Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Fans Fix Up Luke Skywalker's Home

An anonymous reader writes "How far would a Star Wars fan go to preserve a relic from the iconic film series? One devoted fan traveled to Tunisia to rescue Luke Skywalker's boyhood home, also known as The Lars Homestead, as seen in Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. On a trip to Tunisia in 2010, Belgian traveler Mark Dermul came upon the modest dome-shaped hut that George Lucas built in the mid-1970s to serve as Luke Skywalker's home. The structure was falling apart when Dermul found it, so he hatched a scheme to restore it. After two years and a lot of cement and plaster, Luke's house is looking better than ever."

28 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. 65k Split pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That url has 19 trackers and loads a new page for each individual image. Deplorable.

  2. calling it now by trdtaylor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    George Lucas will promptly sue him and everyone involved for copyright infringement

    http://motherboard.vice.com/2011/5/12/george-lucas-owns-the-universe-a-timeline-of-star-wars-copyright-battles

    1. Re:calling it now by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Lucas (or RIAA or MPAA) ever tries to sue me, and I end-up owing millions of dollars of supposed "damages", they can eat a bullet. If I'm going to receive a life sentence as my punishment, make it for something worthwhile, not fake rights.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:calling it now by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997!

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:calling it now by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997!"

      Since when it is "anti-social" to kill your masters who are your deliberate and malicious enemies?

      Laws are for the rich. If you decide you have nothing to lose, why not take some of your enemies with you instead of being crushed by the legal system they own?

      It's the ultimate way of saying "NO!", and he who doesn't fear punishment cannot be enslaved. Our masters don't fear us. They only fear brute violence, nothing else. As long as we are cozy enough not to inflict it upon them, they win.

      I'm comfortable enough that I don't feel any need to act. Someone in a different situation might say "enough" and open fire. I'll not call that choice "anti-social". My choice not to act is much more selfish.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:calling it now by SciBoy · · Score: 2

      Actually, the definition of "Anti-social" is to do by direct action or indirect action damage to society. The rich ruling the world is how society works right now, so killing them is indeed anti-social behaviour. But in the same way, if your actions cause a major upheaval of the social structure the definition of what is anti-social may change until killing the rich is no longer deemed anti-social.

      The french did that in 1790.

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  3. Conflicting reports by argux · · Score: 2

    Weren't there supposed to be people living there now? I remember reading about it about a week ago. Did they arrive after this guy restored the place?

  4. Only part of Luke's home by dpilot · · Score: 5, Informative

    The more interesting part was the desert-sensible underground portion. From what I can see the two parts weren't anywhere near each other, just spliced together on film. From the igloo you could only see the berm around the atrium.

    The rest of the house was actually the Hotel Sidi Driss...
    http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g293756-d523724-r32974695-Hotel_Sidi_Driss-Matmata_Gabes_Governorate.html
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1c3Mdk_di7Q

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  5. So pretty by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would be gorgeous in the summer. Great place for Luke to have a barbecue with his family

    What. What did I say?

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    1. Re:So pretty by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would be gorgeous in the summer. Great place for Luke to have a barbecue with his family
      What. What did I say?

      You must have a deep burning desire to hurt them, or you wouldn't be so inflammatory.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:So pretty by kenj0418 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It would be gorgeous in the summer. Great place for Luke to have a barbecue with his family

      You insensitive clod. Luke lost both his aunt and his uncle and has no family. I'm sure he'd give his right hand to have a family again.

  6. $11,000?? by arcite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of that must have been spent on the airplane ticket and transport. That structure isn't even a real desert structure, its constructed out of cheap wood (which is not used in the desert as there are no trees), and plaster....it's not a 'real' house or building, its a SET PIECE. Wouldn't it have been more useful to rebuild it from scratch from cement blocks and then open it as a B&B? Or perhaps set up a live-web cam showing the sunset to mimic the scene from the movie. This could have provided a few jobs for local Tunisians, who have suffered great economic hardship due to the revolution. Just another useless hipster stunt.

    1. Re:$11,000?? by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you really expect a hard-core Star Wars fan to have any real-world skills?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:$11,000?? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Bet he's pretty good with an E-11 blaster.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:$11,000?? by ukemike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That structure isn't even a real desert structure, its constructed out of cheap wood (which is not used in the desert as there are no trees), and plaster....it's not a 'real' house or building, its a SET PIECE. Wouldn't it have been more useful to rebuild it from scratch from cement blocks and then open it as a B&B?

      Uhm... Duh. Movie sets aren't made to last. Most of the time they aren't made to look good up close either. They aren't made to code, and they aren't intended to be lived in. They are made of cheap wood and plaster, or whatever material are quickest, cheapest, and adequate for the planned shot. Sets are usually torn down the day after shooting on the set is finished.

      If this guy had torn it all down and built it out of stone or cement, then the original set would be gone. His goal was to restore it. Using cheap wood and plaster was entirely appropriate, because he was doing a restoration. Now matching the colors to what was seen in the film would have been nice. Oh well.

      --
      -- QED
  7. Mark Hamill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I read the headline I assumed that Mark Hamill had fallen on hard times and some Star Wars fans were patching his roof or something.

    Maybe while George Lucas threw boulders at it. The actual story is a let down.

  8. My question by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just have one question:

    Did he get rid of the corpses?

    1. Re:My question by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Did he get rid of the corpses?

      please - the indigenous dewbacks cleaned those up within a day or two.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Re:Better? by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is an example of a movie that did have an impact for the general public. So there's no wonder that there are people that takes interest in the history of the sets.

    The white makes sense since it reflects heat, and it will over time be worn down and get colored by the sand. The building itself doesn't look out of place in the desert but is actually of a design that you would expect there.

    Add to this that this will be a bonus tourist trap for Tunisia.

    And I don't think that George Lucas will make much fuzz about that restoration since it will end up creating a lot of badwill.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  10. Bad summary by PNutts · · Score: 4, Informative

    Surprised? It came straight from the linked bad blog. Here's the link to the Save Lars site. Mark Durmul is a impromptu guide that lead tourists to Tunisian movie locations. In 2010 some fans were surprised by the set's condition and joked about returning to restore it. The rest is in the blog (and very interesting because it contains more Star Wars and Raiders Of The Lost Ark set locations). And at the risk of being a dick, this set was rebuilt in 2002 for the prequels so it isn't known if it appeared in the original Star Wars movie (never episode IV, thank you very much).

    1. Re:Bad summary by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Funny

      this set was rebuilt in 2002 for the prequels

      Ah, so this is a news story - they found a guy who actually cares about the prequels. Turns out he was hiding in Belgium.

      Psychologists and anthropologists shall be dispatched post haste.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. Obiligitory "Star Wars - Troopers (COPS)" video by PNutts · · Score: 2

    Between what really happened at the Lars Homestead and "Han Shot First" the Empire doesn't look nearly as bad as it did in 1977.

  12. Google Maps location by EvilXenu · · Score: 5, Informative

    After a short bit of searching, I was able to bring up the lat/long coordinates on my navicomputer. Check it out: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=33.842823,+7.779038&hl=en&ll=33.842618,7.778471&spn=0.001635,0.004128&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=50.644639,135.263672&t=h&z=19

  13. Re:Back of the class losers. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Of course it is those who are afraid of reality who recoil from something like this like a Gollum from the light.

    Outside.

    Now.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. Re:Whatever happened to location, location, locati by SScorpio · · Score: 2

    Nah, just get a droid who understands the binary language of moisture vaporators and get them running again. Luke did grow up on a moisture farm.

  15. Young Obi Wan's visit by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ewan McGregor and his friend Charley Boorman visited the original Tunisian set on their motorcycle trek from Scotland to South Africa in 2007. It's included in their travelogue Long Way Down.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  16. Re:Better? by jimicus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's never bothered Lucas before.

  17. Re:Back of the class losers. by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lucas never was right in the head, but he did get worse over the years. The only reason the first three movies were any good is because 1) his wife (now ex-wife, since he dumped her after those movies) cleaned up the dialog and scripts, particularly in the first movie, and 2) in the latter two movies, he had other people help with writing and direction. The second movie was the best precisely because he didn't direct it or write it, and the third wasn't bad because he didn't direct it and only helped write it (Kasdan is credited first with the screenplay on IMDB). Heck, if his ex-wife didn't clean up his crappy scriptwriting on the first movie, Star Wars would probably have been forgotten and never spawned any sequels; she's probably the one we really have to thank, and she probably got cut out of all his riches.