Slashdot Mirror


How the Inventors of Dragon Speech Recognition Technology Lost Everything

First time accepted submitter cjsm writes "James and Janet Baker were the inventors of Dragon Systems' speech recognition software, and after years of work, they created a multimillion dollar company. At the height of the tech boom, with investment offers rolling in, they turned to Goldman Sachs for financial advice. For a five million dollar fee, Goldman hooked them up with Lernout & Hauspie, the Belgium speech recognition company. After consultations with Goldman Sachs, the Bakers traded their company for $580 million in Lernout & Hauspie stock. But it turned out Lernout & Hauspie was involved in cooking their books and went bankrupt. Dragon was sold in a bankruptcy auction to Scansoft, and the Bakers lost everything. Goldman and Sachs itself had decided against investing in Lernout & Hauspie two years previous to this because they were lying about their Asian sales. The Bakers are suing for one billion dollars."

18 of 606 comments (clear)

  1. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought Goldman Sachs were the good guys?

    1. Re:Ironic by jo42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Since when has Wall Street (Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, AIG, et al) done anything other than for themselves?

      They take the little guys money and bend them over (without a tube of Vaseline).

    2. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      but but but ... Goldman's CEO Blankfein said they're doing God's work in there, they MUST be good guys!

      ... for some definitions of 'God' and 'good guys', anyway

  2. One! by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 4, Funny

    billions! It's so much money even the singular takes an "s"!

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  3. They are the good guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    IN BIZARRO WORLD

    1. Re:They are the good guys by lennier · · Score: 5, Funny

      "We guided them to a completed transaction."

      As the lion said of the zebra.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  4. Crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine that, Goldman Sachs involved in swindling people.

    Will wonders never cease.

  5. Re:Why civil? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    If corporations are people, then they're responsible for the relationships between the different thoughts in their heads.

    Couldn't they claim diminished responsibility due to multiple personality disorder?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  6. Wellllllll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "After consultations with Goldman Sachs,..."

    That's your problem right there.

  7. Re:Why civil? by ynp7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't the burden of having all that money and the guilt over how it was acquired really punishment enough?

  8. Re:Why civil? by Smallpond · · Score: 5, Funny

    For example, a bank should not be allowed to combine with another bank. Mergers should only take place between different types of financial institutions as God intended.

  9. Re:Two lessons here by pitchpipe · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you're a first time entrepreneur ... you're gonna get raped.

    By someone named Gold Man-Sacs no less!

    Let's see, names for our new "financial business":

    1. Dewey, Cheatham & Howe - Already taken
    2. Skrewar, Widdow & Childe - Nice ring, but nah
    3. Roper, Bender & Raper - Too obvious
    4. Gold Man-Sacs - By Jove old chap, brilliant!
    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
  10. so what exactly is 'stealing', im sorry by decora · · Score: 3, Funny

    im a little confused as to what you would actually consider 'stealing'.

    my favorite definition is from Jennifer Aniston's character in Office Space.

    you take something thats not yours. and then it becomes yours.

  11. Re:Two lessons here by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

    You forgot my favorite:
    Takeda, Monet, and Runne

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  12. Re:there is no wall at goldman sachs by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do believe the phrase he was looking for is "palsy walsy"

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  13. Re:there is no wall at goldman sachs by kennykb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whether it was wishy-washy or palsy-walsy, the point is that there was hanky-panky going on.

  14. Re:What I wondered is.. by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who owns Scansoft, who apart from GS are the other big winners from this transaction? They got the world's best speech rec software for a fraction of its true value - I wonder who they were advised by?

    A mysterious company called Soldman Gachs, who have since gone out of business after a fire that destroyed all of their files.

  15. Re:there is no wall at goldman sachs by haruchai · · Score: 4, Funny

    More like Hanky-Paulsy

    No bailout for the Bakers', I guess.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body