Cat Parasite May Increase Risk of Suicide In Humans
An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the University of Maryland analyzing meticulous data collected by Danish authorities have identified a positive correlation between suicides among women with infection with the fairly common parasite T. gondii. Carriers were 53 percent more likely to commit suicide in a sample of 45,000 Danish women monitored for over a decade (researchers believe that the same correlation likely exists for men). Increased susceptibility to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder was also discovered. The physiological mechanism has not been determined, although some speculation centers around changes to dopamine levels. Two intriguing aspects were noted: 1) human infection often (but not always) begins by exposure to cats carrying the parasite, for example, by changing an infected animal's litter; and 2) the parasite spreads itself by infecting the nervous system of rodents, causing them to become suicidally attracted to feline odors which will increase the likelihood of their hosts being eaten by cats, whose digestive tracts provide the preferred environment for parasite reproduction."
...but it's still okay to eat cats, right? I mean, as long as you avoid the digestive organs?
Do the crazy cat ladies have cats because they are crazy, or are they crazy because they have cats?
Which came first? Crazy cat lady got 20 cats because she is crazy, or cat lady went crazy because she has 20 cats?
Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
sure, this looks like valid research, until you see the citations
Resurch dun by Carnegie Meloncat Institute fellows:
Hovercat
Longcat
Dunecat
with speshul thx 2 cieling cat hoo make all tings possible
(obligatory)
But what if terrorists find a way to use this?
They are a menace to public health.
That's what people would say if cats were ugly, anyway. But they are cute, so they are permitted to carry disease. Only ugly species are eligable for culling.
The first stage in the evolution of the Gou'ald has begun.
The purpose of the behavioral change in rats is to get the rat gobbled up by a cat so that the parasite could reproduce. I wonder if toxoplasmosis in humans promotes reckless and suicidal behavior. This would give the parasite another opportunity to reproduce. Just imagine 50,000 years ago a suicidal or reckless person decided to taunt a hungry tiger. One strike by the annoyed tiger, and the toxoplasmosis would have access to a warm cat gut to reproduce. Isn't nature wonderful
Once the cats perfect this virus it's all over...
Suicidally? Being attracted to something known to shorten your lifespan doesn't mean you're suicidal. Take one example: Americans gorging themselves on McDonald's, then flooding hospitals with heart disease cases in an attempt to stay alive. If they were suicidal, they'd just keep eating more burgers and look emo about it till they died.
Also evidence of correlation with religion ; a higher incidence than average amongst Muslims and Christians (a shame this study didn't assay Atheists though).
A 50% increase is statistically significant, but in absolute numbers wouldn't make that much of a difference, certainly well under the "killed by cars" number, and we don't care enough about that to actually fix the problem.
What I see out of this, and others like it, is that there are a large number of diseases we get infected with over our lives that never leave us, and have effects well into our old age. We wouldn't have "evolved" out of them because the evolutionary pressure for things that don't affect us until after we've passed on our genes is small and indirect. How many "diseases" and infections do we have by the time we are die? What would our old age be like if we managed to avoid/cure them all?
Learn to love Alaska
Of course, my evidence consists of multiple repeated viewings of Tom and Jerry, Sylvester and Tweety, and Pinky and the Brain, but according to my research, it's exposure to Mince and Rats that creates suicidal tendencies in Cats.
Just saying.
Narf.
I can see the fnords!
There is no "Uninformative" to mod you down.
Yeah they've done plenty of studies linking various changes in human behavior to toxoplasmosis infection. Your claim is so strange that I almost wonder if you're part of the pro-toxoplasmosis conspiracy or maybe you're a toxoplasmosis forcing a crazy cat lady to type these things.
Hey, I'm a crazy cat MAN, you insensitive chauvinist clod!
The Danish study is just the latest in a long series of studies which demonstrate a correlation between toxoplasmosis seropositivity and psychiatric problems-- it's been linked to schizophrenia and ADHD, and so on. Wikipedia has a good article on the topic.
It's pretty interesting. Apparently something like 10% of the US population is seropositive for toxo. The infection is thought to be "contained" immunologically, but encysted organisms are still present in muscle and nervous tissue, and the process of "containment" may induce a subtle inflammatory state which affects a broad variety of neurotransmitters (not just dopamine). It's also possible that the causation works the other way-- the people who get chronic infections may have something about their immune system that is different to begin with, and the difference might predispose them to psychiatric problems independently of toxo infection. Good discussion of all that in the Danish study, which was published in Archives of General Psych and seems to be non-paywalled.
What will be really interesting is to see what happens if you identify psychiatric patients with chronic toxo and try to eradicate the toxo with antibiotics-- do their psych symptoms improve? There have been at least two studies I could find (one where it helped and one where it didn't), and apparently there's a large-scale study getting started in the UK.
Subj says it all. Others may have noticed the same.
Could those in the extra 53% suicidal women have suffered earlier miscarriages, by any chance?
For people who are wondering, it looks like they didn't have a good control group. So here is how they answered some potential objections:
1) What if depressed people get cats, and that's why they have the parasite? Did they check people who have cats but aren't depressed?
It's probably not related to cats, because most people who get this parasite get it from undercooked meat.
2) What if depressed people are more susceptible to this parasite because they are depressed? What if non-depressed people are capable of fighting off the parasite with a stronger immune system?
There was no correlation between people who had the parasite, and people who had a history of mental illness. (Also, correlates with other studies, that might have had better control groups, I'm too lazy to check them out to see).
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Hello, looks like you've thought up an objection within 5 seconds of reading the summary. Given that these scientists have spent several years working on this project, you don't think they could have also thought of something similar, do you? Oh wait, they did.
Next time, please at least read the article before spreading your inanity. Scientists usually think of the simple stuff.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
You seem to know about this field. Can you translate this part for me?
Separate logistic regression for RhD-negative subjects showed a 2.53 times higher risk of traffic accidents in Toxoplasma-infected than Toxoplasma-free subjects (CI95: 1.12–5.7, t = 2.23, P = 0.026). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/72
Are they really saying that this is causing "2.53 times higher risk of traffic accidents" among their infected population of Czech male military draftees???
Imagine the repercussions if this is found to be also true in other populations (not that it will be, and not that correlation equals causation, but...):
Car Insurance rates (or driver licenses) could start depending on the results of those blood tests. Criminal sentencing could be affected by the results of those tests. And at the very minimum, the next time you'd fill out a questionnaire for getting car insurance, or filling out an application for becoming a truck driver or operating heavy machinery, or applying to get into the military, you'd be asked all kinds of questions about your history with cats (whether you owned one, your significant other owned one, or whether your family ever owned one while you were growing up).
http://www.nursingtimes.net/home/clinical-specialisms/infection-control/cat-ladies-suicide-risk-probed/5046843.article?blocktitle=Behind-the-Headlines&contentID=4530
British rednecks
I know what you're trying to say, but this is a contradiction in terms. There is no sun in Britain to give anyone a red neck.
Crazy or just plain HOT? You decide :)
I think it T. gondii attacks some regulatory function in the brain that inhibits risk-taking behavior, which for rodents is associated via different mechanisms with the detection of cats and other predators.
The rodents in question remain afraid of open spaces and unfamiliar foods. The only thing that appears to be targeted is the fear of cat urine.
My cat has a better life than me, you insensitive clod!
Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
Maybe Toxoplasma gondii merely causes its hosts to engage in higher risk behaviours. In the wild, for small prey animals such as rats and mice, that is likely to be lethal and result in being eaten by a suitable carrier, but in this artificial environment we live in, perhaps it manifests in other ways. For example, flouting controlled substance laws to gamble 20-30 IQ points against a little temporary euphoria - then bragging about it - that sort of thing.
Ahh - My eye!
The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
Dakhaas literally means roofrabbit and refers to the fact that if you cut the legs, you can pass cat for rabbit. Not in practice anymore but we did have the hungerwinter here thanks to the Americans being to scared to advance and leave the British and Polish forces without backup.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
Most countries now have a ban on having humans as slaves so why not have a ban on animals as slave as well?
Because that would be stupid.
In addition to it being torture on the animal it will have all sorts of negative effects on humans, and this is just one of them. Having animals as "pets" essentially holding them prisoner. We have come to a point we no longer need animals for anything whether it is food, clothing, companionship, rescue, etc. Most countries now have a ban on having humans as slaves so why not have a ban on animals as slave as well?
Good luck trying to keep a cat prisoner.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
How can you be certain they work via a mechanism other than the parasite?
Take a few random specimen of the felidae family.
For each specimen, compare the young baby with the adult.
- lion cub and adult lion
- kitten and adult house cat
etc.
Notice anything peculiar? Unlike the wilder specimen, house cats tend to retain much more juvenile caracteristics: bigger eyes, more fluffy. (And that works also for noise: most bigger cats tend to be silent, or occasionnaly express deep menacing roars. Only house cats (even more than alley cats) tend to meow a lot, and keep a rather high-pitched voice). etc.
We human tend to be pre-wired to be attracted to some traits (bigger eyes, high pitched voices, etc.) because that's how our babies look like. Thus we tend to find cats adorable because they share common trait with the babies that we're pre-wired to find adorable. From that point of view kittens are The Über-cats: even fluffier, even bigger eyes, even higher pitched voice, etc.
Common cats have co-evolved with human while optimising some of their characteristics to be better appreciated by humans. In a way they have "hacked" into our instinctive behaviours. They don't need parasites to achieve that, they evolved their aspect so we can't resist but find them adorable.
Note that the same could be noticed with other species which got adopted by the humans: in the canidae family compare adults dogs and wolves relative to their puppies dogs have partly evolved to look nicer and sweater. (well in the case of dogs there are other advantages too which led to humans adopting them, including social behaviour - dogs are highly social, hierarchical animals living in packs and hunting in an organised manner. Exactly like humans, thus making them interesting as hunting aids. Whereas cats are more autonomous. Their either live alone or in herds, making them more interesting as a "set and forget" solution to eradicate pests like rodent)
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]