Slashdot Mirror


Implant Gives Grayscale Vision To the Blind Using Lasers

MrSeb writes with a bit from Extreme Tech: "After a lot of theorizing, posturing, and non-human trials, it looks like bionic eye implants are finally hitting the market — first in Europe, and hopefully soon in the U.S. These implants can restore sight to completely blind patients — though only if the blindness is caused by a faulty retina, as in macular degeneration (which millions of old people suffer from), diabetic retinopathy, or other degenerative eye diseases. ... The Bio-Retina, developed by Nano Retina, is a whole lot more exciting. The Bio-Retina costs ... around the $60,000 [and] the 576-pixel vision-restoring sensor is actually placed inside the eye, on top of the retina. The operation only takes 30 minutes and can be performed under local anesthetic. Once installed, 576 electrodes on the back of the sensor implant themselves into your optic nerve. The best bit, though, is how the the sensor is powered: The Bio-Retina system comes with a standard pair of corrective lenses that are modified so that they can fire a near-infrared laser beam through your iris to the sensor at the back of your eye. On the sensor there is a photovoltaic cell that produces up to three milliwatts — not a lot, but more than enough."

27 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Ain't technology great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is super cool, if it works, but I'll shit golden sunshine before I let someone near my eyeball with a knife!

    1. Re:Ain't technology great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think if you were unable to see sufficently to function you would take this option! I certainly did when I got lasic.

    2. Re:Ain't technology great? by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is super cool, if it works, but I'll shit golden sunshine before I let someone near my eyeball with a knife!

      If you were blind would you care?

    3. Re:Ain't technology great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should try CXL surgery for a keratoconus, they don't actually cut anything but they drill away the upper layer of your cornea and you're only under local anesthetic so you see it coming. It looks just like a household drill with a small sander and works just the same. After that it's smooth sailing though and if you've gone from -3/-4 to -8/-10 in sight in less then a year you'll do pretty much anything to make it stop. I'm pretty sure a blind person would go through hell to see.

    4. Re:Ain't technology great? by dwywit · · Score: 2

      There might be some additional benefits: Superhero vision http://www.komar.org/faq/colorado-cataract-surgery-crystalens/

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  2. Retina Display Anyone? by oic0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I'll wait for the high res apple version with retina display ;) The resolution on these bad boys blows. (disclaimer, I hate apple but couldn't help myself).

    1. Re:Retina Display Anyone? by otaku244 · · Score: 2
      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    2. Re:Retina Display Anyone? by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean the iEye? Sigh.

      If such a product were available, I could imagine Apple zealots* lining up, waiting to poke their eyes out as soon as it was their turn...

      (*Not picking on all Apple users, just the extremists)

  3. Careful. by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm always happy for research done to improve mobility and functioning for disabled people. Not enough is done to help those who are vision, mobility, or hearing impaired. That said... be really careful out there. There's way too many people who are scared by anyone who looks different. Steve Mann was recently attacked for having a digital eye prothetic by employees of a McDonald's. There didn't appear to be any motive for the assault other than a fear of his prothetics. His family was with him at the time.

    I've heard similar reports of people being attacked who have brain implants to deliver electrical stimulation due to epilepsy, depression, etc. If it's visible, sooner or later some stupid neanderthal bastard's going to attack you for it. I personally think it should be a hate crime to attack a disabled (or 'augmented') person... but it's still more science fiction than science fact to our legislators to consider, I think.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Careful. by Glarimore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quite honestly, I don't know why we shit on ACs just for being ACs. It's the same thing as an ad hominem attack, which we regularly condemn here.

      In reality the AC is correct and the grandparent is incorrect in his assertion that, "There didn't appear to be any motive for the assault other than a fear of his prothetics." Grandparent is apparently unaware that essentially all information regarding Mann's incident comes from his blog. There was thorough discussion on Slashdot about possible motives and I think it was generally agreed upon that the reason for the attack was a perfect storm of a) language barrier b) Mann's disregard for the rules of McDonalds, and from what I gather, unwillingness to leave (no filming or pictures) and c) McDonald's employees who are currently trying to keep their restaurant, which is currently under protest, from going under.

      All this being said, AC's comment, though correct, was inflammatory with the "state facts or STFU" spiel at the end. It looks like there are only losers here.

    2. Re:Careful. by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Informative

      > "Still boils down to fear of cybernetic prosthesis."

      No, it boils down to the guy taking pictures of the premises. It being a prosthesis is irrelevant.

      As far as I could tell from the admittedly-scant information the /. story and linked article provided about Mann's implants & digital vision augmentations, it seems they were not designed, nor had as a normal function, the ability to photograph/video-record on command. The pictures of Mann's attackers were said to have resulted from the attacker's damaging the system resulting in the images being frozen in buffers.

      If McDonalds or any other business that deals directly with the public in such a manner has a problem with the possible capabilities of such prosthesis, then they need to post high-visibility signage at the entrances stating that those with electronic-based prosthesis are not welcome on the premises.

      Assault & battery is not an acceptable response in any civilized society. Then again, the French have never been in danger of being accused of being overly-civil to Americans visiting France. It's one of the main reasons I as a blues musician have turned down opportunities to do tours in France, despite the love the French have for American blues music.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:Careful. by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They may not have known that it didn't permanently record. They just saw a camera affixed to the guy's face and acted.

      No.

      They saw a prosthetic device affixed to the guy's face.

      Because they feared what they did not understand simply because of it's appearance, and in addition, despite documentation he carried for this purpose they assaulted him.

      I don't know how much clearer this can be made that they feared him because of his appearance with prosthesis.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  4. Introducing the iEye by ohnocitizen · · Score: 2

    Every year, a new version will come out with less invasive surgery, better resolution, color... night mode... I hope they make these things somewhat easy to upgrade. Just imagining being able to switch visible spectrum has me wanting the future version for myself.

    1. Re:Introducing the iEye by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't get your hopes up too much, they're not really doing anything to map out the neurons in the eye. They're just punching through and stimulating whatever neurons are behind that spot of the retina, which will be "close enough" to give you a low-resolution grayscale image but they haven't got a clue on how to stimulate only one type of receptors so you can have color or to map it accurately so you can have high resolution. A working eye is a helluva sensor and I suspect we'll be using night vision goggles and such to translate invisible light to visible light for many decades to come.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  5. It's not so great (yet) by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They claim a 24x24 pixel image. The video shows a low-resolution grey scale video of a kid on a swing. Looks fantastic if you consider going from blind to THAT. However I paused a frame and the kids head was 12 pixels wide. So the overall image is probably at least 120 to 240 wide - many times higher resolution than the device actually produces. So the video is not actually representative. With further advancements one can hope (expect?) that the resolution will increase over the years. Gives new meaning to "retina display".

    1. Re:It's not so great (yet) by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously it can only go in 1 eye, as the pixels wouldn't match up perfectly 1:1 between the eyes so the user would be disoriented and have no depth perception

      Don't underestimate the brain's power to figure out the distortion in sensory inputs and compensate for them. For example, there was that study where subjects wore mirrored glasses so that everything they saw was upside down -- within a day or two they didn't even notice (until they took the glasses off, anyway, at which point they had to re-adapt again).

      A more likely reason to limit the procedure to one eye would be to avoid having to double the price to $120,000 for only minimal additional benefit.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  6. Wow! by pubwvj · · Score: 3

    So wonderful! My grandfather went blind towards the end of his life, or nearly so. Having sight again would have been something he dearly would have liked for reading. I hope this continues to advance and quickly for all those who are sight impaired.

  7. What I can not figure out... by Cosgrach · · Score: 2

    Is just *why* the blind are using lasers!

    --
    Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    1. Re:What I can not figure out... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Is just *why* the blind are using lasers!

      Well, they weren't blind when they first started using them...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  8. "modified" to shoot lasers? by erice · · Score: 2

    Never mind the parts that the author did not feel were important enough to mention:
    1) the lasers
    2) The power source for the lasers

    Last I checked, standard corrective lenses didn't have anything batteries, electronics, or even the raw materials to make power sources or electronics.

    They are just regular sharks. Well, apart from the friggin lasers on top of their heads!

  9. Science marches on.. by jxander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eyes ain't the only thing being replaced by tech

    A buddy of mine is a type 1 diabetic; he was simply born with a faulty pancreas. For the majority of his life, he dealt with constant insulin injections, as typical for a diabetic. A few years back however, he was upgraded to an external pump. It looks just like an old beeper, and plugs into a semi-permanent* injection point under his shirt. Whenever he eats, he just has to push a few buttons on the pump and it steadily drips the correct amount of insulin into his blood stream

    Of course, a pancreas isn't nearly as complex as an eye, so I'm glad to see science and medicine marching onward. Given that these advancements have happened in just a few short years, has me excited to see what will happen in this field within the next decade or so.

    *semi-permanent: He stab himself once every few days, and there's a whole bracketing system roughly the size of a silver dollar that glues onto his skin and keeps the needle/tubing at the correct depth.

    --
    This signature is false.
  10. Photovoltaic? by squidflakes · · Score: 2

    If their power comes from a photovoltaic chip on corrective lenses, does that mean that you're going to wake-up blind every morning?

  11. Hopefully improved by tsotha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm hoping not only that resolution improves (and color, naturally), but why stop there? I wouldn't mind being able to see in UV bands and a telescopic lens would be nice.

    1. Re:Hopefully improved by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You might find that the 576 pixels gives the patients better vision than you'd imagine. They'll not be driving or reading any small-print, but our eyes are not massively high res to start with and the brain does a ton of work to scan them around to put the scene together and enhancing the result "post-production". Of course compared to blind even if it isn't all that good it'll still be a massively life changing improvement.

      Just think: in a few decades time "you'll go blind" will no longer be a threat to 14 years olds...

  12. Re:waiting for IPS repair options by slew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not knocking the progress on this optical implant, but it only does greyscale and without serious microsurgery, will never stop being greyscale only. She needs full color to regain what she lost.

    There's no reason to believe that fancy microsurgery is required in order to visualize color. As a trivial example, nearly all color digital cameras have color filter arrays embedded over a monochrome sensor (other than foveon/sigma). It's not a big stretch to imagine that a future revision of this chip could have a color filter array and your brain (visual cortex) could learn to recognize different spatial encoding patterns as different colors.

    That's similar to what your brain does now (although the retina helps by doing some type of local opponent-color coding). If the color mapping isn't easy for your brain to learn and you need a mapping more like your original mapping, in the worst case, you could even make the sensor configurable (stimulate different nerves for different colors). Although if you did this "simply" the pixels might be slightly scrambled, but that could be compensated for by using a really high resolution sensor (all cameras have multi-megapixel sensors these days), and then recoding to a lower resolution for output to the optic nerve.

    All these things can be easily done on the sensor chip itself w/o requiring more advanced surgical techniques... Ah the wonder of silicon technology...

    P.S. Dibs on the patents for this (or at least prior-art on the idea)...

  13. citation needed by ridgecritter · · Score: 2

    A quick WikiP search indicated the latest evidence for effectiveness against cataracts of N-acc drops was not real solid (see 2008 Royal College of Opthalmologists statement), the the Wiki article also indicates subsequent evidence is available, but doesn't give a cite. As someone who's developing corneal opacities, I'm interested, can you give a cite or two? Tnx.

  14. Re:finally... by Teresita · · Score: 2

    It's going to make Jiordi LaForge's vision prosthetic look as outdated as Kirk's flip phone in TOS.