Skype Bug Sends Messages To Random Contacts
An anonymous reader writes "A bug has been discovered in Skype that sends users' private instant messages to other contacts whom the messages were never intended for. Skype has confirmed the issue and is working on a fix. 'We are aware that in rare circumstances IM's between two contacts could be sent to an unintended third contact,' a Skype spokesperson told Engadget. 'We are rolling out a fix for this issue in the next few days and will notify our users to download an updated version of Skype.'"
Why would I go to a theater to see a movie not shot at 24 fps, 48fps is just too fast for me.
Time to offend someone
Skype also sends crap to port 80 at systems where the skype client is or has been running.
This shows up as garbage log lines in Apache.
This has been going on for years and they never fixed it.
how to find out if that happened...just in case i am cheating on my wife
The lunatic is in my head
Is it just me or did the Skype bugs get more entertaining after the MS purchase?
Is Skype for Linux affected?
My first program:
Hell Segmentation fault
You may call that a bug.
the lonely lonely Skype program calls that "making friends".
Come on, sign it up for a dating service, it wants to make friends.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
To use the 5.0 series of Skype. I uninstalled it and went back to 4.2.0.187...........much nicer, thank you very much.
"The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
It's called an open proxy scan, you dipshit. It's intentional.
He just admitted to running Skype. It's kind of a given.
"We are aware that in rare circumstances IM's between two contacts could be sent to an unintended third contact"
The wording is interesting. They are not saying its an error, they are just saying it was sent to an unintended receiver.
In other words: "Yes, we spy on you. But it wasn't our intention your friends know". I wouldn't be surprised if the next story is about skype having simular chat content filters as facebook showed recently.
The part wrong is the recipient, it's supposed to forward your messages to big brother, not your friends.
What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
A new product - Skype Chat Roulette!
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
The old bag is going to some suffragette meeting tonight or something. Bring your Mighty Mouse costume... there will be plenty of time. Can't wait to eat your cheese!!
How about fixing the red exit button so that when I click it the application actually exits, and doesn't keep running in the background, so I have to exit it again, and the confirm?
And before I hear the whiners say:"That's what its supposed to do". I say inability to exit the application with one click is a fucking bug.
If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
A "bug", really? Or was it a "feature" that went slightly wrong? The mere existence of code [in Skype's codebase] that sends messages without the user's input is troublesome (although hardly surprising, considering the source).
The first set of hotfixes (Skype for Windows and Skype for Linux) to the Skype IM/chat bug are out – see http://blogs.skype.com/garage/2012/07/hotfix_for_multiple_skype_clie.html.