Slashdot Mirror


France Ending Minitel Service

New submitter pays-vert writes "On Saturday, France will turn off the Minitel service. A forerunner of the world wide web, Minitel provided news, online banking and, yes, porn via a chic plug'n'play terminal. The service remained massively popular for a while even after the rise of the Internet, but ultimately has lost out to technological innovation. 'About 400,000 of the machines are still in use across the country, but perhaps most affected will be Brittany, where the devices were developed, and where many farmers still depend on them. ... Internet service spread much more slowly in France than it did elsewhere in Europe or in the United States, largely because of the popularity of the Minitel, historians say. Only around the turn of the century did the Internet come to much of this soggy western region, an expanse of green that bulges out into the Atlantic Ocean. The Minitel was hugely useful to farmers. Realizing that the devices could save time and money, local agricultural organizations developed programs for farmers to, say, track pork prices, inform the authorities of animal births and deaths, or consult the results of chemical tests on milk.'"

51 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. The dead past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Internet service spread much more slowly in France than it did elsewhere in Europe or in the United States, largely because of the popularity of the Minitel, historians say

    Now we consult historians to find out about the spread of the internet? That makes me feel old :(

    1. Re:The dead past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's completely misleading. The Minitel was popular because there was no Internet. Then the internet was available, and it was not successful because you had to pay every minute of connection to France Telecom (monopoly, high prices) on top of the fee given to your provider.

      When I heard that local communications were free in the US, I couldn't believe it. It was really expensive in France up to the years 2000.

    2. Re:The dead past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right. The Internet was for rich people who could afford to wait 30 seconds for a picture to download. The Minitel was for everyone else (almost as you still had to pay the connection) but you didn't need to buy a computer (the Minitel was almost given for free).

    3. Re:The dead past by gallondr00nk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like a prime example of whyt government should not interfere with the free market's natural processes (except basic workers' rights protections).

      Because one overreaching umbrella way of doing things obviously works for practically everything. Sigh.

      I've got karma to burn, so here's a postscript. Fuck the free market. Enjoy cheering and waving the banner for the ideology which is hammering away at your living standards.

      Unleashed capitalism is just as gross and obscene as any other ideology that is mistakenly viewed as gospel.

    4. Re:The dead past by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Unleashed capitalism is just as gross and obscene as any other ideology that is mistakenly viewed as gospel.

      There has never been unleashed capitalism. It has always been crony capitalism, fat cats running both government and the corporations.

      If government didn't reserve the prosecution arena to itself, if ordinary citizens could bring charges against the fat cats in both governments and corporations, then you might have real capitalism.

      The problem with people who think we have ever had, or still have, laissez-faire or unleashed capitalism is that the only alternative they can imagine is more and more government. Socialists and corporatists have in common a complete mistrust of individuals thinking for themselves, the idea that only an elite, of which they are a part, can guide the masses. This idea scares them so much that they would rather have a government run by their ideological opponents than have little state at all.

      My big disappointment with the Occupy movement is that they think government might want to rescue them from Wall Street, that they are so naive as to not recognize the two sects represent the iron fist and velvet glove, cycling back and forth so often that ir is impossible to tell which role the fat cats are playing at any given moment. The Tea Party, for all its other stupidities ("Keep your government hands off my Medicare"), at least recognized they had to change government and did get a bunch of politicians elected who did make some changes. But they too are naive to think they can have any permanent effect.

    5. Re:The dead past by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, web usage was slower to pick up in France because a lot of the services that the Internet offered were already on Minitel, and, at least in the early betters, much better on Minitel. Want to find movie or theater times? Minitel had it, Internet didn't. Wanted to have some hot times with some 18-year old who really was a 45 year old man out in the middle of nowhere? Minitel had it, Internet didn't. Wanted to play games that were actually better than what Farmville offers now? Minitel had it.

      The Internet had a hard time in France because the existing system was actually better. Starting mid- to late-nineties, all of that changed, of course. But to argue that government interference prevented the better technology from taking off is ass-backwards: government interference created the better technology. Minitel only was overtaken once the network effect, technological advances and yes, the free market, provided better alternatives.

      RIP Minitel, it was awesome. And it's games were still beyond a lot of the cruft that passes as games on Facebook.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    6. Re:The dead past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wasn't the "internet" mostly developed by government funded institutions (military, research institutions....)? Makes me wonder....

    7. Re:The dead past by sirlark · · Score: 2

      No, socialists don't mistrust individuals thinking for themselves. They distrust individuals ACTING for themselves unchecked, and binding together to anonymise and abbrogate individual responsibility for collective action, usually in guise of practising business. I might trust a man with my life, but never a businessman. I like my life even when it isn't profitable for someone else, and I don't see why it has be proftiable to someone else at all.

    8. Re:The dead past by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Competing products either did not exist or were extremely limited in scope. By having a huge number of customers Minitel could offer stuff that we did not see elsewhere until mid 90s. It did not stifle technology, instead it was at the forefront. Yes it stagnaged later on but it was not necessarily because of government interference, but more likely the private companies that adminstered it were slow to adapt.

  2. [...], historians say by rbrausse · · Score: 2, Funny

    we need historians to get informations about an only 30 year old technology?

    not a good sign for human knowledge, 30 years are within this generation, not some long forgotten aeon...

    1. Re:[...], historians say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We need historians to keep track of certain causes and effects of that 30 year old technology. It's really not something that your average network engineer is good at.

    2. Re:[...], historians say by JustOK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What? You want a whale biologist?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:[...], historians say by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What would you call them? Journalists? Perhaps - there certainly are journalists that write about things several decades ago. But that sort of time frame IS history. It is long enough ago that one has time to gather information about it from many times and try to synthesize something resembling 'the truth'. It is a long enough time that many people forget both the event and the lesson.

      How many people on Slashdot were around during Minitel's heyday? Perhaps half of us? How many people on Slashdot are hearing about Minitel for the first time in this article?

      Yeah it's history and now please, off my lawn.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:[...], historians say by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      I'm Australian, and never stepped foot in France but I'd definitely heard of Minitel. Hell, as I recall, there were parts of my high school French text book that discussed it. It was something the French were very proud of back in the 80s and 90s, and rightly so, as it was massively popular before the WWW was just a twinkle in someone's eye...

    5. Re:[...], historians say by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      we need historians to get informations about an only 30 year old technology?

      It's nothing new. From the introduction to Only Yesterday: An Informal History of the 1920's by historian Frederick Lewis Allen

      Obviously the writing of a history so soon after the event has involved breaking much new ground...

      Further research will undoubtedly disclose errors and deficiencies in the book, and the passage of time will reveal the shortsightedness of many of my judgments and interpretations. A contemporary history is bound to be anything but definitive. Yet half the enjoyment of writing it has lain in the effort to reduce to some sort of logical and coherent order a mass of material untouched by any previous historian; and I have wondered whether some readers might not be interested and perhaps amused to find events and circumstances which they remember well which seem to have happened only yesterday-woven into a pattern which at least masquerades as history. One advantage the book will have over most histories: hardly anyone old enough to read it can fail to remember the entire period with which it deals.

      The linked book (posted in full at the link) was required reading in an undergrad general studies history class I took in the late 1970s. It was published in 1933 and concerned the 1920s.

  3. Re:forerunner to web, but not internet by Lord+Lode · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, that's what the summary said: "... A forerunner of the world wide web, Minitel ..."

  4. Going down kicking and screaming by retroworks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's most interesting about Minitel is not the "historical" origins 30 years ago, but the way the French Government kept subsidizing it up until 2012. It was already presque obsolete when AOL was on the rise, but the tax dollars just kept it going. Government isn't that bad at developing something new (NASA, nuclear power), but it does a pretty bad job of management if it decides to stay "in the business".

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fact that it was working just fine and the population liked and used it will be ignored for the brief moment that your comment is read.

    2. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      But there is nothing wrong with keeping a good service up and running. The fact the article also attributes Minitel to be a working techology allowing a more free marked, means that its the kind of thing a goverment should subsidize. The second issue that there is no reason to lay down a service just because it got more modern competitors, because information fetching via one dedicated portal is effective now as back in 1990s. If it works, nothing is wrong with it.
      Also, why did AOL and the Internet make it obsolote? What if there was no satisfactionary good webpages to replace the service?

    3. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by hey_popey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The fact that it was working just fine and the population liked and used it will be ignored for the brief moment that your comment is read.

      In that case, the fact that it was a horribly ugly and slow even compared to 56k Internet (compare it to an old black-and-white teletext) should also be ignored. I forgot to mention the outrageous charges, even to connect to public administration services; I remember myself waiting for some nation-wide exam results to display, the connection timer was the real source of stress, not the results!

    4. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it isn't a terribly big surprise that, in France, the subsidization happened to be a directly state matter, one should really keep in mind the broader context:

      Minitel was, to no small degree, integrated into the telco infrastructure of the day(not just 'placed on top of it, because it has to be on top of something', like the ad-hoc BBSes or the eventual internet. And, unfortunately, telco(especially, but not exclusively, wireline telco) is one of the worst industries in the contemporary world when it comes to severely dubious state support. Whether it be the overtly state-owned and schlerotic monopoly telco companies, or the 'regulated'(ha, ha, ha) oligopoly-with-regionally-monopolistic-characteristics that passes for a 'free market' in telecommunications services, telcos worldwide historically(and frequently to the present day) are up to their bloody eyeballs in the worst sorts of state tie-ins, whether honestly labelled as such or not.

      Had some of the 'future of the telephone' stuff that Bell was always making videos about in the 60's ever actually been executed, it likely would have been in exactly the same place.

      Really, that's the thing that makes the internet more interesting: Not because it developed in a situation of more enlightened telcom policy(it basically didn't); but because Ma Bell was too caught up in her own line-switched rentseeking circlejerk to notice it before it had grown substantially...

    5. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by Coeurderoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      What makes you think that the french government keeped subsidizing it, it was a cash cow for the government when france telecom was still a mostly "public" company, the high revenue of 3615 (mostly "hot stuff") was bringing billions to the government.

      I'm sure that Bercy (the french Finance Ministery) are still having wet dreams about milking as much from the internet..

      They are closing it because only the "cheapest" service are still around.
      The way it worked is that you could (as a service provider) choose :
      Service Operators pays all (only rare very specialized services worked that way) (nbr 3613)
      Service Operators pays nothing, the user pay little (most "public services", and most of what survives till the end of this week) (nbr 3614)
      Service Operators get a little, the user pays more (nbr 3615)
      Service Operators get a lot, the user pays a lot (nbr 3617)
      Most services where 3615, but now most services ar 3613, and with the number of terminals going from 20 Millions*Lots of hours to 400 K * few hours it probably only now starts to cost more maintaining the service than it generates revenues.

    6. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by C_amiga_fan · · Score: 2

      Yes Minitel was liked. Just as I like my ancient Commodore 64. And my amish neighbors like horse-drawn carriages. That doesn't mean the government should be wasting taxpayer dollars building obsolete C64s and carriages. Turn-over the job to the free market to make the carriages.

      --
      FREE magazine : http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/prior/
    7. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Sorry, I should have been a touch more specific: US telcos have certainly done their level best to extract rents from everybody who touches their lines, even when that touching has already been paid for once at agreed rates(everything from your modem fee, to the period of trying to make home router connection-sharing an extra-cost option, to the persistent demands that internet companies should pay for access to "their consumers"); but they've never really had any luck, and frequently not much interest, in trying to actually develop walled-garden services of their own, rather than merely throwing up tollbooths on the same copper they were comfortable using to route voice calls.

      The various BBSes and pre-internet service providers were largely unaffiliated with the telephone guys, and even the(much later) attempts by cell carriers to build captive marketplaces(despite controlling the handset, the software it ran, having an existing billing infrastructure, and controlling the customer's access to 3rd-party competitors) were pitiful failures.

      Had Ma Bell snapped up Compuserve, or cloned it, we might have had a much more Minitel like situation well into the present...

    8. Re:Going down kicking and screaming by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      But Minitel would not have existed without the government help, the free market was not creating these services at that time. The similar products to Minitel came somewhat later and did not reach the same size as Minitel, and nothing came close to the same per-capita usage until the late 90s.

      The government is good at creating new stuff especially if an infrastructure is needed to make it work but bad at maintaining it later (as the ancestor posts states). But businesses in contrast are very often bad at creating something new if there's no immediate short term economic gain from it or if it's unclear if the idea will succeed in the future, even if they're good at squeezing every last penny out of them once it's going.

      France did turn over control to private entities (France Telecom) so its stagnation can't really be blamed on the French government.

  5. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man outside castle: Hey, you there! Do you think your lord would like an internet?

    Man on battlements: Ah don't think he'll be interested. See, he's already got one. [whispers] Ah told zem we got one already [sniggers]

    MOC: Can we see it?

    MOB: No. [whispers to man next to him] Fetchez la vache.

    MOC: RUN AWAY!!!!!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. The one thing that Minitel had by obarthelemy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    was easy billing of services: depending on a service's call number, several billing levels were available (from free to more than $10/min), and the user was aware of how much each number cost. That's the micropayment thingy the Internet never got right. I remember having to beg to Minitel guys to subsidize me when I was doing Web stuff for a TV station ^^

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:The one thing that Minitel had by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not quite the same. The minitel was.. wait for it... network neutral. Any provider (not just your ISP) could use it to deliver and bill for services. Plus billing was handled by the network operator (France Telecom at the time) which saved having to setup up credit-card/paypal/account billing, though you could still do that and go for free connection+login. It allowed micropayments (well, very low time rate), which are still an issue on the Web.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  7. Re:forerunner to web, but not internet by Bigby · · Score: 2

    ... The service remained massively popular for a while even after the rise of the Internet. ...

    The rest of the summary showed different.

  8. Re:of course by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except the WWW was created by an Englishman while at CERN (on the border of France and Switzerland). The domain system may well be controlled by the US Govt. (Dept. Commerce, -> ICANN) by the WWW is not. If that makes sense.

    And it was hardly political either. Minitel lost out because they stopped innovating, because they were not truly global, and most importantly, because they were not open. To get a service on Minitel required approval, it was just another walled garden, like the various USA options which also died (though earlier). Minitel lost to openness, and the ability for anyone to join without approval from a monopoly corporation.

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
  9. Minitel lasted because it was useful by ReallyEvilCanine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Until some time around 1997, exploring simple travel plans, booking and paying for them was a fucking nightmare for the rest of the world; they'd been doing it for more than a decade already in France, via a system which was very fast (remember those shitty 33.6K & X2 modems?) and very convenient. Standardised. Without pop-ups.

    Germany's Post monopoly prevented this and instead buit the BTX system, designed to make profits, primarily for the Post (fmr. Telekom parent), and because phone costs were so high. getting on-line was a terribly expensive proposition in Germany until the Post monopoly was broken up.

  10. Re:forerunner to web, but not internet by k(wi)r(kipedia) · · Score: 2

    The Minitel looks more like a wide-area BBS system and not like the horrendous Flash-infested "web" sites we have today. Like a BBS, Minitel was a closed network with a text-based interface. Of course the first incarnation of the Web wasn't that much different, and there are still text-mode browsers around.

  11. Re:forerunner to web, but not internet by Coeurderoy · · Score: 2

    Arpanet predates the minitel in some ways, but the minitel started commercial services in 80/81, and in 84 there where thousend of services and millions of users.
    the "Internet" had almost no services except email and ftp before the 90s.

    In practice it represents an "alternative reality" to the Internet and cannot really be seen as a fore or post runner, but a similar tool that created a large industry.
    And most french "Internet Successes" where started by Minitel entrepreuneurs, only now after about 15 years of "Internet" do we start to have people who create Internet businesses without having first dabbled in the Minitel.
    It didn't replace the silicon valley, but it definitivelly gave a "leg up" to france in comparision to other "competitors"

  12. Re:MiniTel was a Come-Lately, too late, too little by Coeurderoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe you where not around in 82, or didn't go to france in the 80s.
    What France Telecom invented (probably by accident) is that under some circumstances you can "let go".

    So they acctually accepted that other companies would make money on their network, they provided the terminal, the infrastructure and the billing but allmost all the rest where in the hand of a lot of various private company.

    When the first "book shop on the internet" came out in the early 90s there where about 40 000 Minitel services and at least 5 active book shops.

  13. We had it (briefly) here in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    US Videotel, based in Texas, tried it out in Houston and DFW. I worked for them for a while and it was actually pretty useful to get people who couldn't afford a computer "online". It was just a dumb b/w terminal with ANSI graphics and text services, but for many of us it was pretty nifty. The main competition at the time were Delphi and CompuServe which required a (>$100's) computer. The Mini-tel could be had for a nominal monthly fee.

  14. Re:3515 ULLA by bourdux · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK, I've sobered up. Just for information, I was born in the 80's in France and am now a researcher computer science researcher at the other end of the world, in Japan. Minitel is what drove me into computer science as I would dream of any career that would let me touch a keyboard at that tine. ind you, secretaries were still using typewriters in France at that time. 3515 ULLA was the equivalent of adultfriendfinder at that time and had paper ads all over countryside roads, usually on electrical installations such as transformers. Minitel might not have been the best of models, but it was in line with the current French policy at that time, which tried to be independent of USA at any cost. We had even our own Micro-computer models made by Thompon (a.k.a Technicolor). Even if unpractical overall, Minitel prepared the French population for the use of the Internet afterwards, making France one of the most active population on the Internet afterwards. So, R.I.P Minitel, we value what you brought to our nation. You will always have a place in our hearts.

  15. Re:Minitel dating by mekkab · · Score: 2

    the 3615 stuff is absolutely fascinating; sort of like how p0rn blazed a trail for the home video systems of the 80's (VHS, et. al.).

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  16. flag whole article flame bait by CharmElCheikh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "many farmers still depend on them. ... Internet service spread much more slowly in France than it did elsewhere in Europe or in the United States, largely because of the popularity of the Minitel, historians say. Only around the turn of the century did the Internet come to much of this soggy western region"

    Seriously? Farmers depend on Minitel? I never saw that in my "soggy wester region", Normandy. Also, care to give citations for what I bolded out? Hell in the US there are still vast portions of the country very, very badly covered by high speed internet access or not at all which isn't true in France. Who are these "historians"?

    Was this article written by a Texan rancher who still strikes out "French fries" on restaurant menus to write "Liberty fries"?

    --
    My /. user ID is probably higher than yours
    1. Re:flag whole article flame bait by bourdux · · Score: 3, Funny

      Am from Normandy too and would have modded you up if I didn't contribute to the topic myself. P'tet ben que les fermiers y zen avaient ren a fout des minitels.

  17. Off to the bitbucket with my other friends by water-and-sewer · · Score: 2

    Sorry Minitel - I never knew you. But say hello to some friends of mine: BBS, Gopher, Usenet, and Telnet. All cool things at the time, all superceded by bigger and better. But at the time they were like magic.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  18. Modems killed Internet by bourdux · · Score: 2

    I was born in Western France and I remember that Minitels started to die when modems became more common in France. Many people bought modems to have access to fax functions, as buying a fax machine was damn expensive at that time. In France, modems usually came bundled with minitel emulators, inciting buyers to not buy extra monthly cost for minitel rent to France Telecom. I remember making my scholarship applications for university on the Minitel for a couple of years until they had a decent Internet website. Everybody gave up on the Minitel already but terminals were still available around campuses just for this purpose. Then they saw less and less students queuing for the few number of terminals and flocking to the computer room, at a time where personal Internet access was not common yet. Web browser usability beats minitels phone-like menus a hundred folds. They then discarded the minitels. RIP minitel, you were part of my life and I will never forget you.

  19. Minitel created the french ISPs of today by Herve5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One forgotten thing in these comments (or did I skip?) is, in an era just without internet, spending lots of time on semiporn chatting on Minitels appears to have raised so much money than it turned these service owners into billionnaires.

    The current owner of Free, which is I believe the largest french ISP after the ex-state monopoly France telecom, started as a minitel porn service supplier. Then he just used his millions to switch to ISP.

    Many french themselves have forgotten this, and here Free has quite a good aura today...

    So, while I seriously doubt Minitel service was costing much to the state, it definitely raised huge amounts of silly guys' money into sex chat providers pockets.

    These, are our present internet landlords here.
    And there are people around that still think theyr work will better the country.

    --
    Herve S.
  20. Yes, obviously Minitel was a monopolistic mistake` by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The French government should have realised in the 1970s that the beacon of the Free World (tm) the Good Old U S of A was soon to give us grateful peasents the internet and shouldn't have bothered trying to provide an extremely useful data service 15 years ahead of its time for its citizens. Because no competition means is a Bad Thing. Unless of course its the US govn. or company then its a different matter.

    You know what, just fuck off you yankee prick.

  21. Breton farmers do NOT depend on Minitel. Grrrr. by evilandi · · Score: 5, Informative

    OP: "perhaps most affected will be Brittany, where the devices were developed, and where many farmers still depend on them."

    Sorry, but that is what we Europeans call "bollocks". I was in Brittany two weeks ago, in a campsite in the middle of nowhere, and it was saturated in 3G/HSDPA mobile broadband. I drove all round the place, 3G everywhere. Decent stuff, too, was browsing BBC News at snappy speeds, even video worked fine.

    Campsite I stayed in had Wifi on about a 4 meg connection, probably ADSL, middle of nowhere. Restaurants and cafes in villages and market towns, ditto. The "Domain de Kerlan" campsite I used last year even had wi-fi to *every* *single* *plot*. So stop this "farmers still depend on dumb terminals with 1.2 kilobit modems" bullshit.

    France is not very big, only twice the size of the UK. It's not like the USA where there are thousands of miles of empty rural plains. It was dead easy to wire up the whole country for ADSL. That happened a decade ago. The furthest you'll ever get from a city of at least 50,000 people is about twenty-five miles, and I can't think of *any* part of France that is more than five miles from a village of at least 2,000 people.

    What's more, French farmers are usually part of a local co-operative who bulk-buy engineering and technology gear at discounted rates (for example, they tend to club together to buy tractors or combine harvesters). I sincerely doubt there is any large farm that wants ADSL, or at least ISDN, that can't get it; French farmers are fscking *minted*.

    "Many farmers still depend on Minitel". My arse.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Breton farmers do NOT depend on Minitel. Grrrr. by heson · · Score: 2

      "Many farmers still depend on Minitel". My arse.

      Of course they do depend on minitel, it is all they know, and they had no urgent need to switch until now.

      I depend on my apartment, it is a crappy one in a (relatively for the region) bad neighborhood but moving involves lots of work and I can not be bothered.

  22. Re:MiniTel was a Come-Lately, too late, too little by YodaSensei · · Score: 2

    Interesting.

    I always saw the minitel as a technological leap forwards (the first data network targeted at the general public), and a terrible anchor that weighted us down and prevented most of us French people from moving to the Internet : that's the usual consensus about the impact of the Internet on the human beings that used/could have used it.

    But I never looked at it from the interactions between the technological service provider and the business models relying on such new media.

  23. Me! Me! I was there! by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Informative

    How many people on Slashdot were around during Minitel's heyday? Perhaps half of us? How many people on Slashdot are hearing about Minitel for the first time in this article?

    I was very much around, and followed Minitel's development with interest. I've used Minitel on visits to France. It filled a need. It worked.

    Lots of people at the time thought teletext was the way to go. In a sense it was, in the days when 1200 baud was considered a fast modem. Remember Prestel (U.K.)? Remember all the hype about Telidon (Canada)? And how little we have to show for it?

    At one time all the ads in French magazines and stuff quoted Minitel codes, almost invariably 3615. Now they all have URLs.

    ...laura

  24. Re:MiniTel was a Come-Lately, too late, too little by Coeurderoy · · Score: 2

    In practice it is the relative efficiency of the business model that slowed down the move to internet.
    I remember very well when I was offering internet on-line service development to french customers, many told me that they would wait until "The Internet" would come to its sense and offer a revenue share similar to the minitel...
    (At least with them you could speak, the ones who believed that anyway Microsoft would offer a "better" solution never buyed anything :-))...

    But is was a fun time :-)

  25. It was deployed in the US, too. by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's not well known, but Minitel, the French system, was deployed in the US. Local dial-up ports were available in most US cities. The system was run by Telecom France, and gave access to both lightly used US services and the full network in France. I used to have an account on it. There was no extra charge for communicating across the Atlantic, so the service was useful to anyone who had people to talk to in France.

    Minitel had a delightful culture in some ways. People wrote poetry on the dating services.

  26. Re:Yes, obviously Minitel was a monopolistic mista by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

    You have absolutely no idea what Minitel was offering. You know how now, everyone has a www., and ads are frequently just attempts to get you to a website? Right around 1990, that's what the 3615 in the ads were - merely a way to get you to use their Minitel service.

    BBS my ass. I know what those looked like, and there was absolutely nothing in them that could compete with the Minitel services.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  27. Meeting Service by eulernet · · Score: 2

    It was also a wonderful tool to meet people.

    I met my wife on the Minitel 17 years ago.

    Since there was a double pricing (3614 was cheap, and 3615 was expensive), men had access to the 3615 part of meeting sites, while women had access to the 3614 part.