Slashdot Mirror


Will Speed Limits Inhibit Autonomous Car Adoption?

Maximum Prophet writes "Here's a thought: at the start, only rich people will be able to pay for a completely autonomous car. Auto-autos will only go the speed limit. Rich people don't like to go slow. Ergo, there won't be any market for automatic cars. Wait, I hear you say. The rich guy will just modify his car to go faster. But, if you go over the limit it's a fine, but to mess with the safety systems of even your own vehicle is probably a felony. Much more likely: the rich will get new laws passed to make it legal for automatic cars to go much, much faster than human-driven vehicles."

16 of 650 comments (clear)

  1. I'll be back. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...honking does no good, because robots do not care if you honk at them."

    Not if the auto-pilot is an 800 series terminator.

  2. Wow.. that is a pile of great logic by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your post is built on assumptions on top of assumptions. Only people who are religious nut jobs, or politicians do this. Nobody likes either.

    Ergo, you have no friends..
    The only reasonable conclusion I can come to about the submitter..

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  3. Can anyone explain this... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...with a good car analogy?

  4. Re:Rich people by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn those rich people screwing us over again. Do you actually sit around all days trying to come up with new ways to be outraged at rich people or what?

    Slashdot seems to have become the last, best hope for Communism on the Internet in the last couple of years. Probably as the technical content has declined, the libertarians have moved elsewhere.

    Why the outrage at this? I mean, if we are going to compete with the Chinese (a constant theme both on /. and in the rest of society) then the first step is obviously to become better communists than them.

  5. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pedestrians? There will be no pedestrians in the future, only autonomous scooters!

  6. Re:designated driver by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Funny

    were I rich, I would be all over autonomous vehicle for a few reasons:
    1) you can probably drive it yourself if you want to speed
    2) I could hit the pub and get wrecked and have the car drive me home without worrying about getting arrested for DUI

    Just don't try the voice activated car options...

    "car, take me to the pub so i can get wrecked"

    "Okay, we are going to wreck into the pub."

  7. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pfft. You only think that because you're not an autonomous car.

  8. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Funny

    How will pedestrians cross the street?
    The pedestrians will have to be autonomous, too. it's all part of the plan.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  9. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by ottothecow · · Score: 3, Funny
    That'd be perfect--I would never have to find a parking spot, I could just tell my autonomous car to circle the block until I am done. A gallon of gas costs far less than a valet or a ramp (especially if my car is efficient and the computer only lets it accelerate super slow and use the highest possible gear at all times).

    Sure, my slowpoke car driving in circles will just create more congestion and emissions for everyone else...but fuck 'em! at least I didn't have to find a parking spot.

    --
    Bottles.
  10. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rich people always change the laws for themselves

    Here, fixed for you.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  11. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by KingMotley · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, but what happens when you use your autonomous car and there is a pedestrian there that wasn't on google maps???

  12. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Also, again, in the UK, pedestrians are often responsible for their own safety, and thus pay more attention.

    In the USA, on the other hand, if pedestrians are stricken by vehicles and die, they come back to life; therefore, they're not responsible for their safety.

    ?

  13. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by KingMotley · · Score: 1, Funny

    The cars cheating, since they are google cars, so they have cameras on them updating google maps as they go. That's how they avoid the pedestrians.

  14. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google's cars work just fine around pedestrians. They see them and respond appropriately.

    So they built them with middle fingers and speakers that blast obscenities?


    Now I'm interested...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  15. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    run my son over to the football field...

    Do be careful how you issue these orders to your car.

    Car: Reporting in, sir. Son successfully run over, awaiting further instructions from football field...

    --

    kurzweil_freak

    5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

    Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  16. Re:No, it'll just be an OPTION by Immerman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Autonomous teleporters?

    I don't know that I trust them to get it right, I'd rather reassemble my own molecules...

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.