Slashdot Mirror


While the U.S. and Iran Negotiate, War Commences In Cyberspace

An anonymous reader writes "A series of reports shows that the U.S. and Israel are engaged in a cyber war with Iran to stop it from developing nuclear weapons. Oddly enough, at the same time, the United States and others nations are trying to negotiate with Iran. As America and others start the world's first undeclared cyber-wars, dangerous precedents are being set that this type of warfare is without consequences. Such ideas could not be further from from truth."

5 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Re:United States playing the role of 1941 Japan by kamapuaa · · Score: 5, Informative

    . The U.S. had already been at war against Japan for several years, bombing & killing their soldiers in China

    What? No. They had an oil embargo, but that was a peanut response to the occupation and attempted colonization of China, which America was nominal allies with.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  2. Re:United States playing the role of 1941 Japan by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Flying Tigers were not US Military -- they were a force of trained Pilots who volunteered their service to a non-US Military effort out of a personal interest and as such, took their lives into their own hands -- hence the Blood Chit that the Tigers had tacked to the back of their flight jackets since the US had no significant military presence in the theatre to perform rescue operations on downed pilots and any US forces present were engaged in civilian relief operations and humanitarian roles only.

    So no -- the US was not at war with Japan prior to Pearl Harbor.

  3. Re:United States playing the role of 1941 Japan by gutnor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interesting comment. Let's talk about 9/11 then, what was the role of Afghanistan and why did the US bombed them ?

  4. Re:Make Cybersex not Cyberwar by Sasayaki · · Score: 3, Informative

    Funny, a quick browse of the threads shows a broad spectrum of opinion, civil discussion for the large part (minus one +5 about the US sticking its dick in the asses of every country in the world then invading when they retaliate), and a lot of facts and citations and interesting discussion.

    Perhaps what you're trying to say is, "Not everyone agrees with me and this is horrible! Groupthink! Censorship!".

    Bonus points: You called Iran a "3rd world theocracy". Do you know who made them into a theocracy by actively overthrowing the democratically elected, reasonably secular leader and installing hardline fundamentalists? I'll give you one guess.

    --
    Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
  5. Re:dude by LeperPuppet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Going the DIY route for a complete software stack isn't a magic solution to hackers. It's damn hard to write secure software and expecting any organised group to rewrite all its own software from the ground up without introducing its own set of new security holes is ridiculous. Reinventing the wheel is wasteful and likely to produce an inferior wheel. Iran deciding to roll its own software from scratch would be a massive boon for the American and Israeli hackers.

    Even if Iran were to choose to go down this path, its unlikely that they have enough qualified manpower to do the job. What you're suggesting is that Iran essentially creates something similar in scope to a Linux distro and a complete network infrastructure, except building the entire thing from scratch or known good components. Now imagine trying to do this with less manpower and no help from hardware manufacturers. It would take years to produce anything that is halfway usable and they'd still be introducing the same sorts of beginner's errors that the current designers have already made and fixed in their products.