Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Banks Rushing To Offer Virtual Wallets

silentbrad writes with this quote from the Globe and Mail:"Canada's big banks are preparing to launch 'virtual wallets' as early as this fall that will allow consumers to digitally consolidate their credit and debit cards from any financial institution, and use them to make purchases online and through their cellphones at cash registers. It is being called the biggest change to the way consumers pay for goods in Canada in decades, and for the banks moving quickly into this space, the strategy is about keeping ownership of the vast and potentially lucrative stores of data that are involved in transactions. ... The majority of the banking sector is expected to follow suit in the next year or so, with each financial institution relying on the concept of 'aliases,' where a password lets consumers access their payment cards, but protects personal information from being passed to the merchant. ... Retailers can use the information contained in transactions, stripped of details that violate privacy laws, to tailor offerings or promotions to consumers. And the banks figure they can build a new business from that new world. Location data on phones can help neighborhood stores connect with customers in the area, while transaction data online can give insight into consumer habits and tastes."

164 comments

  1. if it ain't green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, but what colo(u)r will these virtual wallets be?

    1. Re:if it ain't green. by green1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Canadian bills aren't all green now. $5 is blue, $10 is purple, $20 is green, $50 is red, $100 is brown, $1000 is pink (I believe, been a while since I've seen one) and when we used to have a $1 it was dark green and $2 was orange
      makes it much easier to tell denominations at a glance when looking through your wallet.

    2. Re:if it ain't green. by compro01 · · Score: 2

      Was pink. The $1000 bill was withdrawn back in 2000 due to money laundering concerns.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:if it ain't green. by green1 · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the $1000 is still in circulation, just rare. I know last time I saw one the banks wanted you to call ahead to reserve them.

    4. Re:if it ain't green. by Lucky75 · · Score: 1

      Canadian bills were never all green. I hate using american money, I keep dropping $50's instead of $1's.

      --
      DNA -- National Dyslexic Association
    5. Re:if it ain't green. by Festering+Leper · · Score: 1

      The Bank of Canada stopped printing the $1000 bill in late 2000. They are still considered legal tender but i don't think any institution other than a bank will accept them.

      --
      if you want people to think you know what you are talking about, just put ".com" at the end of everything you say.com
    6. Re:if it ain't green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm confused. You said he needs a real education, then you suggested the US system. I know you're a trollish idiot, but that's not even a good troll. It's just sad.

    7. Re:if it ain't green. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      The $1000 bill is still legal tender, but is withdrawn from circulation.

      Unless they keep a few on hand for sale as collector's items, I wouldn't think any banks would keep $1000 bills around. All the major ones just send them back to the Bank of Canada for destruction.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:if it ain't green. by MachDelta · · Score: 2

      Nope. It's gone for good. They stopped printing them in 2000 and any financial institution that receives one is asked to return it to the BoC for destruction. They're still legal tender and can still be held privately, but they're not officially in circulation. They were rarely used for anything other than money laundering anyways. The only time I ever saw them was in a bank vault in bundles.

    9. Re:if it ain't green. by Yaztromo · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and when we used to have a $1 it was dark green and $2 was orange

      Actually, the $1 was black and yellow on front, and green on the reverse.

      The $2 bill was considered to be "terracotta" coloured, and was more reddish-brown than orange.

      Yaz

    10. Re:if it ain't green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I hate using american money, I keep dropping $50's instead of $1's"

      A fool and their money shall soon be parted. If you cant tell the diff between the # 1 and the # 50, you are a fool.

    11. Re:if it ain't green. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I used to work in a municipal office and quite a few people (mostly elderly) would pay their property taxes with $1000 bills.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    12. Re:if it ain't green. by green1 · · Score: 1

      "redish brown" is one way I would define orange...
      And the $1 had green on the front as well as the black and yellow, and the overall appearance was "green" though a notably different shade than that of the $20
      I don't think of myself as old... but I certainly remember the $1 and $2 bills (theoretically I should still have one of each around somewhere...)

    13. Re:if it ain't green. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      And the $1 had green on the front as well as the black and yellow, and the overall appearance was "green" though a notably different shade than that of the $20 I don't think of myself as old... but I certainly remember the $1 and $2 bills (theoretically I should still have one of each around somewhere...)

      I non-theoretically have a few of each, and the last series of $1 bill (the 1973 series) was predominately black. There was a somewhat greenish tinge to parts of the background, but it was primarily black, not green. The 1967 series, 1954 series, and 1923 series were more green with black boarders, but the series that lasted the last 15 years of the $1 bills life had only the smallest patch of light green on its face.

      The reverses were entirely green on all of those series, mind you -- but I don't know anyone who would describe the colour of the front of the 1973 series as green. I have mint condition versions of the 1973 and 1967 designs, with a very good quality version of the 1954 series. Thanks for giving me an excuse to get them out to inspect them.

      Yaz

    14. Re:if it ain't green. by Lucky75 · · Score: 1

      Or..you know...I'm just used to having bills actually look different.

      --
      DNA -- National Dyslexic Association
    15. Re:if it ain't green. by robsku · · Score: 1

      Just out of interest, are they different in size too, or just in color? Before moving to euro, Finnish mark bills were different colored, but same size - when moving to euro the different sizes first seemed weird to me, but now that I'm used to that it's really convenient... I wonder haw blind people told the difference before (I guess there was a way, don't know how).

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    16. Re:if it ain't green. by robsku · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly - that you are being labeled as troll makes it even sadder.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    17. Re:if it ain't green. by green1 · · Score: 1

      Canadian notes are all the same size, which is more convenient for many things, however they do have some braille-like bumps on them to assist blind people (I don't think they are actually braille, but they are bumps that are different on each denomination)

    18. Re:if it ain't green. by robsku · · Score: 1

      Canadian notes are all the same size, which is more convenient for many things

      Yeah, I guess both ways are convenient some ways :) Btw, interesting tidbit what you told of the "brailleish" stuff on bills, thanks :)

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  2. As I pat my virtual pocket to check by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is great news. Now I no longer have to wait to lose my physical wallet to go through the agony of canceling and replacing credit cards. It can be lost more efficiently in the cloud.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it...

    2. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by IpSo_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      If anything this should be more secure than the RFID credit cards already in everyones wallet up here. The phone shouldn't be transmitting any data until the app is opened and a password is entered. Sure someone could be intercepting the transmission at the checkout of the store, but that risk already exists with existing RFID cards and also with merchants not locking down their POS terminals and subjecting themselves to having them replaced with compromised ones.

      --
      Open Source Time and Attendance, Job Costing a
    3. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Daas · · Score: 2

      The main difference is : I can't remotely kill my wallet if I lose it or if it gets stolen. Plus, there is no password on my wallet.

    4. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by paiute · · Score: 1

      The main difference is : I can't remotely kill my wallet if I lose it or if it gets stolen. Plus, there is no password on my wallet.

      I thought the main difference was that I can keep my actual hand on my actual wallet and know it is safe. How many Russian mobsters are going to have access to my virtual wallet before I even know it is compromised?

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    5. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      There are RFIDs in credit cards? Really? Have you got more information on that?

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Wow, I just started to Google that. I thought the OP was someone paranoid. RFID credit cards do exist. I don't think I've ever seen one but I seriously wonder who in their right might thought this was a good idea.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    7. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "There are RFIDs in credit cards? Really? Have you got more information on that?"

      It's in the Google.

      http://www.google.com/search?q=RFIDs+in+credit+cards

    8. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by IpSo_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does it matter if its compromised by one person or 10,000? The one person who steals your wallet from your car or off the beach when you're not looking can just as easily provide the information to anyone else anyways.

      Lets compare the process in each scenario:

      Physical Wallet:
      1. Thief steals wallet from car.
      2. Thief opens wallet, takes credit cards and starts making purchases at physical stores and online.

      Virtual Wallet in Phone:
      1. Thief steals phone from car.
      2. Thief must prevent any radio signal from reaching the phone to prevent a remote wipe.
      3. Thief takes the phone home and starts the "hacking" process to gain access first to the phone (password lock)
      4. Thief then must gain access to the presumably encrypted virtual wallet app.

      If the encryption is done properly, step 4 would be prohibitively expensive and easily buy the 2-24hours it would take to realize your phone is gone and contact your credit card company.

      Not only that, but once enough people are using the virtual wallet, I would imagine they would be able to easily switch to using bluetooth or similar protocol that uses some sort of SSL encryption with pre-exchanged keys to prevent any man-in-the-middle attacks at the POS terminal.

      --
      Open Source Time and Attendance, Job Costing a
    9. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Visa and MasterCard are now using payWave and PayPass, respectively, so that all the user needs to do is have his/her cards near (about 1cm or so) a dedicated area on the credit card machine in order to pay for the item, instead of either inserting (chip) or swiping (magnetic strip) the card. I'm not sure whether this constitutes as RFID, but the principles are the same.

    10. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Don't know if they're RFID or not, but credit cards which don't require being swiped to make payments are pretty widespread.

      Some of them you just put up near a receiver and it will process a transaction.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      you must not be in the US then. No-swipe (RFID) credit cards are common, and rfid credit card scanners are all over the place. You just wave your card over the scanner, and it charges it.

    12. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they're actually starting to become a thing that card makers are pushing. I remember seeing guides of how to fry the RFID chip (I believe a microwave for a few seconds works, but don't blame me if it also breaks the card) because even a lot of non-techies realize the security risk.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    13. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

      They have been around for quite awhile. Over three years ago my bank at the time sent me a new card with a RFID chip with no explanation other than a marketing letter promoting it as "new & improved".

      Bull. I checked and it turns out that my card was one of the ones compromised during the Heartland Payment Systems breach that was announced during the Obama inauguration. ( http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10146275-83.html )

      They didn't bother notifying me for 6 months. I cancelled the card AND the bank for trying to pull a fast one.

      In other news, it is easy enough to kill the RFID by nuking your card in the microwave.

      Note to TSA: I am not a terrorist even though I used the words "kill" and "nuking".

    14. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only thing that does not get lost in the cloud are the ads :)

    15. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      yes, they are both rfid

    16. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note to TSA: I am not a terrorist even though I used the words "kill" and "nuking".

      Thanks, now if only we could get everyone to just admit when they are and aren't, that would make our jobs a LOT easier. Keep up the good work, patriot!

    17. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I'm indeed not in the US. Probably the reason, I haven't seen any... Hopefully, I won't see any... ever....

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    18. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've got one on my CC. It works great, I can just wave my wallet at the reader and I'm good to go. I don't have to touch the pen or pinpad that Typhoid Mary and Ebola Gary have been licking.

      It's limited to $50 transactions.

      The field is very short, approx 6".

      It's my CC, so there's a buffer between it and my real money.

      I'm an EE. An RF EE. They're fine. The machines aren't always set up to take them though, so it doesn't work everywhere.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    19. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen any credit cards with the little smartcard chip in it? If you've had any cards replaced in the last few years (at least in north america), then it's guaranteed that you'd have a smartcard chip.

    20. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just wave my wallet at the reader and I'm good to go.

      I'm in a country that doesn't generally have RFIDs on credit cards, so I have a question. How does this system know which credit card to charge? I have 3 in my wallet at the moment, for example, but I know people who carry around 4 or 5.

    21. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by swillden · · Score: 1

      There are RFIDs in credit cards? Really? Have you got more information on that?

      Technically, they're contactless smart cards, not RFIDs (different standards, different frequencies, different RF characteristics that create different range, etc., characteristics, different capabilities, including the ability to use cryptographic security, and different physical security characteristics), but yes. They use the same fundamental technology and protocols as Google Wallet and the other upcoming phone-based wallets. Well, more precisely, the phone-based NFC technology is based on the contactless smart card technology, but embedded in a phone and with additional capabilities, including -- just to make it all more confusing -- the ability to act as an RFID tag or reader.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    22. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      It's limited to $50 transactions.

      Read your cardholder agreement. $50 is usually the personal liability on fraudulent charges.

      The field is very short, approx 6".

      With their reader. With an off-the-shelf reader with a much higher transmit power, not so much.

      Mastercard sent me one of those 3 years ago... I cancelled the card, because they wouldn't send me one that didn't have it. Visa sent me one a month ago, and it was a 5 minute conversation to convince them that they should send me one that didn't have it. They're providing them for convenience, but they're well aware of what the technology is actually capable of. There's a reason it's become so much easier to get a card without an RFID in it.

    23. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with them is that there's no way to turn them off. At least on my cell i can disable NFC and password (and track) the device. With cards you either have to permanently disable them or get a shielded wallet. I opted for the shielded wallet, but most people don't know why they would need one. Even my mom, who's been in the banking industry for 25 years, was surprised that my phone could pick up her CC through her purse. If people are so ignorant of the dangers that the whole act seems like magic, they're easy to take advantage of.

    24. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by HungryHobo · · Score: 3, Informative

      option 2: phone malware picks up your details the next time you use the app.

      option 3: pre installed networkcrapware like this
      http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/01/technology/carrier_iq/index.htm destroys any semblance of security.

    25. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two credit cards in my wallet, but in order to make it disambiguous to the card reader, I take out the one I want to use and tap it to the reader. It partially defeats the purpose of the feature, but I would rather do it this way than finding out on my bills later that they have charged it to the wrong card. This is especially important for me since one of the cards is not directly billed to me and I only use this card for instant discount on gas and pooling reward points together with my family.

      On the other hand, a few years ago, I had a security card and only one credit card in the wallet. The system either got confused or kept reading the security card instead of the credit card. It is possible that whichever one it successfully reads first will be the one it charges.

    26. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Now I no longer have to wait to lose my physical wallet to go through the agony of canceling and replacing credit cards. It can be lost more efficiently in the cloud.

      And be replaced just as well.

    27. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerability-management/167901026/security/client-security/240003490/apple-ban-gives-miller-time-to-hack-other-things.html

    28. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by paiute · · Score: 1

      1. Thief steals wallet from car.

      I can choose not to leave my wallet in my car. I can't choose whether the bank leaves my virtual wallet in their virtual car with the virtual doors unlocked.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    29. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "RFID long range" to get an idea of what can be done. Commercial products that can read the tags over 450 feet away, for example.

    30. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got one on my CC. It works great, I can just wave my wallet at the reader and I'm good to go.

      Many of us have more than one credit card, so I still have to open my wallet & take out the card to make sure the correct credit card is charged. That greatly reduces the convenience factor.

    31. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

      Their use is not common in all places in the US. In my area, card swipes that also support rfid scanning are fairly common, but some places do not have them. However, I have never seen anyone actually use one of those scanners anywhere. What type of location do you live in? A large city?

    32. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Can you please send us your real name, home and work address, and home, work and cell phone numbers, so we can properly note you down as being 'not a terrorist'.

      Thank you for your cooperation, citizen.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    33. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by foradoxium · · Score: 1

      sadly, most people won't even have a password lock on their phone :/

    34. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you going to do when the OPP pull you over and demand your license and insurance ? Tell them it's in your virtual wallet ?

    35. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      I never said they were actually used. Just that banks put the chip in the cards, and the readers are fairly common.

      Even I don't actually *use* them. It's not like it saves any time over just swiping the card.

    36. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an EE. An RF EE. They're fine.

      Until someone cannot simply walk next to me to read my CC number, they aren't. Considering this has been done, you're wrong.

    37. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Really, you have just lost your phone with your virtual wallet, how are you going to call and cancel all of your credit cards? For that matter, now that all of your credit card information is in your phone and you no longer carry any in your wallet, how are you going to pay for anything (such as gas to get home)?
      What this does is substitute a single point of failure for what is now redundancy.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    38. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      If there's a fraudulent charge, I won't pay it. That's why I don't care. If someone steals my CC info via an RFID long-range reader, it doesn't matter. It's not my money, it's MasterCard's. It only becomes my money once I've paid my bill. I don't care if that charge is $0.25 or $25,000. If I didn't make it, I'm not paying it.

      I liken my CC to my user account. I can use it all the time, go to any shady place and use it, no worries. My bank card, that's root, and I only use it at trusted locations and as infrequently as possible.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    39. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by IpSo_ · · Score: 1

      But they can have one is the point. Pretty hard to put a password lock on your wallet or physical credit card. Even the chip&pin system only works for in-person purchases, a virtual wallet could at least work over the internet too.

      I tend to not trust big corporations much, but even a few rookie developers can at least make the virtual wallet more secure than a physical wallet. How much more is the real question.

      The other nice thing is no waiting for new credit cards in the mail when they do get stolen, you could literally have a new one downloaded to your app (on another phone) the same day its stolen.

      --
      Open Source Time and Attendance, Job Costing a
    40. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by IpSo_ · · Score: 1

      This is flawed thinking, for the following reasons:

      - Credit card companies don't actually lend money, its really the bank who puts their name on the card that is lending the money. Credit card companies make money off the transactions that flow over their network.
      - When fraud occurs, its usually the merchant who is left holding the bag, not the credit card company or the bank.
      - When merchants get left holding the bag, they pass the costs on to you the customer.

      Therefore it is your money, because every purchase you make pays for fraud that effected you directly and all the other dumb asses who lose their wallet every other week.

      --
      Open Source Time and Attendance, Job Costing a
    41. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1
      1) I was being a bit facetious. My point, anything made of software can be duplicated.

      2) I don't believe the information will be on a device except in tokenized form, ie. a server somewhere in the cloud will most likely hold the real information. Not that this doesn't hold a lot of issues with security in itself, but that's not my argument to make.

    42. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      Don't pay your credit card and see how far that takes you in life. The truth is the system has you by the short and curlies by linking how you pay your credit card with important stuff like getting a mortgage, getting a business loan, getting a decent cell phone, hooking up utilities without paying a ridiculously high deposit, renting a hotel room, or lately, even landing some kinds of jobs. In my experience, the only people I have met who talk like you are either inexperienced with credit, or fools. We'll see how you talk after your first bankruptcy.

    43. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I have a mortgage, a job with a security clearance, no cell phone, and all my utilities are already hooked up.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    44. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't seen any credit cards with the little smartcard chip in it? If you've had any cards replaced in the last few years (at least in north america), then it's guaranteed that you'd have a smartcard chip.

      False. The USA has not yet moved towards Chip & PIN for credit cards. As a result most US cards only have the conventional magnetic stripe.

      Since most of the rest of the world has been using Chip & PIN for some time, you may have trouble using a US card with a magnetic stripe while traveling overseas.

      There are a handful of US cards (catering to travelers) that are available with Chip & PIN so that it's easier to use it overseas, but Chip & PIN is currently not used in the USA.

    45. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Let your credit card go unpaid for a few months, and see what happens to your security clearance.... If you don't lose it, then your clearance isn't as high as you think it is.

      In the cardholder agreements for most credit cards, you are liable for $50 of any fraudulent transaction if it happens before you report the card stolen. If it happens after you report it stolen, you're not liable. They can put through a $1500 charge, and you won't have to pay $1450 of it, but you will still be on the hook for $50 if you didn't report the card stolen. It's no coincidence that the purchase limit on the RFID method of payment is $50. Whether you're taking a moral/ethical stand against it is irrelevant... by using the card in the first place you're agreeing to those terms, and if you disagree with them, then you should cancel your card. Or, like I did, call them and ask them to send you one without an RFID.

    46. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I would suggest reading how those "virtual wallets" are actually implemented first. It always includes some form of hardware encryption, so hacking the app itself is not sufficient.

    47. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      shouldn't be transmitting any data until the app is opened and a password is entered

      "Shouldn't". Now there is a weasel word that in this context, has packed in a whole lot of weasel. Might even be fair to call it a wolverine word.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    48. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Really? Ok, I'll revise my statement then. Canadian credit cards are all but guaranteed to have the chip. Almost every card I have seen recently uses it.

    49. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      So what if the information is not on the device? You have lost access to it and someone else has gained access to it. How long will it take you to cut off their access to it? My problem with this is that it creates a single point of failure for even more elements of your life. While it is convenient to have all of that stuff in one place, at some point it becomes outrageously difficult to fix it if that place becomes compromised.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    50. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had mine disabled at the bank. They told me if fraud occurs(because no pin required under $50), they would cover it..... I had them disable it anyways. I don't need the extra hassle.

    51. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      As long as you convince the bank it was a fraudulent charge....

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    52. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      If there's a fraudulent charge, I won't pay it. That's why I don't care. If someone steals my CC info via an RFID long-range reader, it doesn't matter. It's not my money, it's MasterCard's. It only becomes my money once I've paid my bill. I don't care if that charge is $0.25 or $25,000. If I didn't make it, I'm not paying it.

      I liken my CC to my user account. I can use it all the time, go to any shady place and use it, no worries. My bank card, that's root, and I only use it at trusted locations and as infrequently as possible.

      Let's see how that goes for the general public.

      First, they need to recognize a fraudulent charge. That means they need to go over it in detail every month. If more than one person has a card they all need to. And recall all of their spending if there's something that could be/could not be (such as an extra but reasonable charge from a store you do frequent.)

      Second, they need to have it taken off their bill. Just not paying something (as the quote suggests) is against your contract with the credit card people, and it's not a good thing. If instead the quote means telling them specifically you won't pay X as it's fraudulent, they don't just take it off the bill. They instead waive it while an investigation is done.

      Third, they need to make sure not paying actually sticks. We had a second charge from a large chain made about 3 minutes after a valid use. It brought the total between the two to just under $500, which was a threshold at the time. We told the card about it, they said they'd investigate. Several months later, they jsut reinstated the charge. We had to call them back, they said the investigation found nothing and was closed, and they were charging us. (Mind you, we had no notification of this except it just showing up on our bill again.) We got them to reopen it, requested a copy of the receipt, pointed out how the signature bore NO RESEMBLANCE to ours, and then they finally removed it. If there was any investigation, it obviously didn't happen to look at that. (Funny note: the signature isn't authorization, it's your agreement with the merchant to pay as outlined in your credit card agreement. Not password-like at all.)

      You, like us, may go through your bills religiously. But I doubt everyone does, and I don't happen to think that they then "deserve" getting defrauded because they trust a service they have reasonable expectations to be secure.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    53. Re:As I pat my virtual pocket to check by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      If anything this should be more secure than the RFID credit cards already in everyones wallet up here. The phone shouldn't be transmitting any data until the app is opened and a password is entered. Sure someone could be intercepting the transmission at the checkout of the store, but that risk already exists with existing RFID cards and also with merchants not locking down their POS terminals and subjecting themselves to having them replaced with compromised ones.

      The phone transaction should be very secure. RFID sends data in the clear. The phone has a processor to perform encryption.

      In poor countries there is already a paperless society for banking. I person goes into an authorized location (pharmacy, bank, etc.) and puts $20.00 on his phone. There is a fee and it includes taxes. Now when he takes a taxi, he transfers an amount to the driver for payment. When he receives payment, it is transfered to his phone from the other phone. African countries find they do not have to produce many coins or bills.

      This system is ubiquitous and should be implemented here in North America. It penalizes the banks by eliminating them from obtaining fees for many kinds of transactions.

      If the phone is lost, the money is not. That is the beauty of their system. (and yes, the government could take a few pennies for each transaction. Perhaps they do).
           

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  3. It's all about selling customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FTFA:

    Retailers can use the information contained in transactions, stripped of details that violate privacy laws, to tailor offerings or promotions to consumers. And the banks figure they can build a new business from that new world. Location data on phones can help neighbourhood stores connect with customers in the area, while transaction data online can give insight into consumer habits and tastes.

    The title of the article should read:

    "Canadian banks rushing to offer your private buying history to the highest bidder"

    1. Re:It's all about selling customer data by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Not just the highest bidder. It will be sold to everyone.

      Privacy aside, the idea of my phone being spammed every time I get near a store or restaurant is a big concern. This should really be an op-in feature. But that'll never happen.

    2. Re:It's all about selling customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're aware that the same thing happens with the credit cards everyone uses today, right?

    3. Re:It's all about selling customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just use an email that bounces the promotion back to the web master. No harm no foul.

    4. Re:It's all about selling customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had this arguement with so many people over the years.

      Facebook isn't free,
      Google isn't free,
      All these cloud services are not free....

      The price is your privacy.

      Most people either don't understand how much info is included with every transactions, or they are too baffled by 'Apple's cool new way to store stuff' then go watch dancing with the stars.

    5. Re:It's all about selling customer data by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      I can't believe that more people aren't alarmed by this type of thing. People don't value their privacy any more, and I don't understand why.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    6. Re:It's all about selling customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You nailed it.

      http://archive.org/details/EbenMoglenKeynote2007MysqlConferenceExpo
      http://archive.org/details/EbenMoglen-WhyFreedomOfThoughtRequiresFreeMediaAndWhyFreeMedia

    7. Re:It's all about selling customer data by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between privacy vs convenience most people will choose convenience every time.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    8. Re:It's all about selling customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of the article should read:

      "Canadian banks find yet another way to ass-rape their customers."

      I can't think of another industry where customers are treated so shitty and the corporations that do it are protected by the government. Please, please can we open the banking sector to foreign ownership? Can we get banks up here that know about customer service?

  4. Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't society care about privacy anymore?

    1) I do not want every store I shop at to have my name and phone number.
    2) I do not want my bank to have a full list of where and when I bought stuff, how much I spent and, possibly, what exactly I bought.
    3) I don't want stores to keep tabs on what I buy.
    4) I don't want my virtual wallet to be compromised should I somehow lose my phone.

    Sorry, but you should be happy enough that I shop at your store. I do not owe you to let you provide me with advertisements.
    I'll pass until privacy is taken seriously.

    1. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want stores to keep tabs on what I buy. [etc]

      Then use cash. They're not going to MAKE you use this, any more than they're making you use credit cards today. I can pay for my groceries and replacement door hinge and shampoo in cash. If you don't want to use this, then don't. The people who want to, will, and the people who don't want to, don't have to.

    2. Re:Privacy? by bmd256 · · Score: 1

      In Canada, when paying with Interac (debit card), the bank already has the information on where and when ( not what though ) you make purchases. This is a good thing most of the time. When I view my bank statement I can see where my money is going. They also use this information to track your purchasing patterns. My bank has used these patterns to prevent fraud when an Interac terminal was compromised and stealing PINs. I don't like the idea of merchants having too much information though.

    3. Re:Privacy? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Cash. That's what I've been doing lately especially with many places starting to not accept credit cards.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    4. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't society care about privacy anymore?

      Simple:

      1. Society has developed such that the most successful people are known and sometimes famous.
      2. You don't get to be famous by hiding. Note that famous criminals on the run actually DID something before they took to hiding. Same with, say, reclusive artists.
      3. The internet (specifically, YouTube and similar) has reinforced the notion that if you take the time to express yourself and risk being known, you have a far greater chance of being well-regarded than someone who willingly chooses to be a nobody.

      When you take all those together and add in a culture that has learned to ignore advertisements due to overexposure, not to mention the basic human desire for togetherness being seriously warped in the age of instant global communication, you get the current apathy towards heavy privacy. In fact, you get serious disdain towards the tinfoil hat crowd for popping up out of the woodwork over and over again to whine.

      Now, whether or not that's an intrinsically good or bad thing depends on if you're a YouTube celebrity or a tinfoil hat*, I suppose. Me, I can actually ignore most advertisements, and I don't feel some manner of deep shame or whatnot whenever an ad DOES make me aware of a product or service that I might actually like.

      *: Yes, a tinfoil hat. I'm very convinced at this point that the hat itself is a parasitic being that disguises itself as tinfoil, convinces its host that it will protect him from invisible rays, and, having gained trust, eats away at the brain from the inside and takes control.

    5. Re:Privacy? by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Leonard Cohen predicted this decades ago:

      "There's gonna be a meter on your bed which will disclose
      What everybody knows."

    6. Re:Privacy? by hendridm · · Score: 1

      with many places starting to not accept credit cards.

      Really? That seems like a good way for the business to lose a lot of sales.

    7. Re:Privacy? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't society care about good service and human interaction anymore? Remember when a store owner knew your name? Knew what you regularly bought and had it ready for you? Offered you discounts for loyalty and for things you purchased often? I can't understand all these people paranoid about their privacy. Really, how does being offered discounts on products you actually buy and use constitute a bad thing. Are you such a sick deviant fuck that you are ashamed by your purchases, or buying illegal things, or buying things to commit illegal actions? Seriously? Get over it.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    8. Re:Privacy? by pla · · Score: 2

      Really, how does being offered discounts on products you actually buy and use constitute a bad thing.

      Just make them cheaper to start with and skip the games. Simple enough for ya?


      Are you such a sick deviant fuck that you are ashamed by your purchases, or buying illegal things, or buying things to commit illegal actions?

      8/10.


      Seriously? Get over it.

      I pay with cash. Consider me over it.

    9. Re:Privacy? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Are you such a sick deviant fuck that you want to know what everyone else is doing and buying? Seems like. Maybe you're just a shill. Seems like you're very quick to assume that someone that wants privacy, that doesn't want other people to know what they buy, means they are doing naughty things. You may have gotten a discount price on your brain, but I don't think you got a good value.

      And that world you're thinking of? Just a myth shrouded thru the fog of TV and movies.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    10. Re:Privacy? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      You're not very coherent, but what the hell.

      If you aren't ashamed of something or doing something that shouldn't be done, then why are these people so concerned about databases (not other humans) knowing their purchasing habits?

      Seriously, why are people so afraid of people finding out who they actually are?

      I'd say most US'ians are just paranoid people who don't know themselves or others and want to keep it that way.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    11. Re:Privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one ever actually cared about privacy on this level until very recently.

      You don't care that the clerk at the supermarket knows what food you eat. You don't care that the teller at the bank knows your account number. It's only now that the people you've been giving information to for free have started actually paying attention that anyone started caring about this sort of privacy.

    12. Re:Privacy? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      If I've got nothing to hide, why do you feel so strongly that you should be allowed to look?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    13. Re:Privacy? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      >> with many places starting to not accept credit cards.

      > Really? That seems like a good way for the business to lose a lot of sales.

      Ever heard the joke about "we'll lose money on every transaction, but make up for it in volume"? All that "lot of sales" is going to come at the cost of 2 or 3 percent cut by the credit card issuer. In a business with thin profit margins, it can mean the difference between profit and loss. That's why those places are willing to "sacrifice" that business.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    14. Re:Privacy? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      If you aren't ashamed of something or doing something that shouldn't be done, then why are these people so concerned

      Everyone shits but are concerned about privacy. Most everyone masturbates, but want to do it in privacy.

      Seriously, why are people so afraid of people finding out who they actually are?

      Everyone thinks they are different. Some are and the rest of us have been convinced that we're different and have things to be ashamed of.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    15. Re:Privacy? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Why would I want to look?

      I think the whole privacy crap in the USA is because people are so self-important that they actually think their life matters to other people. But really, except for a few outliers nobody could care about your buying habits. Companies don't even care about 'your' buying habits, they care about the aggregate data. The only thing that cares about matching up your identity and buying habits is some automated software that'll send you propaganda.

      What's really funny about the whole privacy issue in the states is that more people get worked up about some minor little thing that tries to get you to buy stuff you already buy or related stuff but they gave away a whole bunch of freedom and privacy in this century. Visiting the US is really like diving into 1984, the broadcasts in airports would be comical if it weren't for the fact that these people are serious! I'm not sure there's a bigger terrorizer of the US than the US itself.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    16. Re:Privacy? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      If they don't care about my buying habits, why do they work so hard to track it?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    17. Re:Privacy? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Learn to read and think. They don't care about you as an individual or a person, just an anonymous consuming unit.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    18. Re:Privacy? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand what anonymous means.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    19. Re:Privacy? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      You don't seem to understand the difference between reality and paranoid delusions. No HUMAN is going around checking your purchase habits. You don't matter anymore to business as a person. You figure the US would be so happy that not only do they get the depersonalization of service that their paranoia demands but they also get cheaper products.

      Oh no! some electrical pattern in some computer in some warehouse in the middle of nowhere knows I buy apples every week and they send me a coupon every week! Where will the madness stop! What about the children?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  5. What? by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did anyone else read the entire summary and still have no idea WTF it's talking about? Something to do with aliasing personal information to merchants... so they can target advertising... when the merchant has all the customer's personal data out of necessity anyway...?

    Canadians already primarily use a card system called Interac to make most purchases; granted, it's been a while since I lived in Canada but even three years ago it was very rare for me to make a cash purchase.

    Reading TFA it seems like it's talking about cell phone wireless payments, and banks selling your demographic information to retailers. Frankly, if my bank did that, I'd opt out of it immediately, and potentially change banks if they didn't allow the opt-out. This suggests to me that within five years there will be no bank that will allow opting-out unless it's protected by law.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only use cash in shwarma shops or sketchy convenience stores that sell copy-cat goods that don't accept any cards... or when buying bus tickets

    2. Re:What? by azalin · · Score: 1

      Let's use an internet version of this business model: The Google add system. Google/the banks will know a lot about you. They sell merchants the options to advertise to their intended demographic, but not the info itself (that would be facebook). The merchant is not supposed to know who you are, just that you are a potential customer (based on past purchases). The merchants will also get anonymous data for marketing to consider the right demographic to address.
      At least that's what I consider this to be.

    3. Re:What? by Piata · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian and I still make mostly cash purchases expressly to avoid giving merchants/banks a record of my purchasing history. And no, I don't see any value in being more directly targeted in marketing based on my previous purchases. I'm tired of being told what a product can do for me, how it will make me think or feel and how it's perfectly suited to my lifestyle. The only thing marketing makes me want to buy is the building materials for a cabin in the woods.

    4. Re:What? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      >s. Frankly, if my bank did that, I'd opt out of it immediately, and potentially change banks if they didn't allow the opt-out.

      Not related to this article but I already know a LOT of people who just store living expenses in their banks are are converting their income into buying silver and other metals. Money is really worth nothing and chances of precious metals sinking is slim to none, while currency is not guaranteed at all.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  6. Wither Paypal? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    The whole point of Paypal was you don't have to give your cc number to the vendor; it'll stay with Paypal.

    But people found out Paypal's not necessarily always your pal.

    Anyway, if these banks are offering this service, would there remain a reason for Paypal?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    1. Re:Wither Paypal? by RattFink · · Score: 2

      The whole point of Paypal was you don't have to give your cc number to the vendor; it'll stay with Paypal.

      A little like contracting smallpox to keep you from catching cowpox.

      --
      "I don't necessarily agree with everything I say." - Marshall McLuhan
    2. Re:Wither Paypal? by azalin · · Score: 1

      What a very nice analogy. I intend to use it some time in the future.

    3. Re:Wither Paypal? by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      That depends on how much of a pain international payments will be to make. I can't speak for other Canadians, but virtually the only times I use Paypal I'm paying for goods or services from the States.

    4. Re:Wither Paypal? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Anyway, if these banks are offering this service, would there remain a reason for Paypal?

      Easy, paypal is the only company offering ONE service that NO ONE ELSE does. Allow random joes to accept a credit card without a merchant account.

      If you're a business, Paypal offers you nothing more than what a regular merchant account does - to a business, it IS a regular merchant account.

      If you're an individual, accepting credit cards is nigh-impossible as merchant accounts are extremely difficult to obtain for individuals, especially those not doing a minimum number of transactions a month.

      And doing anything online without accepting credit (or debit) cards is a pretty good way to lose customers if they have to go and write a cheque (or get a money order) and mail it off, wait for it to arrive, wait for it to clear, and THEN have the item shipped out (anyone really want to go back to the "please wait 6-8 weeks for your order"?).

      Of course, as a buyer, I had to use Paypal when a vendor decided they wanted to do a CYA and do "extra verifications" that required sending in scans of my credit card via e-mail or fax. They had the honesty to admit it would delay the order, but not to give you a "free" upgrade to expedited shipping. (They also argued it "was for your protection" - which is an utter lie - doing what they want is a great way to BE unprotected). If I didn't need the item (being practically only available from them), I would've gone elsewhere. On the flip side, I learned how to get 10% off the order by using those "10% off your next order" generic codes that show up after the order, so I did cost them the discount for their stupid policy.

    5. Re:Wither Paypal? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Just wondering: did they want a scan of the back of the card too (CVV)? Shady.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  7. Do Not Track by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    We're approaching a point where full records (and analysis) of consumer habits will be available from multiple sources. From how we find what we buy (google, etc), the stores themselves (from amazon and fresh direct to local grocery stores and pharmacies) down to how we pay (banks and credit cards). While there is some movement towards "Do Not Track", it is only for that very first step. What we need is a "Do Not Track" option that extends beyond browsing on the web, and allows us to purchase goods without giving companies a complete record of everything we do.

    1. Re:Do Not Track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that ASKING corporations to not track you actually results in them not tracking you? Hahahahaha!

    2. Re:Do Not Track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, as Eben Moglen puts it: Do Not Surveil

      http://archive.org/details/EbenMoglen-WhyFreedomOfThoughtRequiresFreeMediaAndWhyFreeMedia

  8. free market fundamentalists take note: by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    canada will lead here, because you need a government entity to dictate the terms of something like a virtual wallet

    private market forces do not necessarily lead to advancement, because there is no natural market that is not dominated and suppressed by it's largest players. for example: mastercard and visa will stymie google's and apple's virtual wallet efforts out of jealousy and wanting to monopolize that action themselves

    and then we will have the crackpots WHARRGARBLing about virtual currency and paranoid schizophrenic fantasies of world domination, and the crackpots will be featured on faux news, because it serves the entrenched corporate interest's agenda to keep the public enthralled, confused, and propagandized about anything better than the world they want to lock them into where their rent seeking monopolistic and oligopolistic practices go unchallenged

    so: only evil "socialist" countries deserve things like commonsense healthcare financing and technological progress, and my country continues it's slow circling of the toilet, as corporate rent seeking parasites strangle my government, and various morons conclude the solution is less government regulation on the stranglers

    canada: can new york state join your union? please?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:free market fundamentalists take note: by bmd256 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this will eventually tie in with MintChip [http://mintchipchallenge.com/]

    2. Re:free market fundamentalists take note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why wait for NY to join Canada? Just drive there if it is such a wonderful place and so enlightened.

    3. Re:free market fundamentalists take note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know this whole thing isn't just corporations doing the same thing in Canada? They said Canadian banks, not Canada.

      Also, if Canada wants to require the Mark of the Beast for payments, maybe Quebec will decide to join our Union.

    4. Re:free market fundamentalists take note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know this whole thing isn't just corporations doing the same thing in Canada? They said Canadian banks, not Canada.

      I think he believes Canadian banks are more regulated by government, so he thinks the chance of this whole thing being a ploy by corporations to be lower (than the banks in your union)

    5. Re:free market fundamentalists take note: by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Canada will not lead here, because their banking system is woefully behind the times. They don't even have visa debit cards yet, so I can't use my standard visa debit card without it being treated like a credit card, needing a much m=higher minimum puchase etc. Pathetic.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  9. Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You need to read up on Stephen Harper and his plans for world domination.

    1. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stephen Harper favours decentralizing the loosest federation among major countries. How do you get from there to world domination? You're afraid he'll just turn around and sweet-talk everyone? Any more delusions you'd like to share?

  10. Here is how it will work in practice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You go to the store and buy some dog shampoo. The state is immediately alerted and it is determined that you do not show ownership for a dog. You will be investigated for failing to properly license your dog. This is how you keep a society safe from terrorists. Enjoy.

  11. Melting currency by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    And by introducing self-destructing plastic currency we won't have a choice...
        http://business.financialpost.com/2012/07/12/new-plastic-bills-reportedly-melting-in-summer-heat/

    1. Re:Melting currency by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... why do I get the feeling that this is from some crackpot taking a lighter to the bill because they don't like the plastic money? A few weeks ago when we had that heat wave here in Southern Ontario, I was on an offsite job, and the storage locker on my truck hit 144C, the bills in it were fine. Including the 100's and 50's which were both the new plastic notes.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Melting currency by stepho-wrs · · Score: 1

      Australia has been using polymer notes since 1992. We had a few problems with the ink for the queen's eyes being easy to rub off but they solved all that years ago. The notes never had any problems with our 45C (113F) heat.

  12. I can hear the FAIL from here.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    They already tried this in the USA with the stupid nearfield credit cards. it was an epic failure. Paypal has tried it several times and failed and is on their next failure with this technology.

    People DO NOT WANT to have loosey Goosey access to their money. It is why you dont see RFID on all your groceries and a push and pay register at Walmart... if they could lay off almost all the cashiers forever they would.

    Good luck canada, but Mastercard could not get enough banks and people to use their atempt, I think you will have about the same chance.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by swillden · · Score: 2

      You're wrong, this is going to happen.

      Visa and MasterCard have announced that they'll implement the chip card liability shift next year in North America. What that means is that starting in 2013 all liability for fraudulent transactions will accrue to whichever links in the chain (issuing bank, merchant, merchant acquiring bank, clearinghouse) do not have the chip-based technology implemented. Since merchants pay for nearly all of the credit card fraud, you'll see a very fast response from them to add the necessary technology at the point of sale.

      While the liability shift doesn't address the question of contact vs contactless (RF) payment chip technology, at this point everyone will be deploying contactless. From a security perspective it doesn't matter whether it's contact or contactless, because any contact design has to assume that attackers will be able to eavesdrop or even MITM the contact connections, and the contactless technology has a lot of advantages. More to the point, the north american banks tried contact cards a decade ago and it failed -- not due to any problem with the technology, but still the failure left a bad taste in their mouth. So bank execs see "contact failed, so maybe contactless will work better". And it will, but not due to any advantage of the technology. It does have advantages, but they aren't the reason it's going to succeed.

      So, what we have now is a confluence of events that will drive adoption. The merchants will deploy the infrastructure because it will save them huge amounts of money. Banks will deploy chip cards because they don't want to absorb that fraud. Because of Google Wallet, ISIS, Apple's initiative (whatever it will be), etc. more and more smartphones will have NFC, to the point that over the next 2-3 years you can expect basically ALL new smartphones to have NFC. And while you may not like it, people really DO like being able to pay with their phone, and to use a virtual wallet.

      I notice this especially among the younger population. When I use Google Wallet at stores, the cashier's reaction is very strongly correlated with age... the younger the cashier, the more they like it. This shouldn't surprise anyone given how central mobile phones have become to young peoples' lives.

      The obvious next step, once you're using your phone for payment, is to integrate loyalty and coupons. It sounds like these banks are taking a slightly different approach than Google or ISIS, but the fundamental idea is the same. For manufacturers and retailers, it provides a smoother path to deliver incentives to consumers and -- even more important -- a path that allows them to close the loop. When General Mills puts cereal coupons in the newspaper, they know roughly how many coupons are printed and roughly how many are redeemed, but they don't have any real way to figure out how effective those coupons were at motivating people to buy who wouldn't otherwise have bought. Electronic coupons can fix that.

      From a consumer perspective, there's fantastic convenience in having all of this stuff integrated. My wife often goes to the grocery store with an inch-thick stack of coupons, and it takes a lot of time for the cashier to process all of them. Many of us have a crazy number of loyalty cards we carry around, so there's big value in moving all of that into electronic form as well. And then when you get to where you can apply all loyalty discounts and relevant coupons and perform the payment in one 250ms tap, that's really nice.

      Of course, there are some significant privacy questions around all of that. The whole point of loyalty cards is to enable retailers to get more detailed information about their customers at an individual, privacy-busting level. But, by and large, people are fine with that. So far, it appears that the vast majority of people will also be fine with electronic coupons giving an anonymized handle to them to manufacturers as well -- and this same anonymized handle may well be a way for individuals

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My old PC Mastercard from Loblaws in Canada has RFID ages ago and that was well before they even "upgrade" to the contact smart chips in the last couple of years..

    3. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada has had those 'nearfield credit cards' for years. They are everywhere, along with the readers.

    4. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if this is going to happen, then I'll be using cash only.

      I'm all for chip cards (even if they are cracked, and they are, they're less cracked then magstrips as long as consumers aren't liable like they are in the UK). But contactless payment is a definite no for me unless it requires I enter my pin, which all the ones I've seen don't require.

      So, they can count me out as their customer. And probably many others too.

      My expectation? The NFC payment methods will exist and will be used by some. But not all.

      Oh, and yes, I'm Canadian, and yes, most all of my transactions are chip based debit transactions, TYVM.

    5. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody wants the nearfield cards except for merchants and the banks. Because it's easier to spend they get more money.

      Several of the fast food resturants around here, Mc Donalds for example had the readers outside the drive up windows and have cince removed them as nobody was using them. Even TARGET, has removed all the nearfield readers from all their stores.

      I suggest looking at what the stores are doing and ignore the PR releases from the banks. No way in hell Mastercard is going to up the fees to mcdonalds, they cant afford to lose a giant company like them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Almost nobody wants the nearfield cards except for merchants and the banks.

      If the merchants and banks want them... they'll happen. And, actually, consumers like them too once they use them.

      Several of the fast food resturants around here, Mc Donalds for example had the readers outside the drive up windows and have cince removed them as nobody was using them.

      Sure, because hardly anyone has the cards, or phones with virtual wallets, yet, and there's no liability-related reason for merchants to care. But both parts of that are changing.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:I can hear the FAIL from here.... by swillden · · Score: 1

      But contactless payment is a definite no for me unless it requires I enter my pin, which all the ones I've seen don't require.

      The virtual wallets will all require a PIN, I think. Google Wallet does, and ISIS will according to their documentation.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  13. A wallet with many holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the carrier, the phone manufacturer and the many app developers all have access to our phones? Is this access in many cases an effective back door? Is so, this seems like bad place store money or access to money.

  14. Certainly will be convenient, by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    All my cards and such in one place.

    Much easier for me to just wave my phone or whatever and it gets deducted. Just hope I choose the right 'card'.

    And much, MUCH easier for the crooks to steal one thing, instead of going after each of my accounts one at time. One-stop shopping for them.

    No, I'm not cynical, much.

    Progress.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  15. Not News by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Banks rushing headlong into some whiz-bang, poorly understood, but technology-based solution (product) for a problem that doesn't exist, but surely will make them a lot of money, without first fully considering or mitigating the obvious potential risks. Film at 11.

    Is this not the history of the banking sector for at least a generation?

  16. and all the security of a Harem Girls Pants by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    sure in the technical sense most harem girls are wearing pants but its not like 1 they conceal anything at all 2 they wont come off if you so much as stare at them hard

    in similar fashion the "security" for this will work

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  17. who likes risk? by Krau+Ming · · Score: 1

    i am so not doing this. at least not until i can have my phone permanently attached at the wrist a la pipboy. too risky. your phone gets stolen, which costs $$$, plus access to banking and credit cards??? not to mention the inevitable "whoops your personal banking info was exposed on the internet, sorry!" that will happen to thousands of people when the banks get hacked, or they goof, or your phone gets some kind of malware that lifts that info... NO THANKS BANKS.

  18. What's the worst that could happen? by azalin · · Score: 2

    What's the worst that could happen? There is no way that idea could wreak havoc to you finances if something goes wrong. Actually forget the "if" and replace it "once". One basket was not a good idea a few hundred years ago when carrying eggs and still isn't.

  19. Re:nice timing by PmanAce · · Score: 2

    I'm curious to hear why, what are your examples?

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  20. Oh great by IndigoDarkwolf · · Score: 0

    Now I'll never get rid of that Canadian Tire money. It'll sit in my sock drawer for all eternity.

  21. Canada certainly not cashless by Geof · · Score: 1

    Canadians already primarily use a card system called Interac to make most purchases; granted, it's been a while since I lived in Canada but even three years ago it was very rare for me to make a cash purchase.

    I see no evidence that your experience is typical. Cash is widely used, as are credit cards. We are far from being a cashless society. I only use Interac a few times a year. Interac has been hit with fraud sprees by criminals using tampered skimmers. Unlike with credit cards, where banks impose such losses on merchants, banks often fail to refund the money.

    1. Re:Canada certainly not cashless by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I think it depends where you are (where are you?)... I lived in southwestern Ontario.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Canada certainly not cashless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Montreal and never do me or my girlfriend have cash, Interac is everywhere, and where they don't have it, they go out of buisness.

  22. Anonymity by PoiBoy · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    "If a consumer walks into Home Depot today and pays with cash. Home Depot has no idea who that customer is, how many times they've been in the store and what they've actually purchased," said Darrell MacMullin, managing director at PayPal Canada.

    That's precisely why I use cash much of the time. I'd rather not have every retailer in the country tracking my every purchase.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:Anonymity by Krokus · · Score: 1

      Stores up here like Safeway and Save-On Foods get around people making cash transactions by inflating their prices and then dropping many (but not all) of those prices back to normal as long as you sign up as a "member". Then, it doesn't matter how you pay. If you don't sign up and let them track your purchasing, you get shafted on the price you pay. You might say, "well, then don't shop there", and I usually don't. When I do, however, I sort-of get around it by using my brother's wife's membership number.

  23. TOO BIG TO MESS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am against concepts that require transactions to be interdependent as vulnerabilities carry more severe penalties. For example a debit card can be locked to protect customers and takes a few days to unlock. Imagine if all your debit cards, your credit cards and even access to credit were suddenly shut off for ten days or worse. Or imagine a hacker being able to completely drain all your financial resources. Keeping it safe and keeping it simple do have a relationship.

  24. Compromising one card at a time not good enough? by MetaDragon · · Score: 1

    Given the frequency that anything online gets hacked these days, you would have to be really really naive to trust every one of your credit cards to a service that sounds like a potential one-stop shop for identity thieves. I mean, come on, has the world grown so lazy that manual entry of payment info when making purchases online is considered difficult?

  25. And we Canadians are going to rush to it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..not for convenience, but because our new "paper" currency is made of plastic, http://www.google.ca/search?q=canadian+plastic+money , AND WE ALL HATE IT!
    It melts together in only moderately high heat, they are so thin and staticy that they easily stick together (making it too easy to hand over 2 or 3 bills instead of just one) and it just plain DOES NOT FEEL NICE. I call conspiracy on this one.

    1. Re:And we Canadians are going to rush to it... by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      It's the same tech as Australian currency which is more than 20 years old and proven. The crap you said simply isn't true. Get used to it, it is an improvement in every way.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  26. Paperless by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Just another way of saying powerless. He who controls the bits controls how much money you 'actually' have... and how you 'actually' voted.

    A paper trail really is right up there as a facet of a truly free and open society; we casually abandon it at our peril.

  27. Can't take the heat by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Apparently, when their fancy new plastic bills get hot, they shrivel up like (non-Canadian) bacon. Oh, AGW irony, Hr. Harper.

    1. Re:Can't take the heat by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      I fucking hate the new 100s and 50s. They are way to slippery. I had a 100 in my pocket and went to pull something else out and lost the 100. I hate using a wallet, but now if I have one or more I only will carry them in a wallet. The "paper" money has enough friction that it stays put when you reach in and out of your pocket. The new bills should be embossed with micro ridges or something to at least give them the same friction as the old paper bills. As it is these new plastic bills slide like a greased [make up some disgusting analogy and put it here].

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  28. I don't see the benefit for the customer by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    I only see benefits for the banks in this scheme.

    First, they will now have access to a crapload more data about people's shopping habits that they can mine and sell.

    Second, service charges. Hey now instead of paying for the privilege of using your debit card to Bank A, you can also pay a service charge on top of that to Bank B who is providing this digital wallet.

    Zero benefit for the customer.

    1) I already carry a physical wallet. I keep my cards in it and they are always with me -- digital wallet provides no benefit over this.

    2) If I lose my physical wallet, I call and cancel my cards. With a digital wallet if I lose my cell phone I call and cancel my cards and my phone. -- again, no benefit.

    3) I'll have to pay more service charges to the banks for this "service". Banks in Canada nickel and dime us to death already and they will not offer this service for free. -- No benefit.

  29. Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that doesn't respect your freedom respects neither your privacy, nor your security nor, ultimately, your personal safety.

  30. sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how so many people commenting have no idea how banking works in canada. First off, almost everyone uses interac debit -- every bank in Canada has the same thing. Email money transfers are the norm here - almost every bank supports it (small credit unions are just coming online with it now) Fraud departments at our credit card companies are awesome. We do have RFID based cards, but transactions are limited for most to $50 (for most people -- you can have it raised).

    However, if its a fraudulent transaction its removed -- Banks realize there can be potential issues to RFID as such, the first time I actually used my card for an RFID transaction, I recieved a call that night from card security making sure it was me.

    Also re: lack of RFID -- maybe in the USA. However, in canada, you can use your RFID card pretty much anywhere -- including walmart

    this new project isnt really anything new - it's basically going to be like paypal.. which seems dumb, but I guess the banks want in on it.. ie) you can put money into your 'virtual wallet' from multiple sources.

  31. Credit Cards by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Using credit cards gives your information to foreign corporations (USA) who process all this information in the USA and naturally their government has access to all of it. Don't expect it to go well, Russia tried to at least have the data processed within their nation and lost that fight.

    Canada is more likely to have standards develop and government (post Harper) properly regulate it; plus they do have credit unions... Wasn't Canada the nation who's government was looking into providing official electronic money?

    Banks will at some point make this cheap or free to compete against credit cards etc. Then as soon as possible they will wring every dime from you as legally possible.