoretically the courts etc. Even the military.

      It's not like leadership wouldn't emerge, and if enough top level people just got killed you're mostly banking on whomever takes over to actually go ahead and still have future elections and so on, regardless of how exactly succession officially works.

      If you start spending huge amounts of money protecting every member of congress, every member of the senate, every senior cabinet member every assistant cabinet secretary, the courts, and then all of their immediate families etc. etc. etc. you're starting to look at billions of spending, and you start getting into serious questions about their ability to live lives relatively normally in fear of rare events.

      Sure a nuclear bomb blowing up a capital city (london paris washington etc.) would be more than a little problematic, but in that situation you can't even assume that the 2nd person in line to the throne/presidency is going to still have their mental faculties even if they are otherwise alive and physically uninjured. In that case someone will have to improvise leadership until order can be restored, assuming such a concept is even still relevant.

    2. Re:Really 10th in line? by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Informative

      We have a ridiculously long line of succession that we shouldn't be worried.

      President
      VP
      Speaker of the House
      President Pro Tem of the Senate
      15 cabinet secretaries, starting with the Secretary of State

      Really, you just need to protect the top 3-4, unless there's a particular threat to another one (Clinton as SoS gets special protection as a former first lady, for example). It would be nearly impossible to knock out the first 20. And if they did, the House would immediately elect a new Speaker, who would be elevated to president by being speaker. So really after that you get all the ranking members of the majority party. It's not worth worrying about.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:Really 10th in line? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here is the trick it is a representative democracy. you can kill them all (nuke DC during the state of the union address) the states can then hold elections to repopulate the federal government.

      Which is how it was done the first time around.

      The people generally don't need the federal government. it is symbolic but isn't necessary. The police, fire , even national guard are all funded from STATE coffers. As long as every state government doesn't collapse too it wouldn't take more than a year to completely rebuild the federal government.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Really 10th in line? by riverat1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      During the State of the Union address there is always at least one official fairly high in the line of succession who does not attend the speech and stays in an undisclosed location specifically because of this issue.

    5. Re:Really 10th in line? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember reading (Apocryphal story alert.) that the Postmaster General (or Secretary of Veterans Affairs) was usually selected for this job, and they loved it. Usually it was an excuse to have a nice party offsite for the staff, but occasionally it meant a trip on Air Force One.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    6. Re:Really 10th in line? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a hardened bunker under the whitehouse. That's not exactly secret, but there are numerous others. There's a major centre in Pennsylvania, NORAD command etc.

      The raven rock facility (in Pennsylvania but on the border with maryland) was revealed in 2004 as where cheney spent most of the latter bit of 2001 hiding out. Blame (sort of) time magazine for that one. I'm not sure it was actually much of a secret where the facility was.

      Biden actually disclosed that there's a bunker in the vice presidents house in D.C. Which again, isn't a huge surprise. You'd have expected there to be bunkers of varying quality in official housing, and on various military bases and command and control centres.

       

    7. Re:Really 10th in line? by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh my gosh!

      You're questioning the wisdom that's been provided by representatives of the Heritage Foundation -and- the American Enterprise Institute? The very think-tanks that write the words that become the lines that the Republicans tow? The bastions of conservative intelligence that push for perpetual wars, and want and need the FEAR of the general populace against THEM to give them power?

      Oh my gosh!

    8. Re:Really 10th in line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It matters little. Our government would not be headless. There are a whole lot of corporate headquarters not located in Washington after all.

    9. Re:Really 10th in line? by careysub · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the lines that the Republicans tow?

      That would be toe, as in lining up the ends of your feet with a chosen line.

      He is coining a new figure of speech - we imagine legions of Republicans faithfully towing weighty barges of ideology.

      Quote apt, really.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  3. Reminds me of "Debt of Honour" by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A book by Tom Clancy, from well before 9/11, which involved most of the US government being wiped out when a plane is crashed into the capitol building during a ceremony that put almost the entire legislative and executive branches in the same building. Was sort of interesting (horrifying?) to see that sort of attack played out a few years later, albeit without the coordination to hit that much of our government in one swoop.

    --
    William George
    1. Re:Reminds me of "Debt of Honour" by gman003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends. Early Jack Ryan, or crazy-nutso hardline-conservative Jack Ryan, from when Clancy went off his meds?

      I used to be a big Clancy reader, but I haven't really kept up. I read the newest one a few months ago, and I was shocked at how much he'd turned it into his own political fantasy. He (or his ghostwriters) pack it with strawmen and the "good guys" are just *loved* by *everyone* who isn't one of those strawmen.

      Let's just look at the story. Spoiler alerts, obviously.

      A terrorist leader who is /totally/ not Bin Laden gets captured by an illegal, unofficial special forces group (which is a whole rant in itself) and basically dropped off in front of a US jail, Batman-style. The astoundingly stupid President makes a big show out of giving him a trial; his defense attorney is an ACLU hippie woman (whose breasts Clancy devotes a few too many sentences to), and even then this entire subplot is being orchestrated by an ex-Soviet still-Communist media mogul. Jack Ryan, running to be the second president to serve non-consecutive terms, makes it a major campaign issue that he will not give not-Laden an open trial, getting a standing ovation after declaring in a debate that his first act as President would be to ship him off to Gitmo for a secret military trial.

      Meanwhile, Ryan's son is off being part of the aforementioned spec-ops group, which operates not just beyond international law, but actually completely without the knowledge or even authorization of the current US government. Let me say that again - a secret group of heavily-armed people who operate completely alone, their only connection to any sort of authority being the bank safe full of blank (but signed) presidential pardons, who fund themselves by tapping into the CIANSA data link and using the data for insider trading, and whose goals are to kill any terrorist threat to America, again, without *any* sort of oversight.

      Anyways, Junior's subplot is mainly about a rogue Pakistani general's plot to steal his own country's nuclear weapons and give them to Islamic terrorists in Unpronouncablistan - and *their* plan is to mount them on hijacked space rockets to launch at Moscow. Junior, and his fellow assassins, do this by eventually *invading* Pakistan, with running gun battles through the streets that fit Call of Duty better than Rainbow Six. Oh, and Rainbow does show up again, only to be completely incompetent because international bureaucracy fucks EVERYTHING up. That's almost an exact quote, by the way.

      The C-plot is something about Clark tracking down who's behind the A-plot (spoiler: the filthy commie goes to jail too), with the obligatory East Germany/Soviet Russia backstory. Not really anything to it.

      There are random asides about irrelevant-to-the-story-but-political-hot-topics like health care (apparently socialized health care is *terrible*, and without CAPITALISM to drive them, doctors just don't give a shit and get drunk during surgeries). That's not even relevant to some D-plot, that's just random pages of POLITICS crammed in there for no good reason.

      So yeah. The only good thing I can say is that the actual prose is as good as it ever was - the details of the story are great, the action scenes are actiony, the dialog is good, but the Rand-esque political monologues and overall plot are pretty grating.

      I'm not sure if I just didn't really pay much attention to it when I read his books earlier, or if Clancy (or, again, his co-authors) are just nuts.

  4. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a suitcase nuke goes off in Washington, "Government continuity" at that high a level is about #273 on our priority list.

  5. This to ensure survival of the Constitution? by macraig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the Constitution will survive a nuclear holocaust in D.C. just fine. It's a set of intangible ideas. What might not survive it is the One Percent's hold on government by proxy. Which makes me wonder about Ornstein's pedigree given that he would make such a misdirected statement.

  6. Re:lose track of all of them by Mitchell314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because we're supposed to be a civilized nation that doesn't kill people for difference of political opinion?

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  7. Re:protection by Fyzzler · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, you have to climb into a refrigerator to survive that.

    --
    I have one question. If the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture is not in charge of Gundam, then who is?
  8. Not a problem by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congress already lacks brains, ears, eyes, hearts, guts, and balls.

    I don't see how being headless would change much.

  9. Re:lose track of all of them by Alex+Belits · · Score: 5, Insightful

    civilized nation that doesn't kill people for difference of political opinion

    lol

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  10. Problem isn't that the Secretary of Transportation by edremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doesn't have protection, it's that mayors, assistant Governors, and the like do. Seriously, it's not necessary for a mayor to bring a multi-person security detail with them everywhere, nor is it necessary for them to get high speed police escorts where ever they need to drive. We don't live in Afghanistan. It's simply not that dangerous- there are plenty of mayors, governors and the like who *don't* have protection layered around them and there hasn't been a wave of assassination attempts on them.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  11. Suitcase? Mice Nuts! by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The recent U.S. Open reminded me of the previous event at the Olympic Club, held near the end of the last millennium -- 1998. I was working for a company that was a big customer of Cadence. And Cadence put on the dog by inviting us and others to party in San Francisco to celebrate the Open (tickets, too). There were limos, a long pitch from Scott McNealy (2 minutes about Java and 20 minutes about Bill Gate's evil empire), and a performance by Stomp, but the final act was the clincher. It was a renown reporter, whose name escapes me, that was part of the White House press corp during the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations. He told stories about how the press did not talk about the personal lives of Presidents back then, about how Lyndon Johnson made Bill Clinton, who was being impeached, look like a choir boy, and then the big finish. He told us about a private interview with JFK where he mentioned rumors of a nuke built inside the Russian Embassy, just blocks from the Capitol. Apparently, it was smuggled in pieces using diplomatic exemptions and assembled in a lead-lined room in the top floor. Big enough to wipe out the entire metropolitan area, Kennedy responded, "You know about that, too, eh?"

  12. Constitution by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet the threat is real. Our leaders' failure to establish plans to ensure that our Constitution survives is irresponsible.'

    The majority of those leaders are a bigger threat to the survival of the Constitution where they are than if they are gone.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  13. Re:Nuking the Capital would destroy the government by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Really? Has no one really thought of that before?

    The problem with this is that most of the major officials are ELECTED. Unless we want to double the cost of running the government by electing understudies, that would mean the government would be left in the hands of unelected bureaucrats

    Sorry, but you're incorrect. Only the top 3 are elected......all the others in line are unelected cabinet members.

    US Presidential Line of Succession:

    1 Vice President of the United States
    2 Speaker of the House
    3 President pro tempore of the Senate
    4 Secretary of State
    5 Secretary of the Treasury
    6 Secretary of Defense
    7 Attorney General
    8 Secretary of the Interior
    9 Secretary of Agriculture
    10 Secretary of Commerce
    11 Secretary of Labor
    12 Secretary of Health and Human Services
    13 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
    14 Secretary of Transportation
    15 Secretary of Energy
    16 Secretary of Education
    17 Secretary of Veterans Affairs
    18 Secretary of Homeland Security

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  14. no no no by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a nuke took out DC, the military would take over in about... 15 minutes. Maybe 20. The "chain of command" bullshit is just window dressing for the naive. The banks and the military industrial complex run the USA. Period, end of story. The civilian government is maintained because it give people the illusion they have some political agency. They don't. So if a nuke ever took out DC, the next ruler of the USA would likely be the highest ranking general or admiral available and willing to step up and be the object of disgust. The first thing would be a "calm down, we're fixing this" statement to america, followed by a "we will set up new elections as soon as we can" statement, so the military industrial complex and the banking industry can go back to doing what they do best - looting the treasury in secret.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  15. Re:Why would anyone care? by lightknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On behalf of the American people, if our congressmen are stupid enough to get us into a conflict whereby it would be necessary to swear in someone a dozen people down from the President, then they deserve to burn. Why? Because any conflict that large will have the majority of the US population dead or near death, and Americans don't believe in protecting / rewarding politicians who get us killed.

    Putting the instigators in special bunkers, while the innocent have to fend for themselves against nuclear / biological / chemical weapons...it kind of sends the wrong message.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  16. Re:Why would anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a republic, the death of individual "leaders" should be unimportant. The strength and continuity of the nation, rests with the people, not the individuals that serve. Elected officials are no different than any other servant of the nation. They are expendable in a very general sense. To dedicate extraordinary efforts to their security seems unbalanced when they are so easily replaced.

  17. Re:Why would anyone care? by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a false meme to start with. Citation is from the Heritage Foundation, which might as well be the softer branch of the John Birch Society. It's a way to pronounce additional fear, embarrass the Obama Administration farther than it already is, and anchor more false paranoia.

    Summary: bad question, designed to be politically subversive to the current administration with propagandized memes.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  18. Taken care of back in the 1940s. There's a plan. by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in 1947, the present rules of presidential succession were set up. The present line of succession has 18 people. That ought to be enough.

    When this is a real worry, a few of those people should be in a bunker. During presidential inaugurations and presidential speeches to Congress, that's actually done; at least one person in the line of succession is in a safe place far away. It's usually someone far down the list, but in 2001 Dick Cheney (VP) was sent to the "undisclosed location", and in 2003, Ashcroft (AG) got bunker duty. In 2005, 2006, and 2007, the president pro tem of the Senate went to the bunker. In 2009, Holder (the AG) got the duty. Since then, after most of a decade with no significant terrorist attacks, it's back to the low-rankers.

    In terms of actual threat, nobody in the US presidential line of succession has ever been assassinated.

    This is a problem for which a solution was implemented long ago, back when a major war looked like a likely possibility.

  19. Re:Why would anyone care? by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You defend the Heritage Foundation, yet don't know who the Commerce Secretary was.

    This is your cognitive dissonance lesson for today.

    The legitimacy of the Heritage Foundation is rooted in its founder's ideals, and one of his admirers were specific Birchers. Birchers are very scary people.

    The foundation for the post is a political meme that is false and cloying, forwarded and advanced by an organization whose intents are well-defined.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.