Slashdot Mirror


Bryson Crash Reveals Threat of Headless Government

Hugh Pickens writes "According to Business Week, the traffic accident that left U.S. Commerce Secretary John Bryson unconscious and alone in his bashed-up Lexus on June 9 raises questions about why the 10th official in line to succeed the president was left so vulnerable. It also highlights potential gaps in security for senior U.S. government officials, who receive varying levels of protection. 'They lost track of him,' says James Carafano, a terrorism scholar at the Heritage Foundation. 'Post 9/11, that's a bit of a head scratcher.' Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who are high in the line of succession and have national-security responsibilities, are provided protection 24 hours a day, seven days a week, but other federal officials, even in cabinet-level positions or other top posts, often travel without the security details that even a big-city mayor or state governor would be provided. Threats to cabinet-level officials aren't overblown, says Norman Ornstein, a congressional scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, who has urged that the government revamp its succession plans and says a nuclear bomb hidden in a suitcase detonated in Washington could leave a headless government. 'The lack of interest in continuity may stem from the same reasons some smart people refuse to create wills, even though failure to do so leaves behind horrific messes for their loved ones,' writes Ornstein. 'Yet the threat is real. Our leaders' failure to establish plans to ensure that our Constitution survives is irresponsible.'"

16 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Who gives a shit by PNutts · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the Secretary of Education we have to protect. So say us all.

  2. Really 10th in line? by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly we narrowly escaped what would have been a disaster for our entire nation. Hyperbole much? Gee wiz

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Really 10th in line? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ya really. Aside from cabinet officials, you then have members of both legislative houses, theoretically the courts etc. Even the military.

      It's not like leadership wouldn't emerge, and if enough top level people just got killed you're mostly banking on whomever takes over to actually go ahead and still have future elections and so on, regardless of how exactly succession officially works.

      If you start spending huge amounts of money protecting every member of congress, every member of the senate, every senior cabinet member every assistant cabinet secretary, the courts, and then all of their immediate families etc. etc. etc. you're starting to look at billions of spending, and you start getting into serious questions about their ability to live lives relatively normally in fear of rare events.

      Sure a nuclear bomb blowing up a capital city (london paris washington etc.) would be more than a little problematic, but in that situation you can't even assume that the 2nd person in line to the throne/presidency is going to still have their mental faculties even if they are otherwise alive and physically uninjured. In that case someone will have to improvise leadership until order can be restored, assuming such a concept is even still relevant.

    2. Re:Really 10th in line? by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Informative

      We have a ridiculously long line of succession that we shouldn't be worried.

      President
      VP
      Speaker of the House
      President Pro Tem of the Senate
      15 cabinet secretaries, starting with the Secretary of State

      Really, you just need to protect the top 3-4, unless there's a particular threat to another one (Clinton as SoS gets special protection as a former first lady, for example). It would be nearly impossible to knock out the first 20. And if they did, the House would immediately elect a new Speaker, who would be elevated to president by being speaker. So really after that you get all the ranking members of the majority party. It's not worth worrying about.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:Really 10th in line? by riverat1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      During the State of the Union address there is always at least one official fairly high in the line of succession who does not attend the speech and stays in an undisclosed location specifically because of this issue.

    4. Re:Really 10th in line? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember reading (Apocryphal story alert.) that the Postmaster General (or Secretary of Veterans Affairs) was usually selected for this job, and they loved it. Usually it was an excuse to have a nice party offsite for the staff, but occasionally it meant a trip on Air Force One.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    5. Re:Really 10th in line? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a hardened bunker under the whitehouse. That's not exactly secret, but there are numerous others. There's a major centre in Pennsylvania, NORAD command etc.

      The raven rock facility (in Pennsylvania but on the border with maryland) was revealed in 2004 as where cheney spent most of the latter bit of 2001 hiding out. Blame (sort of) time magazine for that one. I'm not sure it was actually much of a secret where the facility was.

      Biden actually disclosed that there's a bunker in the vice presidents house in D.C. Which again, isn't a huge surprise. You'd have expected there to be bunkers of varying quality in official housing, and on various military bases and command and control centres.

       

    6. Re:Really 10th in line? by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh my gosh!

      You're questioning the wisdom that's been provided by representatives of the Heritage Foundation -and- the American Enterprise Institute? The very think-tanks that write the words that become the lines that the Republicans tow? The bastions of conservative intelligence that push for perpetual wars, and want and need the FEAR of the general populace against THEM to give them power?

      Oh my gosh!

    7. Re:Really 10th in line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It matters little. Our government would not be headless. There are a whole lot of corporate headquarters not located in Washington after all.

    8. Re:Really 10th in line? by careysub · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the lines that the Republicans tow?

      That would be toe, as in lining up the ends of your feet with a chosen line.

      He is coining a new figure of speech - we imagine legions of Republicans faithfully towing weighty barges of ideology.

      Quote apt, really.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  3. Re:lose track of all of them by Mitchell314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because we're supposed to be a civilized nation that doesn't kill people for difference of political opinion?

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  4. Re:protection by Fyzzler · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, you have to climb into a refrigerator to survive that.

    --
    I have one question. If the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture is not in charge of Gundam, then who is?
  5. Not a problem by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congress already lacks brains, ears, eyes, hearts, guts, and balls.

    I don't see how being headless would change much.

  6. Re:lose track of all of them by Alex+Belits · · Score: 5, Insightful

    civilized nation that doesn't kill people for difference of political opinion

    lol

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  7. Suitcase? Mice Nuts! by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The recent U.S. Open reminded me of the previous event at the Olympic Club, held near the end of the last millennium -- 1998. I was working for a company that was a big customer of Cadence. And Cadence put on the dog by inviting us and others to party in San Francisco to celebrate the Open (tickets, too). There were limos, a long pitch from Scott McNealy (2 minutes about Java and 20 minutes about Bill Gate's evil empire), and a performance by Stomp, but the final act was the clincher. It was a renown reporter, whose name escapes me, that was part of the White House press corp during the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations. He told stories about how the press did not talk about the personal lives of Presidents back then, about how Lyndon Johnson made Bill Clinton, who was being impeached, look like a choir boy, and then the big finish. He told us about a private interview with JFK where he mentioned rumors of a nuke built inside the Russian Embassy, just blocks from the Capitol. Apparently, it was smuggled in pieces using diplomatic exemptions and assembled in a lead-lined room in the top floor. Big enough to wipe out the entire metropolitan area, Kennedy responded, "You know about that, too, eh?"

  8. Re:Why would anyone care? by lightknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On behalf of the American people, if our congressmen are stupid enough to get us into a conflict whereby it would be necessary to swear in someone a dozen people down from the President, then they deserve to burn. Why? Because any conflict that large will have the majority of the US population dead or near death, and Americans don't believe in protecting / rewarding politicians who get us killed.

    Putting the instigators in special bunkers, while the innocent have to fend for themselves against nuclear / biological / chemical weapons...it kind of sends the wrong message.

    --
    I am John Hurt.