Slashdot Mirror


Washington State To Allow Voter Registration Over Facebook

An anonymous reader writes "The Associated Press reports that the state of Washington will soon have an application available on its Facebook page that will let residents register to vote. Washington and other states already allow online registration, but this is the first time it will be allowed over Facebook. The state's co-director of elections, Shane Hamlin, said, 'In this age of social media and more people going online for services, this is a natural way to introduce people to online registration and leverage the power of friends on Facebook to get more people registered.' Facebook won't have access to the State's database, and Hamlin says Facebook won't collect any of the personal information with which it interacts."

36 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nah, no chance for vote fraud there.

    Why make voting easy? Why not make it hard? That makes sure only people who care enough to at least truly believe in who they're voting for, instead of making elections a shallow beauty contest.

    1. Re:Lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No possibility that Facebook will track voters. No constitutional issues at all. Nothing to see here, move along.

    2. Re:Lovely by Hentes · · Score: 2

      I think they only register on Facebook don't actually vote there, although with America and their evoting machines you never know. As for unnecessarily complicating the voting process to scare off undecided voters, that may not have the effect you are hoping for. You see, the more you know, the less you trust all the bullshit the parties are feeding to you, or that elections really have an effect on your life. The people who will go to an election no matter what are the radicals.

    3. Re:Lovely by mister2au · · Score: 2

      I almost missed the point on first reading there ...

      I'm guessing the implied problem is suggesting that compromised facebook accounts give the possibility for the step in fake voter registrations which can be then used for vote fraud?

      Or is was a troll attempt and I read meaning into something that had none.

    4. Re:Lovely by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they only register on Facebook don't actually vote there, although with America and their evoting machines you never know. As for unnecessarily complicating the voting process to scare off undecided voters, that may not have the effect you are hoping for. You see, the more you know, the less you trust all the bullshit the parties are feeding to you, or that elections really have an effect on your life. The people who will go to an election no matter what are the radicals.

      It makes a difference from the "hanging chad", people saying "I didn't vote I just clicked "like" on a picture of a kitten and it registered as a vote for Mitt Romney"

    5. Re:Lovely by jpate · · Score: 5, Informative

      The people who will go to an election no matter what are the radicals.

      "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal" —Emma Goldman

    6. Re:Lovely by quadrox · · Score: 5, Funny

      > tl;dr your a failure

      should read

      > tl;dr your'e a failure

      Sincerely,
      Hauptgrammatikfuhrer

    7. Re:Lovely by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Not from the US.
      Why do you need to register to vote anyway?
      Isn't any adult automatically allowed to vote and doesn't government already have a list of every adult?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:Lovely by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People keep migrating, so the states cannot keep track of the residents. Also lot of things makes you ineligible to vote. The registration gives the states time to verify eligibility. From what I understand, all countries register voters for this reason. Is it different in your country?

    9. Re:Lovely by Pax681 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who is John Galt?

      here in Scotland John Galt was a novelist and has a primary school named after him in Irvine, North Ayrshire ;)

    10. Re:Lovely by Bysshe · · Score: 2

      Better yet, make it required with penalty of fine if you don't. If you have no opinion you vote blank. That way you get a more moderate and rational reflection of actual citizen opinion instead of just the extreme ends who are emotionally vested in the issues

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    11. Re:Lovely by Bysshe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is different in different countries. Here in Holland when you live/move to a city you are required by law to register with that city (else not be able to get health insurance, vote, or get social assistance). When you're registered they also automatically send you your voter card before elections. Then its up to you if you go to vote or not. Next elections here are September 12th.

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    12. Re:Lovely by bmo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, no chance for vote fraud there.

      Voter fraud is the distraction to the real issue - electoral fraud.

      Voter fraud is low-reward, high risk. It makes no sense to stand in line more than once to vote, after standing in line for an hour each and travelling between towns to hide it. So say in an afternoon, you get to pull off 3 votes - 1 real vote, and 2 frauds. Woop de doo. You didn't affect an election much at all unless it's a squeaker. But you just committed two felonies, for which you can go to jail. Supposedly, if you listen to the talking heads decrying voter fraud, this is a rampant problem.

      But anyone and everyone trying to measure voter fraud comes up with bupkis.

      Compare and contrast with actual electoral fraud problems we've had over the recent years, with missing ballots, electronic vote flipping, etc. This doesn't get as much airplay, because the good ol' boys don't want you to know how your vote is being stolen by them. So they distract. They invent a fake controversy about voter fraud and represent that as to why your vote doesn't count like you think it should. The reality is that your vote is being flipped or disappeared if you are in a county or state with electronic voting machines with no paper records.

      --
      BMO

    13. Re:Lovely by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who is John Galt?

      A shibboleh of fatuity?

      --
      "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit is a gimp plugin and must be run by the gimp in order to be used."
    14. Re:Lovely by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Here in Holland when you live/move to a city you are required by law to register with that city

      Fortunately, (or not, depending on your perpsective), I don't have to register with the government to move in the USA.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    15. Re:Lovely by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      If Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela had been American, they would both have been denied both a right to vote and a right to run for office.

      Umm, no.

      Both of them, assuming they were US Citizens, would have been granted the right to vote by the 14th Amendment.

      Last I checked, the 14th Amendment was passed before any of their grandparents had been born, so they'd have had the right to vote.

      Ditto the right to run for office. While the President is restricted to natural born citizens (as opposed to naturalized citizens), other offices are not so restricted.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    16. Re:Lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it's the next logical step after so many dead people have voted for Democrats.

    17. Re:Lovely by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Why aren't convicted felons allowed to vote?
      After all, they were convicted for breaking laws which were put into place by politicians who were voted into office.
      It seems logical that they should have an equal say into what these laws are as the people who aren't breaking them.
      As Voltaire wrote: "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
      Democracy is build on the principle that every individuals' opinion counts, no matter how much you disagree with it.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    18. Re:Lovely by Fjandr · · Score: 2

      This has long been one of my pet peeves. Even if one were to argue that a currently-incarcerated person should not be allowed the vote, once a sentence is served a person is supposed to have paid their debt in full. However, in many States a felony conviction results in the sentence of disenfranchisement for life.

  2. What could possibly go wrong? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems like an incredibly bad idea, for several reasons:

    1. People use bad passwords on Facebook
    2. People get their Facebook accounts compromised all the time
    3. Giving Facebook (the company) access to this kind of information scares the shit out of me.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by mister2au · · Score: 2

      Giving what information scares you?

      It just pre-populates the existing voter application with your facebook info (like name and date of birth) ... end of story - you don't vote online and still have all the other registration steps outside of facebook

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by OhPlz · · Score: 2

      The party you register under determines which ballot you get during the primary election. It makes sense since you're voting for the party's nominee. Once that's settled, then it's free for all in the general election. In my state, you can register without specifying a party and choose which ballot you'd like at the primary. That automatically enrolls you, but they also let us switch back to having no party before leaving the polling station.

      The state had argued over whether those without a party should be allowed to vote in the primary. At the time, I was thinking yes because independents should be able to vote for the best candidate so their favorite has a chance at being a nominee. The downside is that if you have an incumbent or an obvious win for one party, independents-in-name-only can snipe the other party's ballot. They'll vote for the most-like-my-party's candidate.

  3. The sock-puppet party by deniable · · Score: 2

    They support Farmville aid and voting by like button.

  4. Re:Getting people out to vote in the US is a good. by acidfast7 · · Score: 2

    because it's usually associated with disenchantment, indifference or contentment. None of which is good. Also, a high turnout is generally perceived (globally) as an estimate legitimacy of the current voting system ... unless it's mandatory of course.

  5. Bold Statement of the Month by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hamlin says Facebook won't collect any of the personal information with which it interacts

    Riiiight

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  6. Your first statement is correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a chance for voter *registration* fraud -- a notably different crime with a notably different detriment to society. Voter registration fraud is criminal, but it in no way changes the outcome of our democratic elections. Since people will not be voting on Facebook, people will not be committing voter fraud on Facebook.

    Small "d" democracy is about everybody voting. Not the smartest, not the richest, not those who "care enough". Everybody. We require citizenship and adult age, reasonably. We (some states, not all) then tack on a whole host of other requirements which are, in my opinion, far less reasonable: you can't be in prison, you can't be on parole, you can't have been convicted of a felony, you must have a government issued ID with your current address on it, you can only vote absentee if you will be out of town [even if the polls are open during inconvenient hours], you must register to vote 17+ days before the election, and so forth.

    Not happy with the way other folks are voting? You've got a few choices. In the short term, go convince 'em to vote based on reasons or issues which *you* think are important. In the longer term, fight for things like campaign finance reform, election reform, better journalism, and better education. All the while, have conversations about politics with friends, acquaintances, and foes alike; the more people talk about politics the more likely they'll pay closer attention to political facts, theory, and outcomes.

  7. Wilma!!!!!!! by setrops · · Score: 5, Funny

    Facebook?

    Really?

    Are you fucking nuts?

    I feel like watching a bad episode of the Flintstones where Fred gets one of his stupid ideas.

  8. Re:Getting people out to vote in the US is a good. by acidfast7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    What is this, the 1600s again, every citizen (within reason) has a RIGHT to vote, it's not a PRIVILEGE reserved for those not disenchanted/disenfranchised. People have the RIGHT to vote based on nothing of substance. Personally, I think every citizen has a RESPONSIBILITY to vote.

    Voting gives people a chance to feel that they have the power to make a difference in who makes decisions ... and that makes all the difference because it holds the elected accountable. Low voter turnout suggests to the elected that they need only cater to a smaller portion of their constituents to be re-elected. Low voter turnout, and having an outdated two-party system with a similarly outdated electoral college, has caused a lot of problems with the policy of the US government. For example, having a few Pirate Party members in Senate/House would prevent a lot of the "copyright-based" complaints on ./

  9. Doh!!!!! by lymang · · Score: 2

    I was thinking the Simpsons, personally, since Homer's ideas are WAY worse than Fred's ever were. But we're on the same page, I think.

    --
    Meh.
  10. Re:Getting people out to vote in the US is a good. by acidfast7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMHO, every citizen has the responsibility to become educated about the choices and vote. I apologize as that's what I should have said at the beginning. It ensures that the you're doing your (minimal) part to keep the process running correctly.

  11. Pundits will ask how the "John" vote will swing by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    John Bigboote, John Careful Walker, John Chief Crier, John Coyote, John Fish, John Fledgling, John Guardian, John Icicle Boy, John Jones, John Kim Chi, John Littlejohn, John Many Jars, John Mud Head, John Nephew, John O'Connor, John Omar, John Parrot, John Rajeesh, John Ready to Fly, John Repeat Dance, John Smallberries, John Take Cover, John Thorny Stick, John Two Horns, John Whorfin, John Ya Ya . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  12. Facebook won't have access to the State's database by dcsmith · · Score: 2

    Facebook won't have access to the State's database, and Hamlin says Facebook won't collect any of the personal information with which it interacts

    Wa ha ha ha ho ho hee hee hee, ahhh, [wipes tears of laughter from corner of eyes]

    Wait... What? That was supposed to be a serious statement? Oh, crap.... Sorry.

    --
    This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  13. One Facebook Account != One Vote by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 2

    All Facebook is doing is directing you to to the existing online voting registration system, and then transferring over your name and birthday. So an expansion of fraud on the part Facebook's involvement really isn't an issue here. The issue here is the norm of Facebook and other companies from data mining citizen's voting habits.

  14. More concentration of power by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    This is just a continuation of what we've seen regarding Google/FB. More and more concentration of data in fewer and fewer hands. It seems with each passing day FB becomes more of a "portal" for everything, and the sad/scary thing here is that the American populace is more than happy to acquiesce, without really thinking about the consequences.

    Whats next: apply for Drivers Licenses, Passports, Loan Applications, etc via FB?

    I don't have a FB account for several reasons, however two come to mind:
    1. When someone told me "you have to be on Facebook".
    2. When I started seeing the FB logo everywhere, including on the brand of yogurt I buy.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  15. It Makes Sense, Really by guttentag · · Score: 2
    The fact is that it is difficult to get people to register to vote. In California, we encourage voter registration at the Department of Motor Vehicles. The reason is because when you're stuck somewhere with masses of brain-dead people, and you don't have a choice in the matter, you're more receptive to the idea that voting empowers you to make choices... (segue to flashback of last DMV experience)

    Zombie: "Hi, you called my number. I lost my license because I was doing 65 in a 25, but it wasn't my fault because I was almost out of liquor and the store closes at midnight. But I really need to get my license back because the liquor store near my house charges too much and I'm almost out of money, and if I run out of money I'll run out of liquor."
    DMV: "Sir, your number is H376. The number we called is J."
    Zombie: "But H is a lower number than J in the alphabet."
    DMV: "Not at the DMV. The numbers go in whatever order the TV says they do. Please go sit down and we'll call you soon."
    Zombie: "Really? You'll call me soon? Because I'm in a hurry."
    DMV: "I don't know if it will be soon. I just do what the TV tells me."

    (And we're back)... In fact, 72% of people visiting the DMV feel "strongly" that they could run it better than the idiots running the state, and if they could replace the idiots running the state, they would never have to ensure this again. Ergo, they are more likely to register to vote.

    I assume Washington found that the DMV route wasn't working for them because the DMV experience is not as awful in Washington as it is here (there just aren't that many people, and that's really the key to a crummy DMV experience), so the closest approximation they could find was Facebook. This still incorporates the lack of choice and masses of brain dead people, but they're able to use technology to import them from the rest of the world.

  16. Your knees... they're jerked! by asylumx · · Score: 2

    The quality of comments on this thread is significantly degraded from what I expect of the Slashdot community. The actual process being followed here is that WA has created a web application to allow voter registration. Just a web application. They are then using oauth to allow people with facebook accounts to use the information from their facebook accounts on their site. This is NOT "on facebook" at all. Facebook never touches any data that they don't already have. In fact, this is really a non-issue and should be supported by a group of technology enthusiasts that the Slashdot community used to consist of.

    I'm sorry your knees are all jerking.